Home Blog Page 268

Nigeria’s Telecom Contribution To GDP Hits 16 Per Cent – Prof. Danbatta


The telecommunications sector’s contribution to the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has increased significantly to 16 per cent in the second quarter of 2023, according to the data reported by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), based on the computation by the Nigeria Bureau of Statistics (NBS).
The Executive Vice Chairman of NCC, Professor Umar Danbatta, dropped this hint yesterday, September 7, in a keynote address at the annual Telecom Executives and Regulators Forum (TERF) hosted by the Association of Telecom Companies of Nigeria (ATCON) in Lagos.
According to Professor Danbatta, from a 14.13 per cent contribution in the first quarter of 2023, and up from the hitherto 15 per cent all-time-high record in the second quarter of 2022, the telecommunications sector had added 16 per cent to the national GDP in the second quarter of 2023 to set a new record.
Speaking on the theme: “Success Factors and Barriers to National Broadband and Digital Economy Aspirations,” Professor Danbatta said that from about eight per cent contribution to GDP in 2015, when he came on board as the Executive Vice Chairman of NCC, the quarterly GDP has increased significantly to reach its current threshold of 16 per cent.
He said that this has continued to positively impact all aspects of the economy.
“Through sustained regulatory excellence and operational efficiency by the Commission, the industry has grown in leaps and bounds over the past two decades and this has impacted on all other sectors of the economy. The effective regulatory regime emplaced by the NCC and with the support from all stakeholders has been our major success factor as an industry.”
Professor Danbatta said that while there are barriers to broadband deployment in the country, ranging from the issue of right of way (RoW), fibre cuts, high capital requirement for deployment, multiple taxations and regulations, among other challenges, the NCC is navigating regulatory complexities, digital divide and literacy, security concerns with firmness and increased collaborations with necessary stakeholders such as ATCON to create measures towards tackling the challenges.
On the RoW challenge, the NCC boss said that there are about 46 different taxes directed at the telecom sector at the moment. Such charges and levels, coming in various names, are imposed on telecom operators by some agencies and tiers of government, especially at the state and local levels. Danbatta said the challenge translates into greater economic burdens on telecom subscribers in the country.
On connectivity, Danbatta said: “Over the years, we have identified some clusters of access gaps all over the country but we have recorded a significant drop in the number of access gaps, as we continue to drive initiatives that boost access to telecommunications services.”
He said that the Commission does this by enlisting government commitment to a digital economy with robust policy frameworks, promotion of investment and funding, stimulation of infrastructure development, digital inclusion and literacy, promotion of competition and market liberalization, effective allocation of spectrum, as well as driving the e-government ecosystem.
Danbatta said that with various ongoing regulatory efforts, “The NCC is confident that we are going to reach 50 per cent broadband penetration threshold by the end of 2023 and by 2025, we would have met and possibly surpassed the 70 per cent broadband penetration target, as contained in the Nigerian National Broadband Plan (NNBP), 2020-2025.”
The NCC boss commended ATCON and its members for being partners in progress and for constantly engaging the Commission in constructive ways towards finding solutions to the myriad of challenges confronting the industry. The EVC said a national broadband network and a thriving digital economy are not without their challenges.
“However, these challenges can be overcome through determination, innovation, and strategic planning. By focusing on the success factors and addressing the barriers, we can create a future where every Nigerian have access to the opportunities that the digital world offers.”
Danbatta said that the success of the nation’s digital aspirations is beyond technological advancements but also about transforming lives, driving economic growth, and ensuring that a nation remains competitive on the global stage.
“As we work together to navigate this path, I enjoin all our stakeholders in the public and private sectors to remain committed to building a brighter and more connected future for our country.”

Tribunal Fines Labour Party Over N47 Million, Others, For “Frivolous Petitions”

The Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal (PEPT) has fined three political parties for filing what it described as “frivolous petitions.’

They are the Labour Party (LP) which is fined

N47, 910, 431.87; the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) which is fined N23, 391,001.45 and the APM, fined N13,675,890.00.

