The Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) has appointed a media and communication professional, Mallam Abbas Jimoh, as its new Public Affairs Officer. Before his appointment, Jimoh served as an Assistant Editor at the Media Trust Group, publishers of Daily Trust, Trust TV, and Trust Radio. During his time at the organisation, he worked on the Business Desk before moving to the Politics Desk, where he covered major national institutions and beats, including the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF), and several registered political parties. He also reported on international events across Africa, Europe, and Asia. Prior to joining Media Trust Group, he was Assistant Editor (Business) at Sketch Press Limited in Ibadan, Oyo State. Jimoh holds qualifications in Mass Communication from The Polytechnic, Ibadan, Oyo State, and Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, Kaduna State. His distinguished career has earned him several professional recognitions, including a fellowship of the Bloomberg Media Initiative Africa (BMIA) of the Bloomberg Institute, United States, in partnership with the Lagos Business School (LBS). He is also a Fellow of the second cohort of the MTN Nigeria Media Innovation Programme (MIP), organised in partnership with the School of Media and Communication (SMC), Pan-Atlantic University (PAU), Lekki, Lagos State, and the Lagos Business School. Speaking on his appointment, Jimoh described the role as an opportunity to serve Nigeria and the Muslim community. “This is a huge responsibility, and I am not taking it for granted. The NSCIA has been an organization I have reported on, and the appointment serves as an opportunity to gain more insight into how it advocates for the strengthening of Islam and promotes cohesion among Muslims in the country, all in the collective quest for national development.” The Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, being led by the Sultan of Sokoto as its President-General, Alhaji Dr. Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar III, is the foremost Islamic authority in Nigeria. Established in 1973, the Council was created to “cater for, preserve, protect, promote and advance the interests of Islam and Muslims throughout the country.” It remains the officially recognised body by the Federal and State Governments for coordinating Islamic affairs and promoting unity among Muslims in Nigeria.
Heatwave is currently ravaging America with temperatures said to be rising past 113 Degrees Celsius and threatening lives. Report reaching us at Greenbarge Reporters online newspaper said that the potentially deadly and historic heat dome has led the government to ask families to use less electricity to avoid blackouts. The report said that worse hit are the eastern and midwestern states which have been trapped under the heat dome. It said that the heatwave itself bears the fingerprints of the fossil fuel economy. A new scientific study released this week found that record humid-heat levels would have been “virtually impossible” without climate change. Report quoted experts as saying that in 27 states utility companies can legally shut off a family’s electricity due to unpaid bills, adding that electric bills are projected to run 8.5 percent higher than last summer. It said that more families would be forced to choose between keeping the power on and putting food on the table. According to the report, electricity demand is growing 12 times faster than it was five years ago, driven almost entirely by data centers fed by fossil fueled energy sources. An independent market monitor reports that data centres are the prime reason for tight supply and soaring electricity bills across the region, driving 63 percent of the recent capacity price increases. Campaigns Manager, Candice Fortin, said: “No American should lose their life over an electric bill. Losing air conditioning in this heat isn’t an inconvenience – it’s life-threatening. Air conditioning in a dangerous heatwave is what keeps elderly people, pregnant women and young children out of the emergency room, and higher use during summer heatwaves is something every utility plans for. Yet ordinary households are once again paying the highest price for a crisis they didn’t cause. “The reason the grid has so little headroom is that data aere consuming electricity at a scale it wasn’t built for, around the clock, every day of the year. And worse: fed by fossil fueled energy sources that make heatwaves more frequent and more deadly. “350.org is calling for a moratorium on new data centre construction, to give citizens and their elected representatives time to put democratic rules in place to manage their impact on our energy, water and land. Every state should also ban utility shutoffs during extreme heat. “That’s an emergency measure to stop more Americans from suffering. “Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta raked in net profits of over $80 billion in the first three months of 2026 alone. In fact, investor-owned utilities kept on average a profit of 14.6 cents on every dollar they collected from ratepayers.They can afford to wait while communities catch up. “The heatwave bearing down on 160 million Americans right now is a preview of every summer to come. Our leaders must choose who they will protect: tech companies and investor-owned utilities, or people. Access to clean, affordable energy is a right, not a privilege. Real independence means no American is ever again forced to choose between a power bill they can’t afford and heat they can’t survive.” Experts said that such a temperature has never been recorded naturally on Earth and that the highest reliably measured air temperature is about 56.7°C (134°F). They said that human survival outdoors under such weather would be impossible as the body cannot regulate its temperature, leading to rapid heat stroke and death within minutes. “It’s worth noting that 113°C is above the boiling point of water at high altitudes and only slightly above the normal boiling point of water (100°C at sea level). Such an air temperature would indicate an environment fundamentally different from Earth’s current climate and would likely make large regions uninhabitable.”
Sometimes, one wonders whether those occupying power or those in its corridors think Nigerians have lost the ability to think right. How else does one explain a Presidency asking over 200 million citizens to believe that an agency which allegedly appeared in official records, received budgetary allocation, exchanged correspondence with committees of the National Assembly and operated within government circles never existed?
