Lagos Vows To Combat Illegal Dredging, Coastal Degradation

The Lagos State Government has taken stronger measures, including stricter monitoring, community engagement and science-driven interventions to combat illegal dredging and coastal degradation across its 187km coastline.
The state Commissioner for Waterfront Infrastructure Development, Ekundayo Bush-Alebiosu, during a courtesy visit to him by the Head of Lagos Operations of the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), Mrs. Ifeyinwa Omowole, said that the ministry is working closely with relevant agencies and other stakeholders to safeguard the state’s coastline and ensure sustainable development.
According to him, illegal dredging remains a major threat to coastal communities, fisheries and critical waterfront infrastructure.
He said that illegal dredging would hardly take place without the knowledge of some community members
“We will continue to enlighten residents, carry out advocacy campaigns and engage stakeholders on the dangers of these activities.”
The commissioner noted that while some Lagos residents aided perpetrators, others provided useful information that helped the government to identify and curb illegal operations on coastlines.
He said that government is adopting evidence-based approaches to address coastal erosion.
“You must first understand the problem before prescribing a solution.
“We must understand the specific causes of erosion before implementing long-term interventions.”
The Commissioner said that the State Government has engaged a Dutch consultancy firm, CDR International, to conduct studies that would guide its future shoreline protection projects.
“We are currently concluding a pre-feasibility study that will point us in the right direction.”
Bush-Alebiosu said that coastal erosion is not peculiar to Lagos, noting that several countries on the West African coast are facing a similar challenge.
He expressed concern over the impact of indiscriminate dredging on the aquatic ecosystem and fish populations.
“The more the seabed is disturbed, the further the fish migrate.
“The farther fishermen have to travel to catch fish, the more expensive fish becomes for consumers.”
The commissioner said that the ministry has strengthened surveillance operations against illegal dredging activities.
He said that government is also addressing growing concerns over the activities of scavengers and illegal settlers on the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway.
Bush-Alebiosu said the ministry, in collaboration with physical planning authorities, task forces and security agencies, has intensified enforcement and monitoring on the highway.
“The solution is consistency and sustained enforcement.”
The commissioner added that the ministry was promoting innovative waterfront infrastructure, including deployment of floating concrete jetties and partnerships on new waterfront estate developments.
He reaffirmed the state’s commitment to preserving waterfront communities, protecting investments and unlocking economic potential of the coastal assets of Lagos through sustainable management and strategic partnerships.
Earlier, Omowole said that NAN is committed to providing content for Nigerian media organisations as well as communicating government programmes and actions to the citizens.
Meanwhile, the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) said that it has intensified flood preparedness efforts across Lagos State with a focus on communities identified as high-risk in the 2026 flood outlook.
Head of Operations, NEMA Lagos Territorial Office, Mohammed Olatunde, assured that the agency is fully prepared for the rainy season and that adequate measures have been taken to mitigate flood risks.
He said that forecasts by the Nigerian Hydrological Services Agency (NIHSA) and the Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NiMet) indicated that Badagry and Epe might experience high rainfall levels capable of triggering floods.
He said that Alimosho, Ikeja and Surulere are vulnerable to flash floods due to increased rainfall, while Ikorodu and Isheri could be affected by possible water releases from Oyan Dam.
According to him, NEMA has adopted a proactive approach to disaster management through location-specific warnings and intensified community awareness campaigns.
“We do not just broadcast general warnings. Technical information is translated into simple language and disseminated through WhatsApp groups, phone calls and SMS to community leaders in flood-prone local government areas.
“We are also conducting grassroots sensitisation programmes through our emergency management vanguards and volunteers across Lagos State.
“In addition, we are working closely with NIHSA to obtain weekly updates that enable us to provide residents with timely information on emerging flood threats,” he said.
Olatunde said the agency has strengthened collaboration with the Lagos State Government, particularly the Lagos State Emergency Management Agency (LASEMA) and the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources, to enhance flood mitigation efforts.