The Tribunal said that the fines were in line with the Judicial Act 87, sub-section 390 of 1968 (as amended).

The judges asked the parties to pay the money within 48 hours after the judgment into the consolidated account of the Appeal court, lodged at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

I’ve Nothing Against Tinubu, Atiku Clarifies; Says He’s Not Retiring From Politics

Alhaji Atiku Abubakar | Reuters

The Presidential candidate of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2023 election, Atiku Abubakar has made it clear that he has nothing against President Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) even as he said that he has no plans to quit active politics yet.

A statement today, September 7, by Paul Ibe, his media adviser said that Atiku “has nothing personal against President Tinubu. He owes him no ill will.”

Paul Ibe said that the PDP presidential candidate is not going into retirement and will instead continue to be part of the struggle to deepen democracy in the country.

“This struggle is not about Atiku; it’s about Nigeria and the future of our democracy.

“By allowing election riggers to get away with their misdeeds, our democracy will be in greater jeopardy. “Consent is essential to democratic mandate; ruling people against their will undermines everything democracy stands for.”

He stressed that the struggle is about principle and justice and that Atiku is not in this struggle because he hates Tinubu.

“He is in it to ensure that people who rigged elections are not allowed to get away with it. “Injustice and rigging promote bitterness and division. No leader should be proud to lead angry and aggrieved citizens.”

I May Have Lost The Battle But Not The War, Atiku Reacts To Tribunal Verdict

The Presidential candidate of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in the last election in Nigeria, Atiku Abubakar, has admitted that he lost the battle at the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal (PEPT) yesterday, but that the war is yet to be won and lost.

“We may have lost a battle yesterday, but the war is well ahead of us. “And I believe that with our hope in God, we shall win the war of restoring confidence in our electoral system.”

Atiku, who is the former Vice President of Nigeria, spoke today, September 7, at a world press conference, while reacting to the judgement of the PEPT, which confirmed the validity of the election of Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as President in the last election.

The PDP flag bearer said that the last presidential election, in the way it was managed by the electoral umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), left behind unenviable precedents, which he believed the courts have a duty to redress.

“Our gains in ensuring transparent elections through the deployment of technology was heavily compromised by INEC in the way it managed the last presidential election, and I am afraid that the judgement of the court as rendered by the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal yesterday, failed to restore confidence in our dreams of free and fair elections devoid of human manipulations.”

Atiku said that he had instructed his lawyers to file his petition challenging the outcome of the presidential election, with the aim of ensuring that democracy is further strengthened through the principles and processes of fair hearing.

“Gentlemen of the press, I take great pains to tell you that the decision of the court of first instance on this matter utterly falls far short of that expectation.

“I am therefore here to tell you that, though the judgment of the court yesterday is respected, it is a judgment that I refuse to accept. I refuse to accept the judgment because I believe that it is bereft of substantial justice.

“However, the disappointment in the verdict of the court can never destroy my confidence in the judiciary.

“Consequently, I have asked my lawyers to activate my constitutionally guaranteed rights of appeal to the higher court, which, in the instance, is the Supreme Court.

“It is my conviction that the electoral process in Nigeria should be devoid of untidy manipulations and that the outcome of every election should be a perfect reflection of the wishes of the electorate. “I believe that such is the only way through which our democracy can have a manifest expression of its true meaning. “Whether I prevail in this quest or not, the record of my effort in ensuring an order of credible elections in Nigeria shall remain for the future generations to evaluate.”

Atiku called on his supporters to remain steadfast and that he tooktake solace in an immortal lesson he learned from his leader and mentor, the late Shehu Yar’Adua, “that losing a battle is less important than losing the war.”

I’m Sure We’ll Get Back Our 2 Senate Seats – Kogi Gov, Yahaya Bello

Gov. Yahaya Bello

Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello has expressed confidence that the two Senate seats which the All Progressives Congress (APC) lost to the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) at the election petition tribunal will be restored to APC soon.

