Home Blog Page 820

What If Nigeria Was A Shining Example? By Soji Adeleye

Lagos, Nigeria

This is a very unique moment in human history. The first time in our lifetime fear is the common denominator, when there are no superpowers, no segmentation of humanity. It is humbling to observe how inconsequential the human race is. Imagine for a moment if there were no scientists giving the hope of cure or vaccine that could end our present submission to fear.

Do we know how many times a virus, plague has wiped out our distant predecessors? We cannot really tell. But it is a sobering thought knowing all species have co-existed even closer than this time with jumping of pathogens across species a real possibility.

Meanwhile, in the midst of this pandemic with the highest concentration of infections and human death, the United States of America is consumed by one of its most tumultuous perennial protests about racial justice and inequality after a ‘white’ police officer was caught on camera kneeling on a ‘black’ man’s neck snuffing out life from him crying ‘I can’t breathe’.

Anyone that watched the video for the first time and was not shocked is probably not a human being. So, rightly the immediate uproar was understandable. It was therefore unsurprising the fear of contracting the coronavirus did not stop people of all shades from the combustible nationwide protest that has shaken governments at both national and state levels.

Consequently, the fight for justice and equality for the ‘black ’ man who is often than not the target of police brutality tops the political debate in the USA which has the highest concentration of descendants of African former slaves outside the African continent. While this is not new, it has been a struggle with innumerable victims for more than four hundred years. One protestor said “I chose to be killed by coronavirus so that those coming after me would not be killed by the police”. Martin Luther King, Jr (1963) ‘I have a dream’speech saw a country devoid of segregation and injustice –it remains a dream in 2020.

The ‘black’ man is disproportionately represented in all available statistics of human development mobility index in the USA : health, education, wealth, housing. They are unsurprisingly disproportionately represented in the number of infections and mortality from the coronavirus pandemic.

So the call for justice and equal treatment is once again the political hot button topic with the presidential election just a few months away. It would not be the first time this would be the case; elections in the past has witnessed this kind of heightened advocacy for justice and equality in the USA for the ‘black’ man. After the killing of Martin Luther King Jr in April 1968 the election later that year witnessed unprecedented loud cry for justice. Fifty years later, nothing has really changed, the ‘black’ man in the USA is still viewed from the prism of a subhuman ex-slave.

Hence the question, what if Nigeria the largest concentration and most populous country of the African race was a shining human example, would these struggles and continuing tribulations of descendants of those sold out as slaves have been different?

If human development is judged by the visible quality of life of people, it’s environment and respect for the individual, there is really nothing tangible to back the claim of equality by Africans other than humanity and human consciousness. At the individual level there might be no argument but human civilization has relied on the sustained effort of the collectives over time as oppose to the rare and occasional discovery of individual ingenuity. The patriotism and dynamism the late Murtala Muhammad needed to have been sustained after his assassination, the vision and achievements of the late Obafemi Awolowo in the old Western Region of Nigeria needed to have been institutionalised and enshrined as a model for emerging countries after colonisation. Nigeria has never as a human society experienced sustained development that could contribute to its upliftment for humanity.

Lagos a microcosm of Nigeria is a jungle with all the danger it portends, also offers that potential of opportunities of new discovery. The challenge to a foreign visitor visiting Lagos is where else can you go from there? You need good roads, airports, airlines that are reliable. This is the reason why those few investors and tourists that dare to run the gauntlet to come to Lagos go no further.

If Nigeria the most populous country of the African people (black) was a shining example, that pride would have made the struggle for equality by descendants of slaves in the ‘New World’ much less difficult. Because really what is it? Man is a slave to optics. The relative, small but significant case of Ghana is instructive; the whole descendants of slaves in the USA would migrate to Ghana if it had the space and capacity to sustain it. If the promise of independence for Nigeria was carried forward, if the old Western Region model was followed and Nigeria had free education, developed infrastructure, provided free medical services for its people, built future oriented research institutions, good roads, airports, sea ports. It would have been a place of pride for its people, the world and those descendants of slaves would have had a bonafide reason to beat their chests and the struggle for justice and equality of man would have been less dangerous and harrowing.

*Soji Adeleye, CEO Alfecity Institution writes from Lagos

#No To Rape Pandemic, By Reuben Abati

Photo credit: Women

Since February 27, 2020, when the first index case of COVID-19 was reported in Nigeria, and that satanic, virulent virus overwhelmed our lives, Nigeria has had cause to deal with other convergent afflictions: the first in my view, is the pandemic of irresponsible governance as evidenced by the kind of poor leadership responses that we have witnessed in some states of the Federation, and the growing narrative that some key players may have turned the main pandemic itself into a racket; the second is the pandemic of insecurity – even with states and borders on lockdown, bandits, criminals and terrorists – whichever label suits your fancy- have been running riot across the country particularly in the North East/West where villages are sacked in one day, for hours on end, Southern Kaduna where villages have been razed and murder has been committed on a large scale, and elsewhere in the country where members of the middle class are now afraid of their own shadows. The third is the poverty pandemic: lockdowns, shutdowns and the obvious possum-ization of all processes has resulted in the loss of income, the suspension of jobs or their outright loss, a sharp rise of course in unemployment figures and the abbreviation of hope in the face of inflation and economic contractions. The fourth is the pandemic of rape.

I have no immediate data to suggest that the menace of “sex without consent” and the associated ills of domestic and sexual violence have any causal relationship with COVID-19, but what has been seen so far is that in the season of COVID-19, there has been an exponential rise in the reported cases of rape and sexual violence. One newspaper has had cause to report for example that in one month, there were ten high profile cases of rape across the country. In Kaduna, in April, an 18-year-old young girl known as Jennifer was attacked and raped by five men. The victim’s family released a video of her ordeal.  In  Lagos, a young lady, Tina Ezekwe, just 16, was shot and killed at a bus stop in Lagos by a trigger-happy policeman. This was rape of another kind, but a popular variety in Nigeria pointing to the failure of the state and its agents to place a high premium on human lives. A few days later, in Edo State, a 22-year old university student Vera Uwaila Omozuwa, simply known as Uwa was beaten to death in a church after she had been allegedly raped. Her assailants smashed her head with a fire extinguisher.

