Younger brother of a Nigerian journalist, Dele Giwa, who was murdered via time bomb 30 years ago, Tunde Giwa has said that he knows the killer.
Tunde Giwa, said that Dele Giwa’s family has not been lessened 30 years after he was murdered because the killer has not been brought to justice. Dele Giwa was one of the founding Editors of Newswatch Magazine.
Tunde said that the family continued to live in pain seeing that Giwa’s killer, “who everyone knows” was still around and walking freely.
The made a passionate appeal to journalists in the country not to allow the case to be forgotten, adding that just like every other Nigerian, he knew Giwa’s killer and could mention his name.
Tunde spoke on behalf of the Giwa family yesterday,Wednesday at a colloquium organized by the Nigeria Union of Journalists, Lagos State Council to mark the 30th anniversary of Dele Giwa’s death.
Also present on the occasion, which held at the Multipurpose Hall, Radio Lagos/Eko FM, Ikeja, were Giwa’s widow, Funmi, and his daughter, Aisha, who was said to be only a few months old at the time Giwa was killed.
Tunde, who described his slain elder brother as the breadwinner of the family, said the family had not remained the same since he was murdered.
He called on journalists in the country to help the family get justice.
“You people should help us to unravel the mystery surrounding the death of Dele Giwa. Everybody knows the person that killed him. He’s there walking freely around. I can mention his name if you want.
“Please, help us…The day I see the killer arraigned in court, I will be the happiest person on earth.”
In his welcome address, the Chairman of the NUJ, Lagos State Council, Mr. Deji Elumoye, said it was sad and regrettable that 30 years after Giwa was killed by a letter bomb, no arrest had been made and no one had been prosecuted.
He said it was sad that journalists had become the most conspicuous butt of inhuman treatment not only in Nigeria but on the entire African continent.
He demanded, on behalf of the NUJ, that the Federal Government should order the Inspector-General of Police to reopen investigation into Giwa’s assassination.
“It is a matter of worry that journalists could become subjects of attacks in the course of carrying out their duty as members of the Fourth Estate of the Realm.
“Not quite long ago, a photo journalist, Mr. Benedict Uwalaka, and the Executive Director and Chairman, Badagry Prime, were killed with the complicity of security agents.” [myad]
A group calling itself Union of Niger Delta Youth Organization for Equity, Justice and Good Governance has emerged to explain that the $15 million which the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) recently seized from Dame Jonathan, wife of former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan were contributions at various times for 15 years, to her.
“The funds in question were legitimate gifts from her friends and well-wishers over the last 15 years which she had been saving in order to utilize to upgrade family businesses and concerns which had been somewhat dormant by reason of the long period of her husband service as a public officer in Nigeria.”
The explanation was contained in court papers filed by the group, suing a Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) on behalf of Dame Patience. SERAP had filed a suit in court to compel the attorney-general of the Federation to take a legal action against Mrs. Jonathan.
The Niger Delta Youth group, on behalf of Dame Patience, filed a suit number FHC/L/CS/1349/2016 before a Federal High Court in Lagos, alleging “campaign of calumny by SERAP against her.
The group said: “The funds in question were legitimate gifts from her friends and well-wishers over the last 15 years which she had been saving in order to utilize to upgrade family businesses and concerns which had been somewhat dormant by reason of the long period of her husband service as a public officer in Nigeria.
“The gifts were given in small contributions by several persons some of whom she cannot even now recall over this period of 15 years sometimes in as small a gift as N250,000 Naira. In order to preserve the value of these funds which she did not require for any purpose at the time she changed them into foreign exchange and kept them as cash for a long period in her home safe in Port Harcourt and Abuja.
“It was when the family home in Otuoke was burnt down by hoodlums under the instigation of political adversaries in 2010 that she began to think about banking these gifts which had now grown to large sums in United States Dollars. In 2010 she therefore summoned one of her husband’s domestic aides, Waripamo-Owei Emmanuel Dudafa to assist her in opening bank accounts into which the funds could be deposited.
