Home Blog Page 916

Senate Looks Into Law That Makes Policewoman To Seek Permission Before Marrying

Photo credit: PmNews

Nigerian Senate is looking critically at a law which makes it compulsory for policewoman to seek permission before she marries a man her choice.

A bill to amend such Act of 2004, sponsored, Senator Ezenwa Onyewuchi (PDP-Imo East), has been presented and has passed second reading today, December 13 at the plenary.
Regulation 123, the sponsor said: “prohibits women Police from drilling under arms; Regulation 124 mandates female Police officers to apply for permission to marry, while the intending fiancé is also investigated for criminal records.

“It also stipulates that a Police woman who is single at the time of enlistment must spend three years in service before applying for permission to marry.”

Senator Onyewuchi said that the bill seeks therefore, to expunge the provisions of regulations 122, 123, 124 and 127 from the principal act, adding that Regulation 122 restricts female Police officers assigned to the General Duties Branch of the Nigeria Police Force to telephone, clerical and office orderly duties.

The lawmaker said that many of the Police regulations, particularly regulations 122, 123, 124 and 127, are overtly discriminatory to female Police officers.He said that the current regulations stated that: “A woman Police officer who is desirous of marrying must apply in writing to the Commissioner of Police for the State Police Command in which she is serving, requesting permission to marry.

“She is to also give the name, address and occupation of the person she intends to marry.”

He explained that there is need to expunge the regulations, as it was not reasonably justifiable in [a] democratic state like Nigeria which had domesticated the African Charter on Human and People Rights.

Supporting the bill, Senator Istifanus Gyang (PDP-Plateau North) said that the bill is most welcomed, “as it widens the scope of mainstreaming women rights in the country’s statutes.”

He said that exposure to discrimination is one of the factors that was used in rating and ranking the country on the index of best and worst countries for a woman to live in.

“It is good that women’s rights, such as protection from sexual harassment, right to vote and be voted for, and right to hold public office are, today, a reality.

“The quest for gender equality and equity in our clime will be further strengthened by the passage of this bill.”

On his part, Senate Minority Leader, Eyinnaya Abaribe, said that amending the law would give dignity to the female folk, saying: “t is very strange to find such provisions in the Police Act, which is discriminatory in the sense that the male counterparts don’t have the same restrictions.”

Also, Senator Stella Oduah (PDP-Anambra North) urged the senators to give the bill accelerated second reading.

Senator Smart Adeyemi (APC-Kogi West) said Nigeria is a democratic society and there should not be any provision that makes women to be seen as second-class citizen.

In his remark, President of the Senate, Ahmad Lawan, referred the bill to the Senate Committee on Police Affairs, and asked it to report back to the chamber in four weeks.

Source: NAN

DSS Sends Invited Online Publisher Back Home

Department of State Security (DSS) has returned the Editor-In-Chief/Publisher of NewsDiary online, Danlami Nmodu back to his family.
The DSS had asked Nmodu to report in its Abuja office for interrogation over a story published on the online platform over which a rejoinder was also published.
The media world, especially the online publishers under the auspices of Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP) panicked when the news of the invitation of the editor in chief filtered in.
However, Nmodu later sent a message across to his colleagues that he had been asked to go back home to enjoy his freedom.
He wrote: “I want to thank all of you for your prayers.I have been allowed to leave DSS HQ after interaction on the story.Thank you all.”

We Are Not Answerable To You, Presidency Reminds Foreign Nations

Femi Adesina

“We are not answerable to either the U.S. or the UK or the EU; we are Nigeria, a sovereign country,” special adviser to President Muhammadu Buhari on media and publicity, Adesina has said.

In an interview on Channels Television’s Politics Today, Adesina said: “those countries and entities have issues of their own; let them deal with their issues. Let Nigeria also deal with her internal issues. We are not answerable to them.”

The presidential spokesman, who was answering question on the allegations of human rights abuses by the Federal Government with a focus on those in detention, including the convener of #RevolutionNow movement, Omoyele Sowore, said that the criticism of the government on human rights violation are coming from those he described as a minority compared to the large population in the country.