In Dutse, Jigawa, there was the report of a 12-year old girl, named Farishina who was raped repeatedly on different occasions by 11 men. In Ibadan, on June 2, a 19-year old student Barakat Bello was also raped inside her father’s house and murdered. There have been even more horrific reports: of men sleeping with a two-year-old, of men sleeping with their daughters, and the only excuse one imbecilic offender could offer was that if his wife denied him sex, he would seek sexual pleasures from his own daughters. In Lagos, four masked men raped a 12-year-old girl. In Niger State a 25-year-old man raped an 85-year old grandma! A university undergraduate in Lagos was also accused of kissing a child  passionately. He has since been arrested.  In Benue, a 38-year-old man raped his seven-month-old daughter! Nigeria’s social media space understandably, has been inundated with hashtags of protest, anguish and change: #JusticeforUwa, #JusticeforTina, #JusticeforJennifer; #JusticeforFarishina, #JusticeforBarakat; #Wearetired; #NotoRape; #StopRapeNow…#EndRapeNow..

The exponential explosion in reported cases of rape in the time of COVID-19 may be responsible for the outrage that we have seen, but the truth is that the essential difference is the focused media attention that the subject now receives. Rape is an epidemic that has now reached pandemic proportions due to inaction, stigmatization, limitations of existing law and the the failure of the state to respond to what is clearly a major humanitarian crisis. In 2017, the Nigeria Bureau of Statistics reported, and you must take this as merely an estimate given the challenges of data collection in Nigeria, that there were 2, 279 reported cases of indecent assault and 1, 164 cases of anal sex, at the time from 35 states, In July 2019, a poll by NOI reported that one in every three girls in Nigeria would have experienced one form of sexual assault before the age of 25. That means virtually every Nigerian woman has at least a story of sexual harassment or molestation to tell. In 2020, there has been an unprecedented explosion. Is COVID-19 a special type of beast that implants a new variant of madness in people’s heads, which is directly linked to their libido?

Governor Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti State under whose watch rape has been fully criminalized, deserves commendation.  He has just signed into law, a piece of legislation from the State House of Assembly, titled “Compulsory Treatment and Care of Child Victims of Sexual Abuse Law 2020.” There have been objections to the new Ekiti State Law on the grounds that it says no sexual offender will be entitled to bail. Expressly, this would be a violation of Sections 35(1), 36(5) of the Nigerian Constitution, and to that extent questionable, but let it be known that the right of bail is contractual in nature, per Tobi, JSC.

Elsewhere, I have spoken about the principled position that has been taken by Governor Fayemi and the Ekiti State House of Assembly. They are both convinced that there should be zero tolerance for sexual violence for all forms of sexual violence. Nobody should argue with that. Governor Fayemi also says there should be a national consensus on the issue of rape in Nigeria. His wife, the delectable Erelu Bisi Fayemi turns 57 this week and has been a victim of sexual molestation by her own account. I do not not think this is why Fayemi is gung-ho on the question of rape and sexual violence, we should look more at the principle behind his protestation. Before him, it is only in Lagos State that we have had a similar passion expressed about sexual violence, with the establishment under then Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola of a sexual violence agency. In Ekiti, Fayemi has moved further by instituting a more active naming and shaming system by activating a Sexual Offenders Register, and taking that register to the Social Media. It is a brilliant initiative even if we must not overlook the fact that the register has not yet named and shamed a power-figure – power figures, the NGOs insist are the worst perpetrators of rape. Power, class, culture and privilege being the strongest enabling factors of rape. But the issue is: can we ever have a national consensus on rape in Nigeria? Opinion is divided on that and that is the real problem.

Nigeria’s attitude to the issue of rape and domestic violence has been at best unprogressive and far behind contemporary legal thinking. The failure to move forward and align with current trends on this subject is one of the sore aspects of our jurisprudence. With regard to rape, the relevant body of laws include the Criminal Code, Sections 215, 218, 221, 357 – 361 thereof, the Penal Code, Section 282 thereof, Section 1 of the Violence Against Persons Prohibition Act, 2015 (VAPPA), and the Child Rights Act (2003), all reasonable and valid in expression and effect under Chapter Four of the Nigerian Constitution.  Ancillary provisions within the statute books also do not in any way justify the abuse of human rights often indicated by the obtainment of carnal knowledge by force. But there are known gaps in the law that have not been addressed. Without being pedantic, it is worth noting that concerns have been expressed about the definition of “rape” itself under Nigerian law. Section 357 defines rape as a man having forceful carnal knowledge of a woman. In today’s reality, it is not only men who rape women. Women rape women. Men rape women. Men rape Men. The law needs to be changed.

In the extant law, a married man cannot rape his wife. This does not arise from a construction of the doctrine of the unity of spouse: that is a man and his wife being one and the same but the thinking that a married woman is a property of her husband, to be used as deemed fit. There are decided cases that have freed women from this primordial and antiquated misconception but this is one curious area in which the law has not yet penetrated the proverbial “other room” where even wives of Presidents, and accomplished women, suffer in silence.  There is also the problem of child brides. Nigeria operates a conflict of laws, or perhaps a dual legal system with the rights of children. The definition of a child for example in the Child Rights Act (2003) is different from that of the Children and Young Persons Law, in the same manner in which the Criminal Code Provisions on Rape are at variance with the same provisions in the Penal Code that are applicable to the Northern States of Nigeria. The existence of a dual legal system is at the heart of Nigeria’s under-development process. It accounts mostly for the failure to forge a consensus on anything in the country.

