Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Mr. Femi Adesina has made it clear that President Muhammadu Buhari has no intention of tampering with press freedom. He also assured that the President is committed to transparency and accountability, as his government grapples with the task of restoring the fortunes of the nation’s economy. Speaking when the out-going Chairman of the State House Press Corps (SHPC), Mr. Kehinde Amodu, led the newly-elected Chairman of the Corps, Alhaji Ubale Musa, on a courtesy visit to him and the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Malam Garba Shehu at the Aso Presidential Villa, Abuja on Friday, Adesina said it is noteworthy that the election of officers into the Corps was done in a transparent manner, in tandem with the stance of the current administration’s electoral reform, devoid of any form of interference. He reiterated the belief of President Buhari that Nigeria can only be great if Nigerians shun all forms of corruption, greed and selfishness in their actions. The Presidential spokesman said that the election of Ubale Musa is very instructive, given that the same Musa had been “rusticated” from the State House Press Corps by the administration of Goodluck Jonathan, and that he had his accreditation restored by the Buhari administration. The Buhari government’s action in restoring Ubale’s accreditation was to demonstrate the government belief in freedom of the Press. The Special Adviser to the President called on the chairman-elect to continue to lead his colleagues in an inclusive manner, having enjoyed an overwhelming support in his electoral victory. In his remarks, the outgoing chairman, Mr. Amodu, told the Presidential spokesmen that the best candidate won the election and assured that given the maturity and level-headedness of Musa, there will be good working relation between the Corps and government officials in the Presidential Villa. Alhaji Ubale Musa said he was happy to have come up at this time in the life of the administration and asked for the cooperation of the Presidential spokesmen to make his job easy. He assured them of the support of his colleagues as President Buhari embarks on implementing his change agenda. Ubale Musa, a correspondent of Deutsche Welle defeated Rashidat Yusuf of Murhi International and Felix Onuoha of Reuters to emerge victorious. [myad]
A civil right group, Save Lagos Group (SLG) has dragged three citizens of the Republic of India and their company, SUNOLA Vegetable Oil & Foods Limited Company, a subsidiary of KEWALRAM Nigeria Limited, Lagos, to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over alleged illegal and fraudulent seizure of N160. 5 Million Commission rates of the goods bought by the Company’s Authorized Distributor, Mr. Selim Alamutu, the Chairman CESSA-KAMSEL Integrated Investment Limited from 2004 to 2016. The group also alleged that Inspector Sule who is the Officer-In- Charge of Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) of Lagos State Police Command connived with the India citizens to evade the investigation of the Company’s fraudulent activities. It further alleged that many Nigeria citizens have been defrauded by these Indian citizens through their Company in Nigeria, and that it has been the habit of Nigeria Security personnel to cover up foreigners from arrest over criminal acts. In a statement, the Convener of the Save Lagos Group, Comrade Adeyemi Alimi Sulaiman listed the Company officials who have been dragged to the anti-graft agency as Suresh Naya, Rajesh Ramaswamy and Rajnesh Potey, who were respectively ex General Manager, ex Acting General Manager and incumbent General Manager of SUNOLA Foods Limited, Isolo, Lagos State. It also includes the Company’s Head of Account Section, Otteh. The statement said that the group is taking the action of reporting the officers to the anti graft agency in accordance with Part VII of Section 38(1) and Part II of 6(1a-q) of the EFCC Act 2004. The group wanted the anti-graft Commission to investigate the Lagos State Airport Road Branch of the Zenith Bank with Account Number-1011361443, which the India Company has been used to defraud unsuspected Nigerian customers of their Company, and described the Company action as illegal, evil, satanic and anti Nigerians. It called on the concerned authority to save unsuspected Nigerians from the antics of these non-Nigerians. The statement reads: “The Commission of the sales of Mr. Alamutu of CESSA –KAMSEL Integrated Investment Limited from SUNOLA Nig. LTD management since 2004 till date, of this business transaction is now sum of One Hundred Million Naira (N100, 000,000) which is in accordance with the Company agreement with their authorized distributor (Mr. Alamutu) and another payment of Five Million, Seven Hundred Thousand Naira were also made to the Zenith Bank Account of SUNOLA Nigeria Limited by Mr. Alamutu in recent time. “In view of the indubitable fact that jungle rule of delusive demagogues and desperadoes are being satanically entrenched in the aforementioned SUNOLA Refined Vegetable Oils and KEWALRAM Nigeria Limited to the charging of those of unsuspected distributors like Mr. Selim Alamutu and his Companies, who strictly believe in the rule of law/rule of Business tramsaction, ethics and good conscience as principle man of integrity, uprightness, truthfulness and Godliness. So far, we are sincerely and loyally embarked on a radical investigation with a view to authenticating the veracity of these empirical reports in your office and in any competent Court of Law.” [myad]
The death of Fidel Castro was long expected and when it finally came on Friday night, there was very little surprise across the world. He was 90, and in August, he had himself predicted that he would not live beyond 90. He had been sick for about ten years, compelling him to hand over power as Cuba’s leader in 2006. It is instructive that Castro’s death, like his life, was attended by divided opinions. No other man has been more controversial in Latin America and indeed in the whole of the Americas in the last 50 years.
He was hated and loved in almost equal measure, praised by those who admired him, and denounced by those who objected to his politics and style. This much was illustrated as the news of his death spread: while Cubans in Havana and across the country mourned the death of the El Commandante, the father of modern Cuba, and perhaps the last of the iconic revolutionary figures of the 20th Century, 145 kilometres away to the North, in Miami, Florida, many Cubans in diaspora celebrated the death of the man they consider a tyrant who drove them away from their homeland.
Fidel Castro, having survived countless assassination attempts over the years, was fully aware more than anyone else, of the emotional reactions to the choices he made by all categories of persons including ideologues, capitalists, family members and plebeians alike. His response to this was the iconic declaration: “Condemn me. It is of no importance. History will absolve me.” This was in 1953, after the Moncada Barracks event, but that statement more or less defined his life-long attitude to power, leadership and situations. As Cuba’s strong man, he ran his country from 1959 to 2006, like a messiah, giving the people one of the best human development indexes in the world: a developed medical system, free healthcare, free education, advancements in science, research and agriculture, the transformation of Cuba into a centre of culture, and a strong presence in global politics.
