Akpabio, Natasha Brouhaha: Oshiomhole, The Peace Maker Comes To Town, By Yusuf Ozi-Usman

Amidst the frenzy noises, mainly in social and conventional media, and in the political arena on what has been thrown up as an impasse between the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio and Senator Natasha Akpoti-Udusghan on one hand, and between Natasha and the Senate as an institution on the other hand, has emerged what I would like to call “voice of wisdom.”
Since the crisis of authority or lack of it arose from the point of seat reallocations, up to the point at which Senator Natasha was sent on suspension with mouthwatering conditions, the media and political environment have been assailed with gargantuan muscle flexing from different angles: dividing the discourse for and against, depending on which divides the feuding media warriors found themselves.
However, Senator, Oshiomhole, in a video clip that is currently trending, called for peace, insisting that there should be no division in the Senate as a an institution.
In calming down the nerves that have been unnecessarily battered by what I consider to be egocentric, Senator Oshiomhole assured Natasha that a lot of the senators are her true friends, despite the little misunderstanding that has been blown to mountain. He even reminded Natasha that Akpabio had once tagged her as Princess of the 10th Senate, praying that after all the dust that has been raised, she would continue to be the real Princess of the senate.
Reminding the Senate President that the quality of a leader is tested when he’s under severe provocation and how he navigates challenges, he argued that being sorry for the wrong one is believed to have done should be regarded as a sign of strength rather weakness.
Oshiomhole made himself as an example when he apologized to the Senate as he trod the same path by going to complain on television about the grievance he had over accusation of embezzling money, and a few senators felt bad about it.
He also made example of himself when his seat was changed without prior information, but that he accepted the change “because I know that you can only change my seat but you cannot change me or my opinions.”
For the sake of argument to put things in proper perspective, one of the objective legislative analysts was empathic that Natasha’s suspension is strictly about the rules, and had nothing to do with allegation of sexual Harassment. He said that she broke Rule 6:1, 6:2, 6:9, 55:1, 62, 63, 44, 47.
The analyst stressed that Natasha began a fight without due consultation and proper guidance, saying that she cannot be seeking refuge in one side of the law (order 10) while disregarding a whole lot of other parts of the same laws.
If the issue of sexual harassment is presented, as it’s being done, as the groundswell for protest on the action of relocating her from her seat, what would others who were similarly moved at the same time present to justify protest against the same relocation?
As a matter of fact, after the article I published on Greenbarge Reporters online newspaper when the issue of change of seat first raised the dust, these peacemaking words by Senator Oshiomhole obviously made a great deal of impact on the way out of the logjam.
Any other words coming, especially outside the hallow chamber of the respected Senate should be seen as stoking more fire. Such words are mainly emanating from those who are being driven by pure sentiments, emotions and those who are promoting their social media contents simply to make money. Ditto the lawyers.
As we all know of course that Senator Akpabio would not resign on the basis of the allegation (not confirmation) that are flying all over the place, just as Natasha would not be recalled by people she’s representing, and therefore, it is good if the two internalise this matter, resolve it to enable them have the unity of purpose of attaining the primary purpose of legislation, which is for the betterment of their Senatorial Districts and Nigeria at large. One imagines what kind of relationship that would prevail between the two feuding personalities when the dust is settled and they both go to work in the same chamber, without having resolved the impasse.
I want to recall my point in the last write up by saying that it is a misnomer for one lawmaker to regard fellow lawmaker as “enemies” much more, the Senate President. In an ideal legislative setting, there can be no enemies or adversaries, but simply “opposition” or “horsetrading’ from where lobby, consultations, personal interactios are the natural resort.
It is important to stress the point that the ideal legislative interactions between senators and senate leadership in Nigeria should be characterized by respect and transparency.
Senators and senate leadership should work together to introduce, debate, and pass legislation that benefits the country. This involves active listening, open communication and a willingness to compromise.
Senators should maintain a respectful tone when engaging with each other and with senate leadership, even when disagreeing. This fosters a positive and productive legislative environment.
Senate leadership should, on the other hand, ensure that decision-making processes are transparent, with clear explanations for decisions and actions. This helps build trust among senators and the public.
Senators should participate in debates, ask informed questions, and provide thoughtful contributions to shape legislation and they should seek clarification from senate leadership on legislative procedures, rules, and decisions.
All these things point to the fact that even as human beings, we are learning everyday, either from others or from our mistakes. What differentiates the wise from the foolish ones amongst us, human, is the use to which we put such learning and even, the refusal or failure to turn such learning process into something else just to elicit unnecessary furore and sympathy. The learning and accommodation of the tumbles and tribulations is pronounced more in political turfs. Natasha and Akpabio are therefore, in this learning context not enemies per se. The earlier they realise that fact and face the legislative realities the better for them, their individual constituencies and the country.

