Home Blog Page 2475

Hillary Clinton Distances Herself From Obama’s Foreign Policies

hillary clintonJust over a year after leaving her job as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton has offered views on foreign policy that analysts said seem part of an effort to distance herself from the Obama administration as she prepares a possible 2016 White House run.
In appearances this month, Clinton struck a hawkish tone on issues including Iran and Russia, even while expressing broad support for the work done by Obama and her successor as secretary of state, John Kerry.
Clinton said in New York that she was “personally skeptical” of Iran’s commitment to reaching a comprehensive agreement on its nuclear program.
“I’ve seen their behavior over (the) years,” she said, saying that if the diplomatic track failed, “every other option does remain on the table.”
Just two weeks earlier, Clinton was forced to backtrack after she drew parallels between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler at a closed-door fundraiser. In comments leaked to the media by a local reporter who attended the event, Clinton said Putin’s justifications for his actions in the Crimean region were akin to moves Hitler made in the years before World War Two.
“I’m not making a comparison, certainly, but I am recommending that we can perhaps learn from this tactic that has been used before,” she said the next day at an event in Los Angeles.
As secretary of state, Clinton was a key player in a U.S. effort to reset relations with Russia, a policy that critics say now appears to be a glaring failure.
Clinton’s recent rhetoric on Iran and Russia is part of a renewed focus on foreign policy for the former first lady and New York senator, who is widely considered the Democratic presidential front-runner in 2016 if she chooses to run.
She has been giving speeches across the country since leaving the State Department, but Wednesday’s address was her first on-the-record event in recent months focused solely on international relations.
“Secretary Clinton is distancing herself a bit on foreign policy matters from the administration recently,” said John Hudak, a Brookings Institution fellow and expert on presidential campaigns.
“This is a pretty standard practice for anyone looking to succeed the sitting president, even within the same party.
“It’s one of the first steps for her to say, ‘We’re not the same candidate,'” he said.
Clinton’s office did not respond to questions about the issue.
Creating space between her position and Obama’s is a “smart move,” said Hank Sheinkopf, a New York-based Democratic strategist who worked for the 1996 presidential re-election campaign of Hillary Clinton’s husband, Bill Clinton.
“The present administration is in a no-win situation with Russia, with Syria and in the Middle East,” Sheinkopf said before Clinton’s New York speech.
“Making a distance from them can only help.”
During her four-year tenure in the State Department, Clinton helped lead the charge on imposing strong sanctions on Iran, which she mentioned in her New York speech to a pro-Israel audience-including several Democratic lawmakers-at an American Jewish Congress dinner honoring her.
In late January, Clinton sent a letter to Carl Levin, Democratic chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, calling herself a “longtime advocate for crippling sanctions against Iran,” but urging that Congress should not impose new sanctions during negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear program.
She said that like Obama, she had no illusions about the ease or likelihood of reaching a permanent deal with Iran following an interim agreement reached under Kerry.
“Yet I have no doubt that this is the time to give our diplomacy the space to work,” a stance she reaffirmed on Wednesday.
Republicans have promised to make Clinton’s State Department record an issue if she runs for the White House, focusing on the 2012 attacks on a U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, in which four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, were killed.
The Republican National Committee has condemned Clinton’s handling of the Benghazi assault, suggesting in a recent research note that “Benghazi is still the defining moment of Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State.”
Some political analysts see her toughening rhetoric as more than a campaign tactic, and fitting with her foreign policy statements before joining the Obama administration. They said that could broaden her appeal to voters if she chooses to run, a decision she has said will not come until the end of this year.
Clinton, while a senator, voted in 2002 for a resolution authorizing U.S. military action against Iraq, a position that hurt her with liberal primary voters in her losing battle with Obama for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.
“Making a credible and forceful case for America’s place in the world – that’s the kind of thing she’s likely to say and continue to say,” said Josh Block, a former Clinton administration official and now an executive at the Israel Project in Washington.
“Those are messages that will resonate with Democrats and independents, as well as some Republicans.”