But it was Fidel’s politics that turned him into both the symbolic and controversial figure that he became. When he drove out the Fulgencio Batista government in 1959, he was regarded as the messianic revolutionary, along with his band of freedom fighters, who had come to save the people in what became known as the 26th of July Movement. Batista’s military dictatorship imposed enormous misery upon the people and encouraged the transformation of Havana into the playground of the rich, the Mafia, the criminal and the corrupt. Fidel, as he was simply known, promised his people “Fatherland or Death” – (“patria o muerte”), constitutional rule, free and fair elections, and a brighter future. He soon embarked on a series of brutal executions, victimization of his political opponents and mass repression, justified on the basis of the need to consolidate the revolution. His transition from freedom fighter to an autocrat, and the gradual shift from a people’s revolution to a one-man revolution, is one of the striking contradictions of his legacy.
Perhaps the most defining marker of this legacy is Cuba’s relationship with the United States under his watch. By 1960, the would-be socialist democrat had declared that he is a Marxist-Leninist and with his embrace of the Soviet Union, he brought the Cold War, one of the most significant events of the 20th Century to the doorstep of the United States. This marked the beginning of more than 50 years of strained relationship with the United States, beginning with Cuba’s introduction of a nationalized planned economy which resulted in the state take-over of foreign businesses and investments which were mostly American, the Bay of Pigs invasion of 1961 and the nuclear missile standoff of October 1962, which brought the world to the brink of a nuclear war as the Soviets attempted to set up a nuclear base in Cuba, a few miles away from the United States.
Fidel Castro’s face-off with the United States earned his country economic and military blockades, which proved punitive for his people, the flight of many Cubans to the United States, sustained, vitriolic American propaganda against Fidel and Cuba, as well as assassination attempts. By 1961, America broke off diplomatic relations with Cuba. Fidel proved to be a fiercely single-minded, iron-willed, unbending political figure. He resisted both capitalist restoration and American imperialism. He emerged in the long run as a symbol of defiance and a source of inspiration for many of his compatriots and others who drew patriotic zeal and fire from his resistance, nationalism and patriotism.
Cuba was the centerpiece of his revolutionary and ideological exertions. He wanted the best for his country and his people, and in pursuing a pro-worker, pro-people agenda, he stood firmly against the intimidation of the capitalist mega-power to the North. He turned towards the Soviet Union as trading partner and source of subsidies. He lowered racial barriers, preached equality and sovereignty and railed endlessly against capitalism in characteristically fiery and long speeches. With the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1992, the subsidies ended, and the people’s economic hardship increased but Fidel Castro remained stubbornly committed to his agenda and vision. He survived the end of Soviet subsidy with the help of Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela.
He was a very strong, impressive personality, a master of rhetoric, and a notable man of style, with his trademark fatigue, classic Cuban cigar and scraggy beard. He was the oldest and the most enduring of the communists. His example inspired radical politics in Venezuela, Chile, Grenada, Bolivia, Ecuador and other parts of Latin America. He defined the left in Latin America. He changed the Latin American game.
His impact on the larger international order was no less significant. Many Fidelistas emerged in other parts of the world, including Africa, particularly in Congo, South Africa, Angola, Namibia and Mozambique where he supported revolutionary change morally and materially. The Nigerian Left also owes much inspiration to the politics of Fidel Castro and the ideas of his friend and ally, Ernesto “Che” Guevara. Cuban doctors served as volunteers in Angola and Namibia, while over 36, 000 troops and another 300, 000 troops took part in the anti-apartheid, liberation struggles in both countries respectively. Cuban troops were also involved in Algeria, Guinea Bissau, Equitorial Guinea, Sierra Leone and Libya. Africa owes Fidel a debt of gratitude. Comrade Fidel became the hero of many across the world who wanted to stand up for their countries and become like him, champions of the interests of the downtrodden and apostles of the values of equality and sovereignty. He was one of the strongest political, if not moral, voices in the 20th century. He may have been guilty of human rights abuses at home, for debatable reasons of pragmatism, but he was a champion of social justice on the global stage.
The durability of Castro’s politics and influence was further consolidated by the longevity of his life. Many young Cubans may remember him as the old man, and probably be less excited by his politics, which they may not understand, but he is bound to remain the most influential figure in Cuban history for a very long time to come. The United States must be relieved that its arch-enemy is finally gone. Fidel Castro stood up to 11 American Presidents from Eisenhower to Obama and did a lot to promote anti-American sentiments in the global sphere. Even when Jimmy Carter (he removed travel restrictions in 1977 and visited in 2002 and 2011) and Barrack Obama (the first sitting American President to visit Cuba in 90 years) sought to extend a hand of friendship, he was unimpressed.
America’s hope that his death will mark the end of his legacy may be too much of an expectation, but definitely Cuba after Fidel Castro will no longer be the same, but the change will be gradual. Castro’s brother and successor, Raul is 85 years old: some day, a Castro will no longer be in charge of Cuba, and the end of that dynasty may well mark the beginning of another transformation. But before that happens, Donald Trump, Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio, Newt Gingrich and Ted Cruz should stop gloating: their responses to Fidel’s death are too cheap, vilely opportunistic and indecent!
As it is, many Cubans are no longer afraid that America poses a threat to their country’s sovereignty: the psychological weapon with which Fidel controlled the population for decades. Cuba without Fidel draws closer attention to the gains of the Cuban revolution, as to whether or not it has fulfilled its promises. Raul Castro has made the Cuban economy more open and allowed more opportunities for self-expression, there are plans to restore diplomatic relations with the United States, commercial flights to and fro the United States are now possible, future movements may also be in the form of extension of the scope of human freedom.