The APC lost the Kogi East and Central to the candidates of the PDP, with the Tribunal pronouncing Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan of the PDP outright winner of the election in the Kogi Central.

Answering reporters’ questions today, September 7, after paying a solidarity visit to Vice President Kashim Shettima at the Presidential villa, over the APC victory at the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal in Abuja, Governor Yahaya Bello declared: “we are going to have our 3/3 Senate in Kogi state, I can assure you.”

He said that his confidence sprang from the pronouncements yesterday at the appeal court (the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal).

“This is democracy,” the Governor said, adding that the APC candidates have the right of appeal over the Senatorial seats.

“I think they will take the appropriate steps to ensure that no violence is orchestrated anywhere.

“We will follow the due process of the law and whatever will be the outcome at the end of the day, we will abide by it.”

On the verdict of the Presidential Election Tribunal Tribunal, Governor Yahaya Bello said: “nothing is as successful as success. “We are happy; Nigerians are happy and the truth is out there. We appreciate all that happened yesterday. The truth has been exposed.

“Imagine the justices sitting down for almost fourteen hours to deliver that landmark judgements yesterday. “Nigerians, within the country and in Diaspora are happy and I think it’s time to settle down and face governance.

“And I advise all those that feel aggrieved, we have only one country, Nigeria. They should all come together and support President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and ensure that we fix this country.

“Whatever hardship we are facing today is the effects of the past. “Definitely, we have Mr. fix it who is trying his best travelling around the world to ensure that Nigeria is fixed. So we are happy the matter is settled.

“As far as I’m concerned, I dont think there is any ground for appeal. I will rather appeal to them that they should drop any appeal going to the higher court and then save the resources, save the trouble, advise their supporters, admonish them that they should accept yesterday’s judgement.”

There Would Have Been Second Civil War If Peter Obi Had Won, By Reno Omokri


If Peter Obi had won the #NigerianElections2023, or at the Presidential Election Petition Court, there would have been a civil war in Nigeria.
This is because he and his Obidients were just too arrogant and were already recreating, and would have further recreated the events that led up to the Nigerian Civil War. Let me explain:
During the elections, there was nothing they did not do, including cyberbullying, threatening, abusing, insulting, name-calling, accusing, hounding, targeting, ganging up, mocking, caricaturing, and harassing anyone who refused to support them. I did not say anyone who was fighting them. No. Anyone who refused to support them. They made minimal attempts to be persuasive. It was just nogbu nzogbu, enyimba enyi!
They had a warped sense of entitlement that you must support Peter Obi, and if you did not, then you are supporting a “wrong candidate” (the exact words they used).
They were more fascistic than Mussolini. In terms of education, Peter Obi is at the bottom of the barrel, with his second-class degree in Philosophy. You can’t compare him to a PhD in Water Engineering (Kwankwaso), a Master’s with Distinction in International Relations (Atiku) and a BSc in Accounting (Tinubu). Joseph, have the fear of God and answer this question-am: Am I lying?