Jonathan Holds Private Meeting With Pope Francis In Vatican

Pope-BenedictPresident Goodluck Jonathan today, today, held a private meeting with Pope Francis at the Vatican. The meeting was believed to have centred on the promotion of inter-faith dialogue in Nigeria and other parts of the world to foster greater global peace and security.
Speaking to journalists after his private meeting with Pope Francis, President Jonathan said that the promotion of inter-faith dialogue is a cause to which the Pontiff is very committed.
The President said that his administration is already working in close collaboration with Cardinal John Onaiyekan who was “the team leader” for the effort to strengthen inter-faith dialogue in Nigeria, assured the Pope of his administration’s continued commitment to the promotion of religious harmony and the peaceful co-existence of people of all faiths.
He also assured the Pope that his administration will continue to work diligently to alleviate poverty in Nigeria through more inclusive economic growth and development.
President Jonathan who noted that Pope Francis has always taken a keen interest in Nigeria, said that the Pope promised to visit the country.
The Pope, President Jonathan said, also assured him that he would continue to pray for God to bless the country and its people.
“My coming to see the Pope was to discuss issues, especially that of inter-faith dialogue which the Vatican has been promoting.
“Also the Pope has been advocating that the world should do more to eradicate poverty and make sure that the ordinary people of this world are in a position to live more decent lives. The Pope is very dedicated to poverty alleviation and I also interfaced with him on how we can collaborate more with the Vatican on what we are already doing in this regard back home.”
Before leaving the Vatican, President Jonathan also conferred with the Secretary of State, Monsignor Pietro Parolin.
He had received Nigeria’s Vatican-based Cardinal Francis Arinze earlier in the day at the St. Regis Hotel in Rome.

Premier Shocker: Chelsea Pounds Arsenal 6 -0

Arsenal and ChelseaEverything that could have gone wrong did go wrong this afternoon in Arsenal’s visit to Stamford Bridge that ended in an unbelievable 6-0 rout by Chelsea.
Of course, fumbling referee Andre Marriner will have his fair share of the headlines for his hilarious/bizarre/terrible decision to send Gibbs off instead of Oxlade-Chamberlain. But more importantly this defeat surely heralds the end of Arsenal’s slim Premier League title hopes, as the Gunners, who dominated the top of the table for long, have now been pushed to the third position after Liverpool. Chelsea meanwhile march on with their biggest ever win over Arsenal which has helped them to consolidate their grip on the top spot.
The goals started coming quite early in the one-sided game. The following highlights adapted from a The Telegraph match report summarise the story:
•5th min: GOAL! Chelsea 1-0 Arsenal (Eto’o). Arsenal again give the ball away cheaply and Schurrle is the man to profit. His pass to Eto’o is slightly behind the Chelsea striker but he cuts back inside and curls the ball beautifully with his left foot from the edge of the box past a despairing Szczesny dive.
•7th min: GOAL! Chelsea 2-0 Arsenal (Schurrle). Yet AGAIN Arsenal lose the ball on the halfway line and it is worked forward to Schurrle down the right. The German advances and, with Eto’o dragging the defenders away with his decoy run, is able to pick his spot, driving a low shot low across Szczesny into the same corner that the Cameroonian found just moments earlier.
•16th min: RED CARD AND PENALTY! (Gibbs). Oh dear oh dear oh dear oh dear… Hazard has a shot from 8 yards out and Oxlade-Chamberlain, trying to head the ball wide, instead flings his hand at it and flicks it past the post. But WAIT A MINUTE!!! Referee Andre Marriner has sent the wrong man off!!!! He’s sent Gibbs off instead of Oxlade-Chamberlain. Erm…
•17th min: GOAL! Chelsea 3-0 Arsenal (Hazard). Easy as you like, straight down the middle and no problem for Hazard who makes it three for Chelsea.
•42nd min: GOAL! Chelsea 4-0 Arsenal (Oscar). And the camera pans to a disconsolate Wenger. Poor man. Great play from Schurrle who brings the ball down just inside the Arsenal half and knocks it into the path of Torres. The Chelsea substitute drives into the visitors’ box before unselfishly deciding to cut the ball inside to Oscar who is able to lift the ball over Szczesny from four yards out.
•66th min: GOAL! Chelsea 5-0 Arsenal (Oscar). It’s slightly harsh on Arsenal because they have been the better side since the break but the Chelsea fans are holding all five fingers in the air now. Oscar doesn’t get hold of his shot from just inside the Arsenal penalty area but the ball bounces in front of Szczesny, who has a bit of a nightmare failing to prevent it from bobbling into the net.
•71st GOAL! Chelsea 6-0 Arsenal (Salah). His first Chelsea goal! The Egyptian beats the offside trap and has as long as he wants to pick his spot as he latches onto a Matic throughball and bears down on the Arsenal goal. He selects the near post and Szczesny has no chance.

