Place Of Dokpesi In PDP History, By Hamisu Abubakar

The staying power of a political party is its resilience in trying times. In the 16 years of reign by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), its resilience was, really, never tested, until the 2015 general elections when the party was defeated by the All Progressives Congress (APC). Naturally, the defeat brought despondency to many members. Times heal, as they say, and months after the painful defeat, the PDP is already beginning to pick up its own bits and pieces.
Those grieving PDP’s defeat fall into different categories: among them, are the genuine members who have been consistent and loyal to the party for years and who invested time, human and material resources in the elections, which the party lost for reasons that have become obvious. Another category of those in grief are some men and women whose campaign activities were motivated almost solely by personal interests, greed and avarice. And, of course, there were those who were members of the party only by name, and who never made any investment to the party’s efforts, and have been without any commitment to its fortunes and survival. Together, both the genuine and the counterfeit have been grieving or pretending to grieve over PDP’s defeat. Who, exactly, belongs to what category is better left for the conscience of the individuals.
However, Nigerians must have been surprised to hear the television guru, High Chief Raymond Aleogho Dokpesi, express regret over PDP’s defeat at the 2015 polls and apologising to Nigerians for the mistake of presenting former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan as the party’s Presidential candidate. That colossal error, he said, was responsible for the defeat of the PDP. Dokpesi then claimed to be championing the task of reviving the PDP, first, through massive electronic membership registration drive all over Nigeria and second, by organising a self-assessment stakeholders’ conference in which the remote and immediate causes of the party’s defeat would be analysed and solution proffered. Then, there was confusion!
The National Publicity Secretary of the PDP, Chief Olisa Metuh, one of those responsible for the party’s defeat and whose loyalty is also doubtful, queried Dokpesi’s locus standi to speak for the party. Metuh is right. Dokpesi cannot speak on behalf of the PDP for many reasons. He is not a member of the National Working Committee (NWC) of the party. And, concerning Jonathan’s candidacy, the High Chief was, in 2011, the Director-General of IBB’s Presidential Campaign Organisation, which tried but failed to stop Jonathan from contesting for the President that year.
On the issue of whether or not the PDP made a mistake by presenting former President Jonathan as the party’s Presidential candidate, the truth is that Dokpesi was not speaking for the PDP, and he could not have intended to speak on behalf of the PDP, because he, really, was never in the PDP. Nor was he ever with Jonathan, in spite of his recent flattering 58th birthday wishes in which he credited the former President with the enthronement of democracy in Nigeria. Dokpesi was speaking for himself when he apologised to Nigerians for the choice of Jonathan. What he really meant was that he had, ab initio, been against Jonathan’s candidacy for re-election in 2011 and that Nigerians did not listen to him.
That’s Dokpesi’s brand of politics! His problem borders on political dubiety and bloated self-estimation, which are common afflictions with successful media businessmen who veer into politics. Recall that Dokpesi had campaigned for Jonathan based on his assessment of what he would get there and then. In other words, his loyalty was determined by immediate reward, rather than principles or national interest. It was common knowledge, for instance, that Dokpesi had to abandon Jonathan in 2011 on the pretext that the former President declined to approve payment of a bogus sum for the transmission by his AIT of a global football competition hosted by Nigeria. The contract was purportedly packaged under the administration of the late President Umaru Yar’Adua. I stand to be corrected on this.
If Dokpesi were sincere to himself, he would have admitted before Nigerians that he was neither in the PDP nor with Jonathan. And, if he were modest enough in self-assessment, he would have known that he does not have what it takes to champion the task of rebuilding the PDP. What you don’t have, you don’t give. Yet, sadly, that was what Dokpesi set out to do by organising a conference to reassess the fortunes and misfortunes of the PDP.
Being crafty and clever by half, Dokpesi sought to enlist the support of elder statesmen such as former military President, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, Mallam Adamu Ciroma and Chief Alex Ekwueme as Special Guests of Honour, only for the General, whose Campaign Orgainsation Dokpesi served as Director-General, to tell him in the plainest language, “Count me out”. What a shame! Rebuilding the PDP requires men and women of integrity, moral rectitude, commitment and selfless devotion. Unfortunately, the current members of the party’s NWC lack these essential requirements. They are, therefore, incapable of reviving the party.
The good thing is that the PDP still has, in abundance, men and women of honour and integrity, of strength and character, determination and drive, to start the genuine task of rebuilding the party. The problem is that they are not likely to come out, until all the charlatans on the dancing floor give way. What gave the like of Dokpesi the audacity of thinking they can hijack the leadership of the PDP is the void created by the exit of the former National Chairman of the party, Alhaji Adamu Mu’azu. After the departure of Mu’azu, the corrupt members of the NWC refused to vacate their positions, in flagrant violation of the party’s constitution. To date, Uche Secondus, one of those believed to have betrayed President Jonathan by working for his own pocket rather than for the former President, has insisted on holding on to the position of National Chairman which, legally and rightly, belongs to the Northeast geo-political zone.
The greatest challenge facing the PDP today is that the current NWC is a liability that would continue to affect the fortunes of the party. Anybody hearing Olisa Metuh talk, in his usual infantile manner, would never take the PDP serious. The situation is not made better with Uche Secondus’ lack of ideas, focus and personality. All this is compounded by Dokpesi’s entry into the scene, claiming to have the magic wand for reviving the PDP. The situation is pathetic, but not totally hopeless.
