Why There’s Need To Reposition NAHCON For Renewed Trust, By Abdulkarim Abdulmalik

For many Nigerian Muslims, the journey to Hajj is the fulfillment of a lifelong spiritual dream. Families save for years to be able to perform the fifth religious obligation at least, once in lifetime. Communities gather to pray for departing pilgrims.
Expectations are always high not only spiritually, but administratively. At the center of this sacred responsibility is the National Hajj Commission of Nigeria (NAHCON). Under the leadership of its new Chairman, Ambassador Ismail Abba Yusuf, there is a real opportunity to reposition the Commission to restore confidence through improved service delivery.
The challenges facing NAHCON are not new, and to pretend otherwise will not help.
Late preparations have repeatedly complicated operations. When accommodation contracts, airline agreements, and service arrangements are concluded too close to the Hajj season, costs rise and options become limited. This has sometimes placed unnecessary pressure on both officials and pilgrims.
The solution is simple in principle, though demanding in practice: planning must begin immediately one Hajj ends. A culture of early preparation would allow Nigeria to secure better rates and better facilities in Makkah and Madinah.
Another reality is the instability of foreign exchange. Owing to the fact that most Hajj payments are made in foreign currency, fluctuations in the naira directly affect pilgrimage fares.
Pilgrims often struggle to understand why costs rise suddenly.
NAHCON may not control the exchange rate, but it could control communication. A transparent breakdown of Hajj fares—clearly explaining accommodation costs, airfare, feeding, and administrative charges—would go a long way in reducing suspicion and anxiety.
Logistics remain a sensitive area. Delayed flights, overcrowded schedules, and coordination lapses have, at times, overshadowed what should be a spiritually uplifting journey. Airlift operations must be treated as a critical component, not a secondary detail.
Contracts with airlines should include firm performance expectations, and contingency plans should always be in place. Pilgrims—many of them elderly—deserve predictability and dignity in travel arrangements.
Accommodation in Saudi Arabia has also generated recurring concerns. Securing decent buildings close to the Haram requires early negotiation and rigorous inspection.
Nigerian pilgrims should not arrive to discover facilities that fall below expectations.
To this end, a stronger monitoring system, combined with transparent allocation processes, would reassure pilgrims that they are receiving value for what they paid.
Coordination between NAHCON and State Pilgrims’ Welfare Boards is another area that needs strengthening. While NAHCON provides national oversight, state boards are directly involved in registering and preparing pilgrims. When communication gaps occur, the result is confusion over documentation, vaccinations, or visa processes. A unified digital platform linking NAHCON with all state boards could reduce errors and speed up information flow. In an age of technology, manual systems should no longer slow down such an important national assignment.
Digital reform offers perhaps the most practical way forward. An automated registration and payment system would reduce human interference, enhance transparency, and allow pilgrims to track their status in real time. Although technology cannot replace integrity, but it can reduce opportunities for inefficiency and error.
Public perception also matters. Over the years, allegations—some proven, others speculative—have affected the Commission’s image.
Thus, rebuilding trust requires openness. Regular briefings, publication of audited reports, and competitive procurement processes are not luxuries; they are necessities. When people see transparency, confidence follows.
Above all, pilgrims’ welfare must remain central. Hajj is physically demanding. Many Nigerian pilgrims are elderly and require medical support, clear guidance, and organized feeding arrangements. Strengthening medical teams, improving orientation programs before departure, and ensuring effective on-ground support in Saudi Arabia would significantly enhance the experience.
Ambassador Ismail Abba Yusuf is therefore expected to bring his diplomatic experience that could be leveraged to strengthen Nigeria’s engagement with Saudi authorities. High-level coordination can help secure favorable tent allocations in Mina, better transportation scheduling, and improved service conditions.
Repositioning NAHCON is not about cosmetic change; it is about institutional discipline. It requires early planning, financial transparency, technological innovation, and compassionate leadership. If these elements are pursued consistently, the Commission can regain full public confidence.
Hajj is a sacred obligation. Managing it should reflect excellence, accountability, and empathy. With deliberate reforms and steady leadership, NAHCON can rise above its challenges and truly serve Nigerian pilgrims in a manner worthy of the spiritual journey they undertake.

– Abdulkarim Abdulmalik, is a journalist and Author of a handbook on: “Pilgrims’ Companion, a Self-guide to Hajj and Ummrah.”




…. Natasha
He said that given the NCC’s long-standing commitment to regional cooperation through platforms such as the West Africa Telecommunications Regulators Assembly (WATRA), the Commission has no doubt that the region would be stronger and more prosperous when all countries are interconnected.