“The President knows the truth about what is happening in the country, so there is no need for any worry or agitation.

“But the question is who are these Nigerians and how many are they among about 200 million people?

“Who are they? A tiny but vocal minority who will always complain… If they mistakenly get to heaven they will complain about conditions in heaven.”

On Professor Soyinka’s comments, the President’s spokesman said, “If there are genuine issues, they would always be looked into.”

“We respect Professor Soyinka. You don’t have too many of them in the country nor even on the continent.

“Professor Soyinka is an avatar; he is well respected but do you know one thing, Professor Soyinka’s opinion will still be his opinion. It will be considered and if there are things to act on, they will be acted on.”

EDITORIAL: PUNCH’s Uncontrolled Anger

A Lagos based newspaper, The PUNCH, yesterday, December 11, went gaga with anger. It’s the type of anger that led it to open its mouth too wide, cursing and swearing for the President and everything and everybody that is connected to him. It’s the anger that made it lose all sense of control, destroying everything and anything in its front. PUNCH forgot that for everything it saw wrong with others, many things are wrong with it…that launching sadistic insult on our collective President (whether they voted for him in the 2019 election or not), no matter the compelling reason, is a sign of weakness of character, a sign of weakness of mind and faith, and above all, the high point of indiscipline in the way it presented its anger.

Having said all that, what is the PUNCH’s grouse?

Simple: that President Muhammadu Buhari in particular and his government or what it chose to call ‘regime’ in general, has been insensitive to the rule of law as well as human rights, a throwback, according to it, to his military era.

The anger of the newspaper obviously stemmed from the situation surrounding the arrest, detention, and re-arrest of SaharaReporters publisher, Omoyele Sowore. All other points raised in that vexed editorial were built carefully around Sowore’s issue.

The newspaper began, after sounded out that it would thenceforth be addressing President Muhammadu Buhari as Major General (retd), by saying that the entire country (Nigeria) and a global audience are rightly scandalized by the unfolding saga over Omoyele Sowore and the unruliness of the SSS and the government. It added: “but it is only a pattern, a reflection of the serial disregard of the Buhari regime for human rights and it’s battering of other arms of government and our democratic institutions.”

It went on: “PUNCH views this tendency and its recent escalation with serious concern, knowing as the great thinker, Edmund Burke, said that “the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

“Nigeria had trod a path, a veritable obstacle course, where repression, especially under military jackboots, was a malignant presence and this attracted heroic resistance by ordinary people, civil society groups and the press. But Nigerians have lately become lethargic, divided by ethnic and sectarian sentiments and weakened by widespread poverty brought on by a rapacious political class and bad governance.

“PUNCH will not adopt the self-defeating attitude of many Nigerians looking the other way after each violation of rights and attacks on the citizens, the courts, the press, and civil society, including self-determination groups lawfully exercising their inalienable rights to peaceful dissent. This regime’s actions and assaults on the courts, disobedience of court orders and arbitrary detention of citizens reflect its true character of the martial culture. Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd) ran a ham-fisted military junta in 1984/85 and old habits obviously run deep.  Until he and his repressive regime purge themselves of their martial tendency, therefore, PUNCH will not be a party to falsely adorning it with a democratic robe, hence our decision to label it for what it is – an autocratic military-style regime run by Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd).

“Sowore’s travails are symptomatic: having ignored court orders granting him bail, the SSS, after much pressure following 125 days in captivity, released him only to stage a GESTAPO-style raid on the court where the journalist was standing trial. The leader of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria, Ibrahim el-Zakzakky and his wife have spent over three years in detention in violation of court orders granting them bail and ordering their release. A former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki, has been held in detention since 2015 in defiance of several court orders, including one by the ECOWAS appellate court that declared his continued incarceration illegal. Under Buhari, the SSS has become a monstrous and repressive secret police, acting often with impunity. Buhari bears responsibility for the state of repression because, as president, he can stop it today.”

