Home Blog Page 6

EDITORIAL: Presidential Pardon, And Public Sanity

Nigerians were taken by surprise on Thursday, October 9, 2025, when President Bola Ahmed Tinubu announced the pardon granted 175 Nigerians, all convicted by the third tier of the government – the Judiciary (in a democratic setting).
Out of the total number, 82 were granted full pardon, 65 had their sentences reduced while seven death-row inmates had their death sentences commuted to life imprisonment.
There were also 15 ex-convicts, 11 of them deceased, including the Ogoni Nine, who received full pardon.
Prominent among the convicts were the former member of the Federal House of Representatives, 62 year old Farouk Lawan, who was sentenced to five years in 2021 for Corrupt Practices and had served the sentence; 37 year Maryam Sanda, who was sentenced to death in 2020 for culpable homicide and had spent six years, eight months at Suleja Medium Security Custodial Centre.
President Tinubu made it known that the reason for her pardon was that her family pleaded, and that it was in the best interest of her two children.
“The plea was also anchored on her good conduct in jail, her remorse, and her embracement of a new lifestyle, demonstrating her commitment to being a model prisoner.”
Also notable are 44 year old Nweke Francis Chibueze, who was serving a life sentence at Kirikiri for cocaine; 67 year old Dr. Nwogu Peters, who was Serving a 17-year jail term for fraud; 63 year old Mrs. Anastasia Daniel Nwaoba, who had already served her sentence for fraud as well as 58 year old Barrister Hussaini Alhaji Umar, who was Sentenced in 2023 to pay a fine of N150 million in the ICPC case, as well as 63 year old Ayinla Saadu Alanamu, who was sentenced to seven years for bribery in 2019 and has served the sentence.
The presidential pardon, by the provisions of the Nigerian constitution 1999 (as amended) cannot be contested, for, it provides the legal foundation for presidential pardon, including for criminals and convicted politicians. This power is rooted in the “Prerogative of Mercy” vested in the President.
Section 175 of the said Constitution grants the President the power of prerogative of mercy, which reads: The President may:
(a) grant any person concerned with or convicted of any offence created by an Act of the National Assembly a pardon, either free or subject to lawful conditions; (b) grant a reprieve, that is, a temporary suspension of the execution of any punishment imposed; (c) substitute a less severe form of punishment for any punishment imposed; or (d) remit the whole or any part of any punishment imposed or of any penalty or forfeiture otherwise due to the Government of the Federation.
As a matter of fact, the powers conferred on the President under subsection 1 are expected to be exercised after consultation with the Council of State.
Still, the provision says that the President’s powers could be exercised in respect of:
(a) persons concerned with offences tried by any court or tribunal constituted by federal law; and (b) persons convicted of any offence against the law of any State, but only after consultation with the Governor of that State.
The constitution provides the scope of the Presidential Pardon to include pardoning any person convicted of a federal offence, e.g, corruption, economic crimes, drug offences, etc.
Any person convicted under state law can be so pardoned provided the President consults the Governor of the state. Such persons include Politicians, military officers, or public servants convicted of offences, such as corruption or abuse of office.
The civil rights of individuals so pardoned, including the right to vote, hold public office, or travel freely are restored. The conviction is forgiven, but not erased from record unless expunged by court order.
In other words, a pardon does not mean innocence; it merely forgives the offence and cancels the legal consequences.
While we in Greenbarge Reporters online newspaper are not arguing on the constitutional powers of the President to pardon, in consultation with members of the Council of State (made up of, among others, past Presidents and Heads of Government, present and past Chief Judges of the Nigerian, etc), we are however, appalled, like many Nigerians, by the obvious disregard for morality, integrity and sanity in the Tinubu’s arranged presidential pardon.
It is curious that a woman who was convicted of murder and sentenced to death since 2020 (five years now) lived up to October 8, 2025 to enjoy the presidential pardon. This is true also of others who are serving various criminal jail terms, having been convicted by competent Court of justice, and were eventually released into what is supposed to be a sane society, in the name of clemency by the President.
After pardoning Maryam Sanda, for example, is the president going to bring back to life, the husband she killed? Are the victims of others who are so pardoned going to be compensated? It is clear that while the families of those that were pardoned would be jubilating, the families of their victims would reel in fresh pain: they would feel cheated, to the point of feeling the reality of injustice in its naked form.
To think that Farouk Lawal and others who were serving or have served jail terms over offences against the state and humanity are now free like birds in the air to vie for the governorship, and even presidential election in Nigeria makes the whole thing to look laughable and unimaginable.
Presidential pardon to convicted politicians, some of who have already served out their jail terms clearly undermine anti-corruption efforts which the same government claims to be fighting.
There is no running away from the fact that the latest pardons were politically motivated as the country heads to the 2027 general elections, and Presidential election in particular. An observer, perhaps in anger, vented out an opinion that soon, President Tinubu would come up with the idea of pardoning all the prisoners in the country, even including Nnamdi Kanu in his desperate bid to outdo all opponents in the 2027 election. With the way things are going, this point may not be far from the truth.
Indeed, the presidential pardons are becoming so suspicious, to the point of undermining the rule of law, and conversely, giving criminals in and outside government, the hope and confidence that come what may, they would always come out of the temporary judicial convictions (for corruption and criminalities) victorious. As a matter of fact, the concept of Presidential pardon, especially with regard to the one President Tinubu had just pronounced, would go deeper to weaken public trust in the judicial process and anti-corruption campaigns, at best, and at worse, obliterate it (Public trust) completely. The public sanity is bound to suffer erosion!!!