Nigeria’s Flamingoes Book Quarter Final, Send Colombia Packing

Nigerian Flamingo
Nigerian Flamingo

Nigeria’s Flamingoes have qualified for the quarter finals of the FIFA Under 17 World Cup tournament in Costa Rica, after coming from behind to beat Colombia 2-1.

Nigeria had earlier beaten China in their first group game by the same margin.

Needing all three points to stay alive in Group D, Colombia burst out of the blocks with a third minute goal as Angie Rodriguez looped a header from a perfect Nancy Acosta cross over the head of stranded goalkeeper Onyinyechukwu OkekeNigeria drew level just past the midway point of the opening half with Joy Bokiri curling in a perfectly flighted free-kick from the edge of the penalty area, FIFA.com reports.

Nigeria took the lead for the first time approaching the hour mark as some sloppy marking from a corner allowed the tall figure of Uchenna Kanu to nod the ball in unchallenged at the back post.

Midfielder Ihuoma Onyebuchi then rattled the Colombia crossbar with a first time strike from distance with the South Americans increasingly on the back foot.

Colombia goalkeeper Monica Florez memorably pulled off four successive blocks during one almighty goalmouth scramble as they desperately hung on.

The win leaves Nigeria sharing top spot with Mexico, while Colombia will now tackle China PR with each seeking their maiden points of the competition. Both Nigeria and Mexico automatically qualified from their group.

President Jonathan Reduces Abba Moro’s Authority

 Nigeria Minister of Interior, Abba Moro
Nigeria Minister of Interior, Abba Moro

President Goodluck Jonathan may have shown the nation’s minister of Interior, Abba Moro an omen of what to expect soon as he removed his authority of conducting further recruitment exercise into the Nigeria Immigration Service. Abba Moro bungled the exercise last week Saturday in which about 520,000 Nigerians participated out of which about 20 died and several other injured as a result of stampede.
An obviously angry President, at the weekly Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting today at the Presidential Villa, canceled the last week recruitment exercise and constituted a committee to reschedule the exercise nationwide. The special committee is being headed by the Chairman of the Federal Civil Service Commission.
Jonathan announced some form of compensations for the victims of the Saturday’s recruitment mishaps, which is that each of the family of those who died in the stampede will present three young people, one of which must be a woman for automatic employment in the next exercise. Also, all those who were injured would get automatic employment to be made available through the President.
The Minister of Information, Labaran Maku, who briefed State House correspondents after the Cabinet meeting said that the President also took certain measures which he announced to Federal Executive Council.
“The first is that the Immigration recruitment exercise has been completely cancelled and he has directed that a new exercise will be conducted by a special committee under the chairmanship of the Chairman Civil Service Commission to conduct the recruitment exercise to fill the vacancies of the Nigerian Immigration Service.
“Other members of the committee as announced by the President are the Comptroller General of Nigerian Immigration Service, representatives of the Inspector General of Police (IGP),  Comptroller General of  Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, Comptroller General of ‎Prisons Service, Director General State Security Service (SSS) and the Corp Marshal of the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC).
“This committee will proceed to conduct the exercise to fill the vacancies in the Nigerian Immigration Service. The President also directed that for the families of those who lost their dear ones, three spaces be provided for three young people one of which must be a woman in the new recruitment exercise‎.
“Also, all those who were injured in the cause of the exercise across the country will be given automatic recruitment into the service.
“The FEC in sending condolences to the families of the deceased and also in sending special wishes to those who are injured and still undergoing treatment ‎in hospitals in parts of the country, expressed total regrets that this tragedy took place at all.
“We are parents and we know what this means to those who have had the opportunity to train their children and are waiting for the opportunity for these children to now take their place and help their families, only to lose them under this very difficult circumstances that took place on Saturday.
“We reaffirm our commitment to ensuring that this kind of tragedy does not repeat itself in this country.
“The President has also directed that as soon as he returns from his trip abroad he will meet the families of the deceased to express his personal condolences to them over the sad tragedy that took place on Saturday.
“He instructed all MDAs never to embark on exercise of this nature in recruiting people into the public service because what happened could have been avoided. So Mr. President directed that no one outside the armed forces and the police who usually ‎recruit people through exercise that no other MDA is allowed to embark on this kind of exercise that we witnessed on Saturday.
“Council noted that it is regrettable that this took place at a time that every effort was being made by government to increase spaces available for employment. For example last year, we were able to get 1.6 million employed in the various sectors of the economy and the public service. However, this incident that took place is so painful and we will not want to see in this country young job seekers losing their lives in the process of seeking for job after school training.”
“We assure the nation today that every step will be taken to look into the various lapses in recruitment exercises into the public service to ensure that all those who are qualified get access to employment without going through this kind of experience.”