Reading down the lines of The PUNCH editorial, we, in Greenbarge Reporters, and good people around the world, were miffed by not only one-sided reasoning of a newspaper that is supposed to be a national medium, but its blatant blindness to the matters as they are. The editorial relied heavily on hearsay, market-side gossip, and total ignorance as if it is an Ireland on itself.

To start with, PUNCH did not situate the circumstance that led to the arrest of Sowore in its proper context; indeed, it even refused for the sake of the purpose it set out to pursue, to touch it at all. In one word, if PUCH must know or be forced to know, it was the fact that Sowore was mobilizing Nigerians across the country or part of it, for a revolution against democratically elected President Muhammadu Buhari, whom Sowore contested with under a political platform and in a democratic setting.

But when he was released on the order of the court, he was still boasting that he would carry on with the revolution, with his body language, and his motley crowd of supporters, including the PUNCH itself, were hailing him. Is PUNCH not educated enough on the implication of REVOLUTION?

Sowore,  like the leader of Proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu and that of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) or Shiites, Ibrahim El-Zakzaki, was unrepentant. Even before he was properly released, he had violated one or two conditions of the bail.

For a quick reminder, the same situation happened in the case of Nnamdi Kanu, who after he was released on bail, broke all the bail conditions, ran away to his British home and now constitutes security and personal threat to Nigeria and top government functionaries or Nigerians that are visiting other countries in the world.

It is quite obvious that PUNCH is myopic, with very narrow concept of security system, even within the area it operates. In order word, PUNCH has no capacity to know and understand the security implications of allowing Sowore to go out there, join forces with Nnamdi Kanu to be tormenting Nigerians simply because they, like PUNCH  don’t like Buhari and or his government. In other words, the world view of PUNCH on what constitutes security threat is very narrow, and cannot use that narrow world view to lampoon Buhari.

By inferring that President Buhari could have stopped the security operatives from arresting Sowore or his like, PUNCH is saying that the President should interfere in the operations of his security people whom he appointed to properly look after the security and peace of the country. Indeed, it is like PUNCH saying that its owner should be  stopping editor from publishing news items in the newspaper, even though the issue of security is more complex.

It would amount to indicting security operatives if the same person who appoints them to do the work, as provided in the constitution, would continue to direct who should be arrested and who should be released.

If PUNCH is fair-minded and wants to play journalism by its rules, he would not have jumped into conclusion, using unconfirmed legal points as its alibi.

The PUNCH had succeeded in playing the highest form of hatred for President Buhari. The editorial, lacking in ‘balance’ of facts involved, had betrayed the odorous emotion of its owner or the editorial board or both. Such emotion is steeped in myopism, for, as the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and publicity, Garba Shehu had said in his reaction, Nigeria had witnessed those that can be described as worst leaders, including the one that shut down PUNCH offices and sent the employees into job market; the one that massacred Odi and Zaki Biam villagers and so on, but PUNCH did not give them names.

It is unfortunate that the noble journalism is being invaded now by the type of editorial board members The PUNCH is riddled with. This was the profession which used to be the last resort in search of objectivity, fairness, HUMILITY in raging national crisis, even if the journalists felt so bad. But, this is the profession that the like of PUNCH editorial board members are turning into open opposition political group and, ‘bread-and-butter platform.

We in Greenbarge Reporters believe strongly that, though, The PUNCH, like other news media and even all Nigerians, have constitutional rights to say whatever they want to say, but in this case, it had not only misfired but ran headlong into the gutter. We believe strongly that The PUNCH, in exercising its freedom of expression, had crossed the bar and stepped violently on the right of President Muhammadu Buhari.

After all, we feel that anger should not result in throwing away the baby with the bathtoob. We believe that there should be some level of morality in anger; a modicum of dignity in anger.

The PUNCH has carelessly and professionally lost all that, and more.

Even Saudi Crown Prince Celebrates Joshua

Saudi Arabian Crown Prince, Mohammad bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud celebrating with British-Nigerian boxer, Anthony Joshua after defeating Andy Ruiz in the World Heavyweight Championship held in Saudi Arabia recently. Congratulations for the deserved victory.