Appointments By President Tinubu Have No Ethnic Colouration, By Edward David Onoja

In his recent column titled: “New INEC Boss and Tinubu’s Visibilization of Northern Yorubas,” Professor Farooq Kperogi tried to frame President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s appointment of Professor Joash Amupitan, SAN, as the new INEC Chairman within the usual ethnic politics narrative. While his piece may sound intellectual, it misses the simple truth about the philosophy behind President Tinubu’s leadership choices. They are guided by character, competence, and experience.
From his early days in Lagos to his role today as President of Nigeria, Tinubu has remained consistent on one thing: Leadership must be oremised on capacity and results, not ethnic arithmetic.
Back in Lagos, his team reflected the full map of Nigeria – people from different regions, faiths, and backgrounds – many of whom later became national and state leaders in various capacities. That same instinct for spotting talent, not tribe, still defines his appointments today.
Professor Joash Amupitan, SAN, is far from a political lightweight. He is a seasoned academic, a respected legal scholar, and a man whose reputation for integrity and neutrality stands tall. Reducing his appointment to an ethnic or regional sentiment just because he hails from Kogi State and bears a Yoruba name is not only unfair, it is a disservice to national growth and development. It is an embarrassment to both the man and the President who appointed him.
Our unrepentant disposition towards viewing every national appointment through ethno-religious jaundiced-eye has become a heavy burden on our unity and development as a nation. If a Northerner with a Yoruba name cannot be trusted to serve without suspicion, then the problem is not leadership, it is our unwillingness to rise above old divisions.
President Tinubu’s pattern of appointments so far tells its own manifest story of competence over convenience, character over closeness, and delivery over demography.
From the North East to the South South, from Christians to Muslims, from career technocrats to grassroots administrators, the spread has been balanced, well-thought. It is a deliberate for advancement over pettiness and myopism. And the goal is clear: results not rewards.
Bearing in mind that our first and only constitutional identity is Nigerian, ethnicity – a product of accident of birth – may describe where we come from, but it should never define who we are or what we can achieve.
The real test of leadership is not the language you speak but the values you live by. In appointing Professor Amupitan, the President once again reminds us that excellence has no region and integrity has no dialect.
Those still trapped in ethnic thinking are the ones slowing down the unity we need. Nigeria’s strength has always been in its diversity, in the ability of a leader from Lagos to trust a scholar from Kogi, or a professional from Sokoto to work seamlessly with a counterpart from Enugu.
That is the true spirit of the Renewed Hope Agenda; building a Nigeria where merit, not mistrust, defines progress.
As we move forward, we must keep rejecting divisive narratives and instead amplify the dream of one united Nigeria, the same dream our founding fathers lived and died for.
“Though tribe and tongue may differ, in brotherhood we stand.”
Only then can we truly say that the promise of our great nation, under God and guided by justice, is finally taking shape in our time.