“Unknown to her the said Dudafa in a bid to be discreet about the owner of the funds decided to bank the funds in the names of companies owned by him. When she discovered this she was constrained to continue with the names of the companies when she was advised that it did not make any difference as to the ownership of the funds since the director of the company would appoint her as sole signatory to the accounts in question.”
“When in 2016 Dudafa was arrested and detained she had no fear for the funds as she realized that the funds could not be attributable to him once it was discovered that she was the sole signatory to the said accounts. It was therefore a rude shock to her when she discovered that a no transaction order had been placed on the accounts by the EFCC in the belief that the funds belonged to Dudafa.
“She instructed her solicitors to further write to the EFCC to inform them that the funds belong to her and that they formed a part of her legitimate earnings over the last 15 years. It was this letter that was leaked by the EFCC to the media that became sensationalised and led to the plaintiff’s vilification and attack by ignorant persons who had no information about the matter.”
“SERAP is playing to the public gallery in order to gain the notoriety it has achieved over the past years. SERAP has done this mostly by intervening in high profile issues without regard to the rights of persons it claims to protect. SERAP jumped into the fray of ignorant accusations being made against Mrs Dame Patience Jonathan in the public media and has begun a campaign of calumny against her using online, print and electronic media to publish to the public unfounded and malicious allegations that she stole the funds in question and ought to be prosecuted.”
The suit accuses SERAP of using online, print and electronic media to publish to the public unfounded and malicious allegations that she stole $15m (US) and ought to be prosecuted.
SERAP executive director, Adetokunbo Mumuni said the organization received Patience Jonathan’s court papers, dated 6 October 2016, from a bailiff on Tuesday
“The court papers also indicate a prayer for an order of interim injunction restraining SERAP from taking any further steps in further vilification, condemnation and conviction of the Former First Lady Mrs. Dame Patience Jonathan, in all public media and in the use of the judicial process for that purpose by the extremely publicised pursuit of any application for the coercion of the Attorney General of the Federation to prosecute the Plaintiff/Applicant for owning legitimate private property, pending the hearing and determination of the Originating Summons.”
“The suit is seeking an order directing SERAP to stay all action and to desist forthwith from proceeding against Mrs Dame Patience Jonathan, with any process whatsoever, pending the hearing and determination of the Originating Summons.
Mumuni said, “SERAP categorically rejects these misleading and entirely unfounded accusations against us by Mrs Patience Jonathan and her group, and we will vigorously oppose the suit in court. SERAP will never, in the discharge of its mandates, succumb to any intimidation, harassment and attacks in any way, shape or form. We are now consulting with our lawyers and will be preparing shortly our defence in court.”
“At no time did SERAP suggest or even hint that Mrs Jonathan was guilty of the allegations against her. On the contrary, what SERAP has said is that the fact that the $15m found in the four accounts belong to Mrs Jonathan raises serious suspicion or at the very least a prima-facie case of unexplained wealth/illicit enrichment, and imposes an obligation on Mrs Jonathan to explain and justify the source(s) of the $15m.”
“To be sure, SERAP is not engaged in any campaign against Mrs Jonathan or any other politically exposed persons for that matter. Our suit was filed against the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Mr Abubakar Malami, SAN, and not Mrs Jonathan. It’s a joke to accuse SERAP of trying to coerce the Attorney General to perform his constitutional duty, as this is for the court to decide.”
Few weeks to the Presidential election in America, the Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump is already smelling defeat as he accused his rival from the Democrat, Hillary Clinton of colluding with media to rig the election.