That is not merely a contradiction. It is an insult to the intelligence of Nigerians.
Governments make mistakes. Democracies survive because governments admit those mistakes and correct them. But when a government attempts to erase documented facts with a press statement, it ventures into a far more dangerous territory, where official narratives begin to compete with reality itself.
That is exactly where Nigeria now finds itself.
The controversy surrounding the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC) is no longer about one agency or one individual. It has become a test of the credibility of government institutions and the respect they have for the citizens they serve.
The Presidency, through its spokesman, Mr. Bayo Onanuga, has described the PFIPC as a fictitious organisation allegedly created through forged documents by Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew. The government’s position is straightforward: the agency never existed and its promoter is an impostor.
Ordinarily, that should settle the matter. But there is a problem.
Facts have a stubborn way of refusing to disappear simply because powerful people wish them away.
Reports indicate that the Senate Committee on Anti-Corruption and Financial Crimes addressed official correspondence to the Director-General of the PFIPC. The House Committee on Treaties, Protocols and Agreements reportedly did the same.
Pause and think about that for a moment.
We are not talking about village associations or roadside organisations. We are talking about committees of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
How does a non-existent agency receive official recognition from lawmakers?
How does a ghost organisation attract the attention of committees established by the Constitution?
More importantly, how does such an organisation allegedly find its way into the national budget?
According to reports, the PFIPC received an allocation exceeding N1.3 billion in the 2026 Appropriation Act.
If this is true, then Nigerians deserve answers, because budgets do not prepare themselves. Agencies do not insert themselves into appropriation bills by magic.
There are procedures. There are approvals. There are signatures. There are public officials entrusted with responsibilities. Was the agency real when budget preparations were being made and only became fictitious after controversy erupted?
Or are Nigerians now expected to believe that a phantom organisation successfully infiltrated the machinery of government, navigated legislative processes, secured official recognition and obtained public funds without anyone noticing?
Either possibility is alarming.
The first suggests an attempt to distance influential individuals from an embarrassing controversy.
The second suggests a level of institutional failure that should worry every Nigerian.
There is no comfortable explanation.
What makes this matter even more troubling is the apparent haste with which the government appears determined to close the chapter before it is properly read.
Prince Adeyemi has made allegations involving senior government figures, including the Chief of Staff to the President, Mr. Femi Gbajabiamila.
Those allegations remain allegations. No responsible person should pronounce guilt before evidence is examined.
But neither should anyone be declared innocent merely because they occupy powerful offices.
The rule of law does not recognise sacred cows.
A government genuinely committed to transparency should welcome scrutiny rather than fear it.
If the PFIPC was indeed an elaborate fraud, then Nigerians deserve to know how such a fraud allegedly penetrated the highest levels of government.
Who approved the documents?
Who recognised the organisation?
Who facilitated its activities?
Who looked away?
Who benefited?
These are legitimate questions.
If, on the other hand, the agency enjoyed some form of official recognition before falling out of favour, Nigerians deserve to know why the government is now seeking to disown it.
The truth cannot be hidden forever.
What is even more curious are reports and photographs showing Prince Adeyemi in the company of prominent public officials and influential personalities.
While photographs alone do not establish legitimacy, they certainly raise questions.
Was everyone deceived?
Were all these public officials victims of one man’s alleged manipulation?
Or is there a larger story yet to be told?
Nigerians deserve answers.
Unfortunately, this is not the first time citizens have found themselves trapped between official denials and uncomfortable facts.
Over the years, Nigerians have watched scandals emerge, dominate public discourse and eventually disappear without satisfactory explanations.
Files are opened and quietly closed.
Committees are established and forgotten.
Investigations are announced and abandoned.
The public is expected to move on.
But perhaps that is precisely why this matter deserves greater attention.
This controversy goes beyond one agency.
It goes beyond one individual.
It goes beyond partisan politics.
It is about whether public institutions still possess the integrity required to sustain public trust.
Every contradiction left unexplained weakens confidence in government.
Every unanswered question deepens public suspicion.
Every attempt to suppress inquiry creates even greater curiosity.
This is why an independent investigation has become necessary.
Not an investigation designed to protect reputations.
Not an investigation designed to produce predetermined conclusions.
But one capable of following evidence wherever it leads.
If anyone is guilty, let the facts expose them.
If anyone is innocent, let the facts clear them.
That is how accountability works in a democracy.
The Presidency cannot simply wave away documents.
It cannot wish away legislative correspondence.
It cannot erase public records through press statements.
If the PFIPC was a fraud, then expose every official who enabled it.
If it was legitimate, then explain why Nigerians are now being told it never existed.
Silence is no longer an option.
Denial is no longer sufficient.
Arresting one man will not answer the questions confronting the nation.
Nigerians deserve facts, not narratives.
Until those facts are laid bare through a transparent and credible investigation, one question will continue to echo across the country:
Who exactly is deceiving whom?