Trials And Triumphs Of Nigeria’s 10th Senate, By Eseme Eyiboh

In the unfolding story of Nigeria’s democracy, the Senate remains one of its most enduring symbols of institutional resilience and national balance. Beyond the spectacle of debates and the colour of political persuasion, it is the grand arena where the destiny of the nation is shaped, refined, and defended through rules, order, and reason. It is the one chamber where passion must bow to procedure and where leadership must blend authority with decorum.
Under the current stewardship of Senator Godswill Akpabio,GCON the Nigerian Senate has again shown that discipline is not the enemy of democracy but its lifeblood. In a political climate often prone to impulsive rhetoric and theatrical defiance, the Senate’s commitment to its Standing Orders has reaffirmed the solemn truth that democracy thrives only when its institutions are respected and its rules upheld.
At a time when political tempers can easily flare and institutional boundaries are tested, the Senate has chosen the steadier path of order. Its resilience is not borne out of the absence of conflict but from the maturity to resolve such tensions through due process. It is this adherence to procedure that transforms the Senate from a mere congregation of political actors into a citadel of constitutional governance. The Tenth National Assembly has therefore become more than a legislature; it has risen to become the custodian of Nigeria’s democratic rhythm, ensuring that the music of governance remains in tune even when discordant notes arise.
● The Architecture of Order
Every functioning democracy stands or falls by the strength of its institutions. Rules are the unseen architecture that hold those institutions together, shaping not only how decisions are made but also how power is exercised and limited. The Nigerian Senate’s Standing Orders are not ceremonial relics from the past. They are the living constitution of the institution, carefully designed to preserve fairness, consistency, and the sanctity of the legislative process.
The discipline of parliamentary conduct is a universal marker of political civilisation. In the United Kingdom’s House of Commons, the authority of the Speaker is absolute and unchallenged, ensuring that debates proceed with respect and precision. No member, regardless of party or popularity, may openly defy the Speaker’s ruling without consequences. In Canada’s Parliament, even the fiercest partisans understand that procedure is sacred. Heated disagreements are channelled through decorum, not chaos. Similarly, in Australia, the Senate’s ability to hold the executive accountable depends not on the whims of politics but on the meticulous enforcement of rules that keep legislative integrity intact.
Without a doubt, Nigeria’s Senate belongs in that global fellowship of parliaments that recognise chaos as the heart of anarchy and order as the soul of democracy. Its insistence on upholding internal discipline and protecting the authority of its leadership is, therefore, neither personal nor punitive. It is institutional self-preservation. When the chamber asserts that it will not be held hostage by the disruptive instincts of any single member, it is affirming the primacy of collective responsibility over individual grandstanding. This is how strong legislatures endure: not by silencing dissent, but by ensuring that dissent respects the bounds of procedure.
In many ways, the Akpabio-led Senate has re-introduced a tone of seriousness into the conduct of legislative affairs. The presiding officer’s calm firmness, coupled with his inclusivity, has reminded both senators and citizens that freedom within order is the truest form of democracy. Leadership of this sort does not seek applause; it seeks stability. By upholding its Standing Orders, the Senate has reclaimed its moral authority and demonstrated that rules, properly enforced, are not instruments of oppression but shields against institutional decay.
● A Record of Uncommon Legislative Action
To judge a legislature by its distractions is easy, but to measure it by its legislative work is wiser. By that measure, the Tenth Senate has already left an imprint that few in Nigeria’s democratic history can rival. In barely two years, the Senate has processed over 90 bills, with more than 50 receiving presidential assent. To be clear, these are solid, impactful achievements; they are substantive interventions in the nation’s economic, social, and security architecture.
Among them are landmark reforms such as the Nigeria Tax Administration Act and the Joint Revenue Board Act, which harmonise tax collection across the federal, state, and local governments, thereby reducing duplication and boosting fiscal efficiency. These laws lay the groundwork for a more coherent revenue system that can fund Nigeria’s development priorities sustainably. The Electricity Act (Amendment) has opened the power sector to decentralised innovation by placing generation and distribution within concurrent legislative jurisdiction, allowing states to take greater ownership of electrification drives.
Equally significant is the Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) Act, which has established the Nigerian Education Loan Fund, a mechanism designed to democratise access to tertiary education and build the nation’s human capital. Through this law, thousands of young Nigerians from modest backgrounds can now dream beyond financial constraints.
In matters of national security, the Senate has enacted the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons Act and reformed the Defence Industries Corporation to modernise local arms production and improve oversight. It has strengthened the Police Act and advanced the legal framework for community policing, ensuring that law enforcement is both professional and accountable. Social welfare has not been neglected either. The Senate’s approval of an increased national minimum wage reflects its sensitivity to the economic pressures faced by ordinary citizens.
Beyond these legislative milestones, the Senate has exercised its oversight powers with renewed vigour. Ministerial nominees have faced rigorous scrutiny, and budgetary processes have been more transparent than in previous sessions. Committee reports are now subjected to fuller debate, while public hearings are reclaiming their role as forums of accountability rather than ceremonial formality. This spirit of constructive collaboration with the executive, balanced by a firm assertion of institutional independence, has restored public confidence in the Senate’s purpose and performance.
Senator Akpabio’s leadership style has been pivotal in this transformation. Combining political experience with procedural discipline, he has stabilised the chamber and inspired cooperation across party lines. The result is a Senate that legislates with urgency but without recklessness, that debates with passion but within the boundaries of respect. It is a model of legislative management that other emerging democracies might do well to emulate.
● Discipline as Democracy’s Anchor
In any democracy, the question is never whether there will be dissent. Instead, it is always about how it will be handled. The real measure of a democratic institution is how it handles internal turbulence. The Tenth Senate has faced its fair share of provocations and personality clashes, yet it has consistently chosen the path of principle over populism. When it insists that rules must be followed and that leadership must be respected, it is not acting out of pride but out of duty. Every time the Senate enforces its Standing Orders, it sends a message that Nigeria’s democracy is strong enough to discipline itself.
In the world’s most respected parliaments, members who flout rules face swift consequences. In the British House of Commons, suspension or expulsion is not rare when a member’s behaviour undermines parliamentary dignity. In Canada, contempt of Parliament remains one of the gravest offences, warranting public apology or even exclusion. Nigeria’s Senate has every right to apply similar standards, for to allow disorder in the name of political freedom is to invite the slow death of the institution itself.
There is a reason democracies that survive for centuries place such premium on decorum. Discipline is the invisible thread that connects authority to accountability. A Senator who disregards procedure may think he is exercising personal liberty, but in truth, he is unravelling the very order that gives that liberty meaning. The Senate, as the upper chamber of Nigeria’s legislature, bears the burden of showing restraint even when provoked and firmness even when misunderstood.
Under Akpabio’s guidance, that balance has largely been achieved. His steady hand has preserved the Senate’s institutional dignity while ensuring that disagreements, inevitable in a plural polity, never degenerate into institutional disrespect. His colleagues, through their support, have shown that the Senate’s unity is not fragile but founded on shared commitment to the republic’s greater good. This collective resilience is what distinguishes a mature legislature from a mere gathering of political actors.
As democracy worldwide faces disillusionment, with parliaments in many countries besieged by populist anger and public cynicism, Nigeria’s Senate stands out as a stabilising force. Its insistence on rule-based conduct, its robust legislative output, and its respect for leadership all reinforce the idea that democratic governance is not sustained by emotion but by discipline. In times of uncertainty, Nigerians can look to their Senate as a beacon of institutional steadiness, where procedure triumphs over impulse and order over anarchy.
● A Legacy of Institutional Maturity
Every democratic generation must reaffirm its faith in its institutions. For Nigeria, the Senate remains one of the surest proofs that despite imperfections, the system endures. It is the forum where politics matures into policy and ambition yields to service. Its current trajectory under Akpabio’s stewardship shows that a disciplined legislature can coexist with vibrant debate, and that leadership tempered by wisdom can guide even the most divided chamber towards a common purpose.
The trials of the Senate are many: public scepticism, partisan rivalry, and the ever-present temptation of populist showmanship. Yet its triumphs are greater still. By choosing law over noise, the Senate has shown that Nigeria’s democracy can heal itself from within. Each bill passed, each order enforced, and each moment of collective restraint strengthens not just the chamber but the republic it represents.
The true triumph of the Senate lies in its rediscovery of itself as a body governed by rules, led by example, and anchored in service to the nation. In doing so, it has become a model for the continent and a reassurance to Nigerians that the spirit of democracy, though tested, remains alive and well.
As the nation moves through uncertain times, the Senate’s resilience will remain a cornerstone of Nigeria’s democratic stability. Its fidelity to order and leadership not only safeguards the present but also lights the path for future generations. For, in the end, it is not the noise of politics that defines a nation’s greatness but the calm persistence of its institutions. In that regard, the Nigerian Senate stands triumphant, disciplined, dignified, and resolutely democratic in all terms.