Trump therefore gave an indication that he not accept the result of the election if he loses. In a fiery third and final presidential debate, Hillary Clinton had accused him of being a “puppet” of Russian President, Vladimir Putin. Trump, who was responding to a question on whether he would respect the result of the election, said: “I will tell you at the time. I’ll keep you in suspense. Trump also faulted the voter register for the poll, saying: “if you look at your voter rolls, you will see millions of people who are registered to vote” who shouldn’t be registered, Trump said. He said not only was there widespread corruption, but that Clinton “should not be allowed to run. It is crooked. “She is guilty of a very, very serious crime. She should not be allowed to run and just in that respect, I say it is rigged.” Clinton, on her part, described Trumps’ statement as “horrifying.” She said that such statement amounted to Trump “talking down our democracy. “Every time Donald thinks things are not going in his direction, he claims whatever it is, it is rigged against him. “The FBI conducted a yearlong investigation into my emails that concluded there was no case.” [myad]
The All Progressives Congress (APC) in Rivers State has given Justice Inyang Okoro of the Supreme Court one week to withdraw the bribery allegation he made against Minister of Transportation, Chief Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, or be ready to go to jail for contravening the Corrupt Practices And Other Related Offence Act 2000.
The demand is contained in a statement issued today, Thursday in Port Harcourt, by the State APC Chairman, Chief (Dr.) Davies Ibiamu Ikanya.
Davies berated Justice Okoro for his wild and baseless allegation as contained in his letter to the National Judicial Council (NJC), following his recent arrest by the Department of State Service (DSS) for alleged corruption.
The party boss said that while the judgment in the Rivers State governorship election dispute was given by the Supreme Court on January 27, 2015, Justice Inyang Okoro in his letter to the NJC, claimed that Amaechi tried to bribe him on February 1, 2015 to influence a ruling made four days earlier and nine months to alert the public about the alleged bribery attempt!
“One does not need a soothsayer to see that Justice Okoro is very confused and thinks that by mentioning the name of Amaechi in his letter, he would deceive Nigerians and play down the gravity of his sins and crimes against Rivers State people and Nigeria as a whole.
“If we may ask Justice Okoro, why should Amaechi or anybody attempt to bribe him for an election upturned by both the Tribunal and the Appeal Court? An election widely condemned by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the international community and both local and foreign observers who monitored the shambolic exercise in the course of which over 200 of our members were slaughtered like chicken just to install Chief Nyesom Wike of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in power at all cost?”
Davies drew Justice Okoro’s attention to the provisions of the Corrupt Practices And Other Related Offence Act 2000, which makes failure to report bribery or a bribery attempt a crime that attracts both a fine and a jail term. Below are the relevant provisions of the said Act:
(23)-(1) Any public officer to whom any gratification is given, promised, or offered, in contravention of any provision of this Act, shall report such gift, promise or offer together with the name, if known, of the person who gave, promised or offered such gratification to him to the nearest officer of the commission or police officer.
(2) Any person from whom gratification has been solicited or obtained, or from whom an attempt has been made to obtain such gratification, in contravention of any provision of this Act, shall, at the earliest opportunity thereafter, report such soliciting or obtaining, or attempt to obtain the gratification together with the name, if known, or a true and full description of the person who solicited, or obtained, or attempted to obtain the gratification from him, to the nearest officer of the commission or police officer.
(3) Any person who fails, without reasonable excuse, to comply with sub-sections (1) and (2) shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be liable to a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand naira or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to both fine and imprisonment.
“For failing to report the fictional bribery attempt by Amaechi, Justice Okoro has committed an offence that attracts up to two years imprisonment. We are hereby giving him one week to retract his worthless and satanic letter and apologise to Amaechi or we may be forced to set in motion a machinery to invoke the Corrupt Practices And Other Related Offence Act 2000.”
The party chairman commended the DSS for taking the bold step to bring corrupt judges to justice even as he asked the NJC not only to assist the Federal Government in this fight against crimes against the nation but to also overturn the injustices meted to the various states and organs by these agents of darkness in the Judiciary. [myad]
Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Malam Muhammad Musa Bello has drew the attention of police to the going-on in some uncompleted buildings that dot the capital city in their fight to rid the city of criminals.