National Conference, Jonathan’s Dictatorial Safari By Garba Shehu

Garba-Shehu
Garba-Shehu

Some call it a Machiavellian simplification. Throughout the 100 years of existence of Nigeria as a country, there has never been a moment without trenchant agitation for the amendment or outright change of the country’s constitution. At every turn, the colonial administration responded by handing down a new constitution. In like manner, the independence constitution has gone through series of makeover–1963, 1979, 1989 as well the failed attempt in 2006 to remove term limits from it. Every government of this country has made one attempt to either amend, change, slash or fondle small and large sections of the constitution, including the sitting Jonathan administration, which tried but also failed to tamper with term limits.
There is nothing wrong with these attempts, so long as they are carried out within the framework of the law. Every constitution prescribes a method by which it can be amended, because all constitutions are contrived and constructed by ordinary mortals. A constitution is not the word of God or Allah like the Qur’an or the Bible, which as a holy text, is free of error. Every constitution contains errors and flaws and must therefore from time to time, be subjected to changes. The Indian Constitution has had 98 amendments made to it in the last six decades. The 200 year-old US constitution on the other hand, had only 27 amendments to this date.
Nigerian governments have been amending the constitution for their personal gains, and not for the betterment of society. Where they try and fail, they reach for the knife to slash sections of it that they did not want, as the military governments, under General Olusegun Obasanjo, General Babangida, General Abacha and General Abdulsalam did. In the case of Obasanjo in his second coming as elected civilian President, what he did when he failed to secure the changes to make way for his third term in office was to abandon the process entirely. He did not even deem it fit to honour the delegates with a farewell dinner.
This brings us to the current effort of President Jonathan who, like the others before him, made his own effort to amend the constitution that he swore to protect. His state of denial has not succeeded in wishing away the unsettling question that all he wants is to remove the eight-year bar placed on his tenure by the constitution.
To conceal the selfish motive behind the relentless pursuit of the amendment, the government has successfully been whipping up ethnic, religious and regional sentiments, resulting in the convening of this “National Conference.” There is nothing wrong in changing a constitution that retains colonial laws or one constitution that harbours a repressive system of government. Who needs a brutal system that protects the rich and persecutes the poor, one that protects the rulers in robbing Nigeria of its wealth?  We cannot pretend that there are no problems.
The problem with the way Mr. Jonathan is going about it is one; by convening a “national conference” side-by-side with an elected parliament currently engaged in a constitution amendment as prescribed by the constitution itself, he sends a dangerous signal that we have a leader who has absolutely no regard to the institution of parliament. Parliaments all over the world are considered as the repositories of popular sovereignty. A country cannot have two parliaments running concurrently. You cannot say that you are following the constitution, and you are doing things against it.
Two; this budding dictator, the President of Nigeria is going about it in a way suggesting that he is not a firm believer in representative democracy. Why would he not call on the citizens to elect men and women who will represent them at the conference? Instead of allowing representation on the basis of popular mandate, he, by himself, has directly and indirectly appointed 80 percent of the delegates.
The irony of what is happening is not limited to a democratic government’s aversion for the right of the people to choose or elect their representatives. We are a country of robust debate and dialogue; a people who cherish enterprise and hard work. Today we have a government that has reduced us to a frightening new order where tribal and religious anthmetic have chased out ideology, principles and nationalism. It bespeaks of ideological barrenness which one must admit, is hardly unique to Nigerian democracy. The question to ask then is: How did we come to such a pass?
The nature of this conference is a page from medieval political literature whence the “wise leader” presiding over the affairs of the “foolish citizens” knows what is best and chooses on their behalf. Then, it was held that the masses are too weak and malleable to be left alone to decide for themselves.
But a sacred covenant between a citizen and his state cannot be authored by a ruler no matter how “divine” are his powers. M. K.O Abiola, of blessed memory, used to say that you cannot shave a man’s head in his absence. This then clearly brings out the futility of the National Conference, which really is no more than Dr. Jonathan’s dictatorial safari.

