The Jonathan Youth Vanguard (JYV) has cried out over the alleged plans by the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) to sponsor a blackmail documentary against President Goodluck Jonathan ahead of the March 28 presidential election.
Director General of the Vanguard, Ebis Orubebe, said in a statement that the APC documentary is a plan by the opposition party to divert the attention of Nigerians from weighty issues regarding APC’s presidential candidate, Major-General Muhammadu Buhari’s certificate and other atrocities he allegedly committed when he was Head of State as well as chairman of the Petroleum Trust Fund, PTF, among others.
The APC documentary, Orubebe said, will focus on the missing Chibok girls, alleged missing $49 billion, armoured vehicles for former Minister of Aviation, Stella Oduah, naira fall, subsidy removal, Immigration recruitment saga and activities of the dreadful sect, Boko Haram. [myad]
Former Nigerian minister of information Labaran Maku has apologized to Nigerians in general and people of Nasarawa state for his participation in the government runs by Peoples Democratic Party (PDP as minister), the party which he said created insurgents that have been killing people all over the country. Maku, who is now the governorship candidate of All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) in the coming election in Nasarawa State, emphasized that Boko Haram insurgency is a product of the PDP government. Maku who addressed his supporters at a campaign tour of Akwanga Local Government Area of Nasarawa State, apologized to his people for participating in government that is using insurgency to kill them. “I regret working for this government, a government that is sponsoring some disgruntled elements to kill her people because of politics. All the killing taking place in Nigeria is a product of this government.” The former minister pledged to develop the state and to provide jobs to millions of unemployed people in the state. He promised to do everything possible to discourage crime in the state. [myad]
“My struggle to deliver Nigeria from the power of darkness has, many a times, earned me the wrath and vengeance of crooks and thieves. What I want to assure everyone in this room and across the length and breadth of this vast country is that I will do my best for you.” These were the words of the Presidential candidate of All Progressive Congress (APC), General Muhammadu Buhari when he addressed the Delegates Conference of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) today in Abuja. He reminded Nigerians once again of the great crisis the country is going through in various sectors which he summarised into three: security, the state of the economy and corruption. General Buhari made it clear that these three which have formed a terrible troika, “must be tackled all at once before we can achieve any meaningful progress.” The APC Presidential flag bearer regretted that despite the federal government’s defence budget that has gulped over $32.88 billion in the past five years, the security situation in this country has remained ever dire. “Today, Nigerians have to endure, not just terrorist attacks in the North, but militancy in the Niger Delta, communal violence in the Middle Belt, cult wars in the South, and kidnappings, armed robberies, and common acts of thuggery throughout the country. Most are left to fend for themselves. Those who turn to the police, the army or any other state security agencies usually have the means and personal connections to buy help and protection. Those who don’t, simply move on, resigned. The bitter ones may form vigilante groups, others join mobs that dispense jungle justice on suspects and scapegoats alike. Too many believe they have nothing to lose, and everything to gain, and the most alienated are easy prey for terrorists, militants, and thugs.” On economy, General Buhari recalled that a few weeks ago, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) took monetary actions to reduce the pressure on the Naira by devaluing the currency and increasing interests rates – both directly and indirectly, by raising interest rates and restricting the amount banks can lend from their available cash. These actions, he admitted, is necessary to reduce the slide in the currency, but that they have reduced the amount of goods the ordinary Nigerian can purchase with the money he or she has. “We are likely to experience a rise in the prices of all goods, especially fuel, bread and foodstuff. The hard times ahead will affect Nigerians in every part of our country, 67 percent of whom already live on less than N200 per day. “Other challenges facing Nigerians today include youth unemployment, a lack of social services, corruption and poor governance. Nigeria needs a group of people who know what to do about these problems. They must have the competence, the experience, the know-how, the leadership capacity and, most especially, the courage to move Nigeria forward. APC is that group. “An APC government at the centre will treat Labour as a partner in moving the nation forward. Our plan to restore good governance, efficient and effective public sector stands to benefit the country’s labour force perhaps more than any other subgroup.” Buhari said that in line with APC’s manifesto, “we will identify and promote growth of industries and give incentives for the use of local content. An APC government will protect and respect labourer’s right to organize, guaranteeing the rights to collective bargaining in good faith in law. We will promote new skills; equip youth for a modern economy through a network of local technology institutions to provide free training in courses for the unemployed. “But we cannot do any of any of these things alone. We need your support. That is my purpose of being here in your midst today. As you all know I am aspiring for the office of president of Nigeria, not just to hold an office, but to join you in securing and rebuilding a nation, our nation. “I pray that you will support me in this quest. I hope that you will give me a chance. Together, you and I can start to build a peaceful, secure and prosperous Nigeria of our dreams.”