The minister who spoke today, Thursday when the new Assistant Inspector-General of Police, Zone 7, AIG Salisu Abdullahi Mohammed Fagge paid him a courtesy visit as part of his familiarization tour of FCT Police Command, asked the security agents to closely monitor activities in uncompleted buildings to ensure that only the security guards employed by the owners are staying in such places. He asked the Police to encourage community policing in the capital city even as he insisted that monitoring of uncompleted buildings would go a long way to assist in checking criminal activity at its early stage. Muhammad Bello called for deployment of more Police personnel into the capital city to ensure that Abuja, which is the window through which the world sees Nigeria, is better policed. “More people move into the Federal Capital Territory on daily basis and some hardly go back, therefore we need more Police personnel to man the city.” He promised to continue to support all the security agencies in the city to enable them perform their statutory duties as enshrined in the Constitution. “I want to use this medium to thank the Police Force most sincerely for the support that we have always enjoyed. There is no doubt that policing in the FCT is something that is very important by virtue of Abuja being the seat of government of the federation and where we host the President and the diplomatic community.” Speaking earlier, Salisu Fagge assured that the police would be proactive in their approach to the policing of the citizenry. He appreciated the support the FCT Police Command has been receiving from the FCT Administration. The Nigeria Police Force zone 7 comprises of the Federal Capital Territory, Niger and Kaduna states. [myad]
President Muhammadu Buhari has felicitated with distinguished businesswoman, banker, economist and accountant, Otunba Ayora Bola Kuforiji Olubi, saying that Gid has been kind to her.
In a birthday message as Kuforiji clocked 80 years, President Buhari recalled her decades of distinguished career in the private and public sectors of national life, adding that her contributions will remain inspiring to the younger generation. “It is not surprising that she is a proud and well-deserved recipient of the National Honour, fellowships, awards and honorary degrees from within and outside the country.”
President Buhari told Kuforiji who was the first female chairman of one of the first generation banks in Nigeria that she had remained a pace-setter and leader in banking, manufacturing and entrepreneurship not only in Nigeria but also in Sub-Saharan Africa. The President, who emphasised that God has been kind to Kuforiji Olubi, prayed for continued health and longer life for the octogenarian, author and philanthropist to “enable the nation and humanity benefit from her wisdom and wealth of experience.” [myad]
A group known as Buhari Media Support Group (BMSG) has congratulated President Muhammadu Buhari on the rating of Nigeria by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as the largest economy in Africa despite the crisis that had rocked the economy in the last few months.
In a statement signed by the coordinator, Muhamad Labbo and secretary, Cassidy Madueke, the group considered the IMF rating as an indication of Nigeria’s steady economic growth under President Buhari, based on his administration’s diversification policy.
It recalled that earlier in August this year when Nigeria slipped to second place behind South Africa, the minister of Budget and Planning, Senator Udoma Udoma had assured that the Nigerian economy would bounce back in a short while.
The BMSG expressed confidence therefore that President Buhari is leading Nigeria to the true path of economic recovery, even as had been proved by the Chinese Ambassador, Mr. Zhou Pingjian who said that many Chinese business people are “falling over themselves” to come and invest in Nigeria.
The group stressed that the policies on agriculture, solid minerals, oil and gas, job creation, security and overall revival of the economy have the potentials to rejuvenate the economy and prosper the nation.
“From all indications Nigeria will in the next few months begin to witness significant improvement in their wellbeing with the plans already drawn up to re-jig the economy by the President Buhari administration.”
It called on Nigerians to have faith in the federal government and keep hope alive as President Buhari’s administration enunciates policies aimed at rejuvenating the nation’s economy.
In the current assessment published by the IMF, it was acknowledged that Nigeria’s GDP now stands at about $415 Billion as against South Africa’s which is presently at about $280 Billion. [myad]
After the first presidential debate, the Republican Party nominee called for monitoring and intimidation at polling places in cities like Philadelphia and Cleveland. During the second, Trump announced his plan to investigate Clinton using the power of the presidency, and promised to put her in jail for unnamed crimes against the state. He later turned that into a bona fide campaign slogan: “Lock her up.”