So Black People Do PhD? By Muhammad Jameel Yusha’u

Muhammad Jameel Yusha'u
Muhammad Jameel Yusha’u

I followed with interest a recent story that started from Harvard University called I, too, I am Harvard. It is in response to the stereotyping and the challenges faced by black students or more generally, to use the controversial term ‘people of colour.’ They were indirectly protesting against the treatment they receive from colleagues, friends, tutors etc, for being black or non-white. Soon the campaign became viral and students from Oxford and Cambridge also joined the bandwagon to protest against the misrepresentation of blacks, particularly the thinking that you have to belong to a particular race in order to belong to these elite institutions.
But I am afraid, it is not just Harvard or Cambridge or Oxford where being an African or black comes with stereotyping, almost in all aspect of life being an African as an individual, or the continent itself are shrouded in misinformation, ignorance, mystery, stereotyping, and at worst, belittling simply because of how people look.  I was once told by someone, “So black people do PhD?” Sometimes you laugh, other times you explain, and in some occasions you get angry. What is even more interesting is that the media sometimes reinforce such stereotypes.
But one of the things about this stereotyping that you find common is the thinking that Africa is a country, and so a lot of people come to you excited that they will be travelling to Africa. When you ask them where in Africa? They start murmuring and stammering to figure out what you mean.
The first time I experienced this was in March 2004, about ten years ago. I was dressed in white Babbar Riga (a traditional attire common in sub-Saharan Africa). It was a brief visit to London at the time, and I was trying to get a bureau de change in Oxford Street, when I heard a voice across the road shouting “African brother, African brother.” The man crossed the road and came towards me. “I like your dress, please how do I get one. Can you give me your address in Africa so that I can send you the money?”
My address in Africa? I asked, confused. I told him that I am from Nigeria in West Africa. He didn’t have the time to listen to my lecture and so we said goodbye. Interestingly, he is a fellow black guy, who told me that his ancestors were from Africa, and he has consumed the stereotype that Africa is a country.
Sometime in 2005, I was approached by the kids of one of my friends in Sheffield. A very nice family. The children were so happy to see me, and so was I.
“We have been to Africa on holiday,” the young kids told me. “That was great,” I responded and asked: “where in Africa?” Instead of answering my question, they looked at their elder sister, with their father watching by the side, “which part of Africa have we been to?” after a little silence, she responded, “Gambia.”
But don’t blame the local people for not understanding the African continent. Sometimes even the educated people, in fact some of whom supposed to educate us, you will be shocked by their perception of Africa. Here is the story I always laugh at when I remember. It was at the BBC World Service when the language services introduced Premier League commentary in local languages. And one of the best commentators, works for the Swahili Service. He has an excellent mastery of football commentary in Swahili. He has become a household name in his region. In fact, you don’t have to understand Swahili to know which team is performing well, and when he says it’s a Goaaaaaaaal. Almost everyone in the African hub will stop his work or at least smile at the skills of our friend. Then one day, one of the journalists, in fact a senior one, asked whether our colleague could do the commentary for Hausa and other languages. If it were possible I would have been very happy, because that would have saved me from struggling to translate certain football terms in Hausa language. Luckily, we had my friend Aminu Abdulkadir who came up with such excellent terms like ‘bugun lauje” for Conner-kick etc.
But the one that remains fresh in my memory was in the autumn of 2012. I was teaching a course on the impact of propaganda and distortion in the media.  So I had pictures of two locations, Nairobi city in Kenya, and Harlem in New York. As an introduction to the topic, I displayed the picture of Harlem and asked the students to identify the city. Unanimously, all the students said it must be somewhere in Africa, simply because it looks like a deprived area populated by black people.
I then displayed the picture which provides an aerial view of Nairobi and asked them to identify the city. “This must be somewhere in Singapore” one of the students said. “It looks like somewhere in California,” said another. I asked the students why they think Nairobi looks like California, and Harlem is somewhere in Africa. The answer was obvious, that’s how the media represents Africa.
So if I were to advise the black students in Harvard, Oxford and Cambridge, I would have told them to take their peaceful campaign to the doors of the news media, for among other factors, their colleagues think they don’t belong to Harvard, Oxford or Cambridge because of what they see on their television screens.

Russian President, Putin, Annexes Crimea From Ukraine, Signs The Treaty

Russian President Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin, defying Ukrainian protests and Western sanctions, signed a treaty on Tuesday making Crimea part of Russia but said he did not plan to seize any other regions of Ukraine.

In a fiercely patriotic address to a joint session of parliament in the Kremlin today, punctuated by standing ovations, cheering and tears, Putin said Crimea’s disputed referendum vote on Sunday, held under Russian military occupation, had shown the overwhelming will of the people to be reunited with Russia.