Full text of the speech is reproduced here: Let me begin by saying thank you to all of you for giving me the opportunity to address this year’s delegates congress of the Nigeria Labour Congress. I want to also congratulate you who have travelled from near and far, braving bad roads, traffic jams and delayed airlines to be here for the congress. I know you made this journey for a good reason. You came here because you believe in what this country can be. That is to say, you all believe in CHANGE. You believe that the labour of our heroes past and present shall never be in vain. You believe that our hopes and dreams can become reality. You believe in a nation bound in freedom, peace and unity. You believe that we can rebuild the broken walls. You believe that our great country can set a standard for all of Africa to see. I pray that you will give me the opportunity to play a part in bringing about this CHANGE that the All Progressives Congress, the APC, so strongly desires for our country, Nigeria. As most of you know, I am not a novice when it comes to participating in the struggle to deliver Nigeria from the power of darkness. Many times, my efforts have earned me the wrath and vengeance of crooks and thieves. What I want to assure everyone in this room and across the length and breadth of this vast country is that I will do my best for you. Once again, Nigeria is in crisis. Our country is facing grievous challenges in numerous sectors. In the light of recent events, the three most pertinent at this time are security, the state of the economy and corruption forming a terrible troika that must be tackled all at once before we can achieve any meaningful progress. In August 2011, a vehicle smashed through two security barriers at the United Nations headquarters in Abuja just after 11am. Its driver crashed the car into the reception area of the building which housed 26 different UN agencies, and then detonated a bomb. Twenty-five people were killed; around 60, wounded. The then little-known extremist group, Boko Haram, claimed responsibility for the gruesome attack. Since then, Boko Haram has gained international notoriety and become a major national menace – kidnapping girls from their schools and women from their homes; slaughtering boys in their dormitories and men in their farms; exploding bombs in public and private venues; and taking town after town in the northeast of Nigeria. And, for some reason, our defence forces are unable to cope and unable to defend. Despite the federal government’s defence budget that has gulped over$32.88 billion in the past five years. Our security situation in this country has never been so dire. Today, Nigerians have to endure, not just terrorist attacks in the North, but militancy in the Niger Delta, communal violence in the Middle Belt, cult wars in the South, and kidnappings, armed robberies, and common acts of thuggery throughout the country. Most are left to fend for themselves. Those who turn to the police, the army or any other state security agencies usually have the means and personal connections to buy help and protection. Those who don’t simply move on, resigned. The bitter ones may form vigilante groups, others join mobs that dispense jungle justice on suspects and scapegoats alike. Too many believe they have nothing to lose, and everything to gain, and the most alienated are easy prey for terrorists, militants, and thugs. This must CHANGE! And then, the economy. A few weeks ago, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) took monetary actions to reduce the pressure on the Naira by devaluing the currency and increasing interests rates – both directly and indirectly, by raising interest rates and restricting the amount banks can lend from their available cash. These actions, while necessary to reduce the slide in our currency, have reduced the amount of goods the ordinary Nigerian can purchase with the money he or she has. We are likely to experience a rise in the prices of all goods, especially fuel, bread and foodstuff. The hard times ahead will affect Nigerians in every part of our country, 67 percent of whom already live on less than N200 per day. Other challenges facing Nigerians today include youth unemployment, a lack of social services, corruption and poor governance. Nigeria needs a group of people who knows what to do about these problems. They must have the competence, the experience, the know-how, the leadership capacity and, most especially, the courage to move Nigeria forward. APC is that group. An APC government at the centre will treat Labour as a partner in moving the nation forward. Our plan to restore good governance, efficient and effective public sector stands to benefit the country’s labour force perhaps more than any other subgroup. In line with our party’s manifesto, we will identify and promote growth of industries and give incentives for the use of local content. An APC government will protect and respect labourer’s right to organize, guaranteeing the rights to collective bargaining in good faith in law. We will promote new skills, equip youth for a modern economy through a network of local technology institutions to provide free training in courses for the unemployed. But we cannot do any of any of these things alone. We need your support. That is my purpose of being here in your midst today. As you all know I am aspiring for the office of president of Nigeria, not just to hold an office, but to join you in securing and rebuilding a nation, our nation. I pray that you will support me in this quest. I hope that you will give me a chance. Together, you and I can start to build a peaceful, secure and prosperous Nigeria of our dreams. Thank you and God bless. [myad]