Nigeria: The Silent Press And The Silent Siege, By Segun Adediran
Within the next several years, the invisible architecture of Nigeria’s democracy faces a quiet but existential threat. For decades, the local press served as the bedrock of our national identity, but today, that foundation is being hollowed out by unregulated global digital gatekeepers.
Led by Lady Maiden Alex-Ibru, the President of the Newspaper Proprietors’ Association of Nigeria (NPAN), the Press is opening up.
On the platform of the Nigerian Press Organisation (NPO), which represents the collective weight of the NPAN, the Nigeria Guild of Editors (NGE), Broadcasting Organisations of Nigeria (BON), Nigerian Union of Journalists (NUJ) and the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP), it broke the “ungolden” silence.
Last Tuesday, it issued a stark warning on a major threat: Nigeria’s social cohesion, national security, and democratic governance are being surreptitiously surrendered to algorithms controlled from outside our borders. It gladdens my heart.
Silently, the Big Tech firms, under the guise of technological innovation, have been killing the global media one bit at a time. But it appears the Nigerian press can no longer bear the pains of where their “shoe pinches” like their peers elsewhere. They have rightly identified the specific point where troubles, difficulties and stresses for their survival originate: Big Tech’s thieving technology.
They have also highlighted a more insidious vulnerability. In an era where foreign-coded narratives can dictate public discourse and relegate professional journalism to the margins, the “information sovereignty” of the republic is no longer a theoretical concern. It is an active crisis.
And the message is crystal clear: A new commitment to establishing terms of engagement with these global platforms will be needed to ensure that Nigeria’s national conversation is not quietly outsourced to opaque commercial interests beyond our control.
The Nigerian government should be worried. As the world pivots toward a digital-first existence, the structural pillars of the Nigerian Fourth Estate are being dismantled by global forces that owe no allegiance to our national borders, our social cohesion, or our democratic survival.
Yet, amid this mounting disruption, our policy response remains dangerously dormant. While the Presidency and the National Assembly grapple with immediate crises of security and currency, a more insidious vulnerability is being coded into our daily lives: the surrender of Nigeria’s public square to unregulated, transnational digital gatekeepers.
There is no precedent for the complexity of the current digital era. The era of the “town crier” or the monopolistic state broadcaster has given way to a fragmented reality where foreign-owned algorithms determine what a citizen in Kano, Lagos, or Enugu sees, believes, or ignores. They, “the big boys”, smile , to the banks while our news organisations gnash their teeth.
Today, Nigeria’s total advertising spend is estimated to be nearing $1 billion, yet a staggering $340 million of that is being swallowed by digital platforms—primarily Search and Social Media. By 2025, Social Media alone was projected to command $131 million in Nigerian ad spend, while online video and banner ads—territories dominated by Google and Meta—would siphon off another $269 million.
Recent reporting from BusinessDay (February 2026) highlights that the digital ad sector is projected to grow to $148 million in social media alone by the end of this year. Meta’s total 2024 revenue was approximately $134 billion, and Alphabet (Google) exceeded $307 billion.
This is not merely a market disruption; it is a strategic decapitation of the local press. While these global behemoths reported 2024 revenues as high as $164.5 billion globally, their Nigerian operations operate in a financial “black box,” extracting local capital while returning almost zero reinvestment into the newsrooms that provide the very content their users discuss.
When professional journalism collapses, the vacuum is not filled by silence; it is filled by chaos.
The other answer lies in the global history of democratic resilience. When nations in the 20th century realised that certain industries—telecommunications, banking, energy—were vital to national security, they created robust frameworks to ensure they remained indigenous and accountable. Journalism is no different. It is strategic civic infrastructure, as essential to the health of the republic as the judiciary. Yet, we are currently treating it as a disposable commodity in a lopsided global auction where foreign entities pay billions in taxes to the Federal Government—N3.85 trillion in the first nine months of 2024 alone—yet provide no direct compensation to the industry whose intellectual property they monetise.
The Nigerian press does not come to the government seeking a handout. We come with a warning: a democracy of Nigeria’s scale cannot afford to outsource its information sovereignty. And this is not just Nigeria’s trouble; it’s a global movement. Leading democracies have already concluded that non-intervention is a recipe for the institutional collapse of their trusted news industries. The European Union has moved to curb gatekeeper dominance; Australia has implemented a bargaining framework that forces tech giants to remunerate local newsrooms; and Canada has enacted legislation to secure long-term funding for domestic journalism.
These nations recognised a fundamental truth: press freedom requires economic viability. A journalist who cannot afford to eat cannot afford to be brave. A newsroom that cannot fund a legal team cannot challenge corruption.
Today, the Nigerian safety net for truth is frayed. The good news is that it can be restitched. As a first step, the Federal Government should empower the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) and the Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC) to establish a mandatory bargaining code. This would ensure that when global platforms monetise Nigerian news content, a fair portion of that value is reinvested back into the newsrooms that produced it.
Finally, we must insist on transparency in algorithmic distribution, ensuring that local, credible news is not buried under a mountain of sensationalist, offshore-driven “engagement.”
Democracy rarely prevents the emergence of new technologies, but it must serve as a check on their excesses. Citizens need to exert their influence now, demanding that their representatives protect the integrity of the news they consume. We should not allow the next generation of Nigerians to inherit a world where they cannot distinguish between a verified fact and a manufactured lie, or where their national discourse is merely a data point for a foreign corporation’s profit margin.
The decisions made in the hallowed chambers of the National Assembly and the offices of the Presidency over the next two years will define the digital sovereignty of this nation. We can either act to secure a professional, independent, and viable press, or we can watch as the “last major treaty” between the truth and the public is allowed to expire.
This is the time when silence is not golden.
Adediran, NPAN CEO, writes via olusegunadediran@gmail.com