Deen is the Executive Director, IT with Greenbarge Reporters online newspaper
The death has been announced of a famous Educationist who retired as a Vice Principal of secondary school in Edo North, Mr. Mayor Tajudeen Ojeifo. A statement issued on behalf of the family by his son, Mr. Frank Ojeifo, said that the educationist died on Saturday, June 27, 2026, in Agbede, Edo State at the age of 73 after a protracted illness. The statement said that the deceased was a product of Auchi Polytechnic and the University of Benin, who dedicated most of his working life to teaching in secondary schools across Edo North. It said that shortly after his Higher School Certificate [HSC] programme, he taught at Imade College, Owo, before spending the bulk of his career at Government Technical College, Igarra, where he shaped thousands of students. He is survived by his wife, Mrs. Vivian Ojeifo; five children; three grandchildren and two younger brothers: Mr. Sufuyan Ojeifo, publisher of _THE CONCLAVE_ online newspaper, and Mr. Kabir Eromonsele Ojeifo, a senior management staff member at the Federal Capital Development Authority, FCDA, Abuja. His colleagues remembered him as a firm, articulate and selfless teacher whose influence extended far beyond the classroom. A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Chief Oladipo Okpeseyi, recalled a final conversation with the deceased, in a condolence message to Mr. Sufuyan Ojeifo. “My dear Suffy, OMG, Mayor is gone? We spoke warmly a while back and the last time we saw at Owo was when he said he would soon relocate to Agbede,” Okpeseyi wrote. He described Mayor Ojeifo as “one of the seniors, bold and strong leaders we had growing up” who “remained very articulate and appreciative of every assistance with his signature smile always.” “Though frail, he was full of life and hope for a better tomorrow… He was a committed and dedicated school teacher who helped to mould future generations of leaders,” Okpeseyi said. Also, Abiodun Ogundele, an APC chieftain in Ondo State, said that he was “deeply saddened” by the news. In his condolence message to Sufuyan Ojeifo, he wrote: “Please accept my sincere sympathies during this difficult time. I pray that God grants his soul eternal rest in His heavenly kingdom and comforts you and your entire family.” Chief Tajudeen Aderibigbe, the Nene of Owo and a businessman in the oil sector who was one of Ojeifo’s students at Imade College, also commiserated with the family. He recalled his last meeting with his former teacher in Owo and how Ojeifo shaped him and other students. He prayed for the repose of his soul in the bosom of the Almighty God and for fortitude for the family. For many in Igarra and across Edo North, Mayor Ojeifo will be remembered as a blunt, energetic and faithful gentleman who gave his best to education and to the community he served.
Facts have emerged from a curious incidence that happened to me recently to point to the fact that First Bank which used to be the darling of many has been infiltrated by fraud sters and conmen. Beyond that is the fact that has also emerged that First Bank operates by completely isolating its customers. Recall that a couple of weeks ago, I narrated, on this platform, how fraud ster, in what looked like movie, removed a huge sum of money from my First Bank account, leaving a balance of laughable N3,000. It all happened on June 13 when the fraud ster cloned my Android phone by suddenly shutting me from an access to its screen and removing my money. More than ten days after the report was made to a branch of the Bank in Kuje during which time the account details of the culprit was established, the Bank quickly washed its hand off the matter and asked me to go after the culprit myself. The First Bank reluctantly gave the details of the culprit as follows:
Account name: Ishaq Ibrahim (instead of my name, Yusuf Ozi-Usman)
Account number (to which the huge sum was transferred as 0088243601 and the Bank (to which it was transferred) as PAGA.
It is also on record that First Bank said in its message to me that it was “not liable” for the unauthorized transfer of my money in its custody by the fraud ster. Though I have actually taken it upon myself to pursue the case to its end in many ways possible, the exclusive investigations I have carried out revealed something very sinister about the First Bank itself. Here are my findings: 1. My statement of account which the First Bank “reluctantly” released to me through my email address shows that the huge sum was actually transferred on June 12. The First Bank did not send me alert until 1.30pm on June 13, in what was crisis milieu on my phone screen. As a matter of fact, in all my transactions before then, it’s my name that appeared but only the one of June 12/13 bore Ishaq Ibrahim. 2. The confidence with which First Bank washed its hand off the fraud by saying that it was “not liable…” is suspicious. 3. First Bank’s abrupt closure of the investigation of the case and turning its back on me showed a sense of irresponsible business deal 4. First Bank’s initial refusal to give the full details of the person who made the unauthorized transfer of my money to me raised questions about business integrity 5. First Bank’s temerity in asking me to lodge my complaint with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), which of course, I did on June 16, though response is yet to come from the apex Bank, is frightful. 