•Rt. Hon. Eseme Eyiboh mnipr is the Special Adviser on Media/Publicity and official Spokesperson to the President of the Senate.

1,000 Nigerian Lawyers Ask Senate To Disqualify Prof. Amupitan As Next INEC Chairman, Cite Conflict Of Interests, Others

No fewer than 1,000 practicing lawyers, under the auspices Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners (ALDRAP), have written a letter to the Senate asking it not to confirm Professor Joash Amupitan as next chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The Council of State, chaired by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, nominated Professor Joash Amupitan for the INEC job at its meeting yesterday, October 9. His name is to be submitted to the Senate for confirmation, in accordance with the constitutional provision.
The group’s letter is titled “Disqualification of Prof. Joash Amupitan from Confirmation as Chairman of the Independent Nigerian Electoral Commission (INEC) on the ground of likelihood of bias, impartiality and conflict of interests (in violation of section 5 of the Code of Conduct Bureau Act, 1991 and section 19 of the Independent Corrupt Practices and related offences Act (2003) considering his previous engagement as lead Counsel for the All Progressives Congress (APC) during the 2023 Presidential Election petition at the Supreme Court.”
In the letter addressed to the Senate President through the Senate Committee on Electoral Matters, the group of lawyers warned that in the event that the Senate confirms Prof Joash Amupitan, the Association -ALDRAP, will have no option other than to institute a lawsuit to compel the Senate to comply with the requirements of impartiality in the confirmation of a chairman of INEC.
The letter, signed by the ALDRAP’s Administrative Secretary, Jesse Williams Amuga, stressed that the goal of the group is to promote professionalism in the enactment of the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“By way of introduction, Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners-ALDRAP is a professional Association of over 1,000 Lawyers who are both staff and consultants of the National Assembly and other legislatures within and outside Nigeria.”
Copy of the letter is reproduced hereunder:

