Home FEATURES With Saraki In Charge, Present Senate Is Morally Bankrupt, Falana Rules

With Saraki In Charge, Present Senate Is Morally Bankrupt, Falana Rules

Femi Falana
Femi Falana

A Lagos human rights lawyer, Femi Falana has described the current senate, headed by Dr. Bukola Saraki as morally bankrupt and that because of moral question, it is now exercising power beyond its constitutional limit.

Falana who spoke in an interview on Channel TV, insisted that the current senate cannot screen the leadership of anti-graft agency such as Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC), even as he said that the rejection of Ibrahim Magu and subsequent calling for his replacement as the EFCC acting chairman was the highest of impunity.

Falana said that section 171 of the Nigerian constitution vested exclusive power in the President to appoint any person to hold certain office or act in that capacity, explaining that the constitution allows the President to appoint secretary to the government of the federation, permanent secretaries, heads of service, and heads of extra ministerial department such as EFCC without the confirmation of the Senate.

He added that the only exception is the appointment of ambassadors or headsh of foreign mission, saying that the presidency is ill advised for sending name of the EFCC’s boss to the Senate for confirmation in the first place because there is no constitutional provision that compels such action.

According to the human rights lawyer, section 2(3) of the EFCC act which the executive tries to fulfill is superseded by section 171 of the constitution.

He advised the lawmakers to seek the amendment of the constitution if they must remove such constitutional power of the President because as the law currently stands “refusing to confirm the nomination of a public officer does not annul the acting capacity of such an officer.”

Falana said that senators who are standing trial or being investigated by EFCC should not have been part of the screening exercise conducted for Magu because of their conflict of interests.

“This senate will not have approved the nomination of Magu because not less than 15 members are either standing trial or they are under investigation for corrupt practice. The fact that you are standing a trial or under investigation means you cannot sit.”

Falana said the senate headed by Saraki could not have confirmed Magu, adding: “the senate President, Dr. Bukola Sataki ensured that Mallam Nuhu Ribadu was removed when he was to be charged over the   collapse of Societe Generale Bank. Lamode was removed when he invited the wife of the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki.  Magu could not have been confirmed because EFCC is investigating the allegation that  $3.5 billion from Paris-London loan refund has been traced to his account. How could the house headed by such a man confirm Magu?” [myad]