Prior to the formal announcement of President Goodluck Jonathan to contest for another term in office, Nigerians were daily inundated with the messages sponsored by the Transformation Agenda of Nigeria. Our sensibilities were regularly assaulted by the propaganda of how some revolutionary leaders in the world had done great sacrifices to rescue and reform their respective countries, and how Jonathan too is ‘doing’ same in Nigeria. The promo usually opens with how Martin Luther King (Jnr.) did it in the US, fighting for the human rights of the Americans, especially the blacks; how Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore turned around the fortunes of his country to become a first-world nation; how legendary Nelson Mandela helped South Africa to tackle apartheid and how President Barack Obama is doing ‘it’ in the US at the moment. In the message, TAN informed Nigerians of how President Goodluck Jonathan is ‘doing it’ here in Nigeria and urged him to ‘keep doing it.’ Certainly, those leaders being compared to President Jonathan sacrificed immensely and achieved remarkable strides for their respective countries and their popularity and feats endeared them to their people. They became enigmatic with their feats and instantly became heroes even before their demise. They never asked their countrymen to like them, yet they were worshipped. To many Nigerians, Jonathan’s record since he became President, when placed side by side with those leaders, cannot match them. In my estimation of the majority, the comparison is a joke taken too far. Except for unrepentant tribalists, religious bigots, chronic pessimists and sycophants, including those ignorant of history and or with low intellectual capacity to comprehend the issue at hand, the TAN submissions are laughable. Of specific interest here is Nigeria’s recent let-down of the Palestinian people through its infamous and callous abstention from the UN vote on a draft resolution for Palestinian statehood. History has shown how the late anti-apartheid icon, Nelson Mandela stood solidly behind the Palestinians in their quest for freedom from Israeli occupation which has been characterised by killings, settlement activities and all sorts of inhumanities. In the face of Western criticism and despite being labelled a terrorist, Mandela remained undaunted. In 1999, the anti-Apartheid hero toured the Middle East, visiting Palestine. In Gaza, he closely identified the South African struggle for freedom with the Palestinian struggle. However, unlike Mandela who did it for Palestine till his death, President Goodluck Jonathan bungled it on Tuesday, December 30, 2014 at the most crucial time. The Palestinians only needed a vote at the UN from Nigeria to attain statehood. Rather than ride on the same pedestal with Mandela, Jonathan decided to align with the forces in Israel and the US. He simply equated abstention to neutrality. Jonathan’s action marked a pivotal shift in Nigeria’s foreign policy, where the country always voted in favour of Palestine and had always thrown its weight behind a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, even before the recent realisation and support of the EU and all other Super Powers except US. Nigeria’s vote would have ended Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip by 2017. The UN resolution, sponsored by Jordan, had called for fresh talks based on territorial lines that existed before Israel’s occupation of the territories in 1967, and was the culmination of three months of campaigning by the Palestinians at the UN and had the backing of Arab states. The Palestinians required nine votes from 15 permanent and non-permanent members of the UN Security Council. The US and Australia voted against the resolution, while Russia, China, France, Luxembourg, Jordan, Argentina, Chile and Chad voted in favour. Nigeria, Britain, South Korea, Rwanda and Lithuania abstained. Nigeria’s abstention did the damage. The position to say the least was a disappointment to the Palestinians who had banked on the robust historic foreign policy of Nigeria that never queued behind iniquity, support injustice and identified with the aspiration of the oppressed peoples and nations of the South-South, Asia and Pacific nations. The Ambassador of the State of Palestine to Nigeria, Dr. Montaser Abu-Zeid who could not hide his shock, told the media that he received the assurances of Nigeria’s foreign ministry officials and had transmitted same to the Palestinian president and foreign minister. While the anguish continued in Palestine and the rest of the world, the Israelis and their US backers were raining praises on Jonathan. The scenario presented by this event is that Mandela did it, but it seemed rather than doing it, President Jonathan bungled it. [myad]