Fidel never wished that there would ever be a counter-revolutionary capitalist restoration in Cuba, as happened in Russia and Nicaragua, hence he had declared in April, that “the ideas of Cuban communism will endure.” He is no longer in a position to determine that, but like Jose Marti (1853-1895), before him, Fidel Castro (1926-2016) will forever occupy an important chapter in the history of his fatherland and the world. When his remains are submitted to the furnace of the pyre on December 4, if the dead could speak, Comrade Fidel could well be heard proclaiming afresh: “La historia me absolvera!”. Certainly, it has. He got away with his principled opposition to imperialism and provided leadership when the world needed it most. [myad]
President Muhammadu Buhari, engages Governor Nasiru El-Rufai of Kaduna state and the minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Malam Muhammad Musa Bello in one of those jokes and banters to ease of the enormous task of presiding over the affairs of over 178 million Nigerians. [myad]
Fidel Castro, who led a Cuban revolution that made his Caribbean island a potent symbol of the 20th-century ideological and economic divisions, and whose embrace of communism and the former Soviet Union put the world at the risk of nuclear war, died yesterday, November 25 2016. He was 90.
His death was announced on Cuban state TV by his younger brother, Raúl Castro, who succeeded Fidel 10 years ago as the country’s leader. The cause of death was not immediately disclosed, but Mr. Castro had been in failing health for several years.
The son of a prosperous sugar planter, Mr. Castro took power in Cuba on New Year’s Day 1959, promising to share his nation’s wealth with its poorest citizens, who had suffered under the corrupt quarter-century dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista.
Mr. Castro, a romantic figure in olive-drab fatigues and combat boots, chomping monstrous cigars through a bushy black beard, became a spiritual beacon for the world’s political far left.
To his legion of followers, Mr. Castro was a hero who demanded a fair deal for the world’s poor and wasn’t afraid to point his pistol at the powerful to get it. His admirers said he educated, fed and provided health care to his own people, as well as to the poor in other countries, more fairly and generously than the world’s wealthy nations, most notably what he called the “Colossus to the north.”
He remained one of world’s longest-serving heads of state, controlling his island nation just 90 miles from U.S. shores for nearly five decades. In his homeland, Mr. Castro was as loathed as he was beloved. He was among the world’s most repressive leaders, a self-appointed president-for-life who banned free speech, freedom of assembly and a free press and executed or jailed thousands of political opponents.
He abolished Christmas as an official holiday for nearly 30 years. While he dispatched Cuban-educated doctors and Cuban-developed vaccines to the poorest corners of Latin America, Cubans in central Havana found pharmacy shelves empty of medicine, and many lived in apartments in which they used buckets in their kitchens as toilets.
With almost theatrical relish, Mr. Castro taunted 10 successive U.S. presidents, who viewed the Cuban leader variously as a potential courier of Armageddon, a blowhard nuisance, a dangerous dictator, a fomenter of revolution around Latin America, a serial human rights abuser or an irrelevant sideshow who somehow hung on after the collapse of communism almost everywhere else.
Mr. Castro’s long reign began to unravel on July 31, 2006, when he temporarily transferred power to his 75-year-old brother, Raúl, after undergoing what he described as intestinal surgery. (The precise nature of Mr. Castro’s health problems was an official state secret.) The transfer of power came weeks before Mr. Castro’s 80th birthday on Aug. 13, and Mr. Castro was not seen in public again for nearly four years.
He formally resigned on Feb. 19, 2008, in a statement read on national television by a spokesman, ending his 49-year reign and giving George W. Bush the distinction of being the first U.S. president to outlast Mr. Castro in power.
The National Assembly officially — and unanimously — named Raúl Castro, the longtime head of the Cuban armed forces, as the country’s new president. The move was seen as deeply anticlimactic, since Mr. Castro had stage-managed the shift to his brother for almost two years.
Since the 1960s, the United States maintained a strict trade and diplomatic embargo against Cuba, hoping to drive Mr. Castro from power. It wasn’t until 2014, when President Obama — the first U.S. president elected in the post-Fidel era — announced plans to restore full diplomatic relations with Havana. During a visit to Cuba in March 2016, Obama met Raul Castro but made no effort to meet his brother. Fidel Castro later delivered a speech, dismissing Obama’s overtures and denouncing the idea of cooperation with the United States.
Tweaking the “imperialists” was always a passion of Mr. Castro’s. He built an enormous public demonstration space — complete with stage lighting and sound — outside the U.S. diplomatic mission on the Malecon, Havana’s main seaside boulevard. There, he regularly led anti-American rallies and delivered the lengthy speeches for which he was famous.
He was a particular thorn to President John F. Kennedy, who sanctioned the clumsy Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in April 1961 by a ragtag group of CIA-trained fighters, which became a humiliating low point of his presidency.
To his benefactors in the Kremlin during the height of the Cold War, Mr. Castro was the useful commander of a communist citadel on the doorstep of the United States. That point was drawn in terrifyingly stark terms during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, when Mr. Castro allowed the Soviets to base on his soil missiles that could carry nuclear warheads to Washington or New York in minutes. The resulting showdown between Kennedy and Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev was the closest the world has ever come to nuclear war.
Unlike many other communist leaders around the world, Mr. Castro did not create monuments to himself or lend his name to streets and buildings. Instead, he erected billboards carrying patriotic slogans of the revolution, such as “We will overcome!,” “Toward victory, always!” and “Motherland or death!”
Under his reign, Havana eventually became something of a Marxist Disneyland — a shiny, happy veneer over something much uglier.
Mr. Castro personally ordered the restoration of Old Havana, an architectural gem where tourists can savor $300 boxes of Cuban cigars, some of the world’s best music and sweet Havana Club rum — the proceeds of which went to Mr. Castro’s revolution. But just a block behind the restored facades, impoverished Cubans lived in crumbling homes on rationed food. Teenage prostitutes openly offered their services to tourists.
In his later years, Mr. Castro enjoyed a resurgence in popularity across much of Latin America, fueled in part by the election of several leaders inspired by his staunch anti-Americanism.
In particular, President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela viewed Mr. Castro as a political beacon and father figure to the Latin American left. Sweetheart oil deals from Chávez, until his death in March 2013, were crucial to Cuba’s ability to survive as its state-dominated economy sputtered.
