Pray, Nigeria Is Boxed Into A Corner, By Yusuf Ozi-Usman

For the first time, perhaps since the Independence in 1960, Nigeria has never been so boxed into a corner like what is now happening. The country, as it is today, qualifies for the status of pariah state, at least within the diplomatic context.
It is obviously strage that for more than two years, the country has no representatives in its 109 foreign missions across the world.
As a matter of fact, by this singlar act of omission and or commission, Nigeria has been opened to high level of rumours and mischief information flying around, from those that have access to information tools, and those who have access to people that matter in any country. This is what is happening in the current looming diplomatic row between Nigeria and the United States.
There’s no justifiable reason for the country to isolate itself, in one way or the other, from the world scene. In fact, it is the worse political, diplomatic, social and economic miscalculation that have ever been made.
For real, absence or inactivity of Nigeria’s foreign missions like embassies, high commissions and consulates for an extended period of over two years now, has had significant diplomatic, economic and social implications on the country.
Indeed, without active embassies, Nigeria’s voice in global affairs has diminished. It has become harder to influence regional and international decisions affecting the country, especially in trade deals, security cooperation and migration issues.
Countries usually engage through embassies and without them, communication becomes less effective and often slower. This strains relationships with allies and trading partners.
Embassies play a major role in attracting investors by promoting Nigeria’s business environment. Their absence discourages investment due to lack of official contact points.
Many economic cooperation agreements in energy, agriculture, infrastructure, etc are initiated through embassies. Nigeria is likely missing such opportunities, even as citizens abroad who depend on embassies for passports, visas, notarial services and legal aid appear to face hardship renewing documents or seeking protection in emergencies.
In times of crisis like conflict, natural disaster or deportation, embassies coordinate evacuations and welfare support, but without them, Nigerians become more vulnerable.
The absence of embassies makes Nigerians abroad feel neglected by their government, eroding trust and national pride.
Diplomatic missions share intelligence and coordinate counterterrorism or anti-crime efforts. Their absence limits Nigeria’s situational awareness and collaboration.
It is instructive to note that the new opposition political party, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) had raised its voice over the present lack of Nigeria’s foreign missions abroad.
In its reaction to the U.S designation of Nigeria as Country of Particular Concern and the threat of military action, the ADC yesterday, asked: “how can a government that has been boasting of unprecedented revenue success continue to give lack of funds as an excuse for not appointing ambassadors?”
The party confirmed and regretted that Nigeria’s continental profile had declined under the current leadership of President Tinubu.
The truth is that as the events are unfolding in the wake of the U.S designating Nigeria as Country of Particular Concern (CPC), and the resultant threat of military action against the country, the masquerades who perhaps cashed in on the lack of Nigeria’s foreign missions are emerging. As a matter of fact, from 2022, one or two top Christian religious leaders have been invited from Nigeria by the U.S Senate and they spoke about the massive killing of Christians, especially in the Northcentral and Northeast. They quoted high sounding figures of the christians that have been killed in the series of attacks and destruction of dozens of churches around some parts of the country to the U.S Congress.
Since then up to last week Friday when President Trump came up with designating Nigeria as CPC, there was no official reaction to the picture that these top Christian religious leaders from Nigeria had painted.
The bigger picture emerged yesterday, November 3, when the key figure in the push for Nigeria to be so designated, an Igbo man residing in the U.S, came out boldly, in the trending video clips, to thank President Trump for heeding to their request. There’s even a letter of appreciation from some Igbo leaders who called themselves “American Veterans of Igbo Descent,” to President Trump for the designation and further action he had taken and promised to take.
Though many Nigerians are cursing the U.S President for the action he had taken and the threat to go into military action with Nigeria, the fact remains that the government of President Bola Tinubu played into the hands of the enemies of Nigeria; those who have been the major parts of the Indigenous People of Biafran (IPoB). Those are the people that have been fighting, mainly from other countries, with Nnamdi Kanu as their arrowhead, to either have their Biafran Republic carved from the Federal Republic of Nigeria or destroy the country by whatever means. There are others who think in one-way in the context of hatefulness for anything North and or Islam.
The web of damaging backyard games being played by such group of people, most of who deliberately chose to be enemies of Nigeria long before now, might have gone deeper than the Nigerian government officials can ever imagine.
President Trump maybe crazy, mad and irresponsible and or maybe not, but he definitely acted on the loads of negative reports rolling into his office, from those who are bent on bringing the country, Nigeria, into diplomatic disrepute and destruction, using religion as a cover. And the sad thing is that there have been no equally strong and convincing diametrically opposed (positive reactions) and or counteractions from nearby officials from the government of Nigeria, in the form of ambassadors.
The United States may have its own method of verifying the facts on the ground, but still needs human interaction to balance up what it (the U.S) have through its satellite system, what the haters of Nigeria feed it with and the counter narratives from the officially designated representatives of the country, like ambassadors.
Therefore, in looking at the scenario that has been playing out, the government of President Tinubu needs to urgently reactivate its diplomatic and socioeconomic structures to give broader human face to his government.
President Tinubu should stop hiding his head in the sand like Ostrich, thinking that nothing serious is happening in and around his government.
This is Tinubu who was reported to have said, at one time, that he had stopped having anything to do with social media and maybe the conventional media “to avoid hypertension.”
Which falls against the formula or the principles of communication or information. In leadership, the importance of communication or information, and “listening,” for anyone that wants to succeed in life cannot be overemphasized.