DSS Invites Newsdiary Online Publisher

The Department of State Services (DSS) has invited the Publisher/Editor-in-Chief of Newsdiary online, Danlami Nmodu, to the headquarters of the Agency in Abuja for questioning.
A DSS operative who called Danlami by telephone yesterday, December 11, said the invitation was with respect to a story recently published on the Kano Ecological Fund projects.
He was asked to come either yesterday or today, December 12.
It could be recalled that Newsdiary online had published a story, titled: “Diplomatic backlash, legal tussle loom as FG dumps German firm over Kano Project.”
After publishing the story, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Boss Mustapha, made further facts available through a rejoinder, which clarified the issues.
The Federal Government’s equally illuminating rejoinder was copiously published by the newspaper.
The online newspaper was also among those who went for an on-the-spot assessment of the Challawa, Sharada and Bompai N2.6 billion ecological projects in Kano in the aftermath of the Newsdiary online story.
However, highly placed sources said on Wednesday that the DSS may be investigating how some documents quoted by Newsdiary online leaked.
The editor-in-chief, a Member of the National Institute, Nigeria’s highest policy think tank institution, Nigeria Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies, who was asked to report for questioning, it was learnt, will be at the DSS headquarters today, from 10am.

Full Text Of PUNCH Controversial Editorial

“As a symbolic demonstration of our protest against autocracy and military-style repression, PUNCH (all our print newspapers, The PUNCH, Saturday PUNCH, Sunday PUNCH, PUNCH Sports Extra, and digital platforms, most especially Punchng.com) will henceforth prefix Buhari’s name with his rank as a military dictator in the 80s, Major General, and refer to his administration as a regime, until they purge themselves of their insufferable contempt for the rule of law.”
The entire country and a global audience are rightly scandalised by the unfolding saga over Omoyele Sowore and the unruliness of the SSS and the government; but it is only a pattern, a reflection of the serial disregard of the Buhari regime for human rights and it’s battering of other arms of government and our democratic institutions.
PUNCH views this tendency and its recent escalation with serious concern, knowing as the great thinker, Edmund Burke, said that “the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Nigeria had trod a path, a veritable obstacle course, where repression, especially under military jackboots, was a malignant presence and this attracted heroic resistance by ordinary people, civil society groups and the press. But Nigerians have lately become lethargic, divided by ethnic and sectarian sentiments and weakened by widespread poverty brought on by a rapacious political class and bad governance.
PUNCH will not adopt the self-defeating attitude of many Nigerians looking the other way after each violation of rights and attacks on the citizens, the courts, the press and civic society, including self-determination groups lawfully exercising their inalienable rights to peaceful dissent. This regime’s actions and assaults on the courts, disobedience of court orders and arbitrary detention of citizens reflect its true character of the martial culture. Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd) ran a ham-fisted military junta in 1984/85 and old habits obviously run deep.  Until he and his repressive regime purge themselves of their martial tendency therefore, PUNCH will not be a party to falsely adorning it with a democratic robe, hence our decision to label it for what it is – an autocratic military-style regime run by Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd).
Sowore’s travails are symptomatic: having ignored court orders granting him bail, the SSS, after much pressure following 125 days in captivity, released him only to stage a GESTAPO-style raid on the court where the journalist was standing trial. The leader of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria, Ibrahim el-Zakzakky and his wife have spent over three years in detention in violation of court orders granting them bail and ordering their release. A former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki, has been held in detention since 2015 in defiance of several court orders, including one by the ECOWAS appellate court that declared his continued incarceration illegal. Under Buhari, the SSS has become a monstrous and repressive secret police, acting often with impunity. Buhari bears responsibility for the state of repression because, as president, he can stop it today.
But the SSS is not alone. The Nigeria Police, whose notoriety predates Buhari’s second coming, has continued its serial abuse of human rights and is ever available to officials who routinely deploy police officers from the mundane abuse of sirens in traffic to arbitrary arrest and torture of victims. The police and military fail to understand that peaceful agitation and the right to associate are fundamental rights.