He said the collaboration is focused on drainage maintenance, waste management and public awareness aimed at reducing flood risks.
According to him, drainage channels remain the first line of defence against flooding, making the clearance of primary and secondary channels a priority ahead of peak rainfall periods.
He said NEMA is also working with relevant stakeholders to ensure flood-risk information reached vulnerable communities promptly.
Olatunde identified indiscriminate refuse dumping and construction on floodplains as major human-induced factors contributing to flooding in Lagos.
He said the agency is supporting enforcement efforts by relevant authorities to discourage such practices.
The NEMA official also commended the state government’s reintroduction of the monthly environmental sanitation exercise, describing it as a critical step towards reducing drainage blockages and promoting cleaner communities.
He said the exercise, held on the last Saturday of every month, encouraged residents to clean their surroundings, clear drainage frontages and ensure proper waste disposal for evacuation by the Lagos Waste Management Authority.
Olatunde advised residents to sustain active participation in environmental sanitation to reduce flood risks and prevent sanitation-related diseases across the state.

Vulnerable populations, particularly in developing nations, bear the greatest burden despite contributing the least to global greenhouse gas emissions.


The 




Why Goodluck Jonathan Should Resist the 2027 Temptation, By Abdulkarim Abdulmalik
It is a statement of fact that former Nigeria’s President, Dr Goodluck Jonathan remains one of the most recognizable political figures in Africa. Years after leaving office, he still commands goodwill across sections of Nigeria. His calm temperament, peaceful concession in 2015, and relatively moderate public image have earned him a level of respect uncommon in Nigeria’s bitter political environment.
That is precisely why he has to be very careful and reflect deeply as he is being pressured to contest the 2027 presidential election.
The call may sound desperate and interesting. It may also be flattering. Politicaians are already floating his name in television studios, newspaper columns, and elite gatherings. Some claim only Jonathan could stabilize Nigeria. Others present him as a compromise candidate capable of calming ethnic tensions and reducing political hostility. A few even romanticize his presidency as a “better era” compared to today’s widespread hardship and insecurity.
But politics is not built on nostalgia alone.
If Jonathan truly values his legacy, history, and personal dignity, he should politely walk away from the pressure to re-enter Nigeria’s dangerous presidential battlefield. Sometimes, the most honorable political decision is knowing when not to return.
*Respect is Distinct from Electoral Reality*
One of the biggest mistakes former leaders make is confusing public sympathy with electoral strength.
Many Nigerians may admire Jonathan today, but admiration does not automatically translate into votes. Political memory is selective. Those praising him now are not necessarily prepared to defend him during a brutal national campaign. Nigerian politics is unforgiving. The same voices encouraging him today may disappear the moment the attacks begin.
And the attacks will come.
The opposition will reopen old wounds: insecurity under his administration, corruption allegations against some of his allies, the Chibok girls tragedy, fuel subsidy controversies, power sector disappointments, and claims of weak leadership. Social media warriors will resurrect every old criticism buried over the last decade.
Nigeria’s current political climate is far more toxic than the one Jonathan left behind in 2015. Politics has become more vicious, more divisive, more tribalized, and more digitally weaponized.
Why should a man who left office with global respect voluntarily walk back into that storm?
*Jonathan Already Achieved What Many African Leaders Could Not*
History has already been kind to Jonathan.
In 2015, he became the first sitting Nigerian president to concede defeat peacefully. That singular act elevated his image internationally. While many African leaders manipulate constitutions, intimidate opponents, or cling desperately to power, Jonathan accepted electoral defeat and preserved democratic stability.
That decision alone secured his place in history.
Today, he is invited to global democracy forums, election observation missions, peacebuilding conferences, and diplomatic engagements across Africa and beyond. He enjoys something many former African presidents never attain: moral legitimacy.
A failed comeback attempt could damage that carefully built reputation.