Take the Child Rights Act. Whereas it has been ratified as required by virtually every State in the South of Nigeria, 11 states, mainly Northern States, have refused to ratify it. They claim that it violates the Shariah law which allows child marriages.  UNICEF reports that Nigeria accounts for one of the highest rates of child brides in the world. The figure is put at 23 million child brides, most likely to double by 2050. Nigeria also accounts for one of the highest rates of Vesico-Vaginal-Festula (VVF), arising due to early exposure of child brides to coitus, with the added complications of high infant mortality, maternal morbidity/maternal mortality rates, out-of-school syndrome, poverty…and yet the defenders of culture, tradition and religion in parts of the North insist that any attempt to change the regime amounts to a violation of their rights. The rule is that a child below a certain age is not in a position to grant consent. The definition of a child in Nigeria is confused and confusing.

This is perhaps why since 2008, every attempt to review the extant laws on rape has been unsuccessful. There have been repeated talks about the need to review the punishment for rape, the definition of it, the burden of proof, the fielding of evidence and the time within which reasonable action can be taken. But every Bill addressing the matter since 2008 simply ends in the drawers. As recently as 2019, a bill to amend the Criminal Code on Rape made it to second reading and vanished into thin air. A few weeks ago, Senator Ovie Omo-Agege and others started talking again about the need to amend the laws to discourage rape. There is no guarantee that the latest effort will not end up as another effort at grandstanding and populism. Rape, like Federalism/Restructuring, is one of the most discussed problems in Nigeria. Every stakeholder knows what the matter is but nobody is willing to do anything about it, or courageous enough to go the extra mile. Nigeria is a country of smart talkers without either ambition or will.

The other issue with regard to rape is the evil of stigmatization. In traditional societies, rape was a taboo, a Karmic affliction, a curse.  Victims and their families could not talk about it. Families were afraid that nobody would marry their daughters who may have been defiled and in those traditional communities, the biggest achievement of a female child was to marry well and be a good wife. The times have changed, but primordial frames of mind have remained resilient. The culture of silence is the biggest threat to the now emerging #MeToo movement in Nigeria and Africa, reinforced by the fear of stigma. The final sticky problem here is that nobody talks about when a man rapes a man, or a woman rapes a man or a woman, and the fact that many of those shouting #MeToo, may just well be making false accusations.

Between Ebira And Igala In Kogi State, By Engr. Abubakar Mosuwa Yakubu

The dispute between the Ebiras and Igalas today is a matter of superior facts and intelligence in law courts. Everyone should research for facts that will be superior to theirs to enable us claim what rightly belongs to us. Below are my research that I feel will be of use to our Lawyers.

*Ebute Eje the ancestor of Ebiras was born in about 1400s to the Royal House of Aku Uka of the Jukuns at Billiri on Burak hill.

*He was the first son of the reigning King of the Kingdom then but of Idoma mother.

* At the death of his father, he was denied of succeeding him because his mother was not of Jukun origin.

* He got annoyed and left the Kingdom with his junior sister ( Ebule Ejune ) and brother ( Agene Puje ) to their mother’s home in Idoma.

* Being trained as a warrior with the intention to succeed his father but denied, he became very useful to Idomas in fighting wars to extend their territories.

* History told us that he died at war front in Idoma.

* His junior sister and brother thereafter migrated to Idah.

* When they got to Idah, there was NO organized ruling system there and because of the Royal blood in them, they organized the people and established one called Atta headed by Ebule Ejune in 1462AD. Note that Ebule Ejune was the sister to our ancestor.

* Ebule Ejune ( first Atta of Idah ) was a very powerful woman both spiritually and physically but childless.

* The first Atta of Idah as was called then was a woman and ours. That is why up till date, every Atta of Igala as now called must pierce holes in his ears as symbol of womanhood.

* She handed over the throne on sensing her end time to her junior brother Agene Puje in 1500 AD.

* Agene Puje was succeeded by his son ( Idoko ) in 1530 AD as the third Atta of Igala as now called.

* It was during the fourth Attah ( Ayeba Omi- Idoko )’s era in 1550AD that disputes arose between him and his brothers ( Itazi Atanuje – the pregoney of Ebira Tao and Ohimi – the pregoney of Ebira Koton Karfi ). The main issues were that Omi – Idoko was born of a Yoruba mother and therefore not qualified for the throne and when he forcefully ascended the throne, he was not acting well as a strong and impartial king should be.

* The two brothers got annoyed and crossed the River Niger to occupy their present locations. No other people crossed with them except their nuclear families.

* It was from these places ( Ebira Opete in Ajaokuta called Uttenyi then and Ebira Igu in Koton Karfi ) that these two brothers started to expand in territories to their present land boundaries with other tribes this side of River Niger.

QUESTIONS FOR IGALAS.

(1) HAS ANY IGALA MAN LIVED WITH THEM ON MIGRATIONS?

(2) DID IGALA PEOPLE WAGE ANY WAR AGAINST THEM TO CLAIM THEIR LAND?

(3) ON WHAT GROUND IS IGAY LAYING CLAIMS TO THESE LANDS?

* The Omi – Idoko who was in throne of Atta at the time our fore fathers left Idah was their half brothers.

* The current four ruling houses in Idah today ( namely Amacho, Itobo Aduba, Akosu and Omri Ubobo ) are descendants of Idoko who was our brother.

* If any tribe has to lay claims to be part of ownership of territory, it is us because it is our descendants that are still ruling Igala up till today and tomorrow insha Allah.

* During our popular Ekuechi festival, our Agidibo (local drum ) still refers to Idoko up till date ( Idoko voza, Idoko vi eku ).