10th October 2025.
President of the Senate,
National Assembly
THROUGH:
Senate Committee on Electoral Matters,
Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,
National Assembly,
Abuja,
Federal Capital Territory (FCT).
ATTENTION: Distinguished Senator Rt. Hon. Simon Lalong, Chairman, Senate Committee on Electoral Matters.
Dear Senate Committee on Electoral Matters, Sirs and Madams,
DISQUALIFICATION OF PROF. JOASH AMUPITAN FROM CONFIRMATION AS CHAIRMAN OF THE INDEPENDENT NIGERIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION (INEC) ON THE GROUNDS OF LIKELIHOOD OF BIAS, IMPARTIALITY AND CONFLICT OF INTERESTS (IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT BUREAU AND TRIBUNAL ACT, 1991 AND SECTION 19 OF THE INDEPENDENT CORRUPT PRACTICES AND RELATED OFFENCES ACT, 2003) CONSIDERING HIS PREVIOUS ENGAGEMENT AS LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE ALL PROGRESSIVES CONGRESS (APC) DURING THE 2023 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION AT THE SUPREME COURT.
By way of introduction, Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners-ALDRAP is a professional Association of over 1,000 Lawyers who are both staff and consultants of the National Assembly and other legislatures within and outside Nigeria.
Our paramount goal is to promote professionalism in the enactment of the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Our methods include public legal education programmes, and public interest litigation.
The ultimate objective is to ensure that both officials and institutions of government comply with the provisions of both the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 and other legislation.
In September 2017 we received formal accreditation as a provider of continuing legal education programmes for the over 200,000 Nigerian lawyers, said accreditation was issued by the Nigerian Bar Association-NBA’s Institute of Continuing Legal Education.
We write to notify the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that any letter from the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria seeking confirmation of Professor JOASH AMUPITAN as the Chairman of INEC, ought to be responded to with immediate effect stating that said Prof. JOASH AMUPITAN does not meet the qualifications in the first instance.
The letter of response to the said letter of nomination should be dispatched with immediate effect without taking the next step of referring the said letter to your respected Committee on Electoral Matters.
The reason is because Prof. JOASH AMUPITAN as a former Legal Counsel to the All Progressives Congress-APC at the 2023 Presidential Electoral Petition at the Supreme Court of Nigeria is automatically disqualified from holding the position of Chairman of INEC.
The reasons are as listed below:
1. Previous Precedent of Senate’s disqualification of INEC Nominees such as Lauretta Onochie in the year 2021 due to their affiliation to the All Progressives Congress-APC to be disqualified from confirmation by your respected Committee. This is reported online at: https://placng.org/Legist/finally-senate-rejects-onochie/
2. Professor Joash Amiputan’s confirmation would be a violation of Section 5 of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act, 1991, which states as follows: “A public officer shall not put himself in a position where his personal interest conflicts with his duties and responsibilities.” Having previously served as a lead legal counsel to the APC, Prof. Joash Amiputan cannot perform the duties of Chairman of INEC which is a position that requires utmost impartiality as the chief electoral umpire, when called upon to arbitrate or oversee conduct of elections between the APC and other political parties, his sympathies would likely be towards the APC;
3. Confirm of Prof. Joash Amiputan would be evidence that he is using his previous position as lead Legal Counsel to the APC to benefit himself and confer advantage upon himself. This is a violation of Section 19 of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Related Offences Commission Act, 2003; and
4. There are over 200,000 lawyers in Nigeria, if the President and the National Council of State has made the decision that the next Chairman of INEC ought to be selected from the legal profession, then there are not less than 100,000 Nigerian lawyers who are not registered members of any political party or previous acted as legal counsel to any political parties in Nigeria. His Excellency President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria can select from this category of lawyers to avoid the appearance of bias.
TAKE NOTICE THAT IN THE EVENT THAT THE SENATE OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA GOES AGEAD TO UNDERTAKE CONFIRMATION OF THE SAID PROF. JOASH AMUPITAN, OUR ASSOCIATION-ALDRAP SHALL BE LEFT WITH NO OTHER OPTION THAN TO INSTITUTE A LAWSUIT TO COMPEL THE SENATE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF IMPARTIALITY IN THE CONFIRMATION OF A CHAIRMAN OF INEC.
We thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.
Yours faithfully,
Jesse Williams Amuga,
Administrative Secretary, ALDRAP.
cc:
1. President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria;
2. Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Abuja, FCT;
3. Director-General, Department of State Security Services (DSS), Headquarters, Abuja, FCT;
4. Inspector-General of Police, Louis Edet House, Abuja, FCT;
5. Ambassador of the European Union to the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Abuja, FCT;
6. Ambassador of the United States of America (USA), Abuja, FCT; and
7. High Commissioner of the United Kingdom in Nigeria