6. There’s a curious fact that the fraud ster targeted my account only in the First Bank. After cloning my phone, the fraud ster was expected to have access to my accounts in other Banks, but he didn’t touch my money in those other Banks. When I flashed my phone and returned it to factory setting, none of my other information (Facebook, email address, other Banks’ Apps WhatsApp etc) was touched. Only my First Bank’s account was ravaged. Why First Bank? As a matter of fact, what the First Bank has simply implied is that customers’ money cannot be safe in its custody. If the Bank does not have modern facilities to safeguard people’s funds in its custody, especially in the world that is fast growing in technology, why would it saddles itself with keeping the people’s funds? What type of feeling is the handlers of the Bank’s operations have when, in this type of my case, customers are duped, even if it is “suspected” to be the fault of the customers? In deed, some Banks, including the First Bank, are now giving customers a rethink about the system, especially the online version of the banking sector. I have actually come across some people who have since di-activated their online system, even including the ATM version. As a matter of fact, many banks in Nigeria are fast loosing customers because of the growing number of cases of unauthorized transfers from customers’ bank accounts. In fact, serious concern is being raised in many quarters about the resilience of Nigeria’s banking systems, against the background of the increasing sophisticated cybercriminals that seem to be operating freely and confidently. One acknowledges that digital banking has transformed financial services, but it has also created new opportunities for hackers to exploit security weaknesses where technology and cybersecurity measures are not continually updated. Banks therefore, have a duty to ensure that their systems meet modern security standards. Customers who entrust financial institutions with their hard-earned savings is purely on the understanding that their funds are protected by robust technology and effective risk management. Any failure to keep pace with evolving cyber threats, irrespective of the circumstances and without any form of excuse, risk exposing customers to financial losses, emotional distress and a gradual erosion of public confidence in the banking industry. Regulators, especially the CBN, need to intensify oversight by ensuring that banks regularly upgrade their digital infrastructure, conduct independent cybersecurity audits and deploy advanced fraud detection systems capable of identifying and blocking suspicious transactions in real time. Likewise, banks should strengthen customer authentication, improve incident response and provide prompt redress where security failures are established. As cybercrime continues to evolve, investing in modern banking technology is no longer optional; it is essential. Protecting customers’ money and preserving confidence in Nigeria’s financial system require continuous investment, vigilance and accountability from both financial institutions and regulators. Or, else our Banks would be inadvertently returning Nigerians back to the medieval era; the era where money and other valuables were being kept under the pillows, in locally designed boxes and other devices.
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has revoked the operating licenses of 46 Microfinance Banks with effect from July 1, 2026, in accordance with its powers under Sections 12 and 13 of the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA), 2020. A statement today, July 1, by the spokesperson of the apex Bank, Hakama Sidi Ali said that the revocation was approved by the Governor, Olayemi Cardoso, “following the banks’ failure to meet the regulatory requirements for continued operation as licensed financial institutions. According to the revocation order, the action became necessary because of one or more of the circumstances listed below: i. Insufficient assets to meet liabilities, ii. Closure of operations without the CBN approval, iii. Inactivity and cessation of financial intermediation, iv. Failure to commence operations within 12 months of licence approval, and v. Failure to maintain minimum capital funds unimpaired by losses. The statement said that the revocation of the licenses is part of the Bank’s ongoing efforts to safeguard the stability of the financial sector, protect depositors, and ensure that licensed institutions comply with current laws and regulatory requirements. The list of the 46 affected Banks is reproduced: 1 Minji-Se Churchill MFB Rivers 2 Merchant MFB, Abia 3 Janmaa MFB, Kwara 4 Busu MFB, Niger 5 Gold MFB, Lagos 6 Zain MFB (foremerly Dawakin Tofa MFB) Kano 7 Bompai MFB, Kano 8 Ajwa MFB (Formerly Gezawa), Kano 9 NOW NOW DIGITAL MFB, Kano 10 Crystabel Microfinance Bank, Bayelsa 11 Chanelle MFB State Lagos 12 Abia SME MFB, Abia 13 Kamba MFB, Kebbi 14 Iwade MFB, Ogun 15 Winview MFB, Abuja 16 Zuru MFB, Kebbi 17 Minjibir MFB, Kano 18 Shanono MFB, Kano 19 Sumaila MFB, Kano 20 Rimin Gado MFB, Kano 21 Mwaghavul MFB State Plateau 22 Sycamore MFB, Kano 23 TOFA MFB, Kano 24 Safegate MFB, Lagos 25 Creekline MFB Delta, 26 Bestar MFB, Oyo 27 Livingspring MFB, Cross River 28 Apple MFB, Ogun 29 Stanford MFB State Uyo 30 Frontline MFB, Anambra 31 Zafec MFB, Kaduna 32 Supreme MFB Tier 1 Lagos 33 Bejin-Doko MFB, Niger 34 Kanopoly MFB, Kano 35 Bellbank MFB formerly Tsanyawa, Kano 36 Yeneng MFB, Plateau 37 Creditville MFB, Lagos 38 MBAG MFB, Lagos 39 STRAIGHT SAHARA MFB, Benue 40 OURPASS MFB, Ondo 41 VERDANT MFB, Lagos 42 BASAWA MFB, Kaduna 43 CASHA MFB, Abuja 44 ESTEEM MFB, Kano 45 ENTERPRENEUR MFB, Lagos 46 AVANTUS MFB, Osun. The statement stressed that the CBN remains committed to promoting a safe, sound and resilient financial system and will continue to take appropriate supervisory and regulatory actions, where necessary, to maintain public confidence in the Nigerian financial system.