By this brief history and analysis, we have a share in Igala Kingdom because we built it together. On the other hand, we built our kingdoms alone and they have NO share out it talk more of owing it.

If they truly collected money from the British in respect of part our land, it was an act of stealing what is NOT theirs. They should be made to pay back with interest and be punished for stealing.

* They are known for greed from time immemorial. Recall their slave trade saga with the Benin Kingdom which eventually cost them to bury their queen alive to avoid wars with the Benins.

Let us wait for them and hear what they have to say. May God continue to be with us as we defend what is ours.

Ohinoyi Ado Receives De Club 10 Leaders

The Ohinoyi, paramount ruler of Ebiraland, in Kogi State, Alhaji Dr. Ado Ibrahim (second from right), on June 7 after receiving solidarity message on the Igala Kingdom expansionist move into Ajaokuta,  in his Azad Palace, Okene, from the leadership of De Club 10 Nigeria, led by the President, Alhaji Saidu Yusuf (far right), Daudu Sule Engineer, chairman of the Ebira Council of Elders and Senior Member of the Council of Ohinoyi (third from right), Alhaji Yusuf Ozi Usman, National Secretary and Publisher of Greenbarge Reporters online newspaper and hard copy magazine (second from left) and Malam Momohjimoh Ochi, Secretary of the Abuja branch of the Club, (far left).

We Shall Defeat Igala In Battle For Ajaokuta Without Sword, Guns – Ohinoyi Of Ebiraland

Ohinoyi of Ebiraland, Dr Ado Ibrahim

The Ohinoyi, paramount traditional leader of Ebiraland in Kogi State, Dr. Ado Ibrahim has made it clear that his Kingdom will as usual, defeat Igala Kingdom in the battle for the ownership of Ajaokuta, without resorting to violence, guns and swords.

The Ohinoyi, who received in audience, the leaders of De Club 10 Nigeria, led by its President, Alhaji Saidu Yusuf, in his Azad Palace, Okene today, June 7, said that this would not be the first time Igala Kingdom had meddled into Ajaokuta and defeated.

Dr. Ado Ibrahim recalled that on more than two occasion, the Attah Igala had laid claim to the ownership of Ajaokuta, and had only now added Lokoja and Koton Karfe to the expansionist tendencies, stressing that he would not open his eyes to see any part of his kingdom excised by whoever.

The Ohinoyi was emphatic that he would take the incursion of Igala into his Kingdom as a big challenge to his person, the Ebira heritage and history, adding that it would not be possible for the people whose heritage is being meddled upon to take it lightly.

He commended members and leadership of De Club 10 Nigeria for being in the forefront of the current fight “to retain our heritage from the rampage of the territorial expansionists.

“I’m aware and confirm that you are always in the forefront in defense and preservation of Ebira course and I commend you for that. I assure you that we will not fail in this battle with Igala to retain our Ajaokuta heritage.”

Earlier, President of De Club 10 Nigeria, Alhaji Saidu Yusuf had acknowledged the good leadership of the Ohinoyi to the entire Ebira people.

He said that the Club is fully behind him in the current battle with Igala Kingdom to take possession of Ajaokuta and will do anything that would hasten the process of victory.

Saidu Yusuf advised that after retrieving Ajaokuta from the expansionists, efforts should be made to delignate the borders of all the Ebiraland.

IPOB Being Funded With $85,000 Monthly Since 2019 To Divide Nigeria, Presidency Alleges

Shehu Garba

Presidency has alleged that the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) is being funded, through available evidence, with a monthly spending of $85,000 USD since October 2019, with no records of the source of this largesse.

In a statement today, June 7, senior assistant to the President on media and publicity, Malam Garba Shehu called on Nigerians and the international community to be wary of the divisive campaign of the IPOB, especially it’s leader, Nnamdi Kanu.

In the statement, the Presidency alerted Nigerians and the international community on the misleading campaign spearheaded by the IPOB, using false allegations of persecution of Christians against the Nigerian State.

According to the statement, a very deep and wide investigation by an agency of the Nigerian government, working with international partners have discovered that there are two interconnected campaigns being run concurrently by the IPOB in this regard.

“Both are using the cover of Christianity – and calling for a US Special Envoy to be appointed to stop the “genocide” of Christians in Nigeria. But the real purpose is to drive a wedge between the Nigeria government and its US and UK/European allies.

“IPOB leadership, of course self-proclaims as “Jewish,” a position not shared by the generality of the members.

“For reasons of convenience, he claims to have an interest in the welfare of Christians – but this is a ruse: the case for independence, the leader believes, is strengthened by “proving” the government of Nigeria is “autocratic”, engaged in a “silent slaughter” of their own citizens along religion and ethnic lines – and that therefore the only viable option for the unique religious and ethnic minority is a sovereign Biafra separate from Nigeria.

“The campaign consists of producing articles in the names of the alleged Christian NGOs’ leaders (of campaign groups created at the time this PR contract with a US lobbying firm was signed) and letters to and from members of Congress to the White House.

“Unfortunately, some Members of Congress have clearly been persuaded there is indeed a “Christian persecution” underway in Nigeria – and do so quoting the campaign – and they are known to be taking up the case directly with the White House to appoint the special envoy.

“The American charity secured a meeting with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and has made presentations to the US Commission on International Religious Freedom.

“There is also a UK and European angle of the Campaign, which is more opaque than its US sister campaign – given there is less legal requirement for public filings – but what is known of this at the moment is that their Budget is sufficient to hire four PR firms in the UK, Belgium, France and the US (the latter additional to the above).

“They have founded an “NGO/Charity” and a linked web-based campaign named “Stop the Silent Slaughter” which is well designed and complete with video “evidence”-completely concocted.

“Members of the alleged Christian NGO have had multiple Op-Ed articles in conservative news websites promulgating their message of a “Christian Genocide”. Some of those articles have also been used as “evidence” in the sister US campaign.