“By postponing the elections, the President (Dr. Goodluck Jonathan) has simply postponed his doomsday,” All Progressives Congress (APC) Presidential Campaign Organisation has said. In a statement, the Director of media and publicity of the party’s Presidential Campaign Organusation, Garba Shehu said that while the election postponement was supposedly to enable a multinational force that will launch an onslaught on Boko Haram and recover the terrorist group’s stolen territories, President Jonathan had actually seen the handwriting on the wall and had become desperate, like most men in a state of panic. “All the opinion polls show that President Jonathan is in his last days at Aso Rock. “Reports reaching us say that even the polls that his government has commissioned in secret by independent polling companies in the United States, United Kingdom and Israel have shown him that the Nigerian people are massively against him. He is surely headed for a loss at the polls.” Garba Shehu said that President Jonathan had the past five years to do everything his government could to stem the Boko Haram crisis, and was now pretending to be suddenly concerned about the people of the northeast when he had hitherto showed no concern for their welfare. “How does he expect anyone to believe that he suddenly cares about the same people he has abandoned all this while? Or does he suddenly care because there is an election coming up? What kind of leader is that?” He made it clear that the election postponement was simply a postponement of the inevitable, adding that there is nothing the president can do to change anything within six weeks. Garba Shehu’s verdict on behalf of the APC Presidential campaign organisation is: “Jonathan has failed Nigeria.” [myad]
A civil rights organization, National Democratic Front (NDF) has seen the shift in the dates for the conduct of the 2015 Nigeria general elections as a master stroke by chairman of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Professor Attahiru Jega to shame his detractors. In a statement in Abuja today, the Coordinator of the Front, Comrade Philip Agbese said that the decision to shift the dates has cleared Professor Jega from some allegations that he has been procured to do the bidding of a particular ethnic group and certain political actors. According to him, the postponement has shown Professor Jega’s respect for the rights of about 22 million Nigerians who might have been denied the right to vote at the polls. He commended what he termed the remarkable improvement in inclusive democratic ethos even as he acknowledged the INEC respect also for human lives “going by the concerns raised by the security chiefs. “Professor Jega has proven to the world that he is a man with conscience. He has shown uncommon love for popular views and his concern for the lives and property of the common Nigerians. He was appointed not just to conduct elections but also protect national interests. This he has exhibited. It is commendable and should be emulated by all public office holders.” He however appealed to INEC and the security chiefs to see the postponement of elections as a window to address the basic challenges confronting the commission with a view to conduct free, transparent and credible elections. “You should not give in to the antics of selfish politicians that are out to make a political capital out of the postponement.” Agbese advised Nigerians not to see the postponement as a setback but that they should see it as a unique opportunity to make a mark in nation’s democratic journey. [myad]
Former Senate President, Ken Nnamani has warned the greatest enemies of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) are members of the party working for other political parties.
Senator Nnamani who spoke today at the PDP campaign rally at Enugu South Local Government Area of Enugu State asked the party to be vigilant and avoid hasty celebrations.
“The greatest opponents PDP has are those who left PDP and those who are in PDP but are working for other political parties. The greatest enemies of PDP are PDP members. We have to be very careful so that we don’t celebrate before the victory is achieved.
“There are those who will support PDP in the daytime but at night, they will be in other political parties. We should be very careful of these people before we start celebrating.”
The former Senate President advised the PDP governorship candidate in Enugu State, Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi, to allocate resources to the various local government areas according to the number of votes the party receives from the separate councils.
Also addressing the rally, a former governor of the old Anambra State, Jim Nwobodo, advised members of the PDP to remain in the party even when they fail to realise their personal ambition.
“When you leave a party because you did not get what you want, you will lose out.
“It is better to remain in the party even when you don’t get what you want because you will be rewarded eventually. I urge all those that left PDP to come back.” [myad]
Lawyers to All Progressives Congress (APC) and its presidential candidate, General Muhammadu Buhari Chief Wole Olanipekun and Lateef Fagbemi told the Federal High Court in Abuja that they would file applications challenging the competence of the suits against Buhari’s qualification to contest the 2015 Presidential election. They would also challenge the entire steps taken in the suit so far, including the orders of service through substituted means.
Justice Adeniyi Ademola had, in two separate suits challenging Buhari’s eligibility to contest in the election, last week granted ex parte orders permitting the plaintiffs to serve the defendants in the suits through newspaper publications. He directed that General Buhari and APC should be served through substituted means in a suit challenging Buhari’s eligibility to stand for the March 28 poll.
The court had also granted an order of abridgment of time within which the defendants must respond to the suits.