In terms of achievements in office, as vice President, Waziri Atiku led the National Economic Council, which paid off our entire foreign debt to the Bretton Woods institution and gave us a 7% GDP consistent annual growth rate. As Governor, Tinuhu built new cities from scratch, ports, rail infrastructure, roads, hospitals l, industries, independent power stations, paid civil servants, and mentored men like Osinbajo, Fashola, Aregbesola, Fayemi, Akabueze and co, who are now movers and shakers. He also increased Lagos’s internally generated revenue by 360%.
In contrast, when asked about his flagship achievement in office, Peter Obi pointed to a brewery, which has been proven to be a loss-making enterprise. Although he invested in schools already built, for which I applaud him, he did not build a single new school.
But he was the right candidate, and anyone who did not support him must be pilloried.
What led to the Nigerian Civil War? It began with the January 15, 1966 coup at which Majors Emmanuel Ifeajuna, Chukwuma Nzeogwu, Chris Anuforo, and Don Okafor killed political and military leaders from every region of Nigeria except theirs.
Major Adewale Ademoyeg was involved with the plotting but not the killing, unlike the others who participated in the massacre.
And in 2023, after Peter Obi lost, prominent Obidients with direct ties to Peter Obi were openly calling for a military coup to restore Obi’s mandate. These guys have learned nothing!
And that was only one reason for the civil war. The other reason was the arrogance and caricaturing of other Nigerians by supporters of Majors Nzeogwu and Ifeajuna (the coup leaders) after the coup.
Soon after the coup, some of their supporters printed almanacs with caricatures insulting prominent Northern, Western and Mid-Western leaders.
In one of the almanacs, Chukwuma Nzeogwu was shown with his leg on top of Sir Ahmadu Bello’s head. Interestingly, in that almanac, Ahmadu Bello’s head was put on the body of a goat.
Those almanacs outraged Northerners and made them turn against the Aguiyi Ironsi-led government.
In February of 1966, a famous Igbo highlife maestro named Celestine Ukwu released a song titled Ewu Ne Ba Akwa, meaning ‘the goat is crying’.
Rightly or wrongly, other Nigerians believed that that song was mocking the killing of the late Sardauna by Nzeogwu. That song and the almanac mocking the Sardauna ignited a pogrom against Igbos in the North. And things eventually descended to civil war.
Is that not what happened in 2023? Were Obidients not caricaturing those who refused to support Peter Obi? I personally was caricatured. Waziri Atiku, Bola Tinubu and their supporters were also caricatured. New Celestine Ukwu songs of 2023 were composed to insult those who supported other candidates instead of their right candidate.
And just as their leaders did not caution them in 1966, so did Peter Obi not caution them in 2022/23. There was no low or dirty thing they did not do, including publishing the photos of Justice Tsamani’s children along with threats to kill them (as they did with my then one-year-old daughter) and recruiting
Rufai Oseni to lie against me and others.
And then there was the Yes Daddy leaked audio, which revealed their true intention for the Muslim Ummah.
History does not repeat itself. Irresponsible people repeat history and then blame history for repeating itself. Peter Obi is one of such people, and I urge Nigerians to remember what he and his supporters stand for. Never forget. Keep that memory fresh. Because Peter and his horde will think we have forgotten and will try to hoodwink us in 2027. We must not fall for it.

