African philanthropist and business leader, Chief Tony Elumelu, has advocated a bold rethinking of Africa’s relationship with the world, in which there would be a shift from charity-driven models to one centered on investment, entrepreneurship and equal partnership Chief Elumelu who spoke at a high-level Africa-Europe summit focused on economic cooperation and sustainable development, insisted: “Africa needs partners, not charity. Our future will not be built by aid, but by investment, partnership and entrepreneurship.” He stressed that Africans must take the lead in driving their continent’s development, while global partners play supportive and collaborative roles. “The time has come to redefine the relationship between Africa and the world — one based on dignity, respect and shared prosperity.” Chief Elumelu, who is the chairman of the United Bank for Africa (UBA), said that Africa’s youthful population, abundant natural resources and growing innovation ecosystem offer immense opportunities for investors seeking sustainable and mutually beneficial growth. He emphasized the need to empowe small and medium-sized enterprises and young innovators as key to unlocking the continent’s economic potential and achieve inclusive development. Chief Elumelu, who has consistently championed entrepreneurship as the engine of Africa’s transformation. The summit brought together policymakers, investors and business leaders from across Africa and Europe to explore ways to deepen trade relations, promote sustainable growth and attract long-term investments.
The family of the late Bilyaminu Ahmed Bello, who was murdered by his wife, Maryam Sanda, in 2017, has expressed deep pain and disappointment over the Presidential pardon recently granted to Maryam Sanda by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu under the Prerogative of Mercy. In a statement signed by Dr. Bello Haliru Mohammed, OFR (Dangaladiman Gwandu), on behalf of the family, the late Bilyaminu’s relatives described the decision as a cruel blow that has reopened old wounds and erased the justice that was painstakingly secured through years of legal battle. The family said that they had chosen silence and dignity since the tragic incident that occurred on Sunday, November 19, 2017, trusting Nigeria’s judicial system to deliver justice. They said that their faith was rewarded when the FCT High Court convicted and sentenced Maryam Sanda to death on January 27, 2020, a judgment that was upheld by both the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court in 2020 and 2023, respectively. “Satisfied that justice had finally been served, the judgment provided some closure of sorts in the circumstance, if ever there could be one,” the statement read. The family said that though Maryam Sanda did not show remorse throughout the saga, but that they took solace in the court verdicts and moved on, “having painfully come to terms with the fate that life had thrust upon one of our own.” The family regretted that the Presidential pardon, which was among 175 granted to convicted persons, including some on death row had shattered their healing process and rendered the justice system hollow.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has made Nigerians to know that his son, Olewaseyi had, from early days of his life, shown the determination and a desire to create and lead. In a birthday message to Seyi, who turned 40 today, October 13, President Tinubu acknowledged that Seyi had walked his path with focus, courage and humility, and that he had done so with a heart that sought to build, serve and uplift others. The content of President Tinubu’s birthday message to Seyi goes thus: Today, as you turn forty, I thank Almighty God for your life and the man you have become. You have walked your path with focus, courage, and humility, and you have done so with a heart that seeks to build, serve, and uplift others. From an early age, you have shown determination and a desire to create and lead. I have watched you turn ideas into institutions and challenges into opportunities. In business and in service, you have shown that true success is not measured by wealth or power but by the impact we make and the lives we touch. Forty is a special age. It bridges youthful drive and the more profound wisdom that life brings. You have carried your name with honour and have remained faithful to the values of discipline, integrity, and hard work. Our entire family is proud of you. We are proud of the family you are building with Layal, your devotion as a husband and father, and your commitment to making a difference in your generation. As you celebrate this milestone, remember that your strength lies in what you achieve and how you inspire others to believe in themselves. May God bless you with wisdom, good health, and peace.Buy vitamins and supplements Happy 40th Birthday, my son. You have made us proud, and I know you will continue to make Nigeria proud. Your Dad, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR President and Commander-in-Chief of the Federal Republic of Nigeria Aso Villa, Abuja.
The Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, has cautioned the newly elected President of the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP) Danlami Nmodu, his executives and members to tighten control on what he called “atrocious fake news peddlers.” In a congratulatory message to the new executive who were elected last week Thursday at the Annual General Congress of GOCOP in Lagos, the minister advised the leadership to prioritize the unity of the Guild through a harmonious corporate relationship that will stand the test of time. He emphasized the need for the Guild to remain vigilant in the face of the “atrocious effects of fake news, misinformation and disinformation threatening the credibility of the journalism profession. “As I congratulate Danlami Nmodu, it pleases me to urge him to run an inclusive leadership that guarantees the participation of all GOCOP members in sustaining the collective aspirations of the Guild. “Mr Nmodu, publisher of Newsdiary Online, with whom I have had a personal and professional relationship for many years, is a thorough journalist who has proved his mettle in journalism, and is deserving of such commanding heights.” Mohammed Idris advised the new GOCOP leadership to collaborate with the Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation, as it champions media and information literacy across the country. “I am trusting Mr Nmodu, who has built a distinguished career in journalism molded in integrity, accountability, courage and resilience, also to bring the same to bear in collaborating with the government to uphold the values of media fidelity and literacy, especially in the fluid digital media space.” The Minister praised the immediate past President of the GOCOP, Dr. Maureen Chigbo, publisher of RealNews Online, identifying her efforts in “providing vibrant leadership to a galaxy of more than 100 online publishers and bequeathing a legacy of honour, dignity, credibility and remarkable growth of the Guild.”
Governor of the Central Bank, Olayemi Cardoso, has been picked to replace the nation’s Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, who is currently indisposed. Cardoso is therefore leading Nigeria’s delegation to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund Annual Meeting in Washington DC, which opens tomorrow, October 13. A statement today, October 12, from the presidency, issued by the presidential spokesperson, Bayo Onanuga, said that the Nigerian team would be made up of the Minister of State for Finance, Doris Uzoka-Anete. The key elements of the Annual Meetings of the world Bank include the Development Committee Plenary session on October 16 and the International Monetary and Financial Committee meetings on October 17. Other featured events include regional briefings, press conferences and fora focused on international development, the global economy and financial markets.
Nigerians were taken by surprise on Thursday, October 9, 2025, when President Bola Ahmed Tinubu announced the pardon granted 175 Nigerians, all convicted by the third tier of the government – the Judiciary (in a democratic setting). Out of the total number, 82 were granted full pardon, 65 had their sentences reduced while seven death-row inmates had their death sentences commuted to life imprisonment. There were also 15 ex-convicts, 11 of them deceased, including the Ogoni Nine, who received full pardon. Prominent among the convicts were the former member of the Federal House of Representatives, 62 year old Farouk Lawan, who was sentenced to five years in 2021 for Corrupt Practices and had served the sentence; 37 year Maryam Sanda, who was sentenced to death in 2020 for culpable homicide and had spent six years, eight months at Suleja Medium Security Custodial Centre. President Tinubu made it known that the reason for her pardon was that her family pleaded, and that it was in the best interest of her two children. “The plea was also anchored on her good conduct in jail, her remorse, and her embracement of a new lifestyle, demonstrating her commitment to being a model prisoner.” Also notable are 44 year old Nweke Francis Chibueze, who was serving a life sentence at Kirikiri for cocaine; 67 year old Dr. Nwogu Peters, who was Serving a 17-year jail term for fraud; 63 year old Mrs. Anastasia Daniel Nwaoba, who had already served her sentence for fraud as well as 58 year old Barrister Hussaini Alhaji Umar, who was Sentenced in 2023 to pay a fine of N150 million in the ICPC case, as well as 63 year old Ayinla Saadu Alanamu, who was sentenced to seven years for bribery in 2019 and has served the sentence. The presidential pardon, by the provisions of the Nigerian constitution 1999 (as amended) cannot be contested, for, it provides the legal foundation for presidential pardon, including for criminals and convicted politicians. This power is rooted in the “Prerogative of Mercy” vested in the President. Section 175 of the said Constitution grants the President the power of prerogative of mercy, which reads: The President may: (a) grant any person concerned with or convicted of any offence created by an Act of the National Assembly a pardon, either free or subject to lawful conditions; (b) grant a reprieve, that is, a temporary suspension of the execution of any punishment imposed; (c) substitute a less severe form of punishment for any punishment imposed; or (d) remit the whole or any part of any punishment imposed or of any penalty or forfeiture otherwise due to the Government of the Federation. As a matter of fact, the powers conferred on the President under subsection 1 are expected to be exercised after consultation with the Council of State. Still, the provision says that the President’s powers could be exercised in respect of: (a) persons concerned with offences tried by any court or tribunal constituted by federal law; and (b) persons convicted of any offence against the law of any State, but only after consultation with the Governor of that State. The constitution provides the scope of the Presidential Pardon to include pardoning any person convicted of a federal offence, e.g, corruption, economic crimes, drug offences, etc. Any person convicted under state law can be so pardoned provided the President consults the Governor of the state. Such persons include Politicians, military officers, or public servants convicted of offences, such as corruption or abuse of office. The civil rights of individuals so pardoned, including the right to vote, hold public office, or travel freely are