While many Cubans expressed genuine and deep loyalty to Fidel — he was never called “Castro” in his homeland — others clearly feared a leader who imprisoned tens of thousands of his enemies over the years, often on little more than a whim.
As he aged, Mr. Castro acted more like a man intent on purifying his legacy, returning his revolution to its ideological core, reversing economic openings and stepping up attacks on political dissent. He imprisoned Cubans whose crimes were as simple as passing out books on democracy.
Many Cubans would not offer criticism of their leader for fear of being overheard by government informants, who lived on practically every block. To indicate Mr. Castro, they would tug on an imaginary beard. Other residents accepted him as a simple fact of life, like the tropical humidity — what good would it do to complain?
The most pointed condemnations came from Cubans who fled Mr. Castro’s rule by the thousands every year. Those with enough money paid for speedboat trips across the Florida Straits, while the poorest attempted the dangerous trip in rickety boats. Some would-be emigres refitted Cuba’s aging American-made cars and trucks, transforming them into unlikely boats.
After Raúl Castro assumed power, he embarked on a plan of economic liberalization that has been more symbolic than substantial. Private enterprise is permitted in a few small segments, such as food service and repair shops, but the military-led government still controls as much as 80 percent of the economy.
Mr. Castro slowed noticeably in his final years. He had long ago given up cigars and rum, and his beard faded from thick and black to scraggly and gray. In June 2001, he appeared to faint while giving one of his weekly Saturday speeches.
Then, in October 2004, he fell and broke a kneecap and an arm. Those events were the first time most Cubans had seen physical weakness from Mr. Castro, who had long worn military fatigues and shown an outward vigor, sometimes joining in countryside baseball games. From that point on, his public appearances became more infrequent.
Mr. Castro’s low profile intensified speculation about the “biological solution” that many Cuban exiles in Miami and other foes had so long hoped for. But as pundits and Cuba experts repeatedly and wrongly predicted his imminent demise, Mr. Castro would answer by appearing in photographs with visiting heads of state, or with blog posts, essays or other messages reminding his people that his detractors had it wrong again.
David Scott Palmer, a Cuba scholar at Boston University, said in a 2009 interview that Mr. Castro seemed to be preparing his country for his eventual death and “skillfully managing his own departure.”
Mr. Castro returned to the public eye in July 2010. Trading his familiar fatigues for an old-man’s track suit, he appeared on live Cuban television, looking thin and weak. Rather than address Cuba’s deepening economic woes, he gave what amounted to a lecture to the United States on the dangers of nuclear confrontation with Iran and on the Korean Peninsula. His halting and wandering address was aimed at world leaders more than ordinary Cubans and seemed designed to burnish his legacy.
Mr. Castro appeared to be a “stuttering old man with quivering hands,” Cuban writer Yoani Sánchez wrote in The Washington Post, describing the reaction of Cubans at seeing the once-invincible leader.
“We had already started to remember him as something from the past, which was a noble way to forget him,” she wrote in August 2010. “In recent weeks, he who was once called The One, the Horse or simply He, has been presented to us stripped of his captivating charisma. Although he is once again in the news, it has been confirmed: Fidel Castro, fortunately, will never return.”
From outcast to revolutionary
Fidel Alejandro Castro Ruz was born Aug. 13, 1926, at Las Manacas, his family’s plantation in the village of Biran in eastern Cuba’s Oriente province.
His father, Angel Castro, was born in Spain and went to Cuba as a soldier in the Spanish army. He became a laborer on a railway owned by the United Fruit Co. Soon he was clearing land for himself in the wilds of Oriente and growing sugar cane, which he sold to the fruit company. In time, Las Manacas comprised 26,000 acres, of which almost 2,000 were owned by the elder Castro.
As a child, Fidel Castro was well off but nowhere near as wealthy as some of the boys at the schools to which he was sent, including the prestigious Colegio de Belen, a Jesuit school in Havana.
Behind his back, he was sometimes called guajiro, or peasant. In his authoritative 1986 biography of Mr. Castro, author Tad Szulc quotes this assessment from Enrique Ovares, an old friend of Fidel’s: “I think that the worst damage Fidel’s parents did him was to put him in a school of wealthy boys without Fidel being really rich . . . and more than that without having a social position. . . . I think that this influenced him and he had hatred against society people and moneyed people.”
Mr. Castro entered the University of Havana in 1945. Perhaps applying his firsthand experience of social and economic inequality, he immersed himself in the legacy of Cuba’s bygone revolutionaries.
Since 1898, when the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor sparked the Spanish-American War, the country had often had tumultuous relations with the United States. Mr. Castro concluded that casting off U.S. hegemony was more important to Cuba than mere prosperity.
He joined the Insurrectional Revolutionary Union and began to carry a pistol. In 1947, he signed up for an abortive expedition to free the Dominican Republic from the dictatorship of Rafael Leonidas Trujillo. In 1948, he went to Colombia to protest a meeting of the Pan-American Union, which was reorganizing into the Organization of American States.
Mr. Castro received his law degree at the University of Havana in 1950 and set up a practice in the capital city. Two years later, he ran for a seat in the Cuban congress on the ticket of the Ortodoxo Party, a reform group. His campaign was cut short on March 10, 1952, when Batista staged a coup and retook the presidency he first held in the 1940s.
Even as a young man, Mr. Castro showed a remarkable ability to persuade people to join him in seemingly impossible tasks — such as his wild scheme to take over the army’s Moncada barracks in Santiago de Cuba.
Mr. Castro’s plan was to distribute arms from the barracks to his supporters and overthrow Batista. Mr. Castro was not deterred by the fact that the garrison numbered more than 1,000 soldiers and that he fielded only about 120 followers.
The July 26, 1953, assault went off with almost comic mismanagement. The contingent with most of the arms got lost in the city’s old quarter, and Mr. Castro’s men rushed into what they thought was an arsenal, only to discover that it was a barbershop. Without firing a single shot himself, Mr. Castro called a retreat. He and most of the others were captured.