“Two of those conservative news websites were co-founded by the owner of the UK PR firm they have hired to generate their publicity as well as an OP-Ed article in the name of a British MP who may have been convinced by their campaign under false pretences.

“They have secured additional coverage in France, EU and Germany.

“They secured a MPs debate on the “Christian Genocide” in the House of Commons in which staff member of the UK PR was referenced as the “private secretary” to the leader of the UK-based Charity.

“It is clear from all of the above that the IPOB’s extraordinarily and dubiously well-funded campaign in the US and UK/Europe is misusing the issue of the welfare of Christians purely to further their own political ends, and it seeks to damage inter-religious dialogue in Nigeria as well as to damage the international reputation of Nigeria.

“Nigerians and the international community are hereby advised to ignore this campaign as they have disregarded similar past campaigns originated by this group which has been designated as a terrorist organisation by the Nigerian State.

“International groups and societies are welcome to send representatives to Nigeria and give a lie to the false claims made by these terrorist groups who are duping them of their money and involving them in conduct and activities disguised to destroy the harmonious relationships existing between their home countries and Nigeria.”

Abuse Of Office And Impunity, By Captain Muhammad BalaJibrin

Adams Oshiomhole

We have followed President’s Buhari political career since 2003, and the biggest he confronted and fought was impunity, manipulation of elections and rigging and injustice. President Buhari himself was a victim of all these. Now, here we are, Adams Oshiomhole, the National Chairman of his Party is engaged in not only abuse of office but is trampling on the APC Constitution simply to perpetuate impunity and injustice just because he holds the office of National Chairman.

We provide some instances. The APC’s National Executive Committee (NEC) not the National Working Committee (NWC) has the final say on the mode of the primary election. Article 20 (IV) – Procedure for Nomination of Candidates (E) states: “Without prejudice to Article 20(u) and (iii) of this Constitution, the National Working Committee shall subject to the approval of the National Executive Committee make Rules and Regulations for the nomination of candidates through primary elections”.

This shows that the powers to determine the mode/type of election to be used for the nomination of candidates rests with NEC and not NWC, or at least MUST get the approval of NEC. So, the truth is that Edo State APC chapter was correct to say that only the NEC has the final say on the matter and not the NWC.

We would recall that on August 29, 2018, the APC’s NEC delegated this function to NWC and the State Chapters of the Party only for the purpose of Osun and Ekiti primary elections and not in perpetuity. Its resolution on this was: “That the State Executive Committee (SEC) shall in consultation with critical Stakeholders in each state identify and agree among themselves the mode of the primary election to be applied in their state”. Therefore, when we take the constitutional provision, and the decision of NEC together, it is evident that the NWC has no power whatsoever on these matters until they go back to NEC. However, both were flagrantly disregardedanddisobeyed by the National Chairman, Adams Oshiomhole.

RIGGING AND MANIPULATION OF INTERNAL PARTY ELECTION PROCESSES.

In his bid to continue with illegalities and acts of impunity, which he perpetrated on a large scale during the November 2018 APC primary elections,  the National Chairman, Adams Oshiomhole, without conscience and sense of fairness and justice wrote a letter to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) that the APC had decided to adopt Direct Primary for the Edo State APC Governorship. He did this three day ahead of the meeting of NWC that was supposed to decide on the matter. Under normal circumstance, this immoral action is enough to remove him from office because it is not just an infraction but a desecration of anything just and fair. The NWC members are also culpable on that.

It is important to note that the APC Constitution did not define or explain the meaning of a direct primary election. Article 20 ii(a) stated that direct primary would be used in the nomination of councillorship election.

The provision stated: “Nomination of Candidates for Councillorship shall be by a direct primary election conducted at the Ward level. For the purpose of this primary election, Party members in every Ward shall vote by open-secret ballot for the candidates of their choice where there is no consensus, provided that where a candidate has emerged by consensus for an elective position, a vote of “yes” or “no” should be called to ensure that it was not an imposition which could breed discontent and crisis.”

Therefore, we can say that the contemplation of the drafters of the APC Constitution is that direct primary means allowing all card-carrying party members to vote in a primary election.  However, there are two issues that unless addressed the whole exercise will be subjected to abuse and manipulation, which is the clear intention of the APC National Chairman, Adams Oshiomhole.

First, not every party member can vote or be voted for. Article 9.3 (i) states that: “Only fully registered and financially up-to- date members of the Party shall have the right to vote and be voted for into any of the elective positions, subject to the provisions made for such elections pursuant to this Constitution or other Laws or Regulations. Consequently, non-financial members shall not enjoy the above rights.” How do you verify, under this situation, who is a financial member or not?

Given this clear provision, only the NEC can decide on who is a fully registered and financially up-to-date member of the Party that is qualified to vote or be voted for, including the mode of the election of candidates during the primary election. Therefore, it is only proper for the National Working Committee (NWC) and Adams Oshiomhole to subject themselves to the NEC, as the only constitutional body that has the final say on the issue. This means that toensure checks and balances and roll back the creeping improprieties and lawlessness of the National Chairman, NEC should summon an emergency meeting and thrash out the issues once and for all.

Second, to conduct a direct primary, the most elementary requirement is an authentic register of party members. Article 9.4 (i) states that: “…the party shall update its membership records every six months and remit updated copies to appropriate Secretariats…”As we speak, the National Secretariat of the APC has no up to date Register of members. The last time the register was updated was in 2017, and since then much water has passed under the bridge with the defection of some APC leaders, like Atiku, Kwankwaso, Saraki, Yakubu Dogara, etc. to PDP, and the decamping of some PDP leaders to APC. As the lawyers say, you can’t build something on nothing.