Tribunal Has Made History By Overcoming Intimidation – Ex President Buhari


The immediate past President, Muhammadu Buhari has expressed his satisfaction with the ruling of the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal, which confirmed the victory of the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the February 25 election.
In a statement by his media aide, Garba Shehu, the former President said that the Tribunal has “written history” by withstanding intimidation and all manner of prejudice to deliver justice according to law and to a majority of Nigerians whose wish has been for the choices they made to be respected.
“If anybody has won today, it is the democracy and the people. With the verdict of the Supreme Court, the election period is over and it is time to put the heat and dust behind us.
“From here, the new APC administration, led by Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu should get the support of everyone in order to deliver the promises it made to the people.”
Buhari expressed his appreciation to all Nigerians for maintaining peace throughout the period and prayed for continued progress and development under the APC government.
He sent warm congratulations to the President, the Vice President and the APC on the victory in court, expressing his best wishes to them in fulfilling the people’s aspirations.

Tribunal Verdict: Atiku, Obi Head To Supreme Court


The presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar and his Labour Party (LP) counterpart, Peter Obi, have advised their lawyers to go on appeal at the Supreme Court after rejecting yesterday’s judgment of the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal affirming the election of President Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC).
The Legal Adviser to the Labour Party, Kehinde Edun, vowed to challenge the judgment at the Supreme Court even as the Atiku’s Lead Counsel, Chris Uche (SAN), said that he had received instructions from his client to file an appeal at the Supreme Court.
“The judgment has been delivered but we have not received justice. Luckily, the law has given us leverage to go on appeal to the Supreme Court. “We have instructions from our clients to go to the Supreme Court. The struggle continues.”
The Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal (PEPT) which began sitting at 9.40am at the Court of Appeal, Abuja, yesterday, September 6, ruled that the petition filed by Atiku and Obi and their parties had no merit and unanimously upheld Tinubu’s electoral victory in the February 25 presidential election.
The Tribunal said that the petitioners were unable to state the figures they claimed were reduced from the election results they garnered in different states of the federation, especially in Ondo, Oyo, Rivers, Yobe, Borno, Tabara, Osun and Lagos States.
It said that the petitioners equally failed to state the polling units where over-voting occurred or the exact figures of unlawful votes that were credited to Tinubu by the INEC.
It stressed that though Obi and LP said they would rely on spreadsheets as well as forensic reports and expert analysis of their expert witnesses, they failed to attach the documents to the petition or serve the same on the respondents as required by the law.
The Tribunal said that though the petition contained serious allegations that bordered on violence, non-voting, suppression of votes, fictitious entry of election results and corrupt practices, Obi and his party, however, failed to give particulars of specific polling units where the incidents took place.
It held that several portions of the petition that contained the allegations were “vague, imprecise, nebulous and bereft of particular materials.”
Therefore, the court struck out paragraphs 9, 60, 61, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, 77, 78, 83 and 89 of the petition.
“They failed to state the number of votes affected and the number of people disenfranchised. The determination of the election is about figures,” Justice Mohammed declared.
He said: “It is unimaginable that a petitioner will allege widespread rigging in 176,000 polling units, over 8,000 wards, 774 LGAs, 36 states and FCT without stating the specific place where the alleged irregularities occur.
“The law is very clear that where someone alleged irregularities in a particular polling unit, such person must prove the particular irregularities in that polling unit for him to succeed in his petition.
“Labour Party made generic allegations of irregularities and said they would rely on spreadsheets, inspection reports, and forensic analysis but the documents promised by the petitioners were not attached to the petition.”
Obi nomination validated
Nevertheless, the court dismissed the contention of the respondents – Tinubu and the APC- that Obi was not validly nominated by the LP to contest the presidential election.
It noted that the respondents had argued that Obi left the PDP on May 24, 2022 and joined the LP on May 27, 2022.
The respondents in its petition claimed that as of May 30, 2022, Obi was not a valid member of the LP and could not have duly participated in its presidential primary election.
“By the provision of section 52 and section 65 of the Electoral Act, INEC is at liberty to prescribe the manner in which results can be transmitted. INEC cannot be compelled to electronically transmit results,” the court held.
The tribunal rejected the European Union Election Observers Mission report on the February 25 presidential election on by Peter Obi and the Labour Party.