To the Russian national anthem, Putin and Crimean leaders signed a treaty on making Crimea part of Russia, declaring: “In the hearts and minds of people, Crimea has always been and remains an inseparable part of Russia.”

Parliament was expected to begin ratifying the document within days.

The speech drew immediate hostile reaction in Kiev and the West. Ukraine’s foreign ministry said it did not recognize the pact, which showed how Russia posed a threat to international security.

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, on a visit to Poland, called Moscow’s action a land grab and stressed Washington’s commitment to defending the security of NATO allies on Russian borders.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said Russia’s move on Crimea was unacceptable to the international community, while British Foreign Secretary William Hague said London had suspended military cooperation with Russia.

BLACK AND WHITE

In his speech, Putin lambasted Western nations for what he called hypocrisy, saying they had endorsed Kosovo’s independence from Serbia but now denied Crimeans the same right, he said.

“You cannot call the same thing black today and white tomorrow,” he declared to stormy applause, saying that while he did not seek conflict with the West, Western partners had “crossed the line” over Ukraine and behaved “irresponsibly”.

He said Ukraine’s new leaders, in power since the overthrow of pro-Moscow president Viktor Yanukovich last month, included “neo-Nazis, Russophobes and anti-Semites.”

Putin thanked China for what he called its support, even though Beijing abstained on a U.N. resolution on Crimea that Moscow had to veto on its own. He said he was sure Germans would support the Russian people’s quest for reunification, just as Russia had supported German reunification in 1990.

And he sought to reassure Ukrainians that Moscow did not seek any further division of their country. Fears have been expressed in Kiev that Russia might move on the Russian-speaking eastern parts of Ukraine, where there has been tension between some Russian-speakers and the new authorities.

“Don’t believe those who try to frighten you with Russia and who scream that other regions will follow after Crimea,” Putin said. “We do not want a partition of Ukraine.”

Setting out Moscow’s view of the events that led to the overthrow of Yanukovich in a popular uprising last month, Putin said the “so-called authorities” in Kiev had stolen power in a coup, opening the way for extremists who would stop at nothing.

NATO SAILORS

Making clear Russia’s concern at the possibility of the U.S.-led NATO military alliance expanding into Ukraine, he declared: “I do not want to be welcomed in Sevastopol (Crimean home of Russia’s Black Sea fleet) by NATO sailors.”

Moscow’s seizure of Crimea has caused the most serious East-West crisis since the end of the Cold War and Putin showed no sign of backing down despite the threat of tougher sanctions.

In Crimea, where his speech and the signing ceremony were broadcast live, his words caused rapture for some.

“Putin’s done what our hearts were longing for,” said Natalia, a pensioner who sells snacks in a kiosk in the center of Simferopol, the region’s capital. “This finally brings things back to what they should be after all those years. For me, for my family, there can be no bigger joy, for us this is sacred.”

Feride Kurtbedinova, a high school student and a member of Crimea’s Muslim ethnic Tatar minority, said: “After Putin met with the Tatar leaders, that made it for me. He showed respect, gave us security guarantees, for Tatars that is important.”

Before Putin’s speech, Ukraine’s interim prime minister, Arseniy Yatseniuk, had sought to reassure Moscow on two key areas of concern, saying in a televised address delivered in Russian that Kiev was not seeking to join NATO and would disarm Ukrainian nationalist militias.

On Monday, the United States and the European Union imposed personal sanctions on a handful of officials from Russia and Ukraine accused of involvement in Moscow’s seizure of the Black Sea peninsula, most of whose 2 million residents are ethnic Russians.

Russian politicians dismissed the sanctions as insignificant and a badge of honor. The State Duma, or lower house, adopted a statement urging Washington and Brussels to extend the visa ban and asset freeze to all its members. The Foreign Ministry in Moscow said it would retaliate.

Japan joined the mild Western sanctions on Tuesday, announcing the suspension of talks with Russia on investment promotion and visa liberalization.

The White House said the world’s seven leading industrial democracies will hold a Group of Seven meeting without Russia on the sidelines of a nuclear security summit in The Hague next week to consider further response to Russia’s actions.

CLOSER TIES

Russian forces took control of Crimea in late February following the toppling of Yanukovich after deadly clashes between riot police and protesters trying to overturn his decision to spurn a trade and cooperation deal with the EU and seek closer ties with Russia

Despite strongly worded condemnations, Western nations were cautious in their first practical steps against Moscow, seeking to leave the door open for a diplomatic solution.