Through the intercession of a bishop who was a friend of his father, Mr. Castro was spared immediate execution and was instead put on trial. Although the court proceeding was held in secret, it gave Mr. Castro, who acted as his own attorney, the chance to make what became the most famous speech of his life. Smuggled out of prison, it concluded with the words that became known to generations of Cuban schoolchildren: “Condemn me, it does not matter. History will absolve me.”
Mr. Castro was sentenced to 15 years but was released after less than two under an amnesty declared by Batista. He then moved to Mexico City, where he continued his work with a group calling itself the 26th of July Movement, commemorating the date of the Moncada assault, which became known as the opening salvo of the Cuban revolution.
The Moncada debacle and its aftermath also brought an end to Mr. Castro’s first marriage. In October 1948, he had married Mirta Diaz-Balart, the daughter of a well-to-do family with close ties to Batista and U.S. business interests. In 1949, they had a son — Fidel Felix Castro Diaz-Balart, known as Fidelito. After their divorce in 1955, Mr. Castro’s former settled settled in Spain and remarried. He raised their son in Cuba.
On Dec. 2, 1956, Mr. Castro and 81 followers returned to Cuba from Mexico aboard a second-hand yacht called “Granma,” whose name was later adopted by the Communist Party newspaper in Cuba. All but 12 in the landing party were killed or captured almost immediately. Mr. Castro, his brother Raúl and an Argentine physician, Ernesto “Che” Guevara, escaped into the mountains and began organizing a guerrilla army.
In the summer of 1958, Batista launched a major offensive against Mr. Castro’s ragtag group. When it failed, it was clear that Batista’s days in power were numbered. He announced to a few close colleagues at a New Year’s Eve party in 1958 that he was leaving the country, and Mr. Castro and his followers triumphantly drove into Havana to take control of the country on Jan. 1, 1959.
He drew support from many intellectuals during the early years of his rule. Among them were Ernest Hemingway, a Castro hero and longtime resident of Cuba; authors Jean-Paul Sartre and Gabriel Garcia Márquez; and Bob Dylan, the troubadour of the American counterculture.
When Mr. Castro took power, he preached democracy and reform. He sought to assuage his critics, insisting that he was not a communist. A wary United States cautiously offered economic aid, which Mr. Castro refused.
Economic and political relations grew increasingly more difficult, particularly when it became known that the new regime imprisoned thousands of political opponents and executed many others. Within two years, Mr. Castro had expropriated $1.8 billion in U.S. property without compensation and turned Cuba into a bastion of Marxism-Leninism.
In May 1960, Cuba established diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union, which was soon supplying most of the island’s petroleum needs, as well as a constant flow of weapons and other military hardware. The government nationalized U.S. and British oil refineries and U.S.-owned banks. In October 1960, the U.S. government imposed an embargo on all trade with the island except for food and medicine.
On Jan. 3, 1961, diplomatic relations with the United States were broken. This set the stage for one of Mr. Castro’s greatest triumphs, the defeat of the CIA-organized invasion by Cuban exiles at the Bay of Pigs, which U.S. intelligence officials thought would set off a popular revolt against Mr. Castro. The invasion by about 1,350 CIA-trained fighters was put down by Cuban military forces, and about 1,200 of the invaders were captured.
The following year, Mr. Castro abetted the nuclear confrontation between Washington and Moscow, which ended when Khrushchev agreed to withdraw Soviet-made missiles and promised not to use Cuba as a base for offensive weapons. In return, the United States pledged not to invade Cuba and to remove missiles it had stationed in Turkey.
The U.S. promise to forgo force after the Cuban Missile Crisis was a major victory for Mr. Castro, but for years he lived under the threat of various CIA assassination plots. He cited U.S. threats to justify a large-scale military buildup, and he tried to export a Cuban-style revolution to countries across Latin America, including Nicaragua, El Salvador, Panama, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Venezuela, Peru and Bolivia. (Guevara was killed leading an uprising in Bolivia in 1967.)
In the mid-1970s, Mr. Castro sent thousands of troops to wars in Angola and Ethiopia. In addition, Cuban military training missions and thousands of physicians and teachers operated in more than a dozen other countries, from West Africa to North Korea.
After Mr. Castrol provided economic and military assistance to the leftist government of Grenada in the early 1980s, President Ronald Reagan argued that an airport under construction on the island would be used to support communists in Central America. In 1983, Reagan ordered an invasion, which left 19 U.S. troops and 24 Cubans dead. It was the only time that U.S. and Cuban troops faced each other in battle.
Reform, austerity, repression
One of Mr. Castro’s first economic acts in 1959 was to start an industrialization program. By producing their own steel and other products, Cubans could end their longtime economic dependence on sugar and tobacco.
He promised that the standard of living would rise faster than anywhere else in the world. The plans failed, and food rationing began in 1961.
In 1968, Mr. Castro ordered a “revolutionary offensive” in which 50,000 small businesses were nationalized, causing the economy to grind to a virtual halt. He abolished Christmas as a national holiday in 1969, saying it interfered with the sugar harvest.
Cuba began to enjoy better times in the 1980s, thanks to huge subsidies from Moscow, which sent cars, food, fuel and fertilizer to keep the island’s economy afloat. But the Soviet Union’s eventual collapse meant calamity for Cuba.
In 1990, Mr. Castro called for austerity measures. Rationing was increased, and industrial enterprises were cut back or shut down, as Cuban workers were shifted to agriculture.
At the same time, Mr. Castro began to open the door to some elements of private enterprise, legalizing the use of U.S. dollars in Cuba. Small businesses flourished on the streets of Havana, with merchants selling car parts, cigars and more. While technically illegal, private businesses gave unemployed Cubans a bit of income.
Faced with grim economic times, Mr. Castro appeared to tolerate a certain level of rule-bending, saying in 1995 that he was willing to allow “unquestionable elements of capitalism” in the Cuban system.
But he refused to give up his socialist ideology, and by the 21st century had begun to roll back earlier economic reforms. The government began to arrest people who used their cars or bicycles as taxis and even shut down small eateries in private homes known as paladares, which had begun in the early 1990s with the government’s approval.