restored. The conviction is forgiven, but not erased from record unless expunged by court order. In other words, a pardon does not mean innocence; it merely forgives the offence and cancels the legal consequences. While we in Greenbarge Reporters online newspaper are not arguing on the constitutional powers of the President to pardon, in consultation with members of the Council of State (made up of, among others, past Presidents and Heads of Government, present and past Chief Judges of the Nigerian, etc), we are however, appalled, like many Nigerians, by the obvious disregard for morality, integrity and sanity in the Tinubu’s arranged presidential pardon. It is curious that a woman who was convicted of murder and sentenced to death since 2020 (five years now) lived up to October 8, 2025 to enjoy the presidential pardon. This is true also of others who are serving various criminal jail terms, having been convicted by competent Court of justice, and were eventually released into what is supposed to be a sane society, in the name of clemency by the President. After pardoning Maryam Sanda, for example, is the president going to bring back to life, the husband she killed? Are the victims of others who are so pardoned going to be compensated? It is clear that while the families of those that were pardoned would be jubilating, the families of their victims would reel in fresh pain: they would feel cheated, to the point of feeling the reality of injustice in its naked form. To think that Farouk Lawal and others who were serving or have served jail terms over offences against the state and humanity are now free like birds in the air to vie for the governorship, and even presidential election in Nigeria makes the whole thing to look laughable and unimaginable. Presidential pardon to convicted politicians, some of who have already served out their jail terms clearly undermine anti-corruption efforts which the same government claims to be fighting. There is no running away from the fact that the latest pardons were politically motivated as the country heads to the 2027 general elections, and Presidential election in particular. An observer, perhaps in anger, vented out an opinion that soon, President Tinubu would come up with the idea of pardoning all the prisoners in the country, even including Nnamdi Kanu in his desperate bid to outdo all opponents in the 2027 election. With the way things are going, this point may not be far from the truth. Indeed, the presidential pardons are becoming so suspicious, to the point of undermining the rule of law, and conversely, giving criminals in and outside government, the hope and confidence that come what may, they would always come out of the temporary judicial convictions (for corruption and criminalities) victorious. As a matter of fact, the concept of Presidential pardon, especially with regard to the one President Tinubu had just pronounced, would go deeper to weaken public trust in the judicial process and anti-corruption campaigns, at best, and at worse, obliterate it (Public trust) completely. The public sanity is bound to suffer erosion!!!
In his recent column titled: “New INEC Boss and Tinubu’s Visibilization of Northern Yorubas,” Professor Farooq Kperogi tried to frame President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s appointment of Professor Joash Amupitan, SAN, as the new INEC Chairman within the usual ethnic politics narrative. While his piece may sound intellectual, it misses the simple truth about the philosophy behind President Tinubu’s leadership choices. They are guided by character, competence, and experience. From his early days in Lagos to his role today as President of Nigeria, Tinubu has remained consistent on one thing: Leadership must be oremised on capacity and results, not ethnic arithmetic. Back in Lagos, his team reflected the full map of Nigeria – people from different regions, faiths, and backgrounds – many of whom later became national and state leaders in various capacities. That same instinct for spotting talent, not tribe, still defines his appointments today. Professor Joash Amupitan, SAN, is far from a political lightweight. He is a seasoned academic, a respected legal scholar, and a man whose reputation for integrity and neutrality stands tall. Reducing his appointment to an ethnic or regional sentiment just because he hails from Kogi State and bears a Yoruba name is not only unfair, it is a disservice to national growth and development. It is an embarrassment to both the man and the President who appointed him. Our unrepentant disposition towards viewing every national appointment through ethno-religious jaundiced-eye has become a heavy burden on our unity and development as a nation. If a Northerner with a Yoruba name cannot be trusted to serve without suspicion, then the problem is not leadership, it is our unwillingness to rise above old divisions. President Tinubu’s pattern of appointments so far tells its own manifest story of competence over convenience, character over closeness, and delivery over demography. From the North East to the South South, from Christians to Muslims, from career technocrats to grassroots administrators, the spread has been balanced, well-thought. It is a deliberate for advancement over pettiness and myopism. And the goal is clear: results not rewards. Bearing in mind that our first and only constitutional identity is Nigerian, ethnicity – a product of accident of birth – may describe where we come from, but it should never define who we are or what we can achieve. The real test of leadership is not the language you speak but the values you live by. In appointing Professor Amupitan, the President once again reminds us that excellence has no region and integrity has no dialect. Those still trapped in ethnic thinking are the ones slowing down the unity we need. Nigeria’s strength has always been in its diversity, in the ability of a leader from Lagos to trust a scholar from Kogi, or a professional from Sokoto to work seamlessly with a counterpart from Enugu. That is the true spirit of the Renewed Hope Agenda; building a Nigeria where merit, not mistrust, defines progress. As we move forward, we must keep rejecting divisive narratives and instead amplify the dream of one united Nigeria, the same dream our founding fathers lived and died for. “Though tribe and tongue may differ, in brotherhood we stand.” Only then can we truly say that the promise of our great nation, under God and guided by justice, is finally taking shape in our time.