Osun Gov, Adeleke; Group Congratulate Newly Elected GOCOP Executives

Newly elected members of GOCOP NEC

The Osun State Governor, Senator Ademola Jackson Nurudeen Adeleke, has congratulated the newly elected members of the National Executive Council (NEC) of the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP), led by the publisher of Newsdiary online, Danlami Nmodu, mni. Also elected at the Guild’s Annual General Congress in Lagos yesterday, October 9, were Sufuyan Ojeifo as General Secretary; Kemi Yesufu as Publicity Secretary; Olumide Iyanda as Deputy President; Akeem Oyetunji as Deputy General Secretary; Ngozi Onyeakusi as Treasurer and Moses Ebosele as Financial Secretary.
In the message by his spokesperson, Alhaji Olawale Rasheed, Governor Adeleke described the emergence of the new helmsmen and women as a testament to professionalism, integrity and the growing strength of the Nigerian online media space.
According to him, the new leadership team brings a wealth of experience and vision to the Guild.
“I warmly congratulate the newly elected leaders of GOCOP, particularly Mr. Danlami Nmodu as President, Mr. Sufuyan Ojeifo as Secretary-General, and Ms. Kemi Yesufu as Publicity Secretary. Their victory is well-deserved and a reflection of the confidence their colleagues have in their capacity to lead with transparency, fairness, and dedication.”
The Governor commended the Guild for conducting a peaceful and credible election, emphasizing that such internal democracy strengthens institutions and reinforces public confidence in the media.
He advised the new leadership to remain steadfast in upholding journalistic ethics, promoting fact-based reporting, and combating the spread of misinformation and fake news which threaten social harmony and national development.
“The media remains a vital pillar of democracy. As a government that values openness and accountability, we count on GOCOP to continue setting standards for responsible journalism in the digital age.”
Governor Adeleke encouraged the new executive to build on the achievements of the predecessors and to continue to foster unity, professionalism and innovation within the online publishing community.
The Governor wished the new GOCOP leadership a successful and impactful tenure that would further strengthen the role of the media as a partner in nation-building.
This was even as a group, Northern Nigeria Minorities Group (NNMG)
congratulated particularly Danlami Nmodu, Sufuyan Ojeifo and Kemi Yesufu on their
emergence as President, Secretary-General, and Publicity Secretary respectively, at thr just-concluded election.
The group also felicitated with other officers elected to serve in various capacities within the
Guild.
The group, convened by the former chairman of the Nigerian Union of Journalists, Federal Capital Territory (FCT) chapter, Jacob Edi, said that the emergence of the new NEC is a strong affirmation of the trust and confidence reposed in
their integrity, competence and commitment to the advancement of ethical journalism
in Nigeria.
The group said that the election of these distinguished professionals is a reflection of
their long-standing dedication to the growth and credibility of the online media space.
“Their track records of fairness, depth, and responsibility stand as enduring examples of what journalism should represent in a rapidly evolving digital era.
“In the same vein, the NNMG urges the new GOCOP leadership to intensify efforts to rid
the profession of fakes and quacks whose activities continue to undermine public trust in journalism.”
The group asked GOCOP to set clear standards and enforce guidelines for the establishment and operation of online news platforms in order to ensure
professionalism, accountability, credibility and sustainability in the fast-growing digital
media environment.
The NNMG advised the new leadership to continue to uphold the highest ideals of integrity, objectivity and national responsibility as well as encouraging
members to produce content that not only informs and educates, but also promotes
national unity and mutual understanding across Nigeria’s diverse communities.
“Once again, the NNMG warmly congratulates the new GOCOP leadership and wishes them a successful tenure, defined by innovation, inclusivity and excellence in service to the journalism profession and to the nation.”