While the absence of up-to-date official Register of Members is a clear dereliction of duty on the part of the NWC, the insistence of adopting a direct primary without a Register of members smacks of sinister motive to cause confusion and violence and manipulate the process to serve the whims and caprices of Adams Oshiomhole.

We saw Pastor Ize-Iyamu, the person Comrade Oshiomhole want to impose by all means as the Governorship candidate of APC in the 2020 Edo elections, announcing on live program on AIT that he has registered as member of APC online. When did the APC develop online platform for membership registration? Where is the registration portal domicile and who manage it? When has the APC announce such development? Has it been advertised? Has the party extended the online registration of members to Kano, Kwara, Taraba, Cross River, Ogun and other states where we have exodus of members in and out of the party shortly before the 2019 general elections?

FUELLING CRISIS WITHIN THE APC

Unless Adams Oshiomhole has an agenda to weaken APC and lowers its esteem before millions of Nigerians, it is inexplicable that he remains at the centre of all the party’s crisis that has engulfed the state chapters of the Party since November 2018. From Zamfara to Ogun, from Imo to Rivers, from Bauchi, Adamawa to now Edo, you can see his hands and his self-centred tendencies visibly.

Rather than become a unifying factor, Adams Oshiomhole has become the most divisive party chairman in the history of party politics in Nigeria. Because of the flagrant violation of the Party’s Constitution by Adams Oshiomhole, the APC has now become a shadow of its former self. Its 2013-2018 format, in which party members feel at home and have a say in the affairs of the Party is no more. The APC is at risk of losing its core if it has not lost it already. Because of Adams Oshiomhole’s ways, the APC is now at the crossroads.

All well-meaning Nigerians will like to see President Buhari complete his term peacefully and leave behind a legacy of robust party politics, real democracy, democratic institution and popular participation of citizens. However, it seems, Adams Oshiomhole will not allow that. He has not learned one lesson and is digging deeper. All well-meaning party leaders should reflect on this and take the necessary action before the APC scatters. If the APC is to survive and institutionalize itself, as President Buhari envisioned during the last NEC meeting, party leaders must wake up. We cannot continue to allow an Adams Oshiomhole to taint a worthy legacy of anti-corruption, good governance and infrastructural development put in place by our beloved President Muhammdu Buhari.

I hereby call on President Muhammadu Buhari, the National leader Bola Ahmed Tinubu and all other well-meaning leaders of APC. To come out and condemn these acts of impunity by Comrade Adams Oshiomhole and save the party from imminent collapse. A word is enough for the wise.

Captain Muhammad BalaJibrin was National Auditor of Congress for Progressives Change (CPC), former Deputy National Auditor of the APC during the Chief Bisi Akande-led National Interim Management Committee and he was APC Governorship Aspirant in Bauchi State in 2019. He served in various APC national assignments toward strengthening the party.

Anti-Corruption: PMB’s Footprints On The Sands Of Time, By Mike Jimoh

President Muhammadu Buhari at the Anti-Corruption Summit in London, United Kingdom 2016.

There used to be a running joke American, Asian and European diplomats delight in sharing at the expense of Nigeria concerning corruption among its public officials, institutions and government contractors.

A Nigerian contractor visits his Indonesian counterpart and finds two snazzy cars parked in his host’s garage in Jakarta. Pointing at them, the Nigerian asks his Asian friend: how did you acquire them?

With a benign smile, the Indonesian points to a long stretch of newly constructed road and replies: 10 percent. The understanding is that he creamed off 10 percent for a road contract he executed for his government and the people of Indonesia.

Years later, the Indonesian visits his friend in Abuja and finds his garage bursting with expensive American, German and Japanese marques. The Indonesian asks: How did you buy all these? Laughing, with a generous display of dentition, the Nigerian points to a vast land of uncleared bush and replies: 100 percent.

That might be apocryphal but there certainly is a ring of truth in it for a country that, for decades, achieved infamy as one of the most corrupt in the entire world. Almost anywhere you travelled in the world – east or west, north and south – that unenviable appellation was just waiting to be flung at you as a Nigerian. It got so bad at one time that erstwhile Zimbabwean dictator, Robert Mugabe, admonished his countrymen and women not to behave like Nigerians. Translation: don’t be corrupt like them.

However unpalatable it may seem to Nigerians, the exchange between the Indonesian and Nigerian captures so very well the attitude of those in positions of authority as public servants – whether politicians, top government functionaries or contractors – to the people they govern.

The inference is that while the Indonesian awarded himself a self-compensatory fraction of public funds, he nonetheless completed a job he was mandated to do, thus adding/ contributing to his country’s development. It is the direct opposite for the Nigerian contractor: not only did he keep to himself entirely what was meant for his country’s growth and development, he deprived others of what should have benefitted their lives.

To say that successive Nigerian governments from long ago have carried on in that manner isn’t quite off the mark. Only recently, the Federal Government recovered $311 million Sani Abacha loot from the U.S and Jersey – only one example of stolen money. And that, as legions of Nigerian and foreign analysts have agonised over time, is why Nigeria is where it is today: a country where those in power divert public funds for personal use; a country awash with vast human and natural resources but has not moved on correspondingly with the human and economic potentials it possesses.

Nigerians remember very well the controversy that surrounded funds provided by the Federal Government – not this – for the reconstruction/ renovation of Lagos/ Ore/ Benin Road that was never executed. Nothing came off it. Nothing happened to the minister in charge of works, either.

Asked once about allegations of corruption in his government, a former president famously declared on national television there was no such thing under his watch. His declaration made the headlines, drawing sharp criticism from Nigerians who thought and believed otherwise.

Not too long ago, a sitting British Prime Minister described Nigeria as “a fantastically corrupt” country. Before him, no former PM had made any such public declaration, perhaps out of decorum for one of its closest allies in Africa, a country the UK colonised and gave Independence. For David Cameron, however, the PM at the time, it was simply too much, it was just so surreal he couldn’t remain silent for long. He had to speak up. And speak up he did!