And, for President Tinubu to say that he doesn’t listen to what Nigerians, the people he’s leading are saying, amounts to reclining into his shell and comforting himself that everything is okay. And pulling the country into the shell or whatever, along with him.








What Does President Trump Want In Nigeria? By Yusuf Ozi-Usman
One is constrained to throw the big question as shown in the title of this piece for more than two reasons.
First, it is on record that the U.S Department of State under International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) first designated Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) on 2nd December 2020 during the first coming of Donald Trump as President. The designation was lifted by the U.S on 17th November 2021 under the presidency of Joe Budden.
It’s curious that the same Trump, who returned to power a couple of years ago still slammed Nigeria, a few hours ago, with the same appellation, based majorly on false security and or diplomatic narration of what Nigeria is all about, though there may be some kind of positive points embedded in it for Nigeria.
Let us first understand the concept and implementations of the United States designating a country a “Country of Particular Concern (CPC).” Such designation carries significant diplomatic, political and sometimes economic implications.
The designation is made under the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) of 1998 of the United States, and it applies to countries that engage in or tolerate particularly severe violations of religious freedom.
The U.S. Department of State, through its Office, of International Religious Freedom, designates CPCs annually.
A “particularly severe violation of religious freedom” means systematic, ongoing and egregious violations, such as torture, prolonged detention or persecution based on religion.
A country so designated faces subtle diplomatic Pressure. As a matter of fact, the designation is a strong form of official condemnation by the U.S government and it can strain diplomatic relations between the U.S. and the designated country.
The U.S often uses this as a tool to push for policy changes, such as the release of prisoners of conscience or reforms to religious laws.
Once designated, a country may face U.S sanctions under various laws, such as economic sanctions, including restrictions on aid or trade, arms embargoes or restrictions on security assistance and travel bans on certain officials involved in abuses.
Being labeled a CPC can damage a country’s international reputation, especially regarding human rights.
It can affect foreign investment, tourism, and international cooperation.
The country might face increased scrutiny from international organizations, NGOs and other governments.
The U.S often pairs CPC designation with recommendations and dialogue.
Some countries make policy or legal changes to be removed from the list, by repealing anti-conversion or blasphemy laws.
Countries that have been designated as CPCs include China, for persecution of Uyghur Muslims, Christians and Falun Gong practitioners; North Korea, for systematic repression of all religious activity; Iran, for persecution of Baháʼís and other minorities and Eritrea, for detention and torture of religious adherents outside state-approved faiths.
In the case of Nigeria, the U.S (President Trump) got the circumstances for designating the country as CPC wrong.
It is not as if the situation in Nigeria is that of “we and them.” In other words, it is not a situation where christians are grouped in one side (of the country) and Muslims are grouped in another side. Or it is not as if Muslims line up Christians and begin to kill them in a row (genocide, according to the picture being painted).
It is indeed, a common knowledge that Muslims and Christians live together in many communities in the country, even with cases where you get Christians and Muslims as members of the same family. There are also cases where the adherencts of the two major religions intermarry, bear children that embrace religion of their choice in-between.
Secondly, the religious insurgents, like Boko Haram, and its like claim to be Islamic base, but have been fighting and killing just anybody that is at variance with their morbid concepts, beliefs and practices, whether Muslims, Christians or anyone else.
Thirdly, the headquarters of Boko Haram is in Borno state, with over 90 percent Muslims making up the population and therefore, it is clear that most of the victims of Boko Haram are Muslims. The same thing applies to places like Yobe State and other states in the core North.
If Christians are being killed in their hundreds (genocide) for example, Bishop Mathew Hassan Kukah would not have found it comfortable to live in Sokoto, the headquarters of Khalifate, as Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Sokoto. He was appointed as Bishop of Sokoto Diocese by Pope Benedict XVI on June 10, 2011, and consecrated on September 8, 2011.
The Sokoto Diocese covers the northwestern part of Nigeria, a region with a predominantly Muslim population and a small Christian minority.
There are thousands and millions of Christians in many parts of the northern Nigeria, either as indigenes or none indigenes that would prefer to remain in the North than going to elsewhere in the country to live.
However, the good thing about Trump designating Nigeria as Country of Particular Concern is the possibility of accelerating solution to the lingering security challenges, posed by insurgents, the bandits and other criminals, which many sane people believe, some leaders in different sections, are or have been benefiting from.
The provision in the Act instituting CPC which gives the U.S the power to issue travel ban and probably seize the assets of those who are identified as beneficiaries and or sponsors of the security challenges, should be fully implemented, believing that the U.S has their list.
All said, it is obviously a shame on the leadership of Nigeria that they allow a situation which they can easily handle to degenerate to a point where another sovereign nation like Nigeria would have to intervene for the purpose of sanitizing the system that has gone unruly.
By my orientation and belief, I have never agreed that America has any special qualifications to play the role of God as they often want to show but, by my patriotic instinct, the Americans or even any other nation, is welcome to put our leaders, as much as possible, on the right track to sanity.
After all, Boko Haram, Bandits, kidnappers and their likes are not invincibles, and couldn’t have been invincibles for all these years they have reign terror on our individual and collective security.
Sentiment apart, what President Trump is simply implying, especially in threatening to invade Nigeria to wipe out terrorists and bandits, is that the country (Nigeria) has no proactive, performing and caring leaders to save the citizens from lingering insecurity.