Yusuf Ozi-Usman nipr, is Editor-in-chief of Greenbarge Reporters online newspaper









The Lenten season is a solemn period characterised by fasting, prayers, penance and almsgiving.
CBN, LG Autonomy And Need For Financial Probity, By Lawal Nasir
When in July 2024, the Supreme Court gave a ruling that effectively granted financial autonomy to the 774 local government councils in the country, the development was received with mixed reactions. While many celebrated the position of the nation’s apex court with regards to the third tier of government, Nigerian governors were clearly not happy because, over the years, the state chief executives have appropriated the resources meant for the local governments to themselves.
Indeed, the governors’ total grip on the local government was so strong that many considered the implementation of the Supreme Court judgment impossible. Even Justice Emmanuel Agim, who read the lead judgment of the apex court, alluded to the governors’ influence when he scolded the decades-long refusal of the state governments on financial autonomy for local governments.
The governors had in 2019 under then President Muhammadu Buhari successfully frustrated the decision by the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) regulating transactions on State and Local Governments Joint Accounts, limiting cash withdrawals from local governments accounts to a maximum amount of N500,000 per day with penalties for banks that failed to comply.
But, the Bola Tinubu administration was determined to implement the judgment. It followed through by setting up a 10-member inter-ministerial committee to implement the Supreme Court judgment. In a broadcast marking Nigeria’s 64th Independence anniversary, President Bola Tinubu said, “As part of our efforts to re-engineer our political economy, we are resolute in our determination to implement the Supreme Court judgment on the financial autonomy of local governments.”
However, the state governors continued their lobby against the enforcement of the Supreme Court judgment. The governors have continued to mount pressure on top officials of the Tinubu Administration to soft-pedal on the implementation of the apex court judgment.
As a result of these developments, government’s actions have been subjected to all sorts of interpretations, most of them wide off the mark. For instance, consider the story titled “LGAs financial autonomy faces fresh hurdle on CBN demand” in the Business Day of February 2, 2025. According to the story, which relied on sources, “Local governments across Nigeria are facing a new challenge in their push to receive monthly allocations directly from the federation accounts, as they must now submit a two-year account audit to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) before funds can be disbursed.”
Continuing, it said: “The direct revenue remittance, initially scheduled to begin in January, was postponed after many of the 774 local councils failed to provide the required account details. As a result, their N361.754 billion share from the total N1.424 trillion distributable revenue for the month was routed through the state governments.
“The CBN has begun the process of opening accounts for local governments to facilitate direct payments, in line with the financial autonomy secured through a Supreme Court ruling in July 2024.
“However, with the next allocation due in a few weeks, concerns are growing over the ability of councils to submit the mandated audit reports before the February meeting of the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC).
Sources at the CBN confirmed that the bank would not proceed with account openings without a clear understanding of each local government’s financial position.”
Why should a move aimed at ensuring accountability, probity, and transparency be considered a hurdle? Are we saying that local governments have no record of their spending? What exactly are you trying to say.
The CBN, we must not forget, is an independent institution with its own standard operating procedure (SOP). But it is also held accountable by relevant government institutions and agencies. If the CBN is expected to always present its audited report despite its independence, why should LGs not be subjected to the same?How many Nigerians will be satisfied with CBN explanation when the figures fail to add up?
Sadly, rather than support CBN’s position on accountability, the National Union of Local Government Employees (NULGE), through its National President Hakeem Ambali, is warning the apex bank against aiding state governors in undermining the financial autonomy of local government councils.
“There is no local government without at least three years of audited accounts. This is made possible due to the presence of the Auditors-General at the local government levels.
“The CBN must understand that it can not go against a landmark Supreme Court judgment. No organisation should allow itself to be used by governors against the realisation of the autonomy for local governments,” Ambali was quoted by The PUNCH as saying.
So, if truly LGs have at least three years of audited accounts, the logical question to ask is: what makes it difficult to present such audited reports and satisfy the said CBN demand?
Unlike local governments, which can still be influenced by state governors through the instrumentality of state electoral bodies, the CBN is not beholden to state governments in any way. While majority Nigerians are in support of LG autonomy so that developmental projects can be executed at the grassroots level, it will be suicidal to do so in a vague and fraudulent way. Going to court, and whatever the outcome, can not change this fact.
Nasir is a journalist based in Abuja