Though, Buhari and the APC had yet to file any papers in the suit, their lawyers – Chief Wole Olanipekun and Lateef Fagbemi – urged the court to adjourn the matter to enable them to file all the necessary documents.
Fagbemi also urged the court to set aside the order of abridgment of time within which the defendants must file their responses, arguing that the granting of the order hinged on urgency, had already been diminished with the postponement of the poll from February 14 to March 28.
The judge then adjourned till February 23.
The plaintiffs in the separate suits are Chukwunweike Okafor and Max Ozoaka. They were represented in court by their lawyers today.
Apart from Buhari and the APC, the Independent National Electoral Commission is a defendant in the two suits.
There are at least three other suits seeking an order directing INEC to disqualify Buhari from participating in the poll because he among other things, failed to attach evidence of his academic qualifications to the form he submitted to the electoral body.
The plaintiffs are in their separate suits contending that the INEC FORM CF 001 submitted to INEC by the APC candidate submitted to INEC was incomplete and therefore urged the court to declare the form as incompetent.
They further stated that the failure of Buhari to accompany the INEC Form with evidence of his educational qualifications and evidence of his birth certificate or affidavit of declaration of age had altogether rendered the form inchoate.
Ozoaka, in a supporting affidavit to the originating summons, stated that the INEC Form submitted by Buhari did not meet the requirements under sections 31(1)(2) & (3), and 31(8) of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended). [myad]
President Goodluck Jonathan has promised to encourage states to continue to sponsor Christian pilgrims to Jerusalem, even as he dissolved a 10-man Board that handled this year’s Christian pilgrims.
Receiving the report of the Federal Government’s delegation to the pilgrimage today at the Presidential Aso Villa, Abuja, from its leader, Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, Jonathan said that economic pressure might have forced the affected state governments to withdraw from sponsoring pilgrims.
“The only thing I noticed is that various state governments are trying to withdraw from sponsorship of pilgrimage maybe because of the economic pressure on them. But we will encourage them to do so.
“Luckily, private institutions have shown interest and I believe that religious bodies, individuals and private institutions will gradually begin to key in to the pilgrimage operations.
“So if sub-national governments relax a little, the gap will be filled up.”
He expressed delight that the exercise was hitch-free despite the huge number of people involved.
He promised that his administration would study the report and implement the various recommendations made.
The President thereafter dissolved the 10-man delegation with a promise to constitute that of 2015 very soon.
Oritsejafor, who is the President of the Christian Association of Nigeria, had earlier told the President that all Christian pilgrims from all the states in the North were sponsored by individuals or were self-sponsored.
He said with the total of 12,890 pilgrims that performed the exercise, the Nigeria Christian Pilgrims Commission recorded about 45 percent increase in self-sponsorship.
As part of the delegation’s report, Oritsejafor called for the adequate funding of Nigerian embassies in Rome, Greece and Tel Aviv to assist in the handling of pilgrims.
He also called on various governments both at the states and local levels to sponsor Christians for pilgrimage especially as the commission is using the pilgrimage as a tool for moral and spiritual transformation. [myad]
Lagos lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN) has described the threat by the Nigeria military that its men and officers would not be available for the elections, originally scheduled for February 14 and 28 respectively as a result of which they were shifted to March 28 and April 11 as an act of mutiny.
In a statement in Lagos today, Falana said that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) should have called the bluff of security chiefs and proceeded with the February 14 presidential election, even as he said that by saying that they would not provide security in aid of civil authorities pursuant to section 217 of the Constitution, the security chiefs have committed the offence of mutiny contrary to section 52 of the Armed Forces Act.
according to him, also by causing the election to be postponed, the National Security Adviser (NSA) and the security chiefs had staged a coup against the constitution.
“They are liable to be prosecuted for the grave offence of treason at the appropriate time,” he added.
He also said that INEC misconstrued section 25 of the Electoral Act when it relied on it to postpone the election, adding: “the reliance on section 25 of the Electoral Act by Professor Attahiru Jega, the INEC chairman is totally misleading.”
According to him, the provision does not support the postponement of a general election in the entire country but “in the area or areas” where there is violence or actual threat of a breakdown of law and order.
“Since the reason for the postponement of any election must be “cogent and verifiable” it is crystal clear from the press conference addressed by Jega last night that INEC did not verify the bogus claim of the NSA and the security chiefs as required by the law.”
Falana said that contrary to the mistaken belief of the INEC leadership, the armed forces had no role to play in the electoral process.