This situation is eerily familiar: as military head of state, Buhari’s appointee who headed the National Security Organisation, as the SSS was then known, Lawal Rafindadi, unleashed a reign of terror on Nigerians, featuring arbitrary arrests and torture in cells described by inmates as chambers of horror. Under the infamous Decree 2, agents had pre-signed detention papers, court orders were ignored and ouster clauses were inserted in decrees, while the press was specifically targeted with the infamous Decree 4 under which Tunde Thompson and Nduka Irabor were jailed.
Returning as an elected president, Buhari has followed the same template, appointing Lawal Daura as Director-General of the SSS, who re-enacted the Rafindadi playbook by his treatment of Dasuki and el-Zakzakky, among others, raided the homes of judges and twice deployed armed SSS heavies to foil the arrest of two former security chiefs by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission. Nigerian Navy authorities similarly ignored court orders to release Navy Captain Dada Labinjo, who they detained for over a year until his recent release on bail; Nigerian Army too detains suspects interminably on the grounds of being terrorism suspects.
Some governors have borrowed from this nefarious model, deploying security agents and perverting the law to punish critics and journalists. Critics, Dadiyata Idris and Stephen Kefas, have been arrested and arraigned. Agba Jalingo is facing a treason charge for offending the Cross River State Government. Jones Abiri, a local publisher in Bayelsa State, has been charged with terrorism while, in Delta State, two journalists are facing criminal defamation charges.
The regime’s Information and Culture Minister, Lai Mohammed, forgetting how, as opposition spokesman in 2014, he was harassed by the SSS and accused of “loitering,” has been vigorously pressing for anti-hate speech laws to restrict the social media. Abdullahi Sabi, a senator, along with others, has re-presented a hate-speech bill: their sole purpose is to insulate officials from criticism and compel unquestioned acceptance of Buhari’s draconian misrule.
Under the law, suspects cannot be held beyond 48 hours except by a court order. But the regime observes this in the breach. Yet, Nigeria is a signatory to the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, African Charter on Human and People’s Rights and the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and other treaties guaranteeing fundamental rights. The 1999 Constitution also spells out basic rights. But the regime chooses which rights or court orders to respect or obey.
This is unacceptable. Critical segments of the society have been assaulted, silenced or compromised. It is time, as a Nobel laureate, Wole Soyinka, has strongly advocated, for civil society to rejuvenate itself and send the message to Buhari to “rein in his wild dogs of disobedience.” From the United States has come a message from the Department of State, two senators and Congress telling the Buhari regime to stop its shocking affront to the rule of law, reminding the General that “respect for the rule of law, judicial independence, political and media freedom, and due process are key tenets of democracy.”
Nigeria has had more than its fair share of draconian rulers, whether in military or civil garb, but none has succeeded in breaking our resilience and irrepressible spirit. This regime will not prove to be an exception. Nigeria, and Nigerians, will overcome.
The strong desire of our people to enjoy the unfettered freedoms guaranteed by the constitution and the rule of law; including the freedom to speak freely and assemble peacefully, will again outlive, outlast and crush the spirit of despotism.
Buhari can still redeem himself and his out-of-control security agents and reclaim his past facade of tolerance. When Daura brazenly inserted himself in politics by recklessly sending armed masked SSS enforcers to besiege the National Assembly, as acting President, Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo promptly sacked him and had him arrested.
Buhari should similarly distance himself and his regime from the lawlessness and impunity of the current SSS DG, Yusuf Bichi, by dismissing him, ordering the release of all victims of illegal detention and compelling obedience to court orders. The SSS has not been efficient in the war against terror; it should perform its primary duty to safeguard the country. As a product of statute, its loyalty should be to the country, not to temporary occupiers of public office.
The regime’s repression cannot succeed but will further polarise the society and weaken national cohesion.  The Nigerian Bar Association has vowed to defend the sanctity of judicial authority, while Soyinka has warned that disregard for court orders could beget desperation and civil disobedience. Nigerians need to stop their supine acquiescence to oppression and learn to stand up for their rights as many are doing around the world, using all peaceful and legal means, including the right to protest and of peaceful assembly. It is Dasuki, el-Zakzakky, Sowore and others today, who knows who is next if repression is not resisted?