Russian stocks gained another 2 percent after rallying strongly on Monday as investors noted the initial sanctions did not target businesses or executives. But the ruble fell 0.6 percent against the dollar and the euro.

In a sign of the negative impact of the crisis on the investment climate, Russia’s state property agency said it may postpone major privatization deals until the second half of the year.

Washington and Brussels have said future punitive measures could affect the economy, energy and arms contracts as well as the private wealth of magnates close to Putin.

The EU also said its leaders would sign the political part of an association agreement with Ukraine on Friday, in a gesture of support for the fragile coalition in Kiev.

Highlighting rifts in the EU, member state Austria offered on Tuesday to mediate between Moscow and the West.

Putin has declared that Russia has the right to defend, by military force if necessary, Russian citizens and Russian speakers living in former Soviet republics, raising concerns that Moscow may intervene elsewhere.

Putin has repeatedly accused the new leadership in Kiev of failing to protect Russian-speakers from violent Ukrainian nationalists. Ukraine’s government has accused Moscow of staging provocations in Russian-speaking regions of eastern Ukraine to justify military intervention.

In a symbolic gesture, Crimean Prime Minister Sergei Aksyonov announced that Crimea would switch to Moscow time from March 30. In the Crimean capital Simferopol, Banks scrambled to introduce the ruble as an official currency alongside the Ukrainian hryvnia.

Letter From Oodua Foundation To Nigeria

This is a letter from the heart to the rulers, leaders, peoples and citizens of Nigeria, from OODUA FOUNDATION, a Yoruba think-tank organization with members in all parts of the world. We write this letter to Nigeria, the country of our birth, from the depth of our love and hopes, and from our accumulated knowledge and experiences in the countries in which we reside across the face of the earth. Our country, Nigeria, can become a major factor in the world. It has the material and human resources for a very significant role in the affairs of our continent and of our world. Most of the countries in which we live in the wide world are not as richly endowed as our own country, and yet most of them have much comfort and beauty to dispense, occupy important positions in the economic and political life of the world, and are respected by other countries and by the general international community.

In contrast, our own country, Nigeria, is little regarded in most parts of the world. In many parts of the world, where many of us have attained prominence and influence as a result of our high education, high qualifications, and qualitative contributions to society, we live in almost constant shame and anxiety from the fact that the news from our own country are almost perpetually of growing decay, growing poverty, unspeakable human suffering, deep-rooted and inscrutable corruption, fearful lack of security, horrific blood-letting conflicts, frequent acts of genocide, religious extremism and terrorism, and constant probability of sudden collapse. Quite often, each of us and our children confront situations in which we are painfully compelled to hesitate to say that we are Nigerians.

We write this letter to our country in the belief that we Nigerians can change these trends in our country’s life. We write it in the hope that this cry from us from all over the world will move our countrymen, and our country’s rulers and leaders, to stop and consider, and resolve, individually and collectively, to change the direction of our country’s path. We in Oodua Foundation are all products of the Yoruba nation. Our parents have, since the beginning of the making of a Nigerian federation in about 1950, contributed with all sincerity and dedication, and made outstanding inputs into all worthy areas of Nigeria’s development. Among other things, they laid the foundations of the influence that we their descendants now command in the world. We are proud of the contributions that our Yoruba nation continues to make today in the various spheres of Nigeria’s life.

We and the whole world know from the facts of our history that our Yoruba nation, and other Nigerian nationalities, lives in undeserved poverty and confusion in Nigeria today – all because of the relentless intensification of corruption in the political and economic management of Nigeria’s affairs since independence in 1960. We the Yoruba nation, and other nationalities of Nigeria, command the cultural assets with which we could easily prosper in today’s world, but being part of Nigeria stultifies and represses the triumph of such assets.

We endorse and support, and strongly commit ourselves to, the contributions being made by our Yoruba nation and our Yorubanation’s leaders at home today towards worthwhile changes in Nigeria, and towards a redirection of the trajectory of Nigeria’s history. After very careful consultations, a delegation of our Yoruba leaders is now in Abuja for the National Conference convened by the President of Nigeria. The hope of our Yoruba nation is that the National Conference will produce outcomes that will lead to a new and rational Nigerian federation, reasonably empower every federating unit of the Nigerian federation to thrive in its own way and make its own kind of contribution to the overall prosperity of Nigeria, generate harmony among the peoples of Nigeria, establish open and democratic political traditions in Nigeria, earn stability for Nigeria as a country, and start a new surge of hope for all Nigerians.