The court said it rejected the report on the grounds that it was not tendered by an official of the body which is the author and has custody of the document.
The tribunal similarly dismissed allegations of non-compliance with the Electoral Act 2022 filed against Tinubu’s election by Atiku and the PDP.
Justice Adah said the petitioners failed to substantiate their claim that the election did not comply with the provisions of sections 134 and 135 of the Electoral Act.
He said, “There has to be sufficient grounds before the petitioners can establish that there was no substantial compliance with the Electoral Act in the conduct of the election. The petitioners have in their petitions, listed some of the facts relating to their complaints of non-compliance with the Electoral Act 2022.
‘’The key facts are in paragraphs 18, 22, 23,, 25, 28, 29, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40-44, 46 and 48 of the petition. The respondents have issues with the petitioners in respect of this issue and they all denied the facts pleaded by the petitioners.
“And 135 (1) says: “An election shall not be liable to be invalidated by reason of non – compliance with the provisions of this Act if it appears to the Election Tribunal or Court that the election was conducted substantially in accordance with the principles of this Act and that the non-compliance did not affect substantially the result of the election.”
That said, Justice Adah further held that “This ground of non – compliance with the Electoral Act has been in all our election laws even when we had a parliamentary system of government.”
Adah, who read the ruling on objections against the petition, expunged several documents tendered by Atiku on the grounds that the exhibits were made during the pendency of the petition.⁣
The tribunal equally expunged from the court’s records several key witnesses presented by Atiku for having been made in manners not known to law.⁣
It held that the wrongful mode adopted by the Adamawa – born presidential candidate in the construction of the petition made several paragraphs liable for expunging due to lack of merit.⁣
The court went further to strike out some portions of the reply filed by Atiku and his party, including the part where they accused Tinubu of having dual citizenship.
It also rejected the aspect where the petitioners claimed Tinubu was not qualified on the grounds of alleged criminal conviction and criminal forfeiture in the US.
The panel recalled that the petitioner made grievous allegations against Governor Yahaya Bello of Kogi State and the Chairman of Olamaboro Local Government Area of Kogi, Friday Adejoh, but he neglected to join them as respondents in his petition.⁣
Justice Ugoh held that the failure to join the governor who was accused of electoral fraud obstructed the petition because the governor was denied the opportunity to defend himself as required by law.⁣
Therefore, the justice dismissed the allegations of over-voting nationwide by the petitioner saying that such pleadings run foul of the law because he failed to mention the specific locations where the alleged over-voting took place.⁣
Atiku’s petition was also faulted for introducing several facts and allegations in unlawful ways that caught the respondents unaware, adding that the tactic employed was unfair and made him clever by half.⁣
Amongst the new facts he was said to have wrongfully introduced were the allegations of certificate forgery, criminal conviction, and dual citizenship of Guinea made against Tinubu outside the mode of filing a petition.⁣
The tribunal had commenced the day’s proceedings by dismissing the petition by the Allied Peoples Movement challenging the qualification of Vice President Kashim Shettima.
“Nigerians were witnesses to the electoral robbery that took place on February 25, 2023, which was globally condemned but the Tribunal in its wisdom refused to accept the obvious. What is at stake is democracy and we will not relent until the people will prevail.
‘’Details of the party’s position will be presented after consultation with our lawyers after the Certified True Copy of the judgment is made available to us.”
Meanwhile, President Tinubu has assured Nigerians of his renewed and energised focus on delivering his vision of a unified, peaceful and prosperous nation, following the judgment by the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in Abuja.
“President Tinubu welcomes the judgment of the Tribunal with an intense sense of solemn responsibility and preparedness to serve all Nigerians, irrespective of all diverse political persuasions, faiths, and tribal identities,” the President’s Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Ajuri Ngelale, said in a statement.
The President said that he recognised the diligence, undaunted thoroughness, and professionalism of the five-member bench in interpreting the law.
He said that the principles of presumption of regularity of elections and substantial conformity made it extremely difficult to prosecute election petitions successfully.
The founder of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), Chief Chekwas Okorie, expressed satisfaction with the ruling which upheld Tinubu’s electoral victory.
He said: “I am not surprised at the outcome of the judgment of the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal. Rather than prove a case of substantial non – compliance with the electoral law, they (petitioners) seemed to have relied on scoring technical points to win their petitions. Their strategy failed.’’
Source: Opshot media.