Today, as records have shown from investigations by Nigerian law enforcement agents with cooperation from their international counterparts, government officials have routinely corruptly enriched themselves that many Nigerians simply went wide-eyed at the humongous amounts they diverted. We all know the mind-boggling sums allegedly parcelled out by a former National Security Adviser to cronies of the government in power then. Also, Nigerians have not forgotten that a former Minister of Petroleum is still on the lam for the dizzying sums – in foreign and local currencies – she allegedly stole from her country.

There are many more instances of brazen theft of public funds by those in government to mention here. Needless to say that a catalogue of such criminal acts can fill tomes many times over. But in the last five years, a new sherrif – in the person of President Muhammadu Buhari – has been in town, as they say, to turn things around. Is he succeeding in his quest to rid Nigeria of looters of publc funds?

A resounding yes is the answer. During his campaign for the 2015 presidential election, one of his campaign promises was to fight the scourge of corruption in government. On becoming president in May of the same year, he followed up his words with action, adopting a boots-on-the-ground approach to tackle head-on what some say and believe has chained the country down for far too long.

In five years, President Buhari has made unimaginable strides in not only courageously doing what previous governments turned a blind eye to but recovered monies stolen by public officials. How did he do it?

Anti-Corruption & Transparency, Fiscal Reforms and Plugging Leakages

True, governments in the past adopted certain measures to curb corruption in Nigeria. But never before has there been this much success as Buhari’s government has recorded.

Barely two years into his administration, for instance, in a report by Yinka Adegoke Africa Editor of  Quartz Africa of January 7 2017, he wrote that “Buhari promised to end corruption in Nigeria’s government and institutions when he campaigned for presidency in 2015.” As of the period Adegoke wrote, Buhari’s government “had recovered up to $9.1 billion in stolen funds,” a figure that will increase geometrically with time.

Between 2015 and 2019, for instance, EFCC recovered N794 billion and hundreds of properties and assets. On its part, ICPC recovered more than N41 billion in inflated personal budgets. Also, in 2019 alone, ICPC recovered N32 billion worth of land, buildings and vehicles. In the same vein, the agency’s probe of Constituency Projects covering 2015 to 2018 recovered N2 billion of diverted funds and assets.

How were most of these recoveries made possible? Through the Whistleblowing Policy set up by the Ministry of Finance in December 2017.

Of course, it is true that one individual cannot by himself just dip his hand in the treasury. No. There has to be a chain of accomplices, from ministers to directors down to accountants and so on. The Whistleblowing Policy under Buhari put an end to all that.

A minister or director who is an inveterate thief may flinch from purloining public funds because he wouldn’t know who, among his staff or where the loot is stashed, might do him in. The policy became so effective that in the first two years alone, it yielded N7.8 billion, US$378million, and 27,800 Pounds in recoveries from public officials targeted by whistleblowers. To shore up on the success, the Federal Government developed and drafted Whistleblowing and Witness Protection Bill in 2019.

Not only that, Buhari’s government also addressed the issue of poor level remittance of operating surplus by MDAs. Gains from such measures became blindingly obvious. For instance, from remitting only N15 million for six years from 2010, JAMB has gone on to remit more than N20 billion to the Federal Government since 2017. That was made possible through Increased Oversight of MDAs.

What about the Presidential Initiative on Continuous Audit (PICA)?

It was set up by Buhari to strenghten controls over government finance through a continuous internal audit process across all MDAs, particularly in respect of all payroll. Through this means, more than 54, 000 fraudulent payroll entries have been identified and removed. The result? Payroll savings of N200 billion annually.

One of the greatest and commendable measures President Buhari issued was the Expansion of TSA Coverage.

Issued on August 7, 2015, only months after he assumed office, all MDAs received a directive from the presidency that they should close their accounts with Deposit Money Banks  (DMBs) and transfer their balance to CBN on or before November 15 of the same year.

To be sure, TSA was launched in 2012 but failed to gain traction until Buhari’s arrival. Since then, TSA system has been implemented in 92 percent of all MDAs. TSA, as most Nigerians have come to understand it, allows managers of the government’s finances, including but not limited to the Ministry of Finance and the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, to have, at any point in time, a comprehensive overview of cash flows across the entire government.

Thus, TSA has consolidated more than 17, 000 bank accounts previously spread across DMBs and saved the government an average of N4 billion in banking charges. That is even the least of the benefits.

One, it has improved transparency and accountability in management of of all FGN receipts by providing a consolidated view of government’s cash flow. Two, it has blocked avenues through which money was siphoned. Three, it has made available funds for execution of government policies, programmes and projects. Four, the TSA system controls aggregate cash flows, improves management of domestic programme and enables investment of idle funds.

The Ministry of Finance continues to fine-tune the system to improve its efficiency, and has also commenced an audit to ensure that all funds due to the TSA are remitted into it.

Indeed, in terms of transparency and accountability, a new sheriff is truly in town.

*Mike Jimoh wrote in from Lagos.

Akinwumi Adesina: The Inside Story, By Fami Adesina

By his bow tie, you know him. And that distinguishing feature was firmly in place when Dr Akinwumi Adesina, President of the African Development Bank (AfDB), breezed into the Presidential Villa at Abuja on June 3, 2020.

One of the hallmarks of seasoned, methodical people is patience, refusal to be rushed or stampeded. Since the alleged breach of ethics saga at the AfDB broke into the open, President Muhammadu Buhari had not said much, at least, not directly. He rather watched developments, got briefings, and weighed his options.

Like the seasoned soldier that he was, an officer and gentleman, President Buhari kept his gunpowder dry. Till he fired on Tuesday. And the echo reverberated round Africa, if not the world.