Ex Katsina Gov, Aminu Masari Frowns At Unrealistic Campaign Promises, Wants Them Challenged

“Unrealistic pledges made (by politicians seeking for elective positions) merely to capture the mood of the electorate should be challenged and exposed. Only then can we begin to elevate our political culture and make sure that the process justifies the end.”
Delivering a Keynote Address at the 9th Annual Conference of the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP) in Lagos, yesterday, October 9, where he made the observation as quoted above, the immediate past Governor of Katsina State, Aminu Bello Masari lamented the yawning gap between political campaign promises by politicians and realities of governance.
He insisted on political actors campaigning with responsibility, and that such campaign promises should be realistic and achievable within the available resources.
Aminu Masari, who is also former Speaker of the Federal House of Representatives, spoke on the theme: “Reconciling Campaign Promises with Governance Realities: Challenges and Prospects.”
He said that governance must be anchored on strong institutions, adding that with capable institutions, policies can be implemented more consistently and transparently.
Masari wants politicians to imbibe honest communication with citizens, insisting that leaders should explain the trade-offs on why certain promises may take longer, why resources must be reallocated and how progress would be measured.
“Citizens themselves, including civil society and the media, must understand realities and properly communicate those realities in addition to holding leaders accountable. They should track promises, and demand transparency instead of creating sensational headlines to attract followers, especially now that the number of followers translates into monetary gain.”
Looking at the challenges before political leaders in fulfilling campaign promises, the former Katsina State governor named limited resources, competing demands and unexpected crises as the culprits.
“Many manifestos are aspirational documents, not grounded in the reality of available resources or institutional capacity. “Fiscal constraints are also a big factor. Campaign promises hinge on the resources available to any country. In many African nations, and more specifically in our case, budgets are still heavily dependent on a single commodity: oil. Yet, as we all know, the price of oil is beyond our control. It is volatile, shaped by global market forces, geopolitical tensions and other complex and unpredictable factors.”
Masari said that beyond resource volatility, there are also unforeseen emergencies that force governments to reorder priorities, citing COVID-19 as an example.
He said that such emergencies consume time, energy and resources and can compel governments to suspend plans and promises across all sectors, resulting in campaign promises suffering in the long run.
“Here in Nigeria, insecurity remains a persistent challenge. It undermines production, disrupts livelihoods and reduces national revenues. It compels the government to divert enormous resources toward security operations. Another major issue is weak institutions. Even when funds are available, corruption, bureaucracy and inefficiency can derail delivery.”
He said that reconciling campaign promises with governance realities is not just about avoiding embarrassment for politicians but about protecting the integrity of democracy itself.
The keynote speaker warned that if citizens repeatedly see promises made and broken, they lose faith in the system.
“But if they see even modest progress explained honestly and delivered consistently, they will continue to believe in the promise of democracy. Let our promises be realistic, our expectations be modest, our governance transparent and our accountability strong. In doing so, we can transform hope into progress, and democracy into a vehicle of real change.”
He commended the National Executive Council (NEC) of and the entire members for Conference, providing a strong platform for the people to have honest conversations about the future of democracy in the country.
“This is journalism at its best, and more specifically GOCOP in this digital age, becomes indispensable. You and your profession are the bridges between the leaders and the people. You shape narratives, hold leaders accountable and track progress.”

Masari (left), with the new President, Danlami Nmodu mni (in the middle) and his immediate predecessor, Dr. Maureen Chigbo (right) of the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP).

I’m Proud To Be Associated With Body Of Credible Professionals Like GOCOP – Bode George

Bode George

Former Deputy National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Chief Bode George, has expressed joy in associating with members of the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP).
He said: “I am extremely happy that GOCOP continues to grow stronger despite the odds. I have followed your activities since inception, and I am proud to be associated with a body of credible professionals.”
Bode George, who chaired the 9th Annual Conference of GOCOP in Lagos yesterday, October 9, advised members to take the lead in clearing the obstacles facing journalism, particularly the menace of fake news and unprofessional conduct among impostors in the industry.
The Annual Conference was themed: “Reconciling Campaign Promises with Governance Realities: Challenges and Prospects.”
The PDP chieftain expressed displeasure over the growing number of untrained individuals masquerading as journalists, even as he commended GOCOP for its consistent efforts in promoting professionalism and integrity in digital journalism.
Chief George advised journalists to continue to uphold truth, ethics and patriotism, reminding them that credible journalism remains a pillar of democracy and national development.
The elder statesman urged the Nigerian government to improve the lives of young citizens who, he lamented, have become victims of poor governance.
He said that Nigeria’s diverse resources and human potential ought to be harnessed responsibly for national progress.
“There is no part of Nigeria that is not endowed. True democracy means utilizing resources for the benefit of the people. Leaders must remember that power is transient and that posterity will judge their actions.”
Chief George warned against any calls for military intervention, insisting that such moves would derail the nation’s democratic progress.
He stressed that the civilian system, despite its imperfections, provides checks and balances through its three arms of government, unlike the military, which centralizes authority.
He also called for a comprehensive review of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to strengthen Nigeria’s democratic institutions and restore public confidence in the electoral process.