In the unfolding story of Nigeria’s democracy, the Senate remains one of its most enduring symbols of institutional resilience and national balance. Beyond the spectacle of debates and the colour of political persuasion, it is the grand arena where the destiny of the nation is shaped, refined, and defended through rules, order, and reason. It is the one chamber where passion must bow to procedure and where leadership must blend authority with decorum. Under the current stewardship of Senator Godswill Akpabio,GCON the Nigerian Senate has again shown that discipline is not the enemy of democracy but its lifeblood. In a political climate often prone to impulsive rhetoric and theatrical defiance, the Senate’s commitment to its Standing Orders has reaffirmed the solemn truth that democracy thrives only when its institutions are respected and its rules upheld. At a time when political tempers can easily flare and institutional boundaries are tested, the Senate has chosen the steadier path of order. Its resilience is not borne out of the absence of conflict but from the maturity to resolve such tensions through due process. It is this adherence to procedure that transforms the Senate from a mere congregation of political actors into a citadel of constitutional governance. The Tenth National Assembly has therefore become more than a legislature; it has risen to become the custodian of Nigeria’s democratic rhythm, ensuring that the music of governance remains in tune even when discordant notes arise. ● The Architecture of Order Every functioning democracy stands or falls by the strength of its institutions. Rules are the unseen architecture that hold those institutions together, shaping not only how decisions are made but also how power is exercised and limited. The Nigerian Senate’s Standing Orders are not ceremonial relics from the past. They are the living constitution of the institution, carefully designed to preserve fairness, consistency, and the sanctity of the legislative process. The discipline of parliamentary conduct is a universal marker of political civilisation. In the United Kingdom’s House of Commons, the authority of the Speaker is absolute and unchallenged, ensuring that debates proceed with respect and precision. No member, regardless of party or popularity, may openly defy the Speaker’s ruling without consequences. In Canada’s Parliament, even the fiercest partisans understand that procedure is sacred. Heated disagreements are channelled through decorum, not chaos. Similarly, in Australia, the Senate’s ability to hold the executive accountable depends not on the whims of politics but on the meticulous enforcement of rules that keep legislative integrity intact. Without a doubt, Nigeria’s Senate belongs in that global fellowship of parliaments that recognise chaos as the heart of anarchy and order as the soul of democracy. Its insistence on upholding internal discipline and protecting the authority of its leadership is, therefore, neither personal nor punitive. It is institutional self-preservation. When the chamber asserts that it will not be held hostage by the disruptive instincts of any single member, it is affirming the primacy of collective responsibility over individual grandstanding. This is how strong legislatures endure: not by silencing dissent, but by ensuring that dissent respects the bounds of procedure. In many ways, the Akpabio-led Senate has re-introduced a tone of seriousness into the conduct of legislative affairs. The presiding officer’s calm firmness, coupled with his inclusivity, has reminded both senators and citizens that freedom within order is the truest form of democracy. Leadership of this sort does not seek applause; it seeks stability. By upholding its Standing Orders, the Senate has reclaimed its moral authority and demonstrated that rules, properly enforced, are not instruments of oppression but shields against institutional decay. ● A Record of Uncommon Legislative Action To judge a legislature by its distractions is easy, but to measure it by its legislative work is wiser. By that measure, the Tenth Senate has already left an imprint that few in Nigeria’s democratic history can rival. In barely two years, the Senate has processed over 90 bills, with more than 50 receiving presidential assent. To be clear, these are solid, impactful achievements; they are substantive interventions in the nation’s economic, social, and security architecture. Among them are landmark reforms such as the Nigeria Tax Administration Act and the Joint Revenue Board Act, which harmonise tax collection across the federal, state, and local governments, thereby reducing duplication and boosting fiscal efficiency. These laws lay the groundwork for a more coherent revenue system that can fund Nigeria’s development priorities sustainably. The Electricity Act (Amendment) has opened the power sector to decentralised innovation by placing generation and distribution within concurrent legislative jurisdiction, allowing states to take greater ownership of electrification drives. Equally significant is the Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) Act, which has established the Nigerian Education Loan Fund, a mechanism designed to democratise access to tertiary education and build the nation’s human capital. Through this law, thousands of young Nigerians from modest backgrounds can now dream beyond financial constraints. In matters of national security, the Senate has enacted the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons Act and reformed the Defence Industries Corporation to modernise local arms production and improve oversight. It has strengthened the Police Act and advanced the legal framework for