For the last week, he’s decried the entire election process as “rigged”—a shadowy conspiracy meant to deny him a victory at the ballot box. And at the final presidential debate at the University of Nevada–Las Vegas, Donald Trump refused to commit to conceding the election, should he lose on Nov. 8.
“I will look at it at the time. I’m not looking at anything now. I’ll look at it at the time,” said Trump after moderator Chris Wallace asked if he would honor the election results. Wallace pressed the question a second time.
There is a tradition in this country, in fact one of the prides of this country is the peaceful transition of power, and that no matter how hard-fought a campaign is, that at the end of the campaign that the loser concedes to the winner. Not saying that you’re necessarily going to be the loser or the winner. But that the loser concedes to the winner, and that the country comes together in part for the good of the country. Are you saying you’re not prepared now to commit to that principle?
Again, Trump refused to commit. “I’ll tell you at the time,” he said, “I’ll keep you in suspense, OK?”
Clinton called this “horrifying.” “We’ve been around for 240 years,” she said. “We’ve had free and fair elections. We’ve accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them. And that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election.”
She’s right. In 1800, Federalist president John Adams lost to Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republicans, following a painful and contentious contest. And rather than fight or challenge the results, Adams handed his rival the reins of power, the first peaceful transition of power in a democracy and a milestone in the history of the modern world. The act of conceding, in other words, is vital to the functioning of democracy. It confers legitimacy on the winner of an election, giving him or her a chance to govern. To refuse to concede, to deny that legitimacy, is to undermine our democratic foundations.
Surrogates for Trump have tried to defend his comments, citing then–Vice President Al Gore’s conduct following the 2000 election. But Gore didn’t challenge the process; he let it move forward. As ordered by state law, Florida had to do a recount. That recount was then stopped by the Supreme Court. At that point, Gore conceded the election, gracefully and without public hesitation.
In presidential elections at least, there’s simply no precedent for what Trump is promising. The slave South may have seceded from the Union following the 1860 election, but neither of Abraham Lincoln’s opponents denied his legitimacy as the duly-elected leader for the United States. It is world-historic in the worst possible way.
Donald Trump’s role in spreading “birtherism” helped turn a fringe belief into an almost permanent fixture of American politics. Thanks to Trump, large numbers of self-identified Republicans would say—for more than five years—that President Obama was born on foreign soil, that he was a Muslim whose presidency was illegitimate. And the seed that Trump planted with birtherism would eventually grow into something sturdy enough to support his bid for the White House. Likewise, Trump’s constant claim that the race is rigged—that voter fraud is endemic and harmful to the Republican Party—has helped create a world where 73 percent of Republicans say they believe the election could be stolen from Trump.
What happens if, on Nov. 8, Trump loses and then refuses to concede? What happens if he attacks Clinton’s legitimacy and insists, as he did at Wednesday’s debate, that she “should never have been allowed to run for the presidency?”
Any suggestion that this doesn’t matter gives short shrift to the rage that could flare in the wake of a Trump defeat, given the paranoia and conspiracy-mongering that dominates the Trump campaign. It’s possible that, on Nov. 9, authorities have to deal with anti-Clinton protests and demonstrations, all based on the idea that she stole the election from its rightful winner. It’s possible that, in those areas where Trump wants his voters to monitor the polls, we’ll see violence and intimidation, as angry and desperate supporters try to “protect” the vote. And it’s possible that two years into Hillary Clinton’s presidency, large numbers of Republicans—maybe even a majority—will believe that she wasn’t actually elected. That the game was rigged in her favor.