Among Mr. Castro’s more successful efforts were universal health care and the near-eradication of illiteracy throughout Cuba. Thousands of classrooms were built in rural areas, and the country’s literacy rate to more than 95 percent. There were more physicians and hospital beds per capita in Cuba than in the United States.
But Mr. Castro’s Cuba remained a place of repression and fear. AIDS patients were confined to sanitariums. Artists and writers were forced to join an official union and told that their work must support the revolution.
The government conducted surveillance on anyone suspected of dissent. In 1965, Mr. Castro admitted to holding 20,000 political prisoners. Some foreign observers thought the number might be twice as high. Numerous historians and human rights groups concluded that Mr. Castro’s government carried out thousands of political executions.
Hundreds of thousands of Cubans simply left, most of them for the United States, flooding mainly into Florida and creating a politically influential bloc of anti-Castro Cuban-Americans in Miami. At first, travel was legal, but Mr. Castro soon imposed restrictions.
In April 1980, he opened the port of Mariel to any Cuban wishing to leave. More than 125,000 people — branded as “worms” and “scum” by Mr. Castro’s government — took advantage of the highly publicized “boatlift” before it was closed in October. Among those encouraged to leave were convicts, AIDS patients, the mentally ill and other “antisocial” elements deemed undesirable by Cuban officials.
By 1994, economic conditions in Cuba were so bad that riots in Havana were followed by another exodus. Thousands fled from the country’s beaches on makeshift rafts; many were intercepted by the U.S. Coast Guard, and others perished at sea.
In February 1996, the Cuban air force shot down two light planes belonging to an exile group in Miami that Havana claimed violated Cuban air space. President Bill Clinton retaliated by signing the Helms-Burton Act, which further tightened the decades-old embargo.
But Mr. Castro’s relations with other countries seemed to improve. When the United Nations convened for its 50th anniversary in 1995, the Cuban leader delivered a much-anticipated address to the General Assembly. Without mentioning the United States, he called for “a world without ruthless blockades that cause the death of men, women and children, youths and elders, like noiseless atom bombs.”
In 1999, Mr. Castro sparred with the United States over the fate of Elian Gonzalez, a young Cuban boy rescued at sea after his mother and her boyfriend drowned trying to reach the United States. U.S. courts eventually ruled that the boy should be returned to his father in Cuba, giving Mr. Castro a huge symbolic victory.
Mr. Castro’s difficult relationship with the Catholic Church also improved over the years. A former altar boy educated by Jesuits, Mr. Castro reinstated Christmas as an official holiday when Pope John Paul II visited Cuba in 1998. He greeted Pope Benedict XVI when he visited Havana in March 2012.
The Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the United States marked the beginning of new lows in U.S.-Cuba relations. Mr. Castro’s initial response to the attacks was remarkably conciliatory, and he expressed his “profound grief and sadness for the American people.” Cuban musicians donated blood for the attack victims, and Mr. Castro offered other humanitarian aid, which was ignored by the George W. Bush administration.
After Bush announced his “war on terrorism,” Mr. Castro said the call to arms could turn into a “struggle against ghosts they don’t know where to find.”
The U.S. government housed suspected terrorists at the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, which had been in U.S. hands since 1903. Mr. Castro, who had long demanded that the base be returned to Cuban possession, refused to cash the checks the U.S. government sent each month as rent for Guantanamo.
With the advancing years, Mr. Castro grew more beleaguered. In 2003, he ordered the arrests of 75 human rights activists, journalists and dissidents who were later convicted on charges of collaborating with the United States to subvert the government. Sentenced to terms of six to 28 years in prison, the dissidents were freed in 2010 and 2011 through the intervention of the Catholic Church.
“This is a war against peace and against pacifists,” Oswaldo Paya, a leading dissident, told The Post in 2003. Paya, who said the Cuban government was using KGB-like tactics to silence dissent, was killed in a July 2012 car crash that his family and human rights groups allege was caused by Cuban government agents.
For someone who was a public figure for decades, Mr. Castro obsessively guarded details of his private life. The names and photographs of his family rarely appeared in the media, and most Cubans did not know where their leader lived.
Rumors about his private life abounded. From the 1980s until his death, he was reportedly married to Dalia Soto del Valle, with whom he had five sons. But many accounts say the closest partner in his life was Celia Sanchez, who was with him from his days as a guerrilla in the mountains and died in 1980.
He was said to have had many mistresses but was secretive about his female companions. For decades Vilma Espin de Castro, a fellow revolutionary and the wife of Raúl Castro, acted as a de-facto first lady at public events.
According to published accounts, Mr. Castro had as many as 11 children with four women. One of his daughters, Alina Fernandez Revuelta, defected to the United States and became an outspoken opponent of her father.
“When people tell me he’s a dictator, I tell them that’s not the right word,” she told the Miami Herald. “Strictly speaking, Fidel is a tyrant.”
None of Mr. Castro’s children in Cuba appeared to be involved in the country’s political life. Two nephews of Mr. Castro’s first wife became Republican U.S. congressmen from Florida. Lincoln Diaz-Balart served from 1993 until his retirement in 2011, when he was succeeded by his younger brother, Mario Diaz-Balart.
Even as his country crumbled around him, and communist regimes toppled across the globe, Mr. Castro remained a true believer in the revolution he had wrought. To the end, and for better or worse, he held true to the maxim he often espoused: “Socialism or death.” [myad]
A politically active elder statesman who once served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees (BoT) of the then ruling People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Chief Anthony Akhakon Tony Anenih, has thrown in the towel in partisan politics.
This was even as the immediate past President of Nigeria, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan almost instantly begged Anenih to reconsider his stand.
Chief Anenih who announced his disengagement from active politics today, Saturday at the presentation of his autobiography: “My Life and Nigerian Politics,” asked Nigerians to support efforts by President Muhammadu Buhari to end recession.