He cited a judgment delivered last week by a Federal High Court sitting in Sokoto where the court declared illegal and unconstitutional the involvement of soldiers in election duties.
The judgment, he said, was binding on all authorities and persons in Nigeria.
He described as blackmail, the letter written to INEC by the National Security Adviser to the President, to the effect that the armed forces could not provide security for the election because of the operations in the north-east region. [myad]
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Mandela Did It, Jonathan Ruined It, By Adeyemi Suleman
Prior to the formal announcement of President Goodluck Jonathan to contest for another term in office, Nigerians were daily inundated with the messages sponsored by the Transformation Agenda of Nigeria. Our sensibilities were regularly assaulted by the propaganda of how some revolutionary leaders in the world had done great sacrifices to rescue and reform their respective countries, and how Jonathan too is ‘doing’ same in Nigeria.
The promo usually opens with how Martin Luther King (Jnr.) did it in the US, fighting for the human rights of the Americans, especially the blacks; how Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore turned around the fortunes of his country to become a first-world nation; how legendary Nelson Mandela helped South Africa to tackle apartheid and how President Barack Obama is doing ‘it’ in the US at the moment. In the message, TAN informed Nigerians of how President Goodluck Jonathan is ‘doing it’ here in Nigeria and urged him to ‘keep doing it.’
Certainly, those leaders being compared to President Jonathan sacrificed immensely and achieved remarkable strides for their respective countries and their popularity and feats endeared them to their people. They became enigmatic with their feats and instantly became heroes even before their demise. They never asked their countrymen to like them, yet they were worshipped.
To many Nigerians, Jonathan’s record since he became President, when placed side by side with those leaders, cannot match them. In my estimation of the majority, the comparison is a joke taken too far. Except for unrepentant tribalists, religious bigots, chronic pessimists and sycophants, including those ignorant of history and or with low intellectual capacity to comprehend the issue at hand, the TAN submissions are laughable. Of specific interest here is Nigeria’s recent let-down of the Palestinian people through its infamous and callous abstention from the UN vote on a draft resolution for Palestinian statehood. History has shown how the late anti-apartheid icon, Nelson Mandela stood solidly behind the Palestinians in their quest for freedom from Israeli occupation which has been characterised by killings, settlement activities and all sorts of inhumanities. In the face of Western criticism and despite being labelled a terrorist, Mandela remained undaunted. In 1999, the anti-Apartheid hero toured the Middle East, visiting Palestine. In Gaza, he closely identified the South African struggle for freedom with the Palestinian struggle. However, unlike Mandela who did it for Palestine till his death, President Goodluck Jonathan bungled it on Tuesday, December 30, 2014 at the most crucial time.
The Palestinians only needed a vote at the UN from Nigeria to attain statehood. Rather than ride on the same pedestal with Mandela, Jonathan decided to align with the forces in Israel and the US. He simply equated abstention to neutrality. Jonathan’s action marked a pivotal shift in Nigeria’s foreign policy, where the country always voted in favour of Palestine and had always thrown its weight behind a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, even before the recent realisation and support of the EU and all other Super Powers except US. Nigeria’s vote would have ended Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip by 2017. The UN resolution, sponsored by Jordan, had called for fresh talks based on territorial lines that existed before Israel’s occupation of the territories in 1967, and was the culmination of three months of campaigning by the Palestinians at the UN and had the backing of Arab states. The Palestinians required nine votes from 15 permanent and non-permanent members of the UN Security Council. The US and Australia voted against the resolution, while Russia, China, France,
Luxembourg, Jordan, Argentina, Chile and Chad voted in favour. Nigeria, Britain, South Korea, Rwanda and Lithuania abstained. Nigeria’s abstention did the damage. The position to say the least was a disappointment to the Palestinians who had banked on the robust historic foreign policy of Nigeria that never queued behind iniquity, support injustice and identified with the aspiration of the oppressed peoples and nations of the South-South, Asia and Pacific nations. The Ambassador of the State of Palestine to Nigeria, Dr. Montaser Abu-Zeid who could not hide his shock, told the media that he received the assurances of Nigeria’s foreign ministry officials and had transmitted same to the Palestinian president and foreign minister. While the anguish continued in Palestine and the rest of the world, the Israelis and their US backers were raining praises on Jonathan. The scenario presented by this event is that Mandela did it, but it seemed rather than doing it, President Jonathan bungled it. [myad]