ECOWAS Re-Admits Burkina Faso, Jonathan Says It Deepens Political Security
The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), today, re-admitted troubled Burkina Faso, even as President Goodluck Jonathan said that the collective action of members countries to nib in the but military incursion in any African will deepen political security in the sub region.
As ECOWAS Authority of Heads of State its began its 46th Ordinary Session in Abuja today, the interim President of Burkina Faso, Michel Kafando, took his seat.
In his welcome address, the host, President Jonathan said that the appointment of Michel Kafando as the interim leader of Burkina Faso is a reflection of his high standing with his people.
“It is also an affirmation of ECOWAS commitment to Democracy and Good Governance as well as its zero tolerance for unconstitutional change of Government. We are pleased that we have remain engaged with the situation in the country and that we were able to find a common voice in seeking to resolve it.
“We see the presence of H.E. Mr. Michel Kafando at this Summit, as strengthening and deepening political security in our sub region. We wish him every success in the enormous task ahead of him and his compatriots.
President Jonathan commended the ECOWAS chairman and President of the Republic of Ghana, John Dramani Mahama for the able and statesman-like manner in which he has managed the affairs of the Community since he assumed office.
He said that like the success story that is unfolding in Burkina Faso, “we are pleased that our exertions to stabilize the polity in other member states, particularly Guinea-Bissau and Mali have also yielded results. Our Organization has worked assiduously for the return to normalcy and stability of these countries through various interventions.”
Jonathan assured that Nigeria remained steadfastly committed to supporting peace and stability in the West African Region, in the belief that a politically stable West Africa will safeguard the vital interests of all its peoples and be a viable partner in the search for global peace.
Acknowledging that much achievements may have been recorded in the area of democracy and economic growth in the member-nations, President Jonathan admitted that the sub-region has continued to face many serious challenges.
Prominent among these challenges, he explained, is the ravaging Ebola epidemic, adding that the last six (6) months have witnessed the negative impact of the Ebola Virus Disease(EVD) on the region.
He said that since its outbreak in March, this year, the disease has resulted in over seven thousand (7,000) deaths apart from negatively impacting the economies.
“I, therefore, call on member-states as well as our development partners and the international community, at large, to contribute generously to the ECOWAS Regional Solidarity funds to fight the Ebola Virus Disease.”
President Jonathan said that another worrisome situation is the rising scourge of terrorism which is now threatening the peace and security of the sub-region.
He said that the Sahel Region has witnessed the increasing proliferation of small arms and light weapons as a result of which countries in the region are today threatened by insurgents and terrorists.
“Their actions have dire consequences for the continuing peace, stability and prosperity of the region.”
The Nigerian leader said that in the Gulf of Guinea, the increasing incidence of piracy has reached a worrisome dimension, and is compounded by drug trafficking, oil bunkering and human trafficking.
“All of these require urgent and concerted actions from all of us. Nigeria calls for stronger and more effective regional, continental and global alliance to rid our region of terrorism, piracy and violent extremism.”
He advised that ECOWAS prepares to mark its 40th anniversary, member countries must not forget that beyond politics, the economic development and integration of the region must remain the fundamental objective of the Organization.
He called on his colleagues to, as a matter of must, accelerate their efforts toward monetary union by striving to meet the convergence criteria and achieving the harmonization of tariff regimes.
He said that within the Community Institutions, there is an urgent need for structural reforms in order to enhance capacity and improve transparency.
“Activities of our Organization must conform to global best practices to strengthen confidence and assure growth. More importantly, we must diversify our revenue base and reduce our imports in the face of rapid changes in the global arena.
“It cannot continue to be business as usual, if our Organization is to fulfill the vision of our founding fathers.”
President Jonathan acknowledged that the Organization has been universally acclaimed as a model in regional integration and hoped that they would sustain this standard and continue to demonstrate their cohesiveness.
He urged members to act and continue to speak with one voice as a region, noting that out of the five regions of Africa, West Africa has the highest number of Member-States of the continental organization which is the African Union.
This, he added, is an important leverage for members who should utilize and exploit it to advance the overall interest of the region.
[myad]









Comparing Buhari With Jonathan: Iroko Versus Rotten Wood, By Dele Sobowale
For the purpose of this series of articles, I want to single out the Professors writing for PUNCH and VANGUARD, who, are usually erudite, futuristic, well-informed and reasonably objective; but who have joined the illogical, and the ill-informed in the pack attack on Buhari.