“I am persuaded that I have no more ambition nor any point to prove in politics. I am, therefore, glad to declare that, from today, I shall be withdrawing from active partisan politics. I shall, however, continue to avail the country of my experience, give suggestions and offer advice, as a statesman.”
The former PDP leader said that the current recession in the country is a national predicament which must be confronted by all irrespective of political affiliation, adding:“I therefore urge Nigerians to persevere and hope for better tomorrow. We must support and pray that God will give the President the wisdom and vision to steer the country away from recession to prosperity.”
But former President Jonathan, who was among distinguished personalities that attended the book presentation, feared that Anenih’s experience in security and politics would be wasted if he makes good his decision to quit politics at this time.
Chief Anenih was born in Uzenema-Arue in Uromi in present Edo state on August 4 1933. He joined the Nigeria police force in Benin City in 1951. Working from home, he obtained secondary school qualifications. He attended the police college in Ikeja, and was selected for further training in the Bramshill Police College, Basingstoke, England in 1966 and the International Police Academy, Washington DC in 1970.
He served as a police orderly to the first Governor General of Nigeria, Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe. He worked as an instructor in various police colleges and in 1975 was assigned to the Administrative Staff College (ASCON), Lagos. He retired from the police as a Commissioner of police.
He was State Chairman of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) between 1981 and 1983, helping Dr. Samuel Ogbemudia become elected as civilian Governor of Bendel State. However, the governorship was cut short by the military takeover of December 1983. He was National Chairman of the Social Democratic Party from 1992 and 1993, when he assisted in the election Chief M. K. O. Abiola as president. He was a member of the Constitutional Conference in 1994.
Anenih was a member of the PDM until early April 2002, when he transferred to the People’s Democratic Party (PDP). Anenih was said to have masterminded the 26 April 2002 declaration of President Obasanjo at the International Conference center Abuja. He was deputy national coordinator of Olusegun Obasanjo’s campaign Organisation in the 1999 and 2003 elections. Chief Anenih was appointed Minister of Works and Housing in 1999. He subsequently became Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the PDP.
He is married to Josephine Anenih, a lawyer, who was the chairperson of the Federation of Women Lawyers from 1994 to 2000, and was the first National Woman Leader of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) from 1999-2005. She was appointed minister of Women Affairs on 6 April 2010, when Acting President Goodluck Jonathan announced his new cabinet. [myad]
President Muhammadu Buhari has described the former Cuban leader, Fidel Castro who died yesterday, as a remarkable selfless global leader. In a condolence message to the people and government of Cuba, President Buhari said that he received the news of his death with profound sadness. The President, who described late Fidel Castro as the Cuba’s longest revolutionary icon, expressed deepest condolences to Cuban President Raul Castro. “I commiserate with the people of Cuba on the passing, early Saturday, of the legendary leader, who passionately served his people for almost half a century.” The President said that Castro was remarkable leader who against all odds, stirred uncommon development in sports, education and healthcare sectors of his nation, even to the benefit of other nations. He also expressed happiness that Fidel Castro lived to see improved ties with the United States, saying that he was a great friend to Africa, countries in the Global South and the Non-Aligned Movement. President Buhari said that Castro’s place in history is assured, given his sustained successful commitment and towering role in the liberation and anti-colonialism struggles in Africa. He said that his prayers and thoughts are with Castro’s family, friends and many admirers as they go through this period of national mourning “and exit of a truly admired selfless global leader.” [myad]
President Barack Obama of America has said that history will record and judge the enormous impact which Fidel Castro, who died at the age of 90, had on the world around him.
In a condolence message to Cuban people, the American President said: “history will record and judge the enormous impact of this singular figure on the people and world around him.” he said in a statement.
He gave assurance that the United States is extending a hand of friendship to the Cuban people, saying: “during my presidency, we have worked hard to put the past behind us, pursuing a future in which the relationship between our two countries is defined not by our differences but by the many things that we share as neighbors and friends.”
Obama said that the death of Castro was an emotional moment for Cubans and Cuban-Americans, offering condolences to Castro’s family.
“At this time of Fidel Castro’s passing, we extend a hand of friendship to the Cuban people.”
He said that administration had “worked hard to put the past behind us.”
The United States restored diplomatic ties with Cuba in July 2015 and re-opened its embassy in Havana a month later in a historic rapprochement, ending more than a half-century of Cold War enmity with the communist island. Obama made a landmark visit to Cuba in March.
Also, the American President-elect, Donald Trump assured that his administration would “do all it can” once it takes office on January 20 to help boost freedom and prosperity for Cuban people after the death of Fidel Castro.
Trump had threatened late in his upstart campaign for the White House that concerns about religious freedom in Cuba could prompt him to reverse President Barack Obama’s moves to open relations with the Cold War adversary after more than a half-century’s estrangement.
Republicans closely await what Trump – a billionaire businessman known for his unconventional approach to politics and policy – will do on Cuba once he takes office.
“Though the tragedies, deaths and pain caused by Fidel Castro cannot be erased, our administration will do all it can to ensure the Cuban people can finally begin their journey toward prosperity and liberty,” Trump said in a statement issued from his West Palm Beach, Florida, resort where he and his family are spending the Thanksgiving holiday weekend.”While Cuba remains a totalitarian island, it is my hope that today marks a move away from the horrors endured for too long, and toward a future in which the wonderful Cuban people finally live in the freedom they so richly deserve,” he added.
At a Miami rally in September, Trump said he would roll back Obama’s Cuban policy reforms unless Cuban leaders allowed religious freedom and freed political prisoners.
“The next president can reverse them, and that I will do unless the Castro regime meets our demands,” Trump told supporters.
A bloc of mostly Republican Cuban-American lawmakers has worked to keep tight restrictions on trade and travel with Cuba for years. Some Republican lawmakers broke with party orthodoxy to back Obama’s reforms, drawn by the economic benefits of restoring ties.
But many have chafed against the changes, saying Cuba’s government was still too repressive to ease restrictions.
Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who ran against Trump to be the Republican presidential candidate, said Castro turned Cuba into “an impoverished island prison” where dissidents were routinely jailed and killed.