Eight founding Member States of the Global Water Organisation (GWO), today, June 29, gathered in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia for the organization Water Week. The Water Week, which would run from today to July 2 is being hosted by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Representatives from Greece, Kuwait, Mauritania, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Senegal and Spain today, met at the Ritz‑Carlton Jeddah to review progress over the past year, since the signing of the GWO Charter in Riyadh in May 2025.
The meeting also aimed at aligning the priorities and preparations for GWO’s first General Assembly. Delegations from non‑member states, United Nations agencies, multilateral development. Banks, and international as well as regional organisations also attended the meeting, reflecting the growing interest in GWO’s mandate. During the meeting, GWO’s founding team presented an overview of progress to date, including the approval of the organisation’s governance model, bylaws, financial and administrative regulations, and its four‑year strategy – which is built around four pillars: research and innovation, data and insights, policy and governance, and financing and funding. The organisation highlighted its participation in key international water convenings in Dakar, Madrid, Dushanbe and Jeddah, alongside engagements with stakeholders. These efforts have contributed to raising awareness of GWO’s role as a facilitator and platform for cooperation as momentum toward the first General Assembly continues to build. GWO’s founding team remarked: “This meeting reflects the collective commitment of our Member States to shaping a stronger, more coordinated global water sector. Over the past year, we have worked closely with countries and partners to lay the foundations of GWO, and we look forward to advancing the next phase together.” The meeting concluded with interventions from the founding Member States, underscoring their shared commitment to supporting GWO’s development and strengthening cooperation across the water sector. As the first global intergovernmental organisation dedicated solely to water, GWO was established in September 2023 to help unify fragmented efforts across the sector, promote collaboration and support countries in strengthening water governance, innovation, financing, and knowledge exchange.
For many people, El Niño is simply a scientific term heard in weather forecasts. For millions of African farmers, however, it represents something far more serious – a climate phenomenon that can determine whether households harvest enough food to survive or face months of hunger. Across Africa, particularly in countries where agriculture depends heavily on rainfall, El Niño has emerged as a major threat to food security, livelihoods and economic stability. El Niño has emerged as a major threat to food security in Africa Recent climate shocks across Southern and East Africa have exposed the vulnerability of farming systems that remain largely dependent on increasingly unpredictable weather patterns. In Malawi, the effects of El Niño have been particularly severe. The 2023/24 agricultural season was characterised by delayed rainfall, prolonged dry spells and erratic weather conditions that significantly reduced maize production, the country’s staple food crop. The situation prompted the government to declare a state of disaster in 23 districts affected by drought conditions linked to El Niño. According to government estimates and humanitarian agencies, including the World Vision International, approximately 5.7 million Malawians experienced acute food insecurity during the 2024/25 consumption period as a result of the drought. Yet the country’s climate-related challenges did not begin with El Niño. Many communities are still recovering from the devastating effects of Cyclone Freddy, which caused widespread destruction across southern Malawi. Thousands of households lost homes, crops and livelihoods. Just as recovery efforts were beginning to take hold, drought conditions returned, further exposing the fragility of Malawi’s agricultural systems. The crisis extends beyond Malawi’s borders. According to the World Food Programme, the current El Niño weather pattern has contributed to one of the most severe food security crises Southern Africa has experienced in recent years. Neighbouring Zambia has also suffered one of its worst droughts in decades, resulting in extensive crop losses and reduced hydropower generation, affecting both agricultural production and energy supply. These developments underscore a growing reality: climate change is no longer simply an environmental issue. It has become a direct threat to economic development, social stability and human well-being. This reality poses significant challenges to Africa’s long-term development ambitions. The African Union’s Agenda 2063, commonly known as “The Africa We Want,” envisions a continent characterised by inclusive growth, food security and climate resilience. Similarly, Malawi’s national development blueprint, Malawi Vision 2063, places agriculture at the centre of economic transformation through increased productivity, commercialisation and industrialisation. However, these aspirations will remain difficult to achieve if agriculture continues to be highly vulnerable to droughts, floods and other climate-related shocks. Agriculture remains the backbone of most African economies, employing millions of people and contributing significantly to national incomes. Yet smallholder farmers continue to rely largely on seasonal rainfall, leaving them exposed to increasingly frequent and severe climate events. Today, many farmers face a complex combination of challenges, including droughts, floods, pest outbreaks, rising production costs and volatile markets. Perhaps the greatest injustice is that African farmers are bearing the brunt of a climate crisis they contributed little to creating. Although Africa accounts for only a small share of global greenhouse gas emissions, it remains among the regions most severely affected by climate change. The issue is therefore not only environmental but also one of equity, justice and sustainable development. Despite these challenges, there are reasons for optimism. Across the continent, farmers are increasingly adopting climate-smart agricultural practices such as irrigation, water harvesting, conservation agriculture and drought-tolerant crop varieties. These innovations are helping communities adapt to changing climatic conditions and improve resilience. However, adaptation cannot rest solely on the shoulders of farmers. Governments must increase investments in irrigation infrastructure, climate-smart technologies, agricultural research, extension services and early warning systems. Development partners must strengthen support for climate adaptation and disaster preparedness initiatives. At the same time, policymakers must ensure climate resilience is fully integrated into national and regional development strategies. Development frameworks such as Agenda 2063, Malawi Vision 2063 and the Sustainable Development Goals provide clear pathways for building more resilient economies and food systems. However, achieving these goals will require sustained investment, political commitment and coordinated action. El Niño serves as a powerful reminder that climate change is already reshaping lives and livelihoods across Africa. The question is no longer whether climate-related shocks will continue to occur. The more urgent question is whether African countries are adequately prepared to respond. Protecting farmers means protecting food security. Protecting food security means safeguarding livelihoods, economic growth and the continent’s future. As climate risks intensify, building resilient agricultural systems must become a priority not only for governments and development partners but for all stakeholders committed to Africa’s sustainable development.