Obasanjo Describes Gov El-Rufai As Near Genius

Former Nigeria’s President, Olusegun Obasanjo has described Governor Nasiru Ahmed El-Rufai as a near genius.
Obasanjo, who made a surprise visit to the Governor in Kaduna today, December 11, acknowledged that Governor El-Rufai is “one of the best persons to work with. He is a near genius.”
The former president who was a special guest at the extraordinary session of the Kaduna State Executive Council which was chaired by Governor El-Rufai, commended the state governor for putting together a pan-Nigerian cabinet with inter-ethnic inclusion.
“We need a character like this, a man that you know where you stand with him. Any job given to him will be well done.”
Obasanjo said that Governor El-Rufai is a good leader and a good student, adding that he learned gender inclusiveness from his administration.
“I made women to matter in my government. He has done the same in Kaduna. He is a very good learner.”
Governor El-Rufai who served as the minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) under Obasanjo’s administration, also described Obasanjo as a mentor from whom he learnt many public service skills when he served in his administration.

ECOWAS Court To Nnamdi Kanu: You Lied, You Were Not Tortured

The ECOWAS Court of justice has put to lie, claim by the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu that he was tortured, assaulted and subjected to inhuman treatment by the security operatives when he was arrested in 2015.
At its sitting today, December 10 in Abuja, the court dismissed the suit by the leader of IPOB against the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The regional court, in the judgement that was read by Justice Dupe Atoki, held that the IPOB leader failed to prove its allegations against the Federal Government, adding that it had no reason to conclude that his arrest and detention were unlawful and arbitrary as claimed.
The three member panel of the Court also dismissed Kanu’s request for monetary compensation.
Though the Court acknowledged that the IPOB leader had the legal capacity to approach it to seek redress for any violation of his human rights, but held that without a mandate, he lacked the legal personality to represent the IPOB before the Court.
The court further struck out names of the second and third defendants, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice and the Director General of the Department of State Service, DSS, from the suit on the premise that they were not signatories to the ECOWAS Revised Treaty, thus leaving only the Federal Republic of Nigeria as the sole defendant in the suit.
Kanu had filed the suit marked ECW/CCJ/APP/06/16, before the Court on March 3, 2016, through his lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor, claimed that his rights to life, personal integrity, privacy, fair trial, freedom of movement, freedom of expression, personal liberty, freedom of association, private property, right to existence and right to self-determination were violated following his arrest and detention by Nigerian security agents.
The plaintiff also alleged that he was a victim of arbitrary arrest, detention, torture, inhuman and degrading treatment while in detention, insisting that federal government confiscated his personal belongings through its agent.
Kanu, who was hitherto the Director of Radio Biafra, registered under the regulatory laws of the United Kingdom and the United Nations, demanded monetary compensation in the sum of $800 million US dollars.
The federal government lawyer, Abdullahi Abubakar, prayed the court to dismiss the suit which he contended lacked merit, stressing that the country is obliged to enforce the rule of law as stipulated in its Constitution, Treaties and Protocol that included defending the sovereignty of an undivided Nigeria.
The counsel added that activities of IPOB were secessionist in nature as it instigated a separationist agenda among the people of the country’s South-East and South-South regions, using its Biafra Radio.
Abubakar averred that acts of the plaintiff were intended to garner support for war against the defendant and carve out a geo-political area to be declared “Republic of Biafra.”
Consequently, he said the defendant initiated an investigation into the allegations against the plaintiff that led to his arrest and discovery of illegal firearms and radio transmitters in his possession, items he said posed security risk to the country.
The defendant also submitted that the plaintiff was investigated while in detention for offences of criminal conspiracy, managing and belonging to an illegal society, saying that though he was granted bail, he was detained again on fresh charges that bordered on treasonable felony.
He told the regional court that although the plaintiff and some members of IPOB had severally threatened the peace of the nation with their demands, it gave no orders to its agencies to kill members of IPOB nor did any such killings occur.
He said that the federal government remained committed to upholding the rule of law, while recognizing and protecting the fundamental rights of its citizens and all groups, including the IPOB.
Other members of the ECOWAS Court panel that upheld FG’s position and dismissed Kanu’s suit on Wednesday were Justices Edward Amoako Asante and Keikura Bangura.
Source: Vanguard