Needless to say, Nigeria’s continued existence as one country depends very much on the achievement of these outcomes. If we Nigerians cannot do Nigeria properly, we might as well let it go. We might as well let other structures emerge that can put substance, joy and hope back into the lives of the 170 millions who now flounder and suffer in Nigeria. We in Oodua Foundation strongly hope that, with this National Conference, we Nigerians will indeed begin to do Nigeria properly.

For this reason, we must express serious shock about the statement credited to the Northern Elders Forum meeting of March 10-11 that:

The planned National Conference has no constitutional basis, or any form of Legitimacy or authority to speak for the people of the North or other Nigerians. Its proceedings, conclusions and recommendations are therefore of no consequence and will not be accepted by the people of the North.

In the interest of all the peoples and citizens of Nigeria, we must urge the Northern Elders to reconsider this very damaging statement of theirs. In the history of the constitutional development of Nigeria, the present National Conference is perfectly in line with all previous Nigerian constitutional conferences, and it is by no means inferior to any in legitimacy. These are no times for irreconcilable stonewalling, or for hard postures designed to intimidate. No Nigerian people can now be intimidated. The way matters stand today, we either all join hands and sort out the colossal mess that Nigeria has become, or we separate.

From all over the world, we wish the National Conference success.

 

Dr. Dejo Ogunwande                                     Prof. Adeniran Adeboye

SECRETARY                                                          CHAIRMAN

Prof.(Senator) Banji Akintoye

PATRON

African Writers To Honour Literary Icon, Chinua Achebe

Chinua Achebe
Chinua Achebe

The Pan African Writers’ Association (PAWA) has announced plans to institute some programmes in honour of  literary icon and late author  of “Things Fall Apart,” Professor Albert Chinualumogu Achebe.
The association, whose members visited President Goodluck Jonathan today at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, sought the support of Nigerian government to “endow a literary prize of international standing to be called The Chinua Achebe Prize for Literature.” The association hinted that it is already working on the modalities for the endowment.
The delegation, led by the secretary general, Professor Atukwei Okai also informed the President of PAWA’s plan to hold this years’s International African Writers’ Day in honour of Achebe in recognition of his giant strides in literature.
“The International African Writers’ Day was established by the African Union to be celebrated annually throughout the continent to afford all the African people a moment to pause to reflect on the contributions of the African writer to the continent’s development. On these occasions in the past, we have honoured writers like Nadine Godimer, Professor Ali Mazrui, Wole Soyinka and Professor Femi Osofisan. This year, it is the turn of Chinua Achebe,” the leader of the delegation said.
He invited the President to be the Chief Guest of Honour at the event scheduled to take place in November in Accra, Ghana.
PAWA also congratulated the President and Rivers state government on the designation by UNESCO, of Port Harcourt, as the International Book Centre for 2014.
President Jonathan said that the plan by the association to honour Achebe is a welcome development and promised to support the effort.
For the Writers’ Day event in Accra, the President asked the association to formalize the invitation by bringing letters to his office, even as he pledged to help in mobilizing funds from Anambra sons and daughters for the Achebe literary prize.
“Anything about Chinua Achebe will be easy for us to mobilize funds. The money may  not necessarily come from government coffers but I will be able to coordinate some friends especially from Achebe’s home state, Anambra which has very vibrant young men and women who can support robustly if they are properly carried along which I can play that role. We will bring them on board to assist.
“Achebe has made the name, not just for Nigeria but also for the continent and writers like you should be able to promote the name further.”
President Jonathan said that his administration has been trying to encourage Nigerian youths to cultivate the habit of reading and writing.
He added that his administration would relaunch the bring back the book initiative and inculcate it into the national educational programme.
“We have also been thinking of how to bring that bring back the book concept to make it a national programme so that young boys and girls in primary and secondary schools can develop a reading and writing attitude.”
It would be recalled that the President  launched the concept in 2010 in Lagos in the company of Nobel Laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka.
The President also blamed the poor reading culture among young Nigerians to the presence of the internet and social media.
“I thank the association for what you have been doing to encourage writing culture. In this age of Internet  and text messages, people don’t like to write long sentences again. Our young people are used to reading very short things, they don’t have interest in reading the novels we read in our days.”

Advertisement
Advertisement ADVERTORIAL
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com