Deputy Vice Chancellor, University Of Jos, Prof Amupitan Emerges INEC Chairman

The National Council of State has approved the nomination of Professor Joash Ojo Amupitan (SAN) from the North-Central as the new Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
Bayo Onanuga, special adviser to President Bola Tinubu on information and strategy, in a statement today, October 9, said that President Tinubu presented Amupitan as the nominee to fill the vacant position, following Professor Mahmood Yakubu’s exit. Yakubu served from 2015 till October 2025.
The statement said that Amupitan is the first person from Kogi, North-Central state, to be so nominated to occupy the position.
It said that the Council members unanimously supported the nomination, with Governor Ahmed Usman Ododo of Kogi State describing Amupitan as a man of integrity.
President Tinubu is expected to send Amupitan’s name to the Senate for screening in accordance with the constitutional provision.
Amupitan, 58, from Ayetoro Gbede, Ijumu LGA in Kogi State, is a Professor of Law at the University of Jos, Plateau. He is also an alumnus of the university.
He specialises in Company Law, Law of Evidence, Corporate Governance and Privatisation Law. He became a Senior Advocate of Nigeria in September 2014.
Amupitan was born on April 25, 1967.
After completing primary and secondary education, he attended Kwara State Polytechnic, Ilorin, from 1982 to 1984, and the University of Jos from 1984 to 1987. He was called to the bar in 1988.
He earned an LLM at UNIJOS in 1993 and a PhD in 2007, amid an academic career that began in 1989, following his National Youth Service at the Bauchi State Publishing Corporation in Bauchi from 1988 to 1989.
Currently, he serves as the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Administration) at the University of Jos, a position he holds in conjunction with being the Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of the Governing Council of Joseph Ayo Babalola University in Osun State.
Among the academic positions he has held at UNIJOS are: Chairman of the Committee of Deans and Directors (2012-2014); Dean of the Faculty of Law (2008-2014); and Head of Public Law (2006-2008).
Outside of academics, Amupitan serves as a board member of Integrated Dairies Limited in Vom, a member of the Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies Governing Council, and a member of the Council of Legal Education (2008-2014), among other roles. He was a board member of Riss Oil Limited, Abuja(1996-2004).
Amupitan is the author of many books on law, such as Corporate Governance: Models and Principles(2008); Documentary Evidence in Nigeria (2008); Evidence Law: Theory and Practice in Nigeria(2013), Principles of Company Law(2013) and an Introduction to the Law of Trust in Nigeria (2014).
He is married and has four children.

Danlami Nmodu Beats Adeleye To Become GOCOP President

The publisher of the Newsdiary online newspaper, Danlami Nmodu has been elected as the fifth President of the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP).
In an election held yesterday, October 8, by the Electoral Committee headed by Yusuf Ozi-Usman, publisher of Greenbarge Reporters online newspaper, Danlami Nmodu defeated Segun Adeleye, publisher of WorldStage online newspaper by 63 votes to 17 vites.
The election was the first that had ever been contested in the twelve years the Guild had existed.
Other members of the National Executive Council (NEC) who were elected by affirmative votes as they had no opponents were Olumide Iyanda of QedNG as Deputy President.
Others were General Secretary, Sufuyan Ojeifo, Publisher of Conclave, Deputy General Secretary, Akeem Oyetunji, publisher of Prompt News, Treasurer, Ngozi Onyeakusi publisher of SupernewsNG, Financial Secretary, Moses Ebosele publisher of City Business News and Publicity Secretary, Kemi Yesufu publisher of Frontline News.

Chief Bode George Laments: Nigeria Electoral Processes In Shambles, Need A Revisit

Former Deputy national Chairman of the People’s Democratic Part (PDP), Chief Bode George has lamented that the country’s electoral processes are in shambles.
Speaking today, October 9, at the 9th National Annual Conference of the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP), in Lagos, George called for revisit of the the processes for the country to get them right.
According to him, if a leader truly knows that his constituency would not vote for him after four years, he would do his best to impact on his people.
Bode George, who spoke as chairman of the Conference, themed: “Reconciling Campaign Promises with Governance Realities: Challenges and Prospects” noted that because politicians in power know that whatever happens, they can rig themselves back to power, they don’t care about the people they serve.
Describing campaign promises as easy, he said that it is a different ball game when it comes to implications.
He said that though there is no perfect system, even as he called on the people to pray for leaders to succeed in taking the country to the promised land.

Advertisement
Advertisement ADVERTORIAL
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com