Who Advises Aisha Buhari, The Angry Matron Of The Villa? By Fredrick Nwabufo

Wife of the Nigeria’s President Mrs Aisha Buhari

Jane Appleton Pierce, the wife of Franklin Pierce, 14th president of the United States, is perhaps, most remembered as the ‘’calamity first lady’’. She spent her years working against the political ambition of her husband. And when he eventually became president, she still did not let up.

Is Aisha Buhari ‘’calamity first lady’’? Really, I ask because she appears to reveal all the dirty and soiled undergarments of the villa to the chagrin of President Muhammadu Buhari.
In October, in the heat of the controversy effectuated by an interview granted by Fatima Mamman Daura, daughter of the ‘’cabal honcho’’ to sully Aisha, I expressed concern regarding the knotty problem the first lady was dealing with at the villa. To me, it was clear Mamman Daura’s daughter leaked the video recording of Aisha in her most distressed state to embarrass her. Also, I considered it duplicitous that the ‘’cabal’’ was in conflict with the first lady and at the same time cozying up to the president and huddling in his kitchen. I had asked: Can the cabal love the president more than his wife? Can they be for the president but against his wife? Does loyalty not come with full compliments? Is disloyalty to the wife of the president, loyalty to the president? I believe the president and his wife share intimacy by dint of marriage. She is naturally his biggest influencer; whispering sweet ‘’nothings and somethings’’ in his ear during pillow talk. But as a matter of fact, Aisha is now coming off as an angry black first lady. Her concerns as regards her family affairs, may or may not be genuine, but she has become catty in handling them. The office of the first lady is a pivotal one. It should bring the zing to the administration. It should be that ‘’soft and cuddly touch’’ of the administration. The office should also be the staunchest promoter of the government and not an outlet for exhibiting hypocritical tigritude. At the weekend, the first lady accused presidential aides of not ‘’defending the government’’ enough. According to her, ‘’aides are supposed to take action against the offenders, or to take action or to take charge or be in control, or caution people, they keep mute. But when it comes to unnecessary things, people will start talking from the presidency.” I find this amusing. Aisha herself has been the biggest demarketer of the administration. I will give instances. In May, the first lady ridiculed the N500 billion social investment programme initiated by her husband’s government. She said it failed in the north. Hear her: “I was expecting the N500bn to be utilised in different methods in the north for the aim to be achieved. I don’t know the method they used, but most of the northern states do not get it. My state does not get it.’’ In October, 2016, Aisha said she might not support Buhari’s re-election — that he is a titular head being puppeteered by three people – the cabal. In November at the National Islamic Council meeting in Abuja, she spared no verbal attack for anyone, cutting down every organ and institution of government with her tongue. But is it the place of the first lady to reprimand aides appointed by the president in the open? Do they report to her? Were they appointed by her? I am really concerned. Does Aisha really know how government functions? Beyond her criticisms of the administration, which I must say resonate with me as a critic, she appears to be classically ignorant of the operations of government. Really, Aisha has shaped up to be that lady of the manor who commands obedience by heckling, cursing and caterwauling. I saw through the veneer of her hypocrisy when she spoke in support of the draconian social media bill. According to her, the first family ought to be protected from the irritations of social media. She even reprimanded Lai Mohammed, minister of information, in public for not taking action on those she conceived to be offenders on social media. It was clear to me that her attacks, even on the administration, were for an insular end – not that she loved the people. I advise Aisha, the matron of the villa, to take lessons in grace, temperance and carriage from Michelle Obama, former first lady of the US. She could also choose to see a role model in the late Mariam Babangida.

Fredrick Nwabufo is a writer and journalist @FredrickNwabufo
Advertisement ADVERTORIAL
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com