The founding fathers of the PDP and other committed members of the party still around, must take up the challenge, chase out the charlatans and start the genuine task of rebuilding the party. The PDP has all the advantages – the structures, experience, material and human resources and above all, committed men and women with the required determination to drive the process through. Rebuilding the party must be seen as a call to duty.
Abubakar, Development Consultant, sent in this piece from Kaduna. [myad]









Kogi: Acid Test For Judiciary And APC, By Halim Agava
It is generally agreed that the electoral issue in Kogi state at the moment is a novel one. However it is an issue that can be addressed thanks to Section 33 of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended. This section gives a path through which to manoeuvre without any breach to the laws of this land. I am not a lawyer but I believe one doesn’t have to be a lawyer to understand the provisions of the laws. The Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice has set the pace and INEC has follow suit. I expect APC leaders to act accordingly and without prejudice.
Having analyzed these people, Igalas, Okuns & Ebiras’ arguments and with reference to the relevant laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and in the light of rule of law, I observe the following:
The Igalas want Audu’s son to replace his late father. Does Kogi state operates a monarchy system of government? Without apology, the Igalas are making mockery of the good legacy of late Audu by parading his son and pushing him to go and claim what, in the eye of law, is not his. No constitutional backing do they have whatsoever. They are equally saying that APC zoned governorship ticket to them. Have they forgotten so quick that the APC primary election included candidates from other senatorial districts, West and Central? Is any zoning arrangement in force in Kogi state at the moment? Of course NOT! I advise the Igalas to accept that their agitation is baseless and unconstitutional. It is nothing, with due respect, but greediness and sentiment.
The Okuns want Mr Faleke to replace Late Audu to conclude the election. They are accusing INEC of declaring the election inconclusive. Are they saying INEC should ignore the relevant provision of its own Electoral Guidelines and acted otherwise? For those who are saying Faleke is now entitled to the votes cast for APC may I refer them to section 221 of the Nigerian Constitution that clearly indicates that the right to vote is the right of a political party, in this case, APC. The combination of Section 221 of the Nigerian Constitution and Section 33 of the Electoral Act leave no room for any conjecture. One lawyer said that Faleke has spent money in the ongoing election hence deserves the victory. Was he telling Nigerians that people’s votes were bought? What about those candidates that contested the primary election? They purchased nomination forms with no small amount of money and when they lost did they ask for refund? If we don’t respect the law, where is the change we are clamouring for? Constitutionally, since Late Audu had NOT been DULY ELECTED as governor, Faleke, as his running mate, NOT deputy at the moment, can neither replace Late Audu nor be sworn-in as governor. The advocacies of this move, who are “highly learned”, with due respect but no apology, allow sentiment to overshadow their respect for the laws of this land and in this particular matter. A barrister even preferred a ludicrous option to INEC to go ahead to conduct the supplementary election and conclude it without filling the vacancy Audu left and thereafter declare Falake the winner and be sworn-in as governor! He added that the relevant sections of the Electoral Act and INEC Guideline should be ignored and thrown out. What a greedy move! This is not only unconstitutional but a gross disrespect for the laws of this land. Faleke remains the running mate for APC in the ongoing election and no one should take it away from him.
If APC upheld Faleke’s position and present him as replacement for Late Audu, and the judiciary does nothing, then Section 33 of the Electoral Act as amended is automatically nulified as that would mean that the moment a running mate is picked he or she would replace the gubernatorial candidate if he or she dies before, during or after the election and not the first runner up in the primary as prescribed by the Electoral Act. In any case, I am not surprised seeing these unfortunate statements coming from some famous lawyers because if the politicians have double mouth, most lawyers have multiple mouths. For instance, if those lawyers who are twisting the laws were counsels to other contesting individuals or groups, they would definitely have contradictory observations respectively. The reason is not far fetched: they were just doing their legal jobs. They were paid to do it! But I must remind them that no individuals or group of individuals, however rich or highly placed, they cannot fool all the people all the time. The laws of this land is supreme.
The Ebiras are saying that APC should strictly adhere and abide by the INEC directive to it to substitute its deseased candidate, Audu, for the 5th December’s supplementary election in the state. This is also in compliance with the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice’s pronouncement.
The Ebiras are also stressing that APC cannot go ahead conduct any fresh primary election to replace Audu as it is unconstitutional as the primary election that gave Audu the ticket is still valid. In addition a party can only conduct a primary election after atleast a 21 day notice has been served to INEC, a provision APC cannot meet, given the time frame to the supplementary election. Section 33 of the Electoral Act has made provision on how to replace a deceased candidate, so why this call for fresh election or Faleke or Audu son to replace the deceased?
The only option available to APC under the Law is to pick the first runner up to Audu in the August, 2015 APC’s primary election to replace him to conclude the gubernatorial election in the state. For cry out loud, the first runner up is not guilty of any wrong doing or anti party activity. Why the regmarole by the APC leaders?
Base on these divergent opinions, the Ebiras’ position should prevail if we are actually serious about change.
The AGF and Minister of Justice, INEC and Ebiras have spoken. The onus is now on APC leaders to do what is legally right through strict observance of the rule of law and without sentiment or favouritism.
Finally, my advice to the good people of Ebiraland is that they should unite, remain firm and use all the available legal instruments to claim their mandate and what is rightfully theirs.
Long live Ebiraland, Long live Kogi state and Long live Nigeria. [myad]