Peter Obi: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly, By Yusuf Ozi Usman

With the voting over between yesterday, February 25 and part of today, February 26, in Nigeria in the 2023 Presidential and National Assembly elections, one cannot resist the urge to take a look at the circumstances around one of the Presidential contestants, Peter Obi.
As a matter of fact, when Peter Obi first emerged from the pack and indicated his intention to contest the presidency under the Labour Party (LP), I was one of those who appreciated and hailed him, for one reason: his emergence from the particular part of the country was to me, a sweet antidote to stop the move by some elements to calve another country known as Biafran Republic from Nigeria.
My positive reaction to his emergence on this parameter was based on the fact that those agitating for Biafra, especially the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPoB) would have no reason to continue because, at least he (Peter Obi) had come to show that Igbo are part and parcel of Nigeria thereby foreclosing Biafran idea. .
I had written then that whatever his ambition might turn out to fetch him, whether success at polls or lack of it, Peter Obi would be regarded as the hero of the 2023 election, and the advancement of democracy.
I considered him as representing a unifying factor in the struggle between the agitating elements in Igbo land and the rest of us on this side.
However, when he introduced series of visits to churches across the country, I began to fear the end to which such visits would lead the country, especially against the background of his alleged historical hatred for Muslims when he was Governor of Anambra State years back. He was accused of demolishing Mosques in the State, maybe at the time he never thought “tomorrow”would come when he would need the same Muslims.
He never made attempt to douse the flame of such fear which many Muslims nursed.
Of course, as the campaign hotted up, youths in many parts of the country queued behind him, seeing in him, the freshness in the idea of moving the country to the next level. This was even as his Igbo people, not only in the Southeast but all over Nigeria: Lagos, Kano, Bauchi and others, vowed to give him block vote despite that he had no political structure anywhere.
But the resort to religious sentiment became a danger to the collective existence of the country.
In other words, there’s nothing dangerously wrong for Peter Obi to try to attract the support and sympathy of his ethnic group, after all, let’s face the fact, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso of New Nigerian Peoples Party (NNPP) and some others before him did the same: there’s nothing wrong in appealing to the conscience of the overzealous youths as he did, neither to even the Labour (workers group) the same way it happens in the United Kingdom. But many things are dangerously wrong in fanning the embers of religion in any form.
The consequences of Peter Obi’s visits to churches started to manifest when most of the churches across the country were turned into open campaign for him.
In the beginning, it looked almost normal since he took his time to visit them and sought their support, and therefore they felt obliged to reciprocate, but it became worrisome when a few days before the election, pastors, reverends and other church leaders campaigned not just with words but also by threats and curses on any Christian who would not vote for Peter Obi.
In fact, one of the church leaders threatened to physically fight Christians that would not vote for the LP candidate.
The situation became so frightening in the Christian circle that Muslims have no choice to also resolve to vote for either Asiwaju Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) or Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) or even Rabiu Kwankwaso of the NNPP, all being Muslims.
Imams and other leaders used their preachings and Sermons in Mosques at the Friday Jum’at prayer (a day to election) to openly call on Muslims to vote for Muslim Presidential candidates.
The end result, in spite of the initial positive idea which Peter Obi initially presented, has been the dangerous move, either inadvertently or knowing, to divide Nigeria along religious line.
He appeared to have given Nigeria a source for the attainment of unity along ethnic and regional lines, and took it back with the divisive tendency along religious line.
On Labour, it is obvious that the effectiveness and the representative status of Nigerian Labour movement, in the context of the 2023 elections, will subsequently be a subject of contention as we move out of the election period.
It is clear that the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) and other labour organizations are now politically inclined, either in power if the candidate they present win election, or opposition party, if power eludes the candidate.
Therefore, the labour unions will no longer have the muscle, as opposition, to fight the government for workers welfare.
The buildup to the campaigns and eventual voting yesterday, from the point of view of Peter Obi’s true political profile and what the labour organizations have turned into, remains hazy, with a lot of questions.








Let Us Accept God’s Choice Through Us, By Hassan Gimba
As you read this, the nation is awaiting the results of the presidential election held two days ago – some anxiously, some eagerly, and some with their hearts in their mouths, but all are hopeful for a new dawn because, depending on the results, hopes for a better nation can either be actualised or marred.
There are 18 presidential candidates, out of which we have the “big four”, among whom we expect the next president of Nigeria to emerge. They are Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Peter Gregory Obi of the Labour Party (LP) and Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso of the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP).
Each of them has his support base and each of them is hopeful of victory. They have traversed the length and breadth of this country in their mobilisation efforts. They have engaged Nigerians in open rallies and town hall meetings, including holding media chats and debates where they told of their intentions when elected. Each of them has journeyed over the oceans and parlayed with the Americans and Europeans, those whom we copy our systems of governments from and look towards for approval.
Our prayer should be: may the best among them win, because all of them are good in their ways and each has a track record worth commending.
Tinubu of the APC has been acclaimed for improving Lagos and identifying outstanding talents for public office, among whom is Yemi Osinbajo.
Atiku Abubakar, too, has been credited with creating institutions and building men, notable among whom is Nasir el-Rufa’i.
Rabi’u Musa Kwankwaso had developed Kano and educated as well as developed men, among whom is Abdullahi Umar Ganduje.
Peter Obi has shown prudence while he was the governor of Anambra State and God knows Nigeria needs a prudent leader.
Therefore, any who emerges among these four giants should be okay. Those who say a Fulani – even though they are ignorant of the fact that both Atiku and Kwankwaso are not Fulani – should not be president twice because Buhari has done it, refuse to acknowledge that Asiwaju and Olusegun Obasanjo are both Yorubas.
If we have refused to acknowledge that if the turn is the South’s, then it should be the South East’s turn, then we should not raise any dust whoever emerges as president.
There is nothing religious about any of the tickets or candidates. To begin with, any position that is Islamic will not be contested for by a Christian and vice versa. And this is why no Muslim president will begin minuting on a file with the name of Allah or a Christian in the name of Jesus. Each one of them will preside over Nigeria according to the dictates of the constitution, nothing more, nothing less.
The two leading Muslim contenders have all identified with Christians. For instance, Atiku Abubakar has praised the agenda for national development brought to him by the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) while Tinubu has assuaged their fears over the Muslim-Muslim ticket by telling Christians that his wife is a pastor and some of his children are Christians. His running mate, Kashim Shettima, had earlier told Muslims that their interests would be taken care of by the Sultan of Sokoto while saying he had rebuilt thousands of churches as well as taken thousands of Christians to Jerusalem.
Therefore, we should not allow ourselves to love or fight for any of them based on their ethnicity or religion because none of these defines any of them.
When our candidate wins, we should not jubilate to the extent of touching on the raw nerves of those whose candidates lost. And if our candidate loses, that should not infuriate us to the extent of taking it out on those celebrating.
In whatever we do, we should be mindful that the politicians — both losers and winners — have a way of making up, patching ruptured relationships and coming together for their good, or the nation’s, whichever.
The average person who will fight his friends, neighbours and family will in the end be the one at the receiving end and he may even lose his life in the process. And the world wouldn’t pause on its track or look back when that happened.
Therefore, what we must avoid are two things: fake news and those who may not accept the results based on their expectations that may not have conformed to reality.
And this is where the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) should help by promptly announcing authentic results as they come in. It should give no room for doubt or controversies in any of its activities.
The media, too, has a responsibility to do all they can not to stoke the embers of discord and anarchy in the land. News reports need to be sieved to keep out all that can cause disaffection. They should not publish unauthenticated results for whatever reasons. Social media netizens should try as much as possible to be patriotic by being more responsible in the way they handle election results; everything should be about national interest.
But for our gallant security agencies, perhaps there would be no Nigeria by now. Now is also their time. They have been called to duty again, and they are required and expected, as always, to protect and be there for us and our dear country.
What is incumbent upon us is to pray to our creator to give us peace and stability and anoint for us the best as He sees fit from among the contestants, and not necessarily as we feel. And we should accept His choice through the thumbprints of the majority.
However, if we close our eyes to the truth and, for some untenable sentiments, use our thumbs to elect the unfit, then I leave us with Abraham Lincoln’s statement: “Elections belong to the people; it’s their decision. If they decide to turn their back on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will just have to sit on their blisters.” And they will, probably, for eight years.
Hassan Gimba is the Publisher and Editor-in-Chief of Neptune Prime.