Emmanuel Harawa, is of the AfricaBrief
…. And What Is El Nino? By Yusuf Ozi-Usman
According to ChatGpt, El Niño is a naturally occurring climate phenomenon in which the surface waters of the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean become warmer than normal. It is part of a larger climate cycle known as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation. Although it begins in the Pacific Ocean, El Niño affects weather around the world, including Nigeria. Its impacts can include higher global temperatures, more droughts in some regions, heavier rainfall and flooding in others, increased risk of wildfires in dry areas and changes in agriculture, fisheries, and water supplies. In Nigeria, El Niño can contribute to hotter-than-normal temperatures, delayed or irregular rainfall in some parts of the country, reduced crop yields due to drought in certain regions and in some years, heavier rainfall and flooding in other areas because of complex interactions with regional weather systems. An El Niño event usually develops every 2 to 7 years and typically lasts 9 to 12 months, although some events can persist longer. The opposite phase of El Ninois called La Niña. During La Niña, the Pacific Ocean becomes cooler than normal, often bringing weather patterns that are broadly opposite to those of El Niño. In simple terms, El Niño is the unusual warming of part of the Pacific Ocean that changes weather patterns across the globe, affecting rainfall, temperatures, farming, and water resources in many countries, including Nigeria.
Members of three set of families are still occupying this eyesore structure that’s reduced to debris by flood after a rain storm in the northern part of Nigeria. Similar situation exists too in other parts of the country.
The United Nations (UN) Secretary-General, António Guterres, has warned the countries in the world against what he called “Irreversible climate change damage,” being caused by fossil fuels, against the background of the heatwave that has continued to grip Europe. In a major keynote speech at London Climate Action Week, the UN chief called for urgent ambitious global action and on AI firms to “come clean” on the full environmental impact of data centres in terms of their carbon, water and land footprints. The Secretary-General referred to a situation where the world’s dependence on oil is driving both the climate crisis and an energy sovereignty crunch. He linked the latter to massive shipping disruption in the Strait of Hormuz and the war involving Iran, Israel and the United States. “These crises may seem separate, but they share the same destructive origin: fossil fuels. And they demand the same answer: a fast, fair transition to clean energy and a surge in adaptation, resilience and climate justice for those already facing climate harm,” Guterres called for political leadership to push through global change akin to that required to phase out leaded gasoline and to ban chemicals that created a hole in the ozone layer. The UN plan for energy independence includes the following- Cut emissions fast: emissions must peak now and reach net zero by 2050, including through a global push to curb methane pollution. Accelerate clean energy: renewables pick-up needs to continue, subsidies must end for fossil fuel projects and fossil fuel profits taxed to support vulnerable communities and the energy transition. Clean up AI: require major AI companies to disclose the environmental impact of their data centres and power them with renewable energy by 2030. Ensure a just transition: ensure the shift to clean energy creates jobs, supports communities and delivers development benefits for developing countries. Boost climate resilience: increase investment in adaptation, early warning systems and other measures to protect people most vulnerable to climate impacts. Unlock fair finance: expand affordable funding for developing countries to invest in clean energy, climate adaptation and sustainable development. Defend science and truth: strengthen trust in science, combat climate disinformation and protect environmental journalists and human rights defenders. It is more than a decade since world leaders agreed in Paris to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, a remarkable show of international unity, led by the UN. Today, although that Agreement stands – and despite the US officially withdrawing for a second time in January this year – UN-backed scientists warn that average annual temperatures are likely to exceed that threshold in coming years. “Every fraction of a degree matters,” the Secretary-General insisted, as he forewarned of the irreversible damage to coral reefs unable to survive in too-warm waters, the melting ice sheets that threaten to reshape coastlines and displace millions, and the real possibility that some small island nations could disappear under the waves. Faced with this existential scenario, “the task before us is to strictly limit the overshoot, shorten its duration and bring temperatures down below 1.5°C as fast as possible,” Guterres maintained. He pointed out that “any peace agreement is welcome and would bring much needed relief”, in reference to a 60-day pause in hostilities to allow ongoing Iranian-US talks in Switzerland, the UN chief noted that the Middle East crisis had unleashed “the mother of all energy shocks” comparable to the oil disruption of the 1970s and the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. As damaging as the Middle East war has been for highly industrialized nations, the UN Secretary-General insisted that developing countries have been hit even harder: “It is a debt shock, a food shock, a development shock,” he told the London audience. “The good news is – unlike every past energy crisis – we now have a clear way out, a clean way out,” the Secretary-General continued. He noted that since 2010, the cost of solar energy has plummeted by almost 90 per cent, onshore wind by more than 70 per cent, and battery storage by 95 per