community policing, ensuring that law enforcement is both professional and accountable. Social welfare has not been neglected either. The Senate’s approval of an increased national minimum wage reflects its sensitivity to the economic pressures faced by ordinary citizens. Beyond these legislative milestones, the Senate has exercised its oversight powers with renewed vigour. Ministerial nominees have faced rigorous scrutiny, and budgetary processes have been more transparent than in previous sessions. Committee reports are now subjected to fuller debate, while public hearings are reclaiming their role as forums of accountability rather than ceremonial formality. This spirit of constructive collaboration with the executive, balanced by a firm assertion of institutional independence, has restored public confidence in the Senate’s purpose and performance. Senator Akpabio’s leadership style has been pivotal in this transformation. Combining political experience with procedural discipline, he has stabilised the chamber and inspired cooperation across party lines. The result is a Senate that legislates with urgency but without recklessness, that debates with passion but within the boundaries of respect. It is a model of legislative management that other emerging democracies might do well to emulate. ● Discipline as Democracy’s Anchor In any democracy, the question is never whether there will be dissent. Instead, it is always about how it will be handled. The real measure of a democratic institution is how it handles internal turbulence. The Tenth Senate has faced its fair share of provocations and personality clashes, yet it has consistently chosen the path of principle over populism. When it insists that rules must be followed and that leadership must be respected, it is not acting out of pride but out of duty. Every time the Senate enforces its Standing Orders, it sends a message that Nigeria’s democracy is strong enough to discipline itself. In the world’s most respected parliaments, members who flout rules face swift consequences. In the British House of Commons, suspension or expulsion is not rare when a member’s behaviour undermines parliamentary dignity. In Canada, contempt of Parliament remains one of the gravest offences, warranting public apology or even exclusion. Nigeria’s Senate has every right to apply similar standards, for to allow disorder in the name of political freedom is to invite the slow death of the institution itself. There is a reason democracies that survive for centuries place such premium on decorum. Discipline is the invisible thread that connects authority to accountability. A Senator who disregards procedure may think he is exercising personal liberty, but in truth, he is unravelling the very order that gives that liberty meaning. The Senate, as the upper chamber of Nigeria’s legislature, bears the burden of showing restraint even when provoked and firmness even when misunderstood. Under Akpabio’s guidance, that balance has largely been achieved. His steady hand has preserved the Senate’s institutional dignity while ensuring that disagreements, inevitable in a plural polity, never degenerate into institutional disrespect. His colleagues, through their support, have shown that the Senate’s unity is not fragile but founded on shared commitment to the republic’s greater good. This collective resilience is what distinguishes a mature legislature from a mere gathering of political actors. As democracy worldwide faces disillusionment, with parliaments in many countries besieged by populist anger and public cynicism, Nigeria’s Senate stands out as a stabilising force. Its insistence on rule-based conduct, its robust legislative output, and its respect for leadership all reinforce the idea that democratic governance is not sustained by emotion but by discipline. In times of uncertainty, Nigerians can look to their Senate as a beacon of institutional steadiness, where procedure triumphs over impulse and order over anarchy. ● A Legacy of Institutional Maturity Every democratic generation must reaffirm its faith in its institutions. For Nigeria, the Senate remains one of the surest proofs that despite imperfections, the system endures. It is the forum where politics matures into policy and ambition yields to service. Its current trajectory under Akpabio’s stewardship shows that a disciplined legislature can coexist with vibrant debate, and that leadership tempered by wisdom can guide even the most divided chamber towards a common purpose. The trials of the Senate are many: public scepticism, partisan rivalry, and the ever-present temptation of populist showmanship. Yet its triumphs are greater still. By choosing law over noise, the Senate has shown that Nigeria’s democracy can heal itself from within. Each bill passed, each order enforced, and each moment of collective restraint strengthens not just the chamber but the republic it represents. The true triumph of the Senate lies in its rediscovery of itself as a body governed by rules, led by example, and anchored in service to the nation. In doing so, it has become a model for the continent and a reassurance to Nigerians that the spirit of democracy, though tested, remains alive and well. As the nation moves through uncertain times, the Senate’s resilience will remain a cornerstone of Nigeria’s democratic stability. Its fidelity to order and leadership not only safeguards the present but also lights the path for future generations. For, in the end, it is not the noise of politics that defines a nation’s greatness but the calm persistence of its institutions. In that regard, the Nigerian Senate stands triumphant, disciplined, dignified, and resolutely democratic in all terms.