History is filled with leaders who overstayed their political relevance and ended up diminishing their own legacies. A statesman can easily become just another desperate politician the moment he begins chasing power again.
Jonathan should avoid that trap.
*Nigeria’s Problem Transcends Recycling Old Leaders*
One uncomfortable truth Nigeria must confront is this: the country cannot continue recycling the same political class while expecting transformational change.
Nigeria is a young nation with millions of energetic and educated citizens. Yet leadership recruitment remains trapped within an aging elite circle where the same names rotate endlessly across decades.
Bringing Jonathan back into the race may temporarily excite sections of the political establishment, but it does little to deepen democratic renewal. Instead, it reinforces the damaging belief that Nigeria’s future can only be entrusted to former rulers.
A healthy democracy must constantly produce new leadership.
Jonathan himself once benefited from generational political transition. He should now encourage the emergence of fresh national figures rather than participate in another elite recycling arrangement.
*North-South Equation may Be Another Political Minefield*
Nigeria’s fragile political balance must also be considered carefully.
Whether people admit it openly or not, the issue of power rotation remains deeply sensitive. Any Jonathan candidacy would immediately reopen debates over zoning, regional entitlement, and political fairness.
The country is already polarized along ethnic and regional lines.
Another emotionally charged presidential contest involving a former president from the South-South could intensify national tensions.
Jonathan may personally desire national unity, but Nigerian politicians often weaponize identity for survival.
His entry into the race could trigger unnecessary political hostility at a time the country desperately needs healing.
*Burden of Crushing Citizenry Expectations*
There is also the danger of unrealistic expectations.
Many Nigerians currently romanticize Jonathan because they compare yesterday’s problems with today’s harsher realities. This is common in politics. Former leaders often appear better after their successors struggle.
But governing Nigeria in 2027 would be even harder than governing Nigeria in 2011.
The economy is under severe strain. Youth frustration is rising.
Insecurity has evolved into multiple complex threats. Public trust in institutions is weak.
Citizens are angrier, poorer, and more impatient than ever before.
Any president emerging in 2027 will inherit enormous pressures.
Jonathan may discover quickly that the goodwill surrounding him today is less about genuine confidence in his leadership capacity and more about public disappointment with the present situation.
That is a dangerous foundation for political ambition.
*Elder Statesmanship And Political Comeback*
Nigeria needs respected national voices outside active partisan combat.
Jonathan can play a far greater role as a mediator, democratic advocate, continental diplomat, and elder statesman than as another presidential aspirant battling for party tickets and political allies.
Former presidents carry moral authority when they remain above daily political warfare. Once they jump back into partisan struggles, that authority weakens.
Rather than contesting elections again, Jonathan should focus on strengthening democratic institutions, mentoring younger leaders, promoting electoral reforms, interfaith harmony, and supporting peace initiatives across Nigeria and Africa at large.
That path would preserve his dignity while expanding his historical relevance.
*The Danger of Political Manipulation*
Jonathan must also be careful not to become a tool in the hands of desperate political actors.
Some of those urging him to contest may not genuinely believe in him. Nigerian politics often thrives on tactical manipulation. Certain groups may simply want to use his name to destabilize rival camps, negotiate power deals, or create bargaining leverage within broader political calculations.
Once political interests change, such supporters can disappear overnight.
A former president should never allow himself to become an instrument in games designed by ambitious power brokers.
*Leaving Gracefully is also so Leadership*
One of the rarest qualities in politics is the wisdom to leave the stage gracefully.
Jonathan already has what many politicians spend their entire lives chasing: national recognition, international respect, historical significance, and relative peace of mind. Re-entering Nigeria’s brutal presidential contest risks unnecessary reputational damage.
Sometimes, political restraint speaks louder than political ambition.
For Jonathan, the wiser path may not be another campaign rally, another ballot paper or another presidential debate.
It may simply be preserving the dignity which history has already given him.
– Abdulkarim Abdulmalik is an Abuja-based Journalist and can be reached on: nowmalik@gmail.com