In her response to Trump’s refusal to commit to conceding, Hillary Clinton made a key observation about his behavior:
Every time Donald thinks things are not going in his direction, he claims whatever it is is rigged against him. The FBI conducted a yearlong investigation into my emails. They concluded there was no case. He said the FBI was rigged. He lost the Iowa caucus. He lost the Wisconsin primary. He said the Republican primary was rigged against him. Then Trump University gets sued for fraud and racketeering. He claims the court system and the federal judge is rigged against him. There was even a time when he didn’t get an Emmy for his TV program three years in a row and he started tweeting that the Emmys were rigged.
We’re at a point in this country where the fabric of our society could unravel more than it already has. But not because of a war or a depression: no, we might see disorder and violence because Donald Trump—the businessman turned reality TV star turned nativist politician—is unable to admit failure. Unable to say that he lost. [myad]
Crown Prince Eheneden Erediauwa has emerged today, Wednesday as the new Oba of Benin kingdom. The heir apparent and Prince Erediauwa, becomes the 39th Oba of Benin kingdom.
His ascension today marks the unending and unbroken chain of succession in the lines of Oba of Benin.
The Oba was born in 1953 and was educated severally in Nigeria and UK. He holds a B.A in Economics and Sociology which he received from the University of Wales.
Prince Erediauwa completed his Master’s degree at Reutgeurs University, the USA. He is a member of the Nigerian Institute of International affairs (NIIA).
Like every other Oba before him, he has chosen a name unique only to him and which henceforth all the children would answer.
ABOUT THE BENIN KINGDOM
What came to the known as the Benin kingdom did not begin its existence as a kingdom in the sense of it being headed by a King or a Traditional ruler as it is known today.
It really began as a conglomeration of villages, each at which was headed by the eldest man in the community, who was and still referred to as the ‘’Odionwere’” or village head.
As time went on, these villages united for the purpose of security against external aggression or for commerce and the most powerful of the old people was said to have automatically assumed the supreme leadership.
This eventually metamorphosed into what was known as King or Oba in Edo language.
The first leader that emerged to assume the position of the king was referred to as an OGISO.
He was described as being from heaven (Oyevbegie No riso).
This is the origin of the title Ogiso which came to be the title of the earliest kings before the advent of Oromiyan, which gave rise to the Oba era.
The Benin kingdom was renowned for its military might as its frontiers were said to have gone beyond the geographical boundary at present day Nigeria to Dahome , (Now Republic of Benin).
The kingdom was also very renowned for its economic and administrative process.
These drew the attention of the European power to make an early contact with its people, many years before the colonial era.
Bronze artifacts from Benin kingdom are renowned worldwide and are to be found in the different museum scattered all over Europe. [myad]
President Muhammadu Buhari, today, Wednesday, warmly received the 21 Chibok schoolgirls at the Aso Rock Presidential Villa, Abuja. The girls, who were among the over 270 that were abducted from their school in Chibok, Borno state in April 2014, by Boko Haram insurgents, were released from captivity recently.
President Muhammadu Buhari and Vice President Prof Yemi Osinbajo with the released 21 Chibok school girls.
21 released Chibok school girls at the Aso Presidential Villa and received by President Buhari. [myad]
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Trump Is Not Running Against Hillary Clinton But Against Our Democracy, By Jamelle Bouie
After the first presidential debate, the Republican Party nominee called for monitoring and intimidation at polling places in cities like Philadelphia and Cleveland. During the second, Trump announced his plan to investigate Clinton using the power of the presidency, and promised to put her in jail for unnamed crimes against the state. He later turned that into a bona fide campaign slogan: “Lock her up.”
For the last week, he’s decried the entire election process as “rigged”—a shadowy conspiracy meant to deny him a victory at the ballot box. And at the final presidential debate at the University of Nevada–Las Vegas, Donald Trump refused to commit to conceding the election, should he lose on Nov. 8.
“I will look at it at the time. I’m not looking at anything now. I’ll look at it at the time,” said Trump after moderator Chris Wallace asked if he would honor the election results. Wallace pressed the question a second time.