•Rt. Hon. Eseme Eyiboh mnipr is the Special Adviser on Media/Publicity and official Spokesperson to the President of the Senate.
No fewer than 1,000 practicing lawyers, under the auspices Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners (ALDRAP), have written a letter to the Senate asking it not to confirm Professor Joash Amupitan as next chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). The Council of State, chaired by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, nominated Professor Joash Amupitan for the INEC job at its meeting yesterday, October 9. His name is to be submitted to the Senate for confirmation, in accordance with the constitutional provision. The group’s letter is titled “Disqualification of Prof. Joash Amupitan from Confirmation as Chairman of the Independent Nigerian Electoral Commission (INEC) on the ground of likelihood of bias, impartiality and conflict of interests (in violation of section 5 of the Code of Conduct Bureau Act, 1991 and section 19 of the Independent Corrupt Practices and related offences Act (2003) considering his previous engagement as lead Counsel for the All Progressives Congress (APC) during the 2023 Presidential Election petition at the Supreme Court.” In the letter addressed to the Senate President through the Senate Committee on Electoral Matters, the group of lawyers warned that in the event that the Senate confirms Prof Joash Amupitan, the Association -ALDRAP, will have no option other than to institute a lawsuit to compel the Senate to comply with the requirements of impartiality in the confirmation of a chairman of INEC. The letter, signed by the ALDRAP’s Administrative Secretary, Jesse Williams Amuga, stressed that the goal of the group is to promote professionalism in the enactment of the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. “By way of introduction, Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners-ALDRAP is a professional Association of over 1,000 Lawyers who are both staff and consultants of the National Assembly and other legislatures within and outside Nigeria.” Copy of the letter is reproduced hereunder:
10th October 2025. President of the Senate, National Assembly THROUGH: Senate Committee on Electoral Matters, Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, National Assembly, Abuja, Federal Capital Territory (FCT). ATTENTION: Distinguished Senator Rt. Hon. Simon Lalong, Chairman, Senate Committee on Electoral Matters. Dear Senate Committee on Electoral Matters, Sirs and Madams, DISQUALIFICATION OF PROF. JOASH AMUPITAN FROM CONFIRMATION AS CHAIRMAN OF THE INDEPENDENT NIGERIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION (INEC) ON THE GROUNDS OF LIKELIHOOD OF BIAS, IMPARTIALITY AND CONFLICT OF INTERESTS (IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT BUREAU AND TRIBUNAL ACT, 1991 AND SECTION 19 OF THE INDEPENDENT CORRUPT PRACTICES AND RELATED OFFENCES ACT, 2003) CONSIDERING HIS PREVIOUS ENGAGEMENT AS LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE ALL PROGRESSIVES CONGRESS (APC) DURING THE 2023 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION AT THE SUPREME COURT. By way of introduction, Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners-ALDRAP is a professional Association of over 1,000 Lawyers who are both staff and consultants of the National Assembly and other legislatures within and outside Nigeria. Our paramount goal is to promote professionalism in the enactment of the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Our methods include public legal education programmes, and public interest litigation. The ultimate objective is to ensure that both officials and institutions of government comply with the provisions of both the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 and other legislation. In September 2017 we received formal accreditation as a provider of continuing legal education programmes for the over 200,000 Nigerian lawyers, said accreditation was issued by the Nigerian Bar Association-NBA’s Institute of Continuing Legal Education. We write to notify the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that any letter from the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria seeking confirmation of Professor JOASH AMUPITAN as the Chairman of INEC, ought to be responded to with immediate effect stating that said Prof. JOASH AMUPITAN does not meet the qualifications in the first instance. The letter of response to the said letter of nomination should be dispatched with immediate effect without taking the next step of referring the said letter to your respected Committee on Electoral Matters. The reason is because Prof. JOASH AMUPITAN as a former Legal Counsel to the All Progressives Congress-APC at the 2023 Presidential Electoral Petition at the Supreme Court of Nigeria is automatically disqualified from holding the position of Chairman of INEC. The reasons are as listed below: 1. Previous Precedent of Senate’s disqualification of INEC Nominees such as Lauretta Onochie in the year 2021 due to their affiliation to the All Progressives Congress-APC to be disqualified from confirmation by your respected Committee. This is reported online at: https://placng.org/Legist/finally-senate-rejects-onochie/ 2. Professor Joash Amiputan’s confirmation would be a violation of Section 5 of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act, 1991, which states as follows: “A public officer shall not put himself in a position where his personal interest conflicts with his duties and responsibilities.” Having previously served as a lead legal counsel to the APC, Prof. Joash Amiputan cannot perform the duties of Chairman of INEC which is a position that requires utmost impartiality as the chief electoral umpire, when called upon to arbitrate or oversee conduct of elections between the APC and other political parties, his sympathies would likely be towards the APC; 3. Confirm of Prof. Joash Amiputan would be evidence that he is using his previous position as lead Legal Counsel to the APC to benefit himself and confer advantage upon himself. This is a violation of Section 19 of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Related Offences Commission Act, 2003; and 4. There are over 200,000 lawyers in Nigeria, if the President and the National Council of State has made the decision that the next Chairman of INEC ought to be selected from the legal profession, then there are not less than 100,000 Nigerian lawyers who are not registered members of any political party or previous acted as legal counsel to any political parties in Nigeria. His Excellency President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria can select from this category of lawyers to avoid the appearance of bias. TAKE NOTICE THAT IN THE EVENT THAT THE SENATE OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA GOES AGEAD TO UNDERTAKE CONFIRMATION OF THE SAID PROF. JOASH AMUPITAN, OUR ASSOCIATION-ALDRAP SHALL BE LEFT WITH NO OTHER OPTION THAN TO INSTITUTE A LAWSUIT TO COMPEL THE SENATE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF IMPARTIALITY IN THE CONFIRMATION OF A CHAIRMAN OF INEC. We thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Yours faithfully, Jesse Williams Amuga, Administrative Secretary, ALDRAP. cc: 1. President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria; 2. Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Abuja, FCT; 3. Director-General, Department of State Security Services (DSS), Headquarters, Abuja, FCT; 4. Inspector-General of Police, Louis Edet House, Abuja, FCT; 5. Ambassador of the European Union to the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Abuja, FCT; 6. Ambassador of the United States of America (USA), Abuja, FCT; and 7. High Commissioner of the United Kingdom in Nigeria
The Osun State Governor, Senator Ademola Jackson Nurudeen Adeleke, has congratulated the newly elected members of the National Executive Council (NEC) of the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP), led by the publisher of Newsdiary online, Danlami Nmodu, mni. Also elected at the Guild’s Annual General Congress in Lagos yesterday, October 9, were Sufuyan Ojeifo as General Secretary; Kemi Yesufu as Publicity Secretary; Olumide Iyanda as Deputy President; Akeem Oyetunji as Deputy General Secretary; Ngozi Onyeakusi as Treasurer and Moses Ebosele as Financial Secretary. In the message by his spokesperson, Alhaji Olawale Rasheed, Governor Adeleke described the emergence of the new helmsmen and women as a testament to professionalism, integrity and the growing strength of the Nigerian online media space. According to him, the new leadership team brings a wealth of experience and vision to the Guild. “I warmly congratulate the newly elected leaders of GOCOP, particularly Mr. Danlami Nmodu as President, Mr. Sufuyan Ojeifo as Secretary-General, and Ms. Kemi Yesufu as Publicity Secretary. Their victory is well-deserved and a reflection of the confidence their colleagues have in their capacity to lead with transparency, fairness, and dedication.” The Governor commended the Guild for conducting a peaceful and credible election, emphasizing that such internal democracy strengthens institutions and reinforces public confidence in the media. He advised the new leadership to remain steadfast in upholding journalistic ethics, promoting fact-based reporting, and combating the spread of misinformation and fake news which threaten social harmony and national development. “The media remains a vital pillar of democracy. As a government that values openness and accountability, we count on GOCOP to continue setting standards for responsible journalism in the digital age.” Governor Adeleke encouraged the new executive to build on the achievements of the predecessors and to continue to foster unity, professionalism and innovation within the online publishing community. The Governor wished the new GOCOP leadership a successful and impactful tenure that would further strengthen the role of the media as a partner in nation-building. This was even as a group, Northern Nigeria Minorities Group (NNMG) congratulated particularly Danlami Nmodu, Sufuyan Ojeifo and Kemi Yesufu on their emergence as President, Secretary-General, and Publicity Secretary respectively, at thr just-concluded election. The group also felicitated with other officers elected to serve in various capacities within