“The dictator has died, but the dictatorship has not,” Rubio said in a statement. “The future of Cuba ultimately remains in the hands of the Cuban people, and now more than ever Congress and the new administration must stand with them against their brutal rulers and support their struggle for freedom and basic human rights.”
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a senior Republican House lawmaker from Florida who fled Cuba as a child, said on CNN that Castro’s death changes nothing.
“We lost our native homeland to communism,” Ros-Lehtinen said. “They just rule over Cuba with an iron fist.”
Senator Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said he hoped Raul Castro would “turn the page” on oppression. “Freedom and democracy are long overdue in Cuba,” he said in a statement. [myad]
My wife who just received her monthly salary, arrived from market yesterday raving, cursing, agitating and dejected over what she called unbelievable high cost of everything, especially food items. To be sure, she has been an ardent supporter of President Muhammadu Buhari, especially on his war against corruption. She was so transparent in her support for the President that her colleagues call her ‘baba pickin’ and she would proudly answer ‘yes o.’ But as the cost of items sky-rocketed in the market, she, like many others, became confused, so much that she was no longer saying ‘yes o’ with confident to those who make jest of her. “This Buhari change is causing us, the common people, a lot of havoc. One cannot buy anything again. Why should we suffer untold hardships in the name of fighting corruption?” She was virtually crying. Less than a week ago, a friend of mine at the periphery of media, Isah Momohjimoh, raised similar alarm and even went as far as saying that he was no longer in support of President Muhammadu Buhari. “It is high time the President toned down this war on corruption so that those who are hiding money in their houses and offices would bring it out. We are gradually dying.” Of course, on more than one occasion, President Buhari and some members of his team were honest enough to acknowledge that they were fully aware of the hardships which Nigerians, especially, the poor ones, are going through as a result of economic recession: the recession that was brought about by among others, ‘the corruption-fighting-back’ syndrome. The continued vandalisation of oil pipelines by the Niger Delta militants; the deliberate hoarding of the currencies, especially, the Dollars by the saboteurs hiding under the new Forex regime; the anti-corruption-war-judiciary and many other negative indices have combined to make the war on corruption as more of a curse than blessing for the common Nigerians. Yet, the war is originally targeted at making the future economic growth of the country bright. A picture was also painted of the smuggling of grains, amidst the bumper harvest this year, by unscrupulous and corruption-fighting-back Nigerians, across the nation’s borders to neighbouring countries. The smuggling, as another form of corruption-fighting-back, is meant to make non-sense of the Buhari’s new economic diversification drive, with emphasis on food production. Indeed, against such odds placed on the way towards cleansing the country of corruption, President Buhari has vowed to succeed. And the question has been that if Buhari succeeds in fighting corruption to a stand-still in his four years or eight years in office, as the case may be, what becomes of the war thereafter? I have heard it said in many quarters that powerful Nigerians who have lived all their lives and earn their living through corruption are only just bidding their time and are in hibernation for the next four or eight years and will surface as soon as Buhari finishes his tenure: that such Nigerians are hiding their loots, in billions, away from the banking system and will return to their old ways once Buhari is out of the scene in 2019 or 2023. People have insinuated that when corruption returns after the Buhari’s tenure, it will be devastating and all-embracing, so much that every other person will be involved. It is perhaps, because of the fear of such resurgence of corruption at any given time in the nation’s life that people of goodwill; people who are still blessed with God-fearing mien, are asking Buhari to look beyond his tenure to make the war against corruption an irreversible one, long after he is done with Nigeria. One of the suggestions is that he should liaise with the National Assembly (if the lawmakers would cooperate) to change the nation’s currency, especially, the N1, 000, N500 and N200 denominations a few months towards the end of his first tenure in 2019. Those who made this suggestion said that this is the only way the President will deal ruthlessly with the people that are hiding the money in various places, other than banks now. With the change of the currencies, such clever-by-half die-hard corrupt Nigerians will suddenly find out that the currencies they are hiding are useless. Another suggestion is that Buhari’s government should tighten security around the nation’s borders to forestall the smuggling of food items out of the country, by those who are bent on making a non-sense of the bumper harvest that God has endowed the country with this year. Of course, there is no doubt that President Buhari and members of his team are aware of all sort of traps that have been mounted on their path by the powerful Nigerians, with their enormous dirty financial resources, and are doing everything possible to overcome the antics of such corrupt Nigerians. Every suggestion must not be taken for granted. In this war against corruption, yes, the common people are suffering, even more than the targeted corrupt ones, but there is no other way the future, where the nation’s resources are equitably distributed and enjoyed amongst all the categories of the citizenry, can be assured than the fight now to streamline things. The saying that nothing good comes easy is relevant here, but how soon things will ease off, and how sustainable the war against corruption will be, remains to be seen. And in all that we say and do, it will be a national tragedy for the country, at any time, to return full swing into the world of corruption. [myad]
Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, today, Saturday, jetted out to Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to honour an invitation extended to President Muhammadu Buhari by the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, who is also the Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the UAE Armed Forces, His Highness, Sheik Mohammed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, as Special Guest at the Eight Race of the Grand Prize of Union Airways for Formula 1. The event considered as the biggest international sporting event in the Middle East, will attract wide global attention, and the presence of several heads of states and governments from across the world. It holds this weekend. Vice President Osinbajo is expected to seize the opportunity of his being in Abu Dhabi to seek to build closer relationship and economic ties with that country. A statement by the senior special assistant to the Vice President on media and publicity, Laolu Akande, recalled that President Buhari held bilateral discussions with the Crown Prince during his visit to UAE earlier this year, securing a number of agreements and offers of assistance from the Emirate, including helping in the North East with the re-establishment of livelihood for IDPs. “While in Abu Dhabi, Vice President Osinbajo will hold follow-up bilateral discussions on this offer, and other issues of mutual economic and diplomatic concerns. The statement said that Osinbajo is being accompanied on the weekend trip by his wife Mrs. Dolapo Osinbajo and the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Mrs. Khadija Bukar A. Ibrahim. They are expected back tomorrow, Sunday. [myad]
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.