There is a tradition in this country, in fact one of the prides of this country is the peaceful transition of power, and that no matter how hard-fought a campaign is, that at the end of the campaign that the loser concedes to the winner. Not saying that you’re necessarily going to be the loser or the winner. But that the loser concedes to the winner, and that the country comes together in part for the good of the country. Are you saying you’re not prepared now to commit to that principle?
Again, Trump refused to commit. “I’ll tell you at the time,” he said, “I’ll keep you in suspense, OK?”
Clinton called this “horrifying.” “We’ve been around for 240 years,” she said. “We’ve had free and fair elections. We’ve accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them. And that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election.”
She’s right. In 1800, Federalist president John Adams lost to Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republicans, following a painful and contentious contest. And rather than fight or challenge the results, Adams handed his rival the reins of power, the first peaceful transition of power in a democracy and a milestone in the history of the modern world. The act of conceding, in other words, is vital to the functioning of democracy. It confers legitimacy on the winner of an election, giving him or her a chance to govern. To refuse to concede, to deny that legitimacy, is to undermine our democratic foundations.
Surrogates for Trump have tried to defend his comments, citing then–Vice President Al Gore’s conduct following the 2000 election. But Gore didn’t challenge the process; he let it move forward. As ordered by state law, Florida had to do a recount. That recount was then stopped by the Supreme Court. At that point, Gore conceded the election, gracefully and without public hesitation.
In presidential elections at least, there’s simply no precedent for what Trump is promising. The slave South may have seceded from the Union following the 1860 election, but neither of Abraham Lincoln’s opponents denied his legitimacy as the duly-elected leader for the United States. It is world-historic in the worst possible way.
Donald Trump’s role in spreading “birtherism” helped turn a fringe belief into an almost permanent fixture of American politics. Thanks to Trump, large numbers of self-identified Republicans would say—for more than five years—that President Obama was born on foreign soil, that he was a Muslim whose presidency was illegitimate. And the seed that Trump planted with birtherism would eventually grow into something sturdy enough to support his bid for the White House. Likewise, Trump’s constant claim that the race is rigged—that voter fraud is endemic and harmful to the Republican Party—has helped create a world where 73 percent of Republicans say they believe the election could be stolen from Trump.
What happens if, on Nov. 8, Trump loses and then refuses to concede? What happens if he attacks Clinton’s legitimacy and insists, as he did at Wednesday’s debate, that she “should never have been allowed to run for the presidency?”
Any suggestion that this doesn’t matter gives short shrift to the rage that could flare in the wake of a Trump defeat, given the paranoia and conspiracy-mongering that dominates the Trump campaign. It’s possible that, on Nov. 9, authorities have to deal with anti-Clinton protests and demonstrations, all based on the idea that she stole the election from its rightful winner. It’s possible that, in those areas where Trump wants his voters to monitor the polls, we’ll see violence and intimidation, as angry and desperate supporters try to “protect” the vote. And it’s possible that two years into Hillary Clinton’s presidency, large numbers of Republicans—maybe even a majority—will believe that she wasn’t actually elected. That the game was rigged in her favor.
In her response to Trump’s refusal to commit to conceding, Hillary Clinton made a key observation about his behavior:
Every time Donald thinks things are not going in his direction, he claims whatever it is is rigged against him. The FBI conducted a yearlong investigation into my emails. They concluded there was no case. He said the FBI was rigged. He lost the Iowa caucus. He lost the Wisconsin primary. He said the Republican primary was rigged against him. Then Trump University gets sued for fraud and racketeering. He claims the court system and the federal judge is rigged against him. There was even a time when he didn’t get an Emmy for his TV program three years in a row and he started tweeting that the Emmys were rigged.
We’re at a point in this country where the fabric of our society could unravel more than it already has. But not because of a war or a depression: no, we might see disorder and violence because Donald Trump—the businessman turned reality TV star turned nativist politician—is unable to admit failure. Unable to say that he lost. [myad]