When an Area Boy finds himself confronting several adversaries, at once, he steels himself for battle by announcing to his opponents, “Ee ti po to [you are too few for me]”. So, to Professors Abidde, Adelakun, Akinnaso, Olukotun, of the PUNCH, and our own Femi Aribisala, I declare “you are too few” for this battle.
Comparing Buhari with Jonathan is like comparing solid “Iroko” with rotten wood. For starters, every carver knows that nobody can make a masterpiece out of rotten wood. And Jonathan’s government is rotten from the head down. So anybody canvassing for a continuation of this government should be regarded as an accessory to the grand larceny going on now in the name of governance.
For the readers, I said they are too few because, when reading their articles, one can notice that they are virtually writing out of the same set of notes – packed full with their opinions, half truths, some falsehood and some venom. The bile belongs to Femi Aribisala, the VANGUARD columnist, who, like Doyin Okupe, must be operating with a dictionary compiled by the devil – when writing about Buhari, Tinubu and APC. Let me assure Femi that we also have a dictionary at UniJankara, full of hotter words. So nobody should be under the impression that he owns a monopoly of such words.
First, the readers of this defence of Buhari might want to observe that all those mentioned above, pretending to reflect “the views of Nigerians” are Southerners, Christians, mostly Yoruba, employed and well-paid, well- or over-educated, and they probably have not stepped into Kano, Sokoto, Bauchi, Nassarawa or Kogi States in the last five years – if at all. Buhari who they all love to “hate” or “hate to love”, however is a Muslim, Northerner, Fulani, and has spent most of his time in the north since retirement.
The ethnic and religious prejudices, obvious to me, might be a mere coincidence to them but, there is no denying the fact that none of that group can sustain the illusion that they speak for the average Northerner, ill-educated, unemployed, lacking all the basic amenities and clinging to life made more tenuous by Boko Haram insurgency which had escalated during Jonathan’s tenure of office. None can because none knows where the shoe pinches; they write in the comfort of their offices and homes, proclaiming how millions, who they have not met will vote in the North especially. This is rotten scholarship. In fact, nobody among them knows how most Northerners will vote.
Among their often-repeated fallacies, based on prejudice, is the charge that Nigerians will not vote for Buhari because he is a “religious fanatic”. Even if true, two observations will dispel this rumour peddled as truth. One, no Muslim in the entire country had ever mentioned to me that he considers Buhari a fanatic and none will vote against him for that reason. The hang-up about Buhari’s perceived fanaticism belongs to some Christians. Second, one person’s fanatic is another person’s staunch believer in his faith. So, “fanaticism” might actually work in his favour.
Speaking strictly for myself, a Muslim fanatic is preferable to a wishy-washy Christian. Everybody knows where the first stands on issues affecting morality; nobody can trust the second. At any rate, my own reading of the two Holy Books – Bible and Quran – has convinced me that there is very little the Bible abhors which the Quran supports; and vice versa. Our “Christian” columnists are only raising false alarm.
Having disposed of that, at least for now, let me turn, briefly, to the issues of Jonathan’s performance and corruption. Kindly let me quote verbatim what Adelakun and Aribisala wrote in defence of Jonathan and to run down Buhari’s bid for the Presidency.
First Adelakun, in PUNCH, October 23, 2014. “Even though many Nigerians are probably weary of Jonathan’s government by now, they are still practical enough to understand that another four years of Jonathan’s government will not kill them. It might bring Nigeria to her knees but at the same time, it is a pain that can be endured.” (italics mine). Despite the use of “probably”, when the word to use is “certainly,” nobody reading that sentence can fail to shed tears for Nigeria. When the brightest and the best expect us to re-elect a President who will not alleviate their suffering, but deepen them till 2019, then all is lost.
Let me close this first part by drawing attention to Aribisala’s statement, undoubtedly made proudly about “his country”, not mine. “In Nigeria, nobody gets elected as President on the platform that he is going to be an anti-corruption crusader when he gets into office.” Apparently, Femi approves of that situation and will like it to continue – as long as Jonathan gets re-elected. This is a Professor? I thought professors are supposed to be engaged in advancing positive original ideas, not in telling us to continue to go to hell, as we are doing now.
[myad]