the Guild. The group, convened by the former chairman of the Nigerian Union of Journalists, Federal Capital Territory (FCT) chapter, Jacob Edi, said that the emergence of the new NEC is a strong affirmation of the trust and confidence reposed in their integrity, competence and commitment to the advancement of ethical journalism in Nigeria. The group said that the election of these distinguished professionals is a reflection of their long-standing dedication to the growth and credibility of the online media space. “Their track records of fairness, depth, and responsibility stand as enduring examples of what journalism should represent in a rapidly evolving digital era. “In the same vein, the NNMG urges the new GOCOP leadership to intensify efforts to rid the profession of fakes and quacks whose activities continue to undermine public trust in journalism.” The group asked GOCOP to set clear standards and enforce guidelines for the establishment and operation of online news platforms in order to ensure professionalism, accountability, credibility and sustainability in the fast-growing digital media environment. The NNMG advised the new leadership to continue to uphold the highest ideals of integrity, objectivity and national responsibility as well as encouraging members to produce content that not only informs and educates, but also promotes national unity and mutual understanding across Nigeria’s diverse communities. “Once again, the NNMG warmly congratulates the new GOCOP leadership and wishes them a successful tenure, defined by innovation, inclusivity and excellence in service to the journalism profession and to the nation.”
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Appointments By President Tinubu Have No Ethnic Colouration, By Edward David Onoja
In his recent column titled: “New INEC Boss and Tinubu’s Visibilization of Northern Yorubas,” Professor Farooq Kperogi tried to frame President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s appointment of Professor Joash Amupitan, SAN, as the new INEC Chairman within the usual ethnic politics narrative. While his piece may sound intellectual, it misses the simple truth about the philosophy behind President Tinubu’s leadership choices. They are guided by character, competence, and experience.
From his early days in Lagos to his role today as President of Nigeria, Tinubu has remained consistent on one thing: Leadership must be oremised on capacity and results, not ethnic arithmetic.
Back in Lagos, his team reflected the full map of Nigeria – people from different regions, faiths, and backgrounds – many of whom later became national and state leaders in various capacities. That same instinct for spotting talent, not tribe, still defines his appointments today.
Professor Joash Amupitan, SAN, is far from a political lightweight. He is a seasoned academic, a respected legal scholar, and a man whose reputation for integrity and neutrality stands tall. Reducing his appointment to an ethnic or regional sentiment just because he hails from Kogi State and bears a Yoruba name is not only unfair, it is a disservice to national growth and development. It is an embarrassment to both the man and the President who appointed him.
Our unrepentant disposition towards viewing every national appointment through ethno-religious jaundiced-eye has become a heavy burden on our unity and development as a nation. If a Northerner with a Yoruba name cannot be trusted to serve without suspicion, then the problem is not leadership, it is our unwillingness to rise above old divisions.
President Tinubu’s pattern of appointments so far tells its own manifest story of competence over convenience, character over closeness, and delivery over demography.
From the North East to the South South, from Christians to Muslims, from career technocrats to grassroots administrators, the spread has been balanced, well-thought. It is a deliberate for advancement over pettiness and myopism. And the goal is clear: results not rewards.
Bearing in mind that our first and only constitutional identity is Nigerian, ethnicity – a product of accident of birth – may describe where we come from, but it should never define who we are or what we can achieve.
The real test of leadership is not the language you speak but the values you live by. In appointing Professor Amupitan, the President once again reminds us that excellence has no region and integrity has no dialect.
Those still trapped in ethnic thinking are the ones slowing down the unity we need. Nigeria’s strength has always been in its diversity, in the ability of a leader from Lagos to trust a scholar from Kogi, or a professional from Sokoto to work seamlessly with a counterpart from Enugu.
That is the true spirit of the Renewed Hope Agenda; building a Nigeria where merit, not mistrust, defines progress.
As we move forward, we must keep rejecting divisive narratives and instead amplify the dream of one united Nigeria, the same dream our founding fathers lived and died for.
“Though tribe and tongue may differ, in brotherhood we stand.”
Only then can we truly say that the promise of our great nation, under God and guided by justice, is finally taking shape in our time.