cent. Renewables avoided more than the annual carbon dioxide emissions of the US, the EU and Japan combined, Guterres said, adding that clean energy investment now attracts almost twice as much as fossil fuels. “There are no embargoes on sunlight and no blockades on the wind,” he said. A seven-point plan for energy independence As part of the Secretary-General’s blueprint for a clean break with fossil fuels, he outlined seven key steps: 1: Emissions must peak immediately and fall steeply this decade, reaching net zero by 2050. The G20 group of wealthy nations “must lead” on this, as it is responsible for around 80 per cent of global emissions, Guterres said. Ambitious measures include a global Call to Action on Methane to reduce emissions of the gas traps around 80 times more heat than carbon dioxide, but which breaks down in the atmosphere within just a decade or two. “The world phased out leaded gasoline. We eliminated ozone-depleting chemicals. Methane pollution must be next,” the UN chief stressed. 2: Clean energy projects should be promoted and public subsidies ditched for new fossil fuel projects. “The eight largest fossil fuel companies reported pocketing an extra $6.5 billion in the first quarter of this year alone…I urge governments to tax them” to help vulnerable families and communities and accelerate the shift to clean, affordable energy, Guterres said. 3: Every major AI company should “measure and publicly disclose the full environmental impact” of data centres: their carbon, water and land footprints – and commit to power every data centre with renewable energy by 2030. Today, AI data centres already consume more electricity than most nations; “it’s time to come clean”, the UN chief noted. By 2030, AI data centres could use enough water to meet the basic needs of all 1.3 billion residents of sub‑Saharan Africa for an entire year, the UN chief said. 4: “No more extraction without development:” Guterres called for greater support for the move to clean energy in a way that benefits workers and communities everywhere and developing countries too, driven forward by the UN Climate Conference – COP31 – in Türkiye. “The transition itself is no longer in question,” he stressed, adding: “It will be either managed or chaotic, fair or unequal, a source of stability or of greater division; and these choices are still ours to make.” 5: Protect those most at risk from climate chaos by helping them adapt, because this “saves lives, safeguards homes and communities, helps economies absorb shocks and holds societies together”, the Secretary-General insisted. Contingency systems need to be put in place before shocks become humanitarian and economic catastrophes, Guterres added. At the same time, developed countries must deliver on their “long-standing commitment to double adaptation finance, with a clear trajectory toward tripling it”, he said. 6: Support fair finance to support phasing out fossil fuels and the green transition at scale and at speed: because many developing countries face borrowing costs that are two to three times higher than in wealthier economies. “Countries rich in renewable potential are being locked out of the clean energy revolution,” the UN chief maintained, pointing to African countries which receive only two per cent of global clean energy investment even though they possess 60 per cent of the world’s best solar resources. Guterres highlighted the $600-800 billion in additional lending capacity of multilateral development banks, such as the World Bank. This should be used “aggressively” to finance the infrastructure of the future and climate adaptation, along with other investment measures such as taxing high-emitting sectors, he maintained. Equally, “developed countries must keep their promises”, including support to the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage and the Green Climate Fund, the Secretary-General continued, noting that the $300 billion pledged to developing countries must be delivered along with concrete steps to mobilize $1.3 trillion a year by 2035. 7: Finally, the UN Secretary-General urged support for science as the bedrock of truth and early warning systems – and to tackle climate falsehoods, since “disinformation is spreading deliberately to delay climate action, entrench vested interests, and erode trust.” Human rights defenders and journalists reporting on the climate and the environment should be protected and trust in evidence and institutions bolstered, Guterres insisted, pointing to the Global Initiative for Information Integrity on Climate Change, led by the UN, UNESCO and Brazil in support of this goal. Later in the day, the Secretary-General paid tribute to the Royal Botanic Gardens as a global centre of science and conservation, while warning that the climate crisis is already taking a toll on the natural world. Citing the loss of more than 400 trees at Kew during the 2022 drought and the growing risks facing many of its species, he said the fate of nature and humanity are inseparable. The UN chief stressed that ending dependence on fossil fuels and accelerating the shift to renewable energy must go hand in hand with protecting forests, restoring degraded ecosystems, safeguarding oceans and defending science. “When the climate crisis comes for the great trees of Kew, it is a warning to us all,” he said, urging greater investment in nature-based solutions to help secure a safer and more sustainable future for people and planet alike.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Fake Agency: The Audacity Of Presidency In Tight Corner, By Deen Adavize
Sometimes, one wonders whether those occupying power or those in its corridors think Nigerians have lost the ability to think right. How else does one explain a Presidency asking over 200 million citizens to believe that an agency which allegedly appeared in official records, received budgetary allocation, exchanged correspondence with committees of the National Assembly and operated within government circles never existed?