Tribunal’s Verdict: We Warned Peter Obi To Stop Wasting Time – LP Faction

File of photo of Labour Party’s National Chairman and Mr Peter Obi

A faction of the Labour Party (LP) under the leadership of Alhaj Lamidi Apapa has welcomed the verdict of the Presidential Election tribunal on the 2023 Presidential election in Nigeria, saying that it had earlier warned its Presidential candidate, Peter Obi to stop wasting time.
The national publicity secretary of the Party, Dr. Abayomi Arabambi, reacting to the verdict of the Presidential Election Petition Court yesterday, confirming the valid election of Bola Tinubu as President, said that it is a shame that the legal team of Peter Obi failed to advice him properly before going to the tribunal.
He said that the Party had accepted the verdict without any bias, adding that the whole process is a waste of time.
“Peter Obi has just gone on a wild goose chase. Imaging the candidate that failed to fund the Party in order to engage the number of required polling agents, also the filing of the witnesses outside the stipulated time has shown that the legal team is a failure.
“Some of us have been saying that Peter Obi decided to go to the tribunal to justify all the money he collected during the campaign. All that money was corruptly syphoned.
“Its unfortunate that Obi failed to convince the Tribunal those polling units where he was rigged out.
“The tribunal also said that he “made generic allegations of irregularities against the respondent without specifying the polling units
“The petitioners allege irregularities and will use spreadsheets, inspection reports, and forensic analysis as evidence in the trial.
“The documents promised by the petitioners were not attached to the petition and served on the respondents.
“The Justices ruled that Obi and the Labour Party did not adequately detail their allegations of corrupt practices, vote suppression, fictitious results, and other irregularities in their petition.”
The court said that it rejected the reports on the ground that it was not tendered by official of the body which is the author and has custody of the document and also that Peter Obi lawyers were aware that the actual copy of the report was earlier in line with all extant Law that same report had earlier been tendered by Atiku Abubakar and PDP while prosecuting their petition before the tribunal
The Tribunal also affirmed that the Nigeria Police, through its IGP, had written to the US to confirm the criminal status of Bola Tinubu and the US government had replied in 2003 stating that Bola Tinubu had no criminal records in the US.
“Thus our previous position has now been confirmed that Peter Obi was just all out to defraud our party of donations made towards 2023 General Election which was in a scary Sum of $15m dollars and N12 billion Naira that Peter Obi deliberate used for cure ABURE Poverty lineage and help other Julius ABURE IPOB irresponsible ethnic irredeemable irredentist supporters in order to have a life line.
“Our party is also in tandem with the tribunal that the Claim ByThe Labour Party Concerning the Blurred 18,088 Results Sheets Is Totally Unfounded As The Party Ought To Have Agents At Every Polling Unit Who Will Have A Copy Of The Result Sheet but here Peter Obi fraudulently converted all monies due to our agent across the country and they all refuse to represent the party at all polling units
“On Peter Obi request that 25% FCT vote is a requirement before a president can be declared, we noted that this is a shame on the part of Peter Obi legal teams to be told in clear terms that Abuja Is Equal To Every Other State In Nigeria since according to the Tribunal, “Residents Of Abuja Don’t Have Special Privileges, Every Nigerian Is Equal.
“Finally, in the hall of fame of absurdities, the prayers presented at the tribunal by Peter Obi and the restrained former National Chairman Julius Abure should be framed for entertainment of future students of Law
“How does anyone claim to have won an election based solely on pejoratives, assumption, vague rhetorics and zero evidence pointing to such being the case, but on the expectation that the actual winner would be disqualified and by some stroke of black magic the candidate in the 3rd place will suddenly be declared winner, without any proof of having scored the Majority vote is absolute rascality on display by Peter Obi and Julius Abure.
“As a law abiding Party, we accept the verdict, and we are going back to the drawing board to know where we have gone wrong.”

Labour Party Rejects Judgement Of Presidential Election Petition Court 

The Labour Party (LP) has rejected the judgement of the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) which was delivered today, September 6.
The Court of Appeal, sitting as Presidential Election Petition Court, dismissed petitions by the party and its Presidential Candidate in the 2023 poll, Peter Gregory Obi, saying that the petitioners did not prove their cases against the election of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC).
The National Publicity Secretary of the LP, Comrade Obiora Ifoh, in a press statement in Abuja shortly after the judgement said: “the Labour Party watched with dismay and trepidation the dismissal of petitions by the five-man panel of the Presidential Election Petition Court led by Justice Haruna Tsammani today and we reject the outcome of the judgment in its entirety because justice was not served and it did not reflect the law and the desire of the people.
“Nigerians were witnesses to the electoral robbery that took place on February 25, 2023, which was globally condemned but the Tribunal in its wisdom refused to accept the obvious.
“We salute the doggedness of our team of lawyers who fearlessly exposed the wrath in our system. We can only weep for democracy in Nigeria but we refuse to give up on Nigeria.”
The statement said that details of the party’s position would be presented after consultation with its lawyers when the certified copy of the judgement is made available to them.
“We urge all lovers of democracy to remain focused and hopeful because a new Nigeria is possible.”
Advertisement ADVERTORIAL
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com