Impatient Nigerians, ever willing to excoriate, had been complaining that the President hadn’t waded directly into the AfDB matter, where one of his citizens was about to be given the shorter end of the stick, in an onslaught led by America, one of the key stakeholders of the bank. When the Ethics Committee investigated and exculpated Adesina, President Buhari hailed the development. When America asked for reinvestigation, leaning on Adesina to step down while the process lasted, Zainab Ahmed, Nigeria’s Minister for Finance, Budget and National Planning, and one of the Governors of AfDB, wrote a decisive letter, condemning and rejecting the decision. On whose behalf did she do that? On behalf of Nigeria, and its President. Yet the professional complainers said the President hadn’t spoken. Their usual refrain is ‘talk to us, talk to us, you must talk to us.’ And when he speaks, they pretend not to hear.

When the fullness of time came, as President Buhari usually elects to do, he spoke personally. And loud and clear.

The aviation sector in both Nigeria, and Abidjan where Adesina is based, were still under lock and key. What to do? President Buhari reached out to the Ivorien authorities for special landing permit, and despatched a presidential jet to fetch the AfDB president, an illustrious son of Nigeria, and a former Minister of Agriculture under the Goodluck Jonathan government.

Adesina and his team of two close aides were seated in the diplomatic room of the Presidential Villa fifteen clear minutes before the scheduled time. This writer was also there, along with some Ministers and senior aides of President Buhari.

On the dot of the hour (he rarely misses it), President Buhari strode in. Ramrod straight, a fact that belies his 77 years of age. He gave his guest an elbow shake from a distance, which caused us all to laugh. The President was being correct heath-wise, as demanded by the social distancing requirement of the COVID-19 pandemic.

With initial greetings and courtesies concluded, Adesina was the first to talk. He thanked the President for facilitating his visit, and for the support he had always given him as AfDB boss, right from his first election in 2015.

“Thanks for helping me to get elected, and for your unflinching support for me over the years. Thanks for your public statement in my support after the Ethics Committee of the Bank finished its work, and exonerated me of all 16 allegations against me,” Adesina began.

“I thank God who made me a Nigerian. I thank Him that I was born here, lived here, and want to die as a Nigerian. And on the day of resurrection, I will beg God to let me rise as a Nigerian.”

General laughter.

“Some lies have been concocted against me to render me ineligible for a second term as AfDB president. The bank has its rules, regulations and laws. And part of it is that any allegation must be substantiated with facts, evidence and documents. This is so that there can be believability, and nobody can act out of malice.

“In all the 16 allegations against me, there were no facts, no evidence, no document. The Ethics Committee investigated for three months. They asked for evidence. The accusers could not bring any. My defense was in 250 pages. Not a line of it was questioned.

“The laws of the bank say when the Ethics Committee has concluded investigations, the report must be transmitted to the Chairman of the Governors of the bank. It was so done, and I was exonerated of all the allegations. If I’d been found wanting, then another investigation could be launched. But since there was no charge, that should be the end of the matter, according to the rules. But the accusers want to bend the rules, asking for reinvestigation. They say they don’t trust the rules, regulations, the Governors, and the Board of the bank. Their motive is to soil me, and soil the bank.

“They are leaning on other countries that hold shares in the bank to support reinvestigation, and that I should step aside for that process. It is against the laws, rules and regulations.”

Adesina’s first term ends on August 31, this year. Election should have held by now, if not for the Coronavirus challenge. It would hold before the terminal date, and the African Union has endorsed the incumbent as the only candidate from the continent. Will the accusers muscle their way through, and get an interim administration installed?

Then President Buhari spoke. He went down memory lane, recalling the role he played as President-elect of Nigeria then, in an election that held on May 28, 2015, a day before his inauguration.

“I personally wrote all African leaders, supporting your candidature. I recommended you, though you were a Minister of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), and I was of the All Progressives Congress (APC). I didn’t because of that withhold support from you. I’ll remain consistent because no one has faulted the step I took on behalf of Nigeria.”

President Buhari pledged to work with all African leaders and stakeholders of the bank to mobilize support for Adesina’s re-election. He said the man had done well, and one good term deserves another.

When people from the north of the country call President Buhari Mai Gaskiya (The Honest One), they know what they are saying. He doesn’t talk tongue-in-cheek. He says it as it is. If any fault had been found in Adesina, he would also have told him point blank that he wouldn’t get support from Nigeria. May God give us more men like the Mai Gaskiya, who don’t call white black, and vice-versa.

In a private chat with Dr Adesina later, he told me something which I would never forget, and which I’ve filed away in my memory. He said it’s a Zambian proverb, which goes thus: “When you’re walking on water, your enemies say you are kicking dust.”

Kicking dust while walking on water? Hahahahahaaaaaaa.

Bad people will always remain who and what they are. Bad.

*Adesina is Special Adviser on Media and Publicity to President Buhari

NNPC Alerts Nigerians Over Contaminated Diesel In Market

The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has alerted the public of contaminated diesel that is harmful to machines and environment being sold across the country.

It said the low grade and contaminated diesel (Automative Gas Oil) is being offered at discounted prices to attract unsuspecting buyers.

The Managing Director, NNPC Retail Ltd, Sir Billy Okoye, who gave the warning in a report, admonished motorists to be wary of the off-spec products.

“The warning became necessary because the low grade, contaminated diesel is harmful to machines and environment.

“NNPC Retail Limited as a market leader, considers it incumbent upon it to alert the public on the subject.” Okoye, in a release by NNPC Group General Manager, Group Public Affairs Division, Dr Kennie Obateru, assured consumers that NNPC Retail Ltd deals only in premium, high-quality products in the interest of Nigerian motorists and users.

He advised consumers to patronize the company’s stations for quality products.

As a deregulated product like petrol, diesel is also imported by other major and independent marketers in the country.

Advertisement ADVERTORIAL
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com