That is not merely a contradiction. It is an insult to the intelligence of Nigerians.
Governments make mistakes. Democracies survive because governments admit those mistakes and correct them. But when a government attempts to erase documented facts with a press statement, it ventures into a far more dangerous territory, where official narratives begin to compete with reality itself.
That is exactly where Nigeria now finds itself.
The controversy surrounding the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC) is no longer about one agency or one individual. It has become a test of the credibility of government institutions and the respect they have for the citizens they serve.
The Presidency, through its spokesman, Mr. Bayo Onanuga, has described the PFIPC as a fictitious organisation allegedly created through forged documents by Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew. The government’s position is straightforward: the agency never existed and its promoter is an impostor.
Ordinarily, that should settle the matter. But there is a problem.
Facts have a stubborn way of refusing to disappear simply because powerful people wish them away.
Reports indicate that the Senate Committee on Anti-Corruption and Financial Crimes addressed official correspondence to the Director-General of the PFIPC. The House Committee on Treaties, Protocols and Agreements reportedly did the same.
Pause and think about that for a moment.
We are not talking about village associations or roadside organisations. We are talking about committees of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
How does a non-existent agency receive official recognition from lawmakers?
How does a ghost organisation attract the attention of committees established by the Constitution?
More importantly, how does such an organisation allegedly find its way into the national budget?
According to reports, the PFIPC received an allocation exceeding N1.3 billion in the 2026 Appropriation Act.
If this is true, then Nigerians deserve answers, because budgets do not prepare themselves. Agencies do not insert themselves into appropriation bills by magic.
There are procedures. There are approvals. There are signatures. There are public officials entrusted with responsibilities. Was the agency real when budget preparations were being made and only became fictitious after controversy erupted?
Or are Nigerians now expected to believe that a phantom organisation successfully infiltrated the machinery of government, navigated legislative processes, secured official recognition and obtained public funds without anyone noticing?
Either possibility is alarming.
The first suggests an attempt to distance influential individuals from an embarrassing controversy.
The second suggests a level of institutional failure that should worry every Nigerian.
There is no comfortable explanation.
What makes this matter even more troubling is the apparent haste with which the government appears determined to close the chapter before it is properly read.
Prince Adeyemi has made allegations involving senior government figures, including the Chief of Staff to the President, Mr. Femi Gbajabiamila.
Those allegations remain allegations. No responsible person should pronounce guilt before evidence is examined.
But neither should anyone be declared innocent merely because they occupy powerful offices.
The rule of law does not recognise sacred cows.
A government genuinely committed to transparency should welcome scrutiny rather than fear it.
If the PFIPC was indeed an elaborate fraud, then Nigerians deserve to know how such a fraud allegedly penetrated the highest levels of government.
Who approved the documents?
Who recognised the organisation?
Who facilitated its activities?
Who looked away?
Who benefited?
These are legitimate questions.
If, on the other hand, the agency enjoyed some form of official recognition before falling out of favour, Nigerians deserve to know why the government is now seeking to disown it.
The truth cannot be hidden forever.
What is even more curious are reports and photographs showing Prince Adeyemi in the company of prominent public officials and influential personalities.
While photographs alone do not establish legitimacy, they certainly raise questions.
Was everyone deceived?
Were all these public officials victims of one man’s alleged manipulation?
Or is there a larger story yet to be told?
Nigerians deserve answers.
Unfortunately, this is not the first time citizens have found themselves trapped between official denials and uncomfortable facts.
Over the years, Nigerians have watched scandals emerge, dominate public discourse and eventually disappear without satisfactory explanations.
Files are opened and quietly closed.
Committees are established and forgotten.
Investigations are announced and abandoned.
The public is expected to move on.
But perhaps that is precisely why this matter deserves greater attention.
This controversy goes beyond one agency.
It goes beyond one individual.
It goes beyond partisan politics.
It is about whether public institutions still possess the integrity required to sustain public trust.
Every contradiction left unexplained weakens confidence in government.
Every unanswered question deepens public suspicion.
Every attempt to suppress inquiry creates even greater curiosity.
This is why an independent investigation has become necessary.
Not an investigation designed to protect reputations.
Not an investigation designed to produce predetermined conclusions.
But one capable of following evidence wherever it leads.
If anyone is guilty, let the facts expose them.
If anyone is innocent, let the facts clear them.
That is how accountability works in a democracy.
The Presidency cannot simply wave away documents.
It cannot wish away legislative correspondence.
It cannot erase public records through press statements.
If the PFIPC was a fraud, then expose every official who enabled it.
If it was legitimate, then explain why Nigerians are now being told it never existed.
Silence is no longer an option.
Denial is no longer sufficient.
Arresting one man will not answer the questions confronting the nation.
Nigerians deserve facts, not narratives.
Until those facts are laid bare through a transparent and credible investigation, one question will continue to echo across the country:
Who exactly is deceiving whom?