Presidency Accuses IMF Of Instigating Nigerians Against Tinubu’s Govt
The Presidency has raised alarm over what it called the scatting statement by the International Monitory Fund (IMF) on the Nigerian economic reforms under President Bola Tinubu, capable of inciting citizens against the government.
“IMF’s statements risked pitching the Nigerian people against the government (of President Tinubu),” said the Presidential Special Adviser on Economic Affairs, Tope Fasua, in an interview on Channels Television’s “The Morning Brief” programme.
Tope Fasua cried out to IMF: “Give us a break; let us be able to know where we are going before coming at us at every angle and generally throwing us off track. We’ve done the right things. They say they want more—but the government also has a right to say, ‘let us see how what we’ve done turns out.’
“Like the president would say: ‘let the poor breathe’.
“This administration under President Tinubu has done some of the deepest reforms we have seen in a while. We only just got the tax bills signed into law—bills that offer relief to low-income earners and double the tax threshold for small businesses.
“We haven’t even allowed those measures to settle, yet we’re hearing all sorts of very fatalistic statements from different places, including, unfortunately, the IMF.’’
He said that the IMF had become overly critical, describing its frequent statements on Nigeria as “heckling” and potentially destabilizing.
“Sometimes one wants to think they go into overdrive. Almost every week or every two to three days, there’s a statement on Nigeria. At the end of the day, it leaves everyone in a state of confusion.”
Fasua said that Nigeria recently repaid $3 billion to the IMF to exit its COVID-19 loan package which, according to him, many other countries have not been able to do.
He wondered why the IMF would continue to pile pressures on Nigeria, adding: “We’re not asking for a pat on the back; we’re just saying, you know what, give us a breather. Let us be able to implement the policies we’ve started.
‘’They acknowledge that the reforms are good, yet they keep demanding more, and it’s almost like being caught between the devil and the deep blue sea.
“It’s like a house that is completely dilapidated. And we’re being asked to provide full comfort in two years after removing the roof and working on the foundation. That’s not realistic.”
Fasua pointed out a contradiction in IMF’s dual role, saying that its advisory messages were often in conflict with its lending stance.
“The IMF has both an advisory and a lending arm, and sometimes it looks like their advice clashes with their lending stance. We don’t even know which to believe anymore.
On the cost-of-living crisis and whether the IMF’s concerns were valid, the presidential aide said that progress had been made in the economy since the body’s recommendations were rolled out.
“They have recommended even more painful reforms. They want us to keep raising interest rates but interest rates are now stabilising. The Central Bank has a view to begin to reduce them gradually,” he explained.
On inflation, Fasua said: “They complained inflation is high. Do they expect it to drop to single digits in a quarter? That’s unrealistic. Inflation has reduced over the last three months and will likely fall further.
“Whoever wrote that statement is not sounding like an economist because an economist is not a fantasist.
“Sometimes these statements feel overrated. We should invest in collecting our own data and stop depending solely on BrettonWoods institutions. Let’s build our own capacity and data credibility.”
In its recent report titled: “How Nigeria Can Unleash Its Economic Potential,” IMF had expressed concerns about the nation’s persistently high inflation rate and the slow impact of its economic reforms.
The report reads: “Upon taking office in 2023, the new government faced low growth and rising poverty. Between 2014 and 2023, real per capita GDP declined on average by 0.7 per cent annually. In 2023, the poverty rate stood at 42 per cent.
‘’This difficult situation was compounded by limited access to dollars, which meant that people had to turn to the parallel currency market and thereby pay a much higher price than the official rate.
“In the meantime, public finances were strained by an opaque fuel subsidy system, which also caused recurrent petrol scarcity. And central bank financing of the fiscal deficit pushed up inflation.
“In response to these challenges, Nigerian policymakers have embarked on a series of bold reforms over the last two years. In 2023 the new government and the Central Bank of Nigeria liberalised the foreign exchange market, stopped central bank financing of the fiscal deficit, and reformed fuel subsidies.
“The government also strengthened revenue collection, which is still one of the world’s weakest.
“Since these reforms were implemented, international reserves have increased, and anyone can now access foreign exchange in the official market. Nigeria successfully returned to international capital markets last December and was recently upgraded by rating agencies.
“A new domestic, private refinery is positioning Nigeria up the value chain in a fully deregulated market.
“While progress has been encouraging, significant challenges remain. Inflation still exceeds 20 percent. Poor infrastructure, especially for electricity, inhibits economic activity. Poverty and food insecurity remain high. Nigeria lacks an effective social safety net to cushion the impact of shocks on the most vulnerable.”
IMF then recommended a more effective budgetary framework, stressing the need to channel savings from fuel subsidy removal into critical investments It advised that once Nigeria’s cash transfer system is fully functional, tax rates could be aligned with regional benchmarks, even as it asked the CBN to maintain a firm stance to reduce inflation and restore confidence in the economy.
IMF said that the country needs stronger and more sustained growth to lift millions out of poverty and food insecurity.
Tinubu’s “Reforms”: Shock Therapy Without Relief, By Jazuli Lawal
As Development Economist, I was shocked reading The Financial Times editorial of May 2025 arguing that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration has “stabilised the economy” and “turned a corner.” While this assessment may seem encouraging on paper, it is detached from the reality of most Nigerians, who are enduring the worst economic hardship in decades. Far from heralding a recovery, these reforms have plunged millions deeper into poverty, hunger, and despair.
1. Fuel Subsidy Removal: Pain Without a Plan
The removal of the fuel subsidy may have been economically justifiable, but it was executed without safety nets for the poor. Transport costs tripled overnight. Food inflation soared above 40%. Public transportation collapsed in many cities. Promised palliatives buses, cash transfers, food programs — either never materialized or were grossly inadequate. For the average Nigerian, this was not reform. It was economic cruelty.
2. Naira Devaluation: Stabilised for Whom?
The editorial praises the naira’s “stabilisation” after its free fall, but at what cost? The official exchange rate may have narrowed against the black market, but imported inflation has devastated households. Medications, textbooks, and technology are now luxuries. The so-called “orthodox monetary policy” has benefited speculators and exporters not the average worker, teacher, or trader. Stability that increases suffering is not progress.
3. Cronyism and Cosmetic Fiscal Changes
While the CBN may have stopped printing money, government waste continues unchecked. Budget padding, inflated contracts, and luxury spending from bulletproof SUVs to a proposed N90 billion pilgrimage subsidies persist. A restructured tax base is meaningless when the proceeds fund elite extravagance instead of schools, clinics, or rural roads.
4. Oil Production: Temporary Gains Amid Systemic Failures
That oil output rose from 1.0 to 1.5 million barrels daily is not a structural win, it is a partial recovery from collapse, not a transformation. Oil theft may be reduced for now, but the deeper issues of diversification, value chain development, and energy access remain unresolved. Worse still, Nigeria’s overdependence on oil continues, as non-oil revenues remain weak and productivity outside Lagos and Abuja stagnates.
5. Inflation and Insecurity: The Twin Threats Ignored
The editorial mildly admits to 24% inflation and ongoing insecurity, but these are not minor challenges, they are national emergencies. Farmers cannot access markets due to banditry. Schools are being closed for fear of abductions. In this context, talking about investor access to dollars misses the mark. The real economy — the economy of ordinary people is in distress.
6. Who Feels the Reform? Not the People.
To claim that Nigeria is in “better shape” than in the last decade is an insult to Nigerians whose real incomes have eroded, whose children are out of school, and who are being told to “endure” while political elites fly private jets and allocate billions for luxury offices. If this is the price of reform, it is too high, too cruel, and too disconnected from any real social contract.
Conclusion: Reform Must Deliver, Not Destroy
The Financial Times rightly notes that Nigeria has potential, but potential does not feed empty stomachs. Nigeria does not need shock therapy that breaks its people before healing its economy. Real reform must be inclusive, empathetic, and transparent. What we are witnessing under Tinubu is not reform, but elite restructuring where the same political class gains, while the masses are told to be patient and patriotic in poverty.
Nigeria can indeed turn the corner, but not with policies that privilege IMF applause over local realities, or foreign investor optimism over domestic survival. True reform must touch the lives of ordinary people or it remains nothing but a foreign illusion and a local tragedy.
Dr. Jazuli Lawal is M.CIoD, Development Economist & Management Consultant Abuja, Nigeria